Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Topical issue on Crayfish
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 19 October 2016
  • Ackefors HE. 2000. Freshwater crayfish farming technology in the 1990s: a European and global perspective. Fish Fish 1: 337–359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Albaugh DW, Black JB. 1973. A new crawfish of the genus Cambarellus from Texas, with new Texas distributional records for the genus (Decapoda, Astacidae). Southwest Nat 18: 177–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anastacio PM, Correia AM, Menino JP. 2005. Processes and patterns of plant destruction by crayfish: effects of crayfish size and developmental stages of rice. Arch Hydrobiol 162: 37–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bohman P, Nordwall F, Edsman L. 2006. The effect of the large-scale introduction of signal crayfish on the spread of crayfish plague in Sweden. B Fr Pêche Piscic 380–381: 1291–1302. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bohman P, Edsman L, Martin P, Scholtz G. 2013. The first Marmorkrebs (Decapoda: Astacida: Cambaridae) in Scandinavia. BioInvasions Rec 2: 227–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Catford JA, Vesk PA, Richardson DM, Pysek P. 2012. Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 18: 44–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. 2013. Invaders for sale: trade and determinants of introduction of ornamental freshwater crayfish. Biol Invas 15: 125–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. 2014. Predicting the risk of introduction and establishment of an exotic aquarium animal in Europe: insights from one decade of Marmorkrebs (Crustacea, Astacida, Cambaridae) releases. Manag Biol Invas 5: 309–318. [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. 2015. Marbled crayfish gaining ground in Europe: the role of the pet trade as invasion pathway. In: Kawai T, Faulkes Z, Scholtz G, eds. Freshwater crayfish: a global overview. CRC Press, pp. 83–114. [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C, Morawetz K, Gross H. 2012. The clones are coming − strong increase in Marmorkrebs Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis records from Europe. Aquat Invas 7: 511–519. [Google Scholar]
  • Cruz MJ, Segurado P, Sousa M, Rebelo R. 2008. Collapse of the amphibian community of the Paul do Boquilobo Natural Reserve (central Portugal) after the arrival of the exotic American crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Herpetol J 18: 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Duggan IC. 2010. The freshwater aquarium trade as a vector for incidental invertebrate fauna. Biol Invas 12: 3757–3770. [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2010. The spread of the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Marmorkrebs (Procambarus sp.), in the North American pet trade. Aquat Invas 5: 447–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2013. How much is that crayfish in the window? Online monitoring of Marmorkrebs, Procambarus fallax f. virginalis (Hagen, 1870) in the North American pet trade. Freshwater Crayfish 19: 39–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2015a. The global trade in crayfish as pets. Crustacean Res 44: 75–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2015b. Marmorkrebs (Procambarus fallax f. virginalis) are the most popular crayfish in the North American pet trade. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 416: 20. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2015c. A bomb set to drop: parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs for sale in Ireland, a European location without non-indigenous crayfish. Manag Biol Invas 6: 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  • Feria TP, Faulkes Z. 2011. Forecasting the distribution of Marmorkrebs, a parthenogenetic crayfish with high invasive potential, in Madagascar, Europe, and North America. Aquat Invas 6: 55–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F, Acquistapace P. 2007. Invasive crayfish in Europe: the impact of Procambarus clarkii on the littoral community of a Mediterranean lake. Freshw Biol 52: 1249–1259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F, Lazzara L. 2006. Effects of the density of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) on pelagic and surface microalgae in a Mediterranean wetland. Arch Hydrobiol 165: 401–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F, Aquiloni L, Dieguez-Uribeondo J, Tricarico E. 2011. Managing invasive crayfish: is there a hope? Aquat Sci 73: 185–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harlioğlu AG. 2011. Present status of fisheries in Turkey. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 21: 667–680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25: 1965–1978. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM. 2002 Distribution of crayfish in Europe and some adjoining countries. B Fr Pêche Piscic 367: 611–650. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM, Reynolds JD, Souty-Grosset C, Sibley PJ. 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394–395: 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Janský V, Mutkovič A. 2010. Rak Procambarus sp. (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae) – Prvŷ Nález na Slovensku [Marbled crayfish – Procambarus sp. (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae) – first find in Slovakia]. Zbornik Slovenského Národneho Múzea (Acta rerum naturalium Musei Nationalis Slovaci Bratislava) 56: 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalous L, Patoka J, Kopecký O. 2015. European hub for invaders: risk assessment of freshwater aquarium fishes exported from the Czech Republic. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 45: 239–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keller N, Pfeiffer M, Roessink I, Schulz R, Schrimpf A. 2014. First evidence of crayfish plaque agent in populations of the marbled caryfish (Procambarus fallax forma virginalis). Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 414: 8. [Google Scholar]
