Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 401, 2011
European Crayfish: food, flagships and ecosystem services
Article Number 07
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 18 May 2011
  • Abrahamsson S.A.A., 1966. Dynamics of an isolated population of the crayfish Astacus astacus Linné. Oikos, 17, 96–107. [CrossRef]
  • Abrahamsson S.A.A., 1971. Fecundity and growth of some populations of Astacus astacus Linné in Sweden. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm, 52, 23–27.
  • Abrahamsson S.A.A., 1983. Trappability, locomotion and diel pattern of activity of the crayfish Astacus astacus and Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Freshw. Crayfish, 5, 239–253.
  • Acosta C.A. and Perry S.A., 2000. Effective sampling area: A quantitative method for sampling crayfish populations in freshwater marshes. Crustaceana, 73, 425–431. [CrossRef]
  • Baillargeon S. and Rivest L., 2007. Rcapture: Loglinear models for capture-recapture in R. J. Stat. Soft., 19, 1–31.
  • Bergqvist B., Bohman P. and Edsman L., 2005. Provfiske efter kräfta i sjöar och vattendrag. Downloaded on 31 January 2011 (in Swedish).
  • Brewis J.M. and Bowler K., 1983. A study of the natural population of the freshwater crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes. Freshw. Biol., 13, 443–452. [CrossRef]
  • Bubb D.H., Lucas M.C., Thom T.J. and Rycroft P., 2002. The potential use of PIT telemetry for identifying and tracking crayfish in their natural environment. Hydrobiologia, 483, 225–230. [CrossRef]
  • Chan Y.H., 2003. Biostatistics 104: Correlational Analysis. Singapore Med. Journal, 44, 614–619.
  • Danielsen F., Burgess N.D. and Balmford A., 2005. Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity Conserv., 14, 2507–2542. [CrossRef]
  • Dorn N.J., Urgelles R. and Trexler J.C., 2005. Evaluating active and passive sampling methods to quantify crayfish density in a freshwater wetland. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 346–356. [CrossRef]
  • Erkamo E., Ruokonen T., Alapassi T., Ruokolainen J., Järvenpää T., Tulonen J. and Kirjavainen J., 2010. Evaluation of crayfish stocking success in Finland. Freshw. Crayfish, 17, 77–83.
  • Fischer J. and Lindenmayer D.B., 2000. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol. Conserv., 96, 1–11. [CrossRef]
  • Goodyear C.P., Die D., Kerstetter D.W., Olson D.B., Prince E. and Scott G.P., 2003. Habitat standardization of CPUE indices: research needs. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 55, 613–623.
  • Gydemo R., 1989. Reproduction and Growth in the Noble Crayfish Astacus astacus L., Ph.D. thesis, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
  • Harley S.J., Myers R.A. and Dunn A., 2001. Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58, 1760–1772. [CrossRef]
  • Hinton M.G. and Maunder M.N., 2003. Methods for standardizing CPUE and how to select among them. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 56, 169–177.
  • Hockley N.J., Jones J.P.G., Andriahajaina F.B., Manica A., Ranambitsoa E.H. and Randriamboahary J.A., 2005. When should communities and conservationists monitor exploited resources? Biodivers. Cons., 14, 2795–2806. [CrossRef]
  • IUCN (World Conservation Union), 1998. Guidelines for reintroductions, Gland and Cambridge.
  • IUCN/SSC (IUCN Species Survival Commission), 2008. Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook, Version 1.0, Gland, 71 p.
  • Jones J.P.G., 2004. The sustainability of crayfish harvesting in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 161 p.
  • Kholodkevich S., Shumilova T., Fedotov V. and Zhuravlev D., 2005. Effects of the Astacus astacus L. population on biomass of macrophytes in a fresh water body. Russ. J. Ecol., 36, 271–276. [CrossRef]
  • Kirjavainen J. and Westman K., 1999. Natural history and development of the introduced signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in a small, isolated Finnish lake, from 1968 to 1993. Aquat. Living Resour., 12, 387–401. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Laloë F., 2007. Modelling sustainability: from applied to involved modeling. Soc. Sci. Inform., 46, 87–107. [CrossRef]
  • Maguire I., Hudina S. and Erben R., 2004. Estimation of noble crayfish (Astacus astacus L.) population size in the Velika Paklenica stream (Croatia). Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 372-373, 353–366. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Maunder M.N., Sibert J.R., Fonteneau A., Hampton J., Kleiber P. and Harley S.J., 2006. Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 63, 1373–1385. [CrossRef]
  • Momot W.T., 1967. Population dynamics and productivity of the crayfish, Orconectes virilis, in a marl lake. Am. Mid. Nat., 78, 55–81. [CrossRef]
  • Nichols J.D., 1992. Capture-recapture models. BioScience, 42, 94–102. [CrossRef]
  • Nowicki P., Tirelli T., Mussat Sartor R., Bona F. and Pessani D., 2008. Monitoring crayfish using a mark-recapture method: potentials, recommendations, and limitations. Biodivers. Conserv., 17, 3513–3530. [CrossRef]
  • Odelström T. and Johansson S., 1999. Flodkräftodling i Norrland – biologiska och ekonomiska förutsättningar. In: Fiskeriverket rapport 1999:1, Stockholm, 17 p. (in Swedish).
