| Issue |
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 427, 2026
Anthropogenic impact on freshwater habitats, communities and ecosystem functioning
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 14 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2026007 | |
| Published online | 10 April 2026 | |
- Barnes MA, Turner CR, Jerde CL, Renshaw MA, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM. 2014. Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environ Sci Technol 48: 1819–1827. [Google Scholar]
- Bates D, Måchler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Ime4. J Stat Softw 67: 1–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brys R, Haegeman A, Halfmaerten D, Neyrinck S, Staelens A, Auwerx J, Ruttink T. 2021. Monitoring of spatiotemporal occupancy patterns of fish and amphibian species in a lentic aquatic system using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 30: 3097–3110. [Google Scholar]
- Brys R, Halfmaerten D, Everts T, Van Driessche C, Neyrinck S. 2023. Combining multiple markers significantly increases the sensitivity and precision of eDNA-based single-species analyses. Environ DNA, 5: 1065–1077. [Google Scholar]
- Caldwell JM, Raley ME, Levine BR. 2021. Detection and quantification of DNA from wastewater: A new tool for understanding human-wildlife interactions. Environ Sci Technol 55: 1244–1252. [Google Scholar]
- Çevik T, Çevik N. 2025. Environmental DNA (eDNA): a review of ecosystem biodiversity detection and applications. Biodivers Conserv 34: 2999–3035. [Google Scholar]
- Clare FC, Economou CK, Faulkes Z, Seymour M, Creer S. 2022. Wastewater as a potential source of eDNA contamination in aquatic monitoring: considerations from consumption-derived DNA. Environ DNA 4: 23–34. [Google Scholar]
- Deiner K, Altermatt F. 2014. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLOS One 9: e88786. [Google Scholar]
- Deiner K, Bik HM, Måchler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, Creer S, Bista I, Lodge DM, de Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez, L. 2017. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol Ecol 26: 5872–5895. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doi H, Uchii K, Takahara T, Matsuhashi S, Yamanaka H, Minamoto T. 2015. Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys. PLOS One 10: e0122763. [Google Scholar]
- Everts T, Halfmaerten D, Neyrinck S, De Regge N, Jacquemyn H, Brys R. 2021. Accurate detection and quantification of seasonal abundance of American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) using ddPCR eDNA assays. Sci Rep 11: 11282. [Google Scholar]
- Hånfling B, Handley LL, Read DS, Hahn C, Li J, Nichols P, Blackman RC, Oliver A, Winfield IJ. 2016. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Mol Ecol 25: 3101–3119. [Google Scholar]
- Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, Makarewicz A et al. 2011. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem 83: 8604–8610. [Google Scholar]
- Inoue D, Ushio M, Murakami H, Miya M. 2023. Consumption-derived eDNA in human sewage as a potential source of contamination in aquatic biodiversity monitoring. Sci Total Environ 858: 159770. [Google Scholar]
- Jane SF, Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS, Young MK, Schwartz MK, Lowe WH, Letcher BH, Whiteley AR. 2015. Distance, flow, and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams. Mol Ecol Resour 15: 216–227. [Google Scholar]
- Jo TS. 2023. Utilizing the state of environmental DNA (eDNA) to incorporate time-scale information into eDNA analysis. Proc Royal Soc B 290: 20230979. [Google Scholar]
- Karia GL, Christian RA. 2003. Wastewater Treatment: Concepts and Design Approach. Prentice-Hall of India. [Google Scholar]
- Khajvand M, Mostafazadeh AK, Drogui P, Tyagi RD. 2022. Management of greywater: environmental impact, treatment, resource recovery, water recycling, and decentralization. Water Sci Technol 86: 909–937. [Google Scholar]
- Knudsen SW, Ebert RB, Hesselsøe M, Kuntke F, Hassingboe J, Mortensen PB, et al. 2019. Species-specific detection and quantification of environmental DNA from marine fishes in the Baltic Sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 510: 31–45. [Google Scholar]
- Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RH. 2017. ImerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82: 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Lenth R. 2023. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means_. R package version 1.8. 5. [Google Scholar]
- Lin M, Zhang S, Yao M. 2019. Effective detection of environmental DNA from the invasive American bullfrog. Biol Invasions 21: 2255–2268. [Google Scholar]
- Maes SM, Desmet S, Brys R, Sys K, Ruttink T, Maes S, Hostens K, Vansteenbrugge L, Derycke, S. 2024. Detection and quantification of two commercial flatfishes (Solea solea and Pleuronectes platessa) in the North Sea using environmental DNA. Environ DNA 6: e426. [Google Scholar]
- Mailhot A, Talbot G, Lavallée B. 2015. Relationships between rainfall and Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) occurrences. J Hydrol 523: 602–609. [Google Scholar]
- Mauvisseau Q, Halfmaerten D, Neyrinck S, Burian A, Brys R. 2021. Effects of preservation strategies on environmental DNA detection and quantification using ddPCR. Environmental DNA, 3, 815–822. [Google Scholar]