  • Koese B. 2008. Rivierkreeften proeftabel. Naturalis, Leiden, 17 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kopecký O, Patoka J, Kalous L. 2016. Establishment risk and potential invasiveness of the selected exotic amphibians from pet trade in the European Union. J Nat Conserv 31: 22–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Tíkal J, Císař P, et al. 2016. The significance of droughts for hyporheic dwellers: evidence from freshwater crayfish. Sci Rep 6: 26569. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Koutrakis E, Perdikaris C, Machino Y, Savvidis G, Margaris N. 2007. Distribution, recent mortalities and conservation measures of crayfish in Hellenic fresh waters. B Fr Pêche Piscic 385: 25–44. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kozubíková E, Petrusek A, Ďuriš Z, Martin MP, Dieguez-Uribeondo J, Oidtmann B. 2008. The old menace is back: Recent crayfish plague outbreaks in the Czech Republic. Aquaculture 274: 208–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lipták B, Vitázková B. 2015. Beautiful, but also potentially invasive. Ekol (Bratislava) 34: 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Lipták B, Mrugała A, Pekárik L, et al. 2016. Expansion of the marbled crayfish in Slovakia: beginning of an invasion in the Danube catchment? J Limnol 75: 305–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge DM, Taylor CA, Holdich DM, Skurdal J. 2000. Nonindigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity: Lessons from Europe. Fisher 25: 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Lőkkös A, Müller T, Kovács K, Várkonyi L, Specziár A, Martin P. 2016. The alien, parthenogenetic marbled crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) is entering Kis-Balaton (Hungary), one of Europe's most important wetland biotopes. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 417: 16. [Google Scholar]
  • Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 2000. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group Auckland, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukhaup C, Pekny R. 2006. Cherax (Cherax) holthuisi, a new species of crayfish (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae) from the centre of the Vogelkop Peninsula in Irian Jaya (West New Guinea), Indonesia. Zool Med Leiden 80: 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Magalhães ALB, Jacobi CM. 2013. Invasion risks posed by ornamental freshwater fish trade to southeastern Brazilian rivers. Neotrop Ichthyol 11: 433–441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P, Kohlmann K, Scholtz G. 2007. The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) produces genetically uniform offspring. Naturwissenschaften 94: 843–846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P, Dorn NJ, Kawai T, van der Heiden C, Scholtz G. 2010. The enigmatic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) is the parthenogenetic form of Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870). Contr Zool 79: 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P, Thonagel S, Scholtz G. 2016. The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (Malacostraca: Decapoda: Cambaridae) is a triploid organism. J Zool Syst Evol Res 54: 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Moorhouse TP, Macdonald DW. 2015. Are invasives worse in freshwater than terrestrial ecosystems? WIREs Water 2: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Mrugała A, Kozubíková-Balcarová E, Chucholl C, et al. 2015. Trade of ornamental crayfish in Europe as a possible introduction pathway for important crustacean diseases: crayfish plague and white spot syndrome. Biol Invas 17: 1313–1326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nonnis Marzano F, Scalici M, Chiesa S, Gherardi F, Piccinini A, Gibertini G. 2009. The first record of the marbled crayfish adds further threats to fresh waters in Italy. Aquat Invas 4: 401–404. [Google Scholar]
  • Novitsky R, Son M. 2016. The first records of Marmorkrebs [Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis] (Crustacea, Decapoda, Cambaridae) in Ukraine. Ecol Monteneg 5: 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Padilla DK, Williams SL. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2: 131–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Papavlasopoulou I, Vardakas L, Perdikaris C, Kommatas D, Paschos I. 2013. Ornamental fish in pet stores in Greece: a threat to biodiversity? Mediterr Mar Sci 15: 126–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Fišáková MN, Kalous L, Škrdla P, Kuča M. 2014a. Earliest evidence for human consumption of crayfish. Crustaceana 87: 1578–1585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Kalous L, Kopecký O. 2014b. Risk assessment of the crayfish pet trade based on data from the Czech Republic. Biol Invas 16: 2489–2494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Petrtýl M, Kalous L. 2014c. Garden ponds as potential introduction pathway of ornamental crayfish. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 414: 13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Kalous L, Kopecký O. 2015. Imports of ornamental crayfish: the first decade from the Czech Republic's perspective. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 416: 4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S. 2009. Invasive non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe: recommendations on managing them. