Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 420, 2019
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 26 August 2019
  • Adams SB, Frissell CA, Rieman BE. 2001. Geography of invasion in mountain streams: consequences of headwater lake fish introductions. Ecosystems 4: 296–307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alexiades AV, Flecker AS, Kraft CE. 2017. Nonnative fish stocking alters stream ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Ecol Appl 27: 956–965. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Allan JD. 1982. The effect of reduction of trout density on the invertebrate community of a mountain stream. Ecology 63: 1444–1455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APAT. 2007. Metodi biologici per le acque. Parte I. APAT, Rome, Italy, 300 p. (in Italian) [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd ed. Report number EPA 841-B-99-002. US EPA, Washington, US, 337 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Baumgärtner D, Rothhaupt KO. 2003. Predictive length-dry mass regressions for freshwater invertebrates in a pre‐alpine lake littoral. Int Rev Hydrobiol 88: 453–463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bechara JA, Moreau G, Planas D. 1992. Top-down effects of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in a boreal forest stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49: 2093–2103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bechara JA, Moreau G, Hare L. 1993. The impact of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on an experimental stream benthic community: the role of spatial and size refugia. J Anim Ecol 62: 451–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benke AC, Huryn AD, Smock LA, Wallace JB. 1999. Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. J North Am Benthol Soc 18: 308–343. [Google Scholar]
  • Bosch J, Rincon PA, Boyero L, Martínez‐Solano I. 2006. Effects of introduced salmonids on a montane population of Iberian frogs. Conserv Biol 20: 180–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bosch J, Bielby J, Martin-Beyer B, Rincón P, Correa-Araneda F, Boyero L. 2019. Eradication of introduced fish allows successful recovery of a stream-dwelling amphibian. PloS One 14: e0216204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Comin E. 2000. Secondary production of benthic communities at the habitat scale as a tool to assess ecological integrity in mountain streams. In Shmutz S, ed. Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters: Proceedings of the International Conference, Vienna, Austria, 9–11 November 1998. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 183–195. [Google Scholar]
  • Buria L, Albariño R, Villanueva VD, Modenutti B, Balseiro E. 2007. Impact of exotic rainbow trout on the benthic macroinvertebrate community from Andean-Patagonian headwater streams. Fundam Appl Limnol 168: 145–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campaioli S, Ghetti PF, Minelli A. 1994. Manuale per il riconoscimento dei macroinvertebrati delle acque dolci italiane. Trento: Provincia autonoma di Trento, 483 p. (in Italian). [Google Scholar]
  • Carlisle DM, Hawkins CP. 1998. Relationships between invertebrate assemblage structure, 2 trout species, and habitat structure in Utah mountain lakes. J North Am Benthol Soc 17: 286–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheever BM, Simon KS. 2009. Seasonal influence of brook trout and mottled sculpin on lower trophic levels in an Appalachian stream. Freshw Biol 54: 524–535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Culp JM. 1986. Experimental evidence that stream macroinvertebrate community structure is unaffected by different densities of coho salmon fry. J North Am Benthol Soc 5: 140–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Detmer TM, McCutchan Jr JH, Lewis Jr WM. 2017. Predator driven changes in prey size distribution stabilize secondary production in lacustrine food webs. Limnol Oceanogr 62: 592–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunham JB, Adams SB, Schroeter RE, Novinger DC. 2002. Alien invasions in aquatic ecosystems: toward an understanding of brook trout invasions and potential impacts on inland cutthroat trout in western North America. Rev Fish Biol Fish 12: 373–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Flecker AS, Allan JD. 1984. The importance of predation, substrate and spatial refuge in determining lotic insect distributions. Oecologia 64: 306–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Giller PS, Malmqvist B. 1998. The biology of streams and rivers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 304 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gíslason GM. 1994. River management in cold regions: a case study of the River Laxa, north Iceland. In Calow P, Petts E eds. The rivers handbook: Hydrological and ecological principles, Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp: 464– 483. [Google Scholar]
  • Kleiber C, Zeileis A. 2008. Applied econometrics with R. New York: Springer-Verlag, 222 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Knapp RA, Matthews KR, Sarnelle O. 2001. Resistance and resilience of alpine lake fauna to fish introductions. Ecol Monogr 71: 401–421. [Google Scholar]
  • Lacasse S, Magnan P. 1992. Biotic and abiotic determinants of the diet of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, in lakes of the Laurentian Shield. Can J Fisher Aquat Sci 49: 1001–1009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Llja K, Šporka F, Štefková E, Tirjaková E, Bitušík P, Bulánková E, Lukáš J, Illéšová D, Derka T, Tomajka J. 2006. Ecological study of a high-mountain stream ecosystem (Hincov potok, High Tatra Mountains, Slovakia). Acta Soc Zool Bohem 69: 299–316. [Google Scholar]