  • Olsson K., Granéli W., Ripa J. and Nyström P., 2010. Fluctuations in harvest of native and introduced crayfish are driven by temperature and population density in previous years. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 67, 157–164. [CrossRef]
  • Otis D.L., Burnham K.P., White G.C. and Anderson D.R., 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monogr., 62,135 p.
  • Pollock K.H., 1982. A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J. Wildlife Manage., 46, 752–757. [CrossRef]
  • Pollock K.H., Nichols J.D., Brownie C. and Hines J.E., 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monogr., 107, 3–97.
  • Price J.E. and Welch S.M., 2009. Semi-quantitative methods for crayfish sampling: Sex, size, habitat bias. J. Crustacean Biol., 29, 208–216. [CrossRef]
  • Rabeni C.F., Collier F.J., Parkyn S.M. and Hicks B.J., 1997. Evaluating techniques for sampling stream crayfish (Paranephrops planifrons). New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh., 31, 693–700. [CrossRef]
  • Rist J., Milner-Gulland E.J., Cowlishaw G. and Rowcliffe M., 2009. Hunter reporting of catch per unit effort as a monitoring tool in a bushmeat-harvesting system. Conserv. Biol., 24, 489–499. [CrossRef]
  • Sahlin U., Smith H.G., Edsman L. and Bengtsson G., 2010. Time to establishment success for introduced signal crayfish in Sweden – a statistical evaluation when success is partially known. J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 1044–1052. [CrossRef]
  • Scalici M., Belluscio A. and Gibertini G., 2008. Understanding population structure and dynamics in threatened crayfish. J. Zool., 275, 160–171. [CrossRef]
  • Schaefer M.B., 1954. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of commercial marine fisheries. Bull. Inter-Am. Tropical Tuna Comm., 1, 25–56.
  • Schwarz C.J. and Seber G.A.F., 1999. Estimating animal abundance. Review III. Stat. Sci., 14, 427–456. [CrossRef]
  • Seber G.A.F., 1986. A review of estimating animal abundances. Biometrics, 42, 267–292. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Seddon P.J., Armstrong D.P. and Maloney R.F., 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv. Biol., 21, 303–312. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Skurdal J. and Taugbøl T., 2002. Astacus. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, 467–510.
  • Skurdal J., Qvenild T. and Taugbøl T., 1992. Mark-recapture experiments with noble crayfish, Astacus astacus L., in a Norwegian lake. Aquac. Res., 23, 227–223. [CrossRef]
  • Skurdal J., Garnås E. and Taugbøl T., 2002. Management strategies, yield and population development of the noble crayfish Astacus astacus in lake steinsfjorden. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 367, 845–860. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Somers K. and Stechey D.P.M., 1986. Variable trappability of crayfish associated with bait type, water temperature and lunar phase. Am. Mid. Nat., 116, 36–44. [CrossRef]
  • Westman K. and Pursiainen M., 1982. Size and structure of crayfish (Astacus astacus) populations on different habitats in Finland. Hydrobiologia, 86, 67–72. [CrossRef]
  • Westman K. and Savolainen R., 2001. Long term study of competition between two co-occurring crayfish species, the native Astacus astacus L. and the introduced Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana, in a Finnish lake. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 361, 613–627. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Westman K., Savolainen R. and Julkunen M., 2002. Replacement of the native crayfish Astacus astacus by the introduced species Pacifastacus leniusculus in a small, enclosed Finnish lake: a 30-year study. Ecography, 25, 53–73. [CrossRef]
  • White G.C., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. and Otis D.L., 1982. Chapter 1: Introduction. In: Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Park Ridge, 4 p.
  • Zimmerman J.K.M. and Palo R.T., 2010. Influence of water regulation and water flow on noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) catch yield in the river Ljungan. Freshw. Crayfish, 17, 141–144.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.