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394–395: 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Perdikaris C, Kozák P, Kouba A, Konstantinidis E, Paschos I. 2012. Socio-economic drivers and non-indigenous freshwater crayfish species in Europe. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 404: 1. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ploeg A. 2013. Trade-the status of the ornamental aquatic industry. Ornament Fish Int J 72: 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Rani P, Immanuel S, Kumar NR. 2014. Ornamental fish exports from India: Performance, competitiveness and determinants. Int J Fish Aquat Stud 1: 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds JD. 2011. A review of ecological interactions between crayfish and fish, indigenous and introduced. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 401: 10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Rezinciuc S, Sandoval-Sierra J, Oidtmann B, Diéguez-Uribeondo J. 2016. The biology of crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci: current answers to most frequent questions. In: Kawai T, Faulkes Z, Scholtz G, eds. Freshwater crayfish: a global overview. CRC Press, pp. 182–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez CF, Becares E, Fernandez-Alaez M, Fernandez-Alaez C. 2005. Loss of diversity and degradation of wetlands as a result of introducing exotic crayfish. Biol Invas 7: 75–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Samardžić M, Lucić A, Maguire I, Hudina S. 2014. The first record of the marbled crayfish (Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis) in Croatia. Crayfish News 36: 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Seitz R, Vilpoux K, Hopp U, Harzsch S, Maier G. 2005. Ontogeny of the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish): a parthenogenetic crayfish with unknown origin and phylogenetic position. J Exp Zool Part A 303: 393–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Silas E, Gopalakrishnan A, Ramachandran A, et al. 2011. Guidelines for green certification of freshwater ornamental fish. Kochi, India: Marine Products Export Development Authority. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Holdich DM, Noël PY, Reynolds J, Haffner P. 2006. Atlas of Crayfish in Europe. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, Vol. 64, 187 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Anastácio PM, Aquiloni L, et al. 2016. The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe: impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Limnologica 58: 78–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer DL. 2010. Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshwat Biol 55: 152–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Svärdson G. 1995. The early history of signal crayfish introduction into Europe. Freshwat Crayfish 8: 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Svoboda J, Mrugała A, Kozubíková-Balcarová E, Petrusek A. 2016. Hosts and transmission of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci: a review. J Fish Dis: 1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Swahn JÖ. 2004. The cultural history of crayfish. B Fr Pêche Piscic 372–373: 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  • Tricarico E, Vilizzi L, Gherardi F, Copp GH. 2010. Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater invertebrates. Risk Anal 30: 285–292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turkmen G, Karadal O. 2012. The survey of the imported freshwater Decapod species via the ornamental aquarium trade in Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv 11: 2824–2827. [Google Scholar]
  • Twardochleb LA, Olden JD, Larson ER. 2013. A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of nonnative crayfish. Freshw Sci 32: 1367–1382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Unestam T. 1972. On the host range and origin of the crayfish plague fungus. Reports from the Inst of Freshw Res 52: 192–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Wilgen NJ, Wilson JRU, Elith J, Wintle BA, Richardson DM. 2010. Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drives the live animal trade in South Africa? Anim Conserv 13: 24–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Veselý L, Buřič M, Kouba A. 2015. Hardy exotics species in temperate zone: can “warm water” crayfish invaders establish regardless of low temperatures? Sci Rep 5: 16340. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilà M, Basnou C, Pysek P, et al. 2010. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ 8: 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt G. 2008. The marbled crayfish: a new model organism for research on development, epigenetics and evolutionary biology. J Zool 276: 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt G. 2015. Bimodal annual reproductive pattern in laboratory-reared marbled crayfish. Invertebr Repr Dev 59: 218–223. [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt G, Tolley L. 2004. Brood care in freshwater crayfish and relationship with the offspring's sensory deficiencies. J Morphol 262: 566–582. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vojkovská R, Horká I, Tricarico E, Ďuriš Z. 2014. New record of the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis from Italy. Crustaceana 87: 1386–1392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Q, Cheng L, Liu J, Li Z, Xie S, De Silva SS. 2015. Freshwater aquaculture in PR China: trends and prospects. Rev Aquacult 7: 283–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiperth A, Csányi B, Gál B, et al. 2015. Egzotikus rák-, hal- és kétéltűfajok a Budapest környéki víztestekben [Exotic crayfish, fish and amphibian species in various water bodies in the region of Budapest]. Pisces Hungar 9: 65–70. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.