| Issue |
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 427, 2026
Anthropogenic impact on freshwater habitats, communities and ecosystem functioning
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 14 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2026007 | |
| Published online | 10 April 2026 | |
Research Paper
Wastewater treatment effectively eliminates exogenous eDNA, preventing downstream false-positive detections
1
Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Geraardsbergen, Belgium
2
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent, Belgium
3
KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, Leuven, Belgium
4
Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Research Center for Aquatic Fauna, Linkebeek, Belgium
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
28
November
2025
Accepted:
21
March
2026
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) is widely applied to monitor aquatic biodiversity, but false-positive detections may arise when DNA from consumed or processed organisms is discharged to waterways through domestic wastewater. We experimentally tested whether such wastewater-derived eDNA persists through municipal treatment and contributes to downstream false-positive detections. Controlled spikes of homogenized tissue from six target taxa (two marine fishes and four freshwater fish/amphibians) were introduced into the influent of four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Flanders, Belgium. Water samples were collected at three points: influent, treated effluent, and the receiving river. Sampling was performed before and up to 24 h after spiking, and eDNA concentrations of each of the six target taxa were quantified using droplet digital PCR. All species showed post-spike increases in influent eDNA concentrations, although individual taxa were not detected in every influent sample, particularly at the largest facilities where hydraulic dilution reduced short-term detectability. In contrast, effluent and downstream concentrations remained zero across all WWTPs, indicating that no spiked eDNA persisted beyond the treatment process. One WWTP located near a marine harbor showed background detection of marine fish species even before spiking, likely originating from seafood processing or domestic discharge. However, these signals were also fully removed during treatment. Overall, modern secondary treatment effectively eliminates exogenous eDNA, preventing its release into receiving waters. While systems with incomplete sewer connectivity or combined sewer overflows may still discharge untreated domestic wastewater, under standard operating conditions riverine eDNA detections can be interpreted as reflecting local biota rather than wastewater contamination.
Key words: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) / DNA removal efficiency / combined sewer overflow / environmental monitoring reliability / eDNA transport dynamics
Publisher note: The supplementary material PDF file was corrected on 14 April 2026.
© C. Van Driessche et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
