Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Topical issue on Crayfish
Article Number 13
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 15 February 2016
  • Avise J.C., 2004. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 684 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Crandall K.A. and Fitzpatrick J.F. Jr, 1996. Crayfish molecular systematics: using a combination of procedures to estimate phylogeny. Syst. Biol., 45, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Dorn N.J. and Wojdak J.M., 2005. Evaluating active and passive sampling methods to quantify crayfish density in a freshwater wetland, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 346–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edsman L., Farris J.S., Ka Llersjo M. and Prestegaard T., 2002. Genetic differentiation between noble crayfish, Astacus astacus (L.), populations detected by microsatellite length variation in the rDNA ITS1 REGION. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 367, 691–706. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Fevolden S.E., Taugbøl T. and Skurdal J., 1994. Allozymic variation among populations of noble crayfish, Astacus astacus L., in southern Norway: implications for management. Aquacult. Fish. Manage., 25, 92–935. [Google Scholar]
  • Frankham R., Ballou J.D. and Briscoe D.A., 2004. A primer of conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 234 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerber A.S., Loggins R., Kumar S. and Dowling T.E., 2001. Does nonneutral evolution shape observed patterns of DNA variation in animal mitochondrial genomes? Ann. Rev. Genet. 35, 539–566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gondko R., Babski P. and Biały L., 1992. Chroñmy raki – bioindykatory wód. In: Ochrona biosfery Bory Tucholskie, Łódź, 204–210. [Google Scholar]
  • Haig S., 1998. Molecular contributions to conservation. Ecology, 79, 413-425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haye P.A., Kornfield I. and Watling L., 2004. Molecular insights into Cumacean family relationships (Crustacea, Cumacea). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 30, 79–809. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., 2002. Background and functional morphology. In: Holdich DM (ed.), Biology of Freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 3–29 [Google Scholar]
  • Knowlton N. and Weigt L.A., 1998. New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 265, 2257–2263 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meyran J.C. and Taberlet P., 1998. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism among alpine populations of Gammarus lacustris (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Freshw. Biol., 39, 25–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miura O., Torchin M.E., Kuris A.M., Hechinger R.F. and Chiba S., 2006. Introduced cryptic species of parasites exhibit different invasion pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 103, 19818. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pedraza-Lara C., Alda F., Carranza S. and Doadrio I., 2010. Mitochondrial DNA structure of the Iberian populations of the white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius italicus italicus (Faxon, 1914). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 57, 327–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Riffel M. and Schreiber A., 1995. Coarse-grained population structure in Central European sculpin (Cottus gobio L.): secondary contact or ongoing genetic drift? J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 33, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Rozas J., Sánchez-DelBarrio J.C., Messenguer X. and Rozas R., 2008. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 19, 2496–2497 [Google Scholar]
  • Schrimpf A., Schulz H.K., Theissinger K., Pârvulescu L. and Schulz R., 2011. The first large-scale genetic analysis of the vulnerable noble crayfish Astacus astacus reveals low haplotype diversity in central European populations. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 401, 35. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Schrimpf A., Theissinger K., Dahlem J., Maguire I., Parvulescu L., Schulz H. K. and Schulz R., 2014. Phylogeography of noble cryfish (Astacus astacus) reveals multiple refugia. Freshw. Biol., 59, 761-776 [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz R., 2000. Status of the noble Crayfish Astacus astacus (L.) in Germany: Monitoring protocol and the use of RAPD markers to assess the genetic structure of populations. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 356, 123–138. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz H., Śmietana P., Maiwald T., Oidtmann B. and Schulz R., 2004. Case studies on the Co-occurrence of Astacus astacus (L.) and Orconectes limosus (Raf.), Snapshpts of a Slow Displacement. Freshwater Crayfish, 15, 212–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz H., Śmietana P. and Schulz R., 2006. Estimating the human impact on population of the endangered noble crayfish (Astacus astacus L.) in north-western Poland. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 16, 223–233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shull H.C., Pérez-Losada M., Blair D., Sewell K., Sinclair E.A., Lawler S., Ponniah M. and Crandall K.A., 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of the freshwater crayfish Euastacus (Decapoda: Parastacidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 37 (1), 249–263. [Google Scholar]
  • Śmietana P., 2001. On the distribution of narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus Esch.) in Western Poland. Anim. Sci., 3, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Śmietana P., 2013. Distributional conditionings and interspecific competition of the noble crayfish (Astacus astacus L.) and the spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus Raf.) in the waters of Pomerania. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Rozprawy i Studia – Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Vol. 860, 214 p., ISSN 0860-2751 (in Polish with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Śmietana P., Krzywosz T. and Strużyński W., 2004. Review of the national restocking programme “Active Protection of Native Crayfish in Poland” 1999–2001. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 372–373, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  • Strużyński W. and Śmietana P., 1999. On the distribution of crayfish in Poland. Freshwater Crayfish, 12, 825–829. [Google Scholar]
  • Stuecheli K., 1991. Trapping Bias in Sampling Crayfish with Baited Funnel Traps. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 11, 236–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., and Kumar S., 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol., 30, 2725–2729. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson J., Higgins D. and Gibson T., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673–4690. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Trontelj P., Machino Y. and Sket B., 2005. Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in the crayfish genus Austropotamobius inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 34, 21–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Uwai S., Nelson W., Neill K., Wang W.D., Aguilar-Rosas L.E., Boo S.M., Kitayama T. and Kawai H., 2006. Genetic diversity in Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) deduced from mitochondria genes-origins and succession of introduced populations. Phycologia, 45, 687–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verovnik R., Sket B. and Trontelj P., 2005. The colonization of Europe by the freshwater crustacean Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda) proceeded from ancient refugia and was directed by habitat connectivity. Mol. Ecol., 14, 4355–4369 [Google Scholar]
  • Versteegen M. and Lawler S., 1997. Population genetics of the Murray River crayfish Euastacus armatus. Freshwater Crayfish, 11, 14–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Zaccara S., Stefani F., Galli P., Nardi P.A. and Crosa G., 2004. Taxonomic implications in conservation management of white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) (Decapoda, Astacidae) in Northern Italy. Biol. Conserv., 120, 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.