Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 404, 2012
Article Number 03
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 12 January 2012
  • Anderson R.O. and Neumann R.M., 1996. Length, weight and associated structural indices. In: Murphy B.R. and Willis D.W. (eds.), Fisheries Techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 447–482. [Google Scholar]
  • Angeli V., Bicchi A., Carosi A., Spigonardi M.P., Pedicillo G. and Lorenzoni M., 2010. Calcolo del peso standard (Ws) per le principali specie ittiche del bacino del fiume Tevere. Studi Trentini Di Scienze Naturali, 87, 141–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Belkessam D., Oberdorff T. and Hugueny B., 1997. Unsaturated fish assemblages in rivers of north-western France: potential consequences for species introductions. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 344-345, 193–204. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bianco P.G. and Ketmaier V., 2001. Anthropogenic changes in the freshwater fish fauna of Italy, with reference to the central region and Barbus graellsii, a newly established alien species of Iberian origin. J. Fish Biol., 59A, 190–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blackwell B.G., Brown M.L., and Willis D.W., 2000. Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assessment and management. Res. Fish. Sci., 81, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanc G., 1997. L’introdution des agents pathogènes dans les écosystèmes aquatiques : aspects théoriques et réalités. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 344-345, 489–514. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown M.L. and Austen D.J., 1996. Data management and statistical techniques. In: Murphy B.R. and Willis D.W. (eds.), Fisheries Techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown M.L. and Murphy B.R., 1991. Relationship of relative weight (Wr) to proximate composition of juvenile striped bass and hybrid striped bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 120, 509–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Byers J.E., Reichard S., Randall J.M., Parker I.M., Smith C.S., Lonsdale W.M., Atkinson I.A.E., Seastedt T.R., Williamson M., Chornesky E. and Hayes D., 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of non indigenous species. Conserv. Biol., 16, 630–640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carosi A., Pedicillo G., Bicchi A., Angeli V., Lorenzoni M. and Ghetti L., 2006. Distribuzione e abbondanza di Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758) nel bacino del fiume Tevere in Umbria. Quaderni ETP J. Freshw. Biol., 34. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp G.H., Tarkan A.S., Godard M.J., Edmonds N.J. and Wesley K.J., 2010. Preliminary assessment of feral goldfish impacts on ponds, with particular reference to native crucian carp. Aquatic Invasions, 5, 413–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx I.G., 1997. L’introduction d’espèces de poissons dans les eaux douces européennes : succès économiques ou désastres écologiques ? Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 344-345, 57–77. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Dove A.D.M. and Ernst I., 1996. Concurrent invaders four exotic 336 species of Monogenea now established on exotic freshwater fishes in Australia. Int. J. Parasitol., 17, 175–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Elvira B., 1995. Native and exotic freshwater fishes in Spanish river basins. Freshwat. Biol., 33, 103–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fulton T.W., 1911. In: Blackwood W. (ed.), The sovereignty of the sea: an historical account of the claims of England to the dominion of the British seas, and of the evolution of the territorial waters, Edinburgh, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaygusuz Ö., Tarkan A.S. and Gürsoy Gaygusuz Ç., 2007. Changes in the fish community of the Ömerli reservoir (Turkey) following the introduction of non-native gibel carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) and other human impacts. Aquat. Invas., 2, 117–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghetti P.F., 1986. In: Bertelli (ed.), I macroinvertebrati nell’analisi di qualità dei corsi d’acqua, Trento. [Google Scholar]
  • Giannetto D., Carosi A., Franchi E., Pedicillo G., Pompei L. and Lorenzoni M., 2011. Proposed standard weight (Ws) equations for Telestes muticellus (Bonaparte, 1837) in the River Tiber basin. Cybium., 35, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Godinho F.N. and Ferreira M.T., 2000. Composition of endemic fish assemblages in relation to exotic species and river regulation in a temperate stream. Biol. Invasions, 2, 231–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey B.C., 1991. Interactions among stream fishes: predator induced habitat shifts and larval survival. Oecologia, 87, 29–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helfman G.S., 2007. Fish Conservation: A Guide to Understanding and Restoring Global Aquatic Biodiversity and Fishery Resources. In: Island Press (ed.), Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Herbold B. and Moyle P.B., 1986. Introduced species and vacant niches. Am. Nat., 128, 751–760. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holcik J., 1991. Fish introductions in Europe with particular reference to its central and eastern part. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 48, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson P.D. and Williams W.D., 1980. Effects of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., on the distribution of some native fishes in three areas of southern Victoria. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 31, 61–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson S.L., Rahel F.J. and Hubert W.A., 1992. Factors influencing the size structure of brook trout populations in beaver ponds in Wyoming. North Am. J. Fish. Manag., 12, 118–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keith P. and Allardi J., 1997. Bilan des introductions de poissons d’eau douce en France. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 344-345, 181–191. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Leveque C., 1997. Introductions de nouvelles espèces de poissons dans les eaux douces tropicales : objectifs et conséquences. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 344-345, 79–91. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge D.M., Taylor C.A., Holdich D.M. and Skurdal J., 2000. Non indigenous crayfish threaten North American freshwater biodiversity: lessons from Europe. Fisheries, 25, 7–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Ghetti L. and Mearelli M., 2006. Native and exotic fish species in the Tiber River watershed (Umbria – Italy) and their relationship to the longitudinal gradient. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 382, 19–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S. and De Poorter M., 2000. 100 of the world’s worst invasive Alien species a selection from the global invasive species database. Aliens, 12. [Google Scholar]
  • Mack R.N., Simberloff C.D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M. and Bazzaz F., 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, Epidemiology, Global Consequences and Control. Ecology, 5, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Maunder M.N. and Punt A.E., 2004. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fish. Res., 70, 141–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Mearelli M., Giovinazzo G., Lorenzoni M., Petesse M.L. and Carosi A., 1995. Zonazione ittica dei corsi d'acqua del bacino del fiume Tevere. Atti SITE, 16, 669–671. [Google Scholar]
  • Meffe G.K., 1984. Effects of abiotic disturbance on coexistence of predator-prey fish species. Ecology, 65, 1525–1534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moran P.A.P., 1951. A mathematical theory of animal trapping. Biometrika, 38, 307–311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • terBraak C.J.F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wege G.J. and Anderson R.O., 1978. Relative weight (Wr): a new index of condition for largemouth bass. In: Novinger G.D. and Dillard J.G. (eds.), New approaches to the management of small impoundments, American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 5, Bethesda, Maryland, 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Zippin C., 1956. An evaluation of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics, 12, 163–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.