  • Magnea U, Sciascia R, Paparella F, Tiberti R, Provenzale A. 2013. A model for high-altitude alpine lake ecosystems and the effect of introduced fish. Ecol Model 251: 211–220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. 1979. Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press, 518 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meissner K, Muotka T. 2006. The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments. J Anim Ecol 75: 421–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Méthot G, Hudon C, Gagnon P, Pinel-Alloul B, Armellin A, Tourville AM. 2012. Macroinvertebrate size-mass relationships: how specific should they be? Poirier Freshw Sci 31: 750–764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miserendino ML. 2001. Length-mass relationships for macroinvertebrates in freshwater environments of Patagonia (Argentina). Ecología Austral 11: 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicola GG, Almodóvar A, Elvira B. 2010. Effects of environmental factors and predation on benthic communities in headwater streams. Aquatic Sciences 72: 419–429. [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2013. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package , version, 2 (9). [Google Scholar]
  • Piacentini E. 2019. Analisi dell'impatto dei bacini idroelettrici sulle comunità di macroinvertebrati bentonici degli ecosistemi acquatici montani. B. Sc. dissertation, University of Pavia, Italy (in Italian). [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (accessed January 15, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Rao CR. 1995. A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondence analysis using Hellinger distance. Qüestiió 19: 23–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Reice SR. 1991. Effects of detritus loading and fish predation on leafpack breakdown and benthic macroinvertebrates in a woodland stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 10: 42–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reice SR, Edwards RL. 1986. The effect of vertebrate predation on lotic macroinvertebrate communities in Quebec, Canada. Can J Zool 64: 1930–1936. [Google Scholar]
  • Rivera-Usme JJ, Pinilla-Agudelo GA, Camacho-Pinzón DL, Castro-Rebolledo MI, Rangel-Churio JO. 2014. Length-mass relationships in the aquatic invertebrate genera Helobdella (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae) and Asellus (Crustacea: Asellidae) of an Andean wetland of Colombia. Actualidades Biológicas 36: 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodríguez-Lozano P, Verkaik I, Rieradevall M, Prat N. 2015. Small but powerful: top predator local extinction affects ecosystem structure and function in an intermittent stream. PloS One 10: e0117630. [Google Scholar]
  • Ross ST. 1991. Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: are there lessons from introduced species? Environ Biol Fish 30: 359–368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruetz CR, Vondracek B, Newman RM, 2004. Weak top-down control of grazers and periphyton by slimy sculpins in a coldwater stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 23: 271–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schilling EG, Loftin CS, Huryn AD. 2009. Macroinvertebrates as indicators of fish absence in naturally fishless lakes. Freshw Biol 54: 181–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D. 2015. − an online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecol Indic 53: 271–282. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D. 2018. − the taxa and autecology database for freshwater organisms, version 7.0. (accessed on April 18, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, Von Hardenberg A. 2012. Impact of introduced fish on common frog (Rana temporaria) close to its altitudinal limit in alpine lakes. Amphibia-Reptilia 33: 303–307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, von Hardenberg A, Bogliani G. 2014. Ecological impact of introduced fish in high altitude lakes: a case of study from the European Alps. Hydrobiologia 724: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, Brighenti S, Canedoli C, Iacobuzio R, Rolla M. 2016. The diet of introduced brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis; Mitchill, 1814) in an alpine area and a literature review on its feeding ecology. J Limnol 75: 488–507. [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, Ottino M, Brighenti S, Iacobuzio R, Rolla M, Von Hardenberg A, Bassan B. 2017a. Involvement of recreational anglers in the eradication of alien brook trout from alpine lakes. J Mount Ecol 10: 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, Nelli L, Brighenti S, Iacobuzio R, Rolla M. 2017b. Spatial distribution of introduced brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis (Salmonidae) within alpine lakes: evidences from a fish eradication campaign. Eur Zool J 84: 73–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, Bogliani G, Brighenti S, Iacobuzio R, Liautaud K, Rolla M, Von Hardenberg A, Bassano B. 2019a. Recovery of high mountain Alpine lakes after the eradication of introduced brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis using non-chemical methods. Biol Invasion 21: 875–894. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tiberti R, Nelli L, Marchetto A, Tartari G, Wienckowski E, Rogora M. 2019b. Multi-year trends and determinants of the hydrochemistry of high mountain lakes in the Western Italian Alps. Aquat Sci , submitted. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Twomey H, Giller PS. 1991. The effects of catastrophic flooding on the benthos and fish of a tributary of the River Araglin, Co. Cork. In Steer MW ed. Irish rivers: biology and management. Dublin: Royal Fish Academy, pp. 47– 58. [Google Scholar]
  • Ventura M, Tiberti R, Buchaca T, Buñay D, Sabás I, Miró A. 2017. Why should we preserve fishless high mountain lakes. In Catalan J, Ninot JM, Aniz Montes M eds. High mountain conservation in a changing world. Advances in Global Change Researches, Vol. 62. Cham: Springer, pp. 181– 205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waters TF. 1977. Secondary production in inland waters. Adv Ecol Res 10: 91–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Wooster D. 1994. Predator impacts on stream benthic prey. Oecologia 99: 7–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaharescu DG, Burghelea CI, Hooda PS, Lester RN, Palanca-Soler A. 2016. Small lakes in big landscape: multi-scale drivers of littoral ecosystem in alpine lakes. Sci Total Environ 551: 496–505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.