- Metcalf & Eddy. 2014. Wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recovery, McGrawHill Education, New York, 2018 p. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen KM, Johnsen PJ, Bensasson D, Daffonchio D. 2007. Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environ Biosafety Res 6: 37–53. [Google Scholar]
- NoBrokerHood. 2021. Sewage Treatment Plant – What It Is and How It Works. Retrieved from https://www.nobrokerhood.com/blog/sewage-treatment-plant/ [Google Scholar]
- Ort C, Lawrence MG, Reungoat J, Mueller JF. 2010. Sampling for PPCPs in wastewater systems: comparison of different sampling modes and optimization strategies. Environ Sci Technol 44: 6289–6296. [Google Scholar]
- Qasim SR. 2017. Wastewater Treatment Plants: Planning, Design, and Operation. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2025). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
- Ragot SA, Villemur R. 2022. Potential for non-local eDNA inputs through predator dispersal in aquatic ecosystems. Front Environ Sci 10: 891005. [Google Scholar]
- Sassoubre LM, Yamahara KM, Gardner LD, Block BA, Boehm AB. 2016. Quantification of environmental DNA (eDNA) shedding and decay rates for three marine fish. Environ Sci Technol 50: 10456–10464. [Google Scholar]
- Secondi J, Dejean T, Valentini A, Audebaud B, Miaud C. 2016. Detection of a global aquatic invasive amphibian, Xenopus laevis, using environmental DNA. Amphib-Rept 37: 131–136. [Google Scholar]
- Sha C, Shen S, Zhang J, Zhou C, Lu X, Zhang H. 2024. A review of strategies and technologies for sustainable decentralized wastewater treatment. Water 16: 3003. [Google Scholar]
- Shogren AJ, Tank JL, Egan SP, August OM, Rosi EJ. 2017. Controls on eDNA movement in streams: Transport, retention, and resuspension. Sci Rep 7: 5065. [Google Scholar]
- Strickler KM, Fremier AK, Goldberg CS. 2015. Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA degradation in aquatic microcosms. Biol Conserv 183: 85–92. [Google Scholar]
- Tchobanoglous G, Leverenz H. 2013. The rationale for decentralization of wastewater infrastructure. In: T.A. Larsen, K.M. Udert, & J. Lienert (Eds.), Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management, IWA Publishing, London, UK. pp. 101–115. [Google Scholar]
- Thomsen PF, Willerslev E. 2015. Environmental DNA – an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conserv 183: 4–18. [Google Scholar]
- Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, et al. 2016. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol 25: 929–942. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Driessche C, Everts T, Neyrinck S, Brys R. 2022. Experimental assessment of downstream environmental DNA patterns under variable fish biomass and river discharge rates. Environ DNA 169: 112807. [Google Scholar]
- Van Driessche C, Everts T, Neyrinck S, Deflem I, Bonte D, Brys R. 2024a. Reduced sampling intensity through key sampling site selection for optimal characterization of riverine fish communities by eDNA metabarcoding. Ecol Indic 169: 112807. [Google Scholar]
- Van Driessche C, Everts T, Neyrinck S, Halfmaerten D, Haegeman A, Ruttink T, Bonte D, Brys R. 2023. Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor fish communities in small rivers and large brooks: insights on the spatial scale of information. Environ Res 228: 115857. [Google Scholar]
- Van Driessche C, Everts T, Neyrinck S, Halfmaerten D, Verschelde P, Breine J, Bonte D, Brys R. 2024b. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reflects spatiotemporal fish community shifts in the Scheldt estuary. Sci Total Environ 934: 173242. [Google Scholar]
- Van Wichelen J, Auwerx J, Maes Y, Brys R, Mergeay J, Maes D, De Bruyn L, Verreycken H, Belpaire C, de Bruin A, Vos, M. 2023. Achtergrondrapport van het soortenbeschermingsprogramma voor grote modderkruiper (Misgurnus fossilis Linnaeus 1758) in Vlaanderen (2021–2025). [Google Scholar]
- Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D. 2023. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.dplyr [Google Scholar]
- Wickham H, Chang W, Wickham MH. 2016. Package ‘ggplot2’. Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. Version 2, 1–189. [Google Scholar]
- Wood SA, Pochon X, Laroche O, von Ammon U, Adamson J, Zaiko A. 2019. A comparison of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR and metabarcoding for species-specific detection in environmental DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 19: 1407–1419. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong W, Maclsaac HJ, Zhan A. 2024a. An overlooked source of false positives in eDNA-based biodiversity assessment and management. J Environ Manag 358: 120949. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong W, Jin Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Chen B, Su H. 2024b. Novel insights into the biological state in algal-bacterial granular sludge granulation: armor-like protection provided by the algal barrier. Water Res 262: 122087. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S, Al-Gashgari B, Medina JS, Wang C, Narayanasamy S, Xiong Y, Wang K, Hong PY. 2025. Extracellular DNA-associated dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in anaerobic versus aerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 437: 133054. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.