Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 400, 2011
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 25 April 2011
  • Balci P. and Kennedy J.H., 2003. Comparison of chironomids and other macroinvertebrates associated with Myriophyllum spicatum and Heteranthera dubia. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 18, 235–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blois-Heulin C., Crowley P.H., Arrington M. and Johnson D.M., 1990. Direct and indirect effects of predators on the dominant invertebrates of two freshwater littoral communities. Oecologia, 84, 295–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Broyer J. and Curtet L., 2010. The influence of macrophyte beds on duck breeding in fishponds of the Dombes region, France. Wildfowl, 60, 136–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Broyer J., Curtet L., Maillier S. and Bove J.J., 1997. Incidences de la gestion des étangs piscicoles de la Dombes sur la flore aquatique remarquable. Écologie, 28, 323–336. [Google Scholar]
  • Broyer J., Curtet L., Bouniol J. and Vieille J., 2009. L’habitat de Leucorrhinia pectoralis Charpentier 1825 (Odonata, Libellulidae) dans les étangs piscicoles de la Dombes. Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon, 78, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Buczyńska E., Buczyński P., Lechowski L. and Stryjecki R., 2007. Fishpond complexes as refugia of aquatic invertebrates (Odonata, Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Tridoptera, Hydrachonidia): a case study of the pond complex in Zalesie Kańskie (Central East Poland). Nature Conservation, 64, 39–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Bukacińska N., Bukaciński D., Cygan J.P., Dobrowolski K.A. and Kaczmarek W., 1996. The importance of fishponds to waterfowl in Poland. Acta Hydrobiologica, 37, 57–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Burnham K.P. and Anderson D.R., 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information – theoretical approach, 2nd edition, Springer, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Cheruvelil K.S., Soranno P.A. and Madsen J.D., 2001. Epiphytic macro-invertebrates along a gradient of Eurasian watermilfoil cover. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 39, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Crowder L. and Cooper W., 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology, 63, 1802–1813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deák C., Gor D. and Lakatos G., 2008. Phytophilous macrofauna assessments in an important aquatic bird area: the Kis-Balaton Protection System. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, 54, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Diehl S., 1992. Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexity. Ecology, 73, 1646–1661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diehl S. and Kornijów R., 1998. Influence of submerged macrophytes on trophic interactions among fish and macroinvertebrates. In: Jeppessen E., Sondergaard M. and Christoffersen K. (eds.), Structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes, Springer, New York, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Downing J.A. and Cyr H., 1985. The quantitative estimation of epiphytic invertebrate populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic. Sci., 42, 1568–1578. [Google Scholar]
  • Dvorak J.A. and Best E.P.H., 1982. Macro-invertebrate communities associated with macrophytes of Lake Vechten and functional relationship. Hydrobiologia, 95, 115–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher J.C., 2005. Predation and bed position effects on hydrilla-dwelling periphyton and macroinvertebrates in the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana, M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University. [Google Scholar]
  • Gee J.H.R., Smith B.D., Lee K.M. and Griffiths S.W., 1997. The ecological basis of freshwater pond management for biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation Marine Freshwater Ecosystems, 7, 91–104. [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson J.M., 1990. Macro-invertebrate size-distributions of two contrasting freshwater macrophyte communities. Freshw. Biol., 24, 481–491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartel T., Nemes S., Cogalniceanu D., Ollerer K., Schneiger O., Moga C.I. and Demeter L., 2007. The effect of fish and aquatic habitat complexity on amphibians. Hydrobiologia, 583, 173–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Humphries P., 1996. Aquatic macrophytes, macro-invertebrates associations and water levels in a lowland Tasmanian river. Hydrobiologia, 321, 219–233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jolivet S., 2006. Inventaire des invertébrés aquatiques du parc naturel régional de la Brenne : insectes aquatiques des étangs brennous, Opie, Parc naturel régional de la Brenne. [Google Scholar]
  • Joly P., Miaud C., Lehmann A. and Grolet D., 2001. Habitat matrix effect on pond occupancy in newts. Conserv. Biol., 15, 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • Juget J., Amoros C., Fanget R. and Rostan J.C., 1972. Les communautés d’invertébrés des étangs piscicoles de la réserve biologique de la Dombes. Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes et des Archéologues de l’Ain, 86, 11–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Keast A., 1984. The introduced aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum as a habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Can. J. Zool., 62, 1289–1303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kornijów R. and Kairesalo T., 1994. Elodea canadensis sustains rich environment for macroinvertebrates. Verhandlungen International Vereinigung Limnologie, 25, 2270–2275. [Google Scholar]
  • Kornijów R., Gulati R.D. and van Donk E., 1990. Hydrophyte macroinvetebrate interactions in Zwemlust, a lake undergoing biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia, 200/201, 467–474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Linhart J., Uvira V., Rulik M. and Rulikova K., 1998. A study of the composition of phytomacrofauna in Batrachium aquatile vegetation. Acta Universitatis Palackionae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Biologica, 36, 39–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Lutz M., 2001. Les étangs de pisciculture en Europe Est-Centrale. Typologie des systèmes d’exploitation et impacts des modalités de gestion sur l’avifaune, Ph.D. thesis, University of Strasbourg. [Google Scholar]
  • Markwell K.A. and Fellows C.S., 2008. Habitat and biodiversity of on-farm water storages: A case study in South-East Queensland, Australia. Environ. Manag., 41, 234–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morin P.J., 1984. The impact of fish exclusion on the abundance and species composition of larval odonates: results of short-term experiments in a North Carolina form pond. Ecology, 65, 53–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morin A., Stephenson J., Skrike J. and Solimini A.G., 2004. Sieve retention probabilities of stream benthic invertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 383–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolet P., Biggs J., Fox G., Hodson M.J., Reynolds C., Whitfield M. and Williams P., 2004. The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales. Biol. Conserv., 120, 261–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B., Auderset Joye D., Castella E., Juge R., Cambin D. and Lachavanne B., 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 104, 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Osenberg C.W. and Mittebach G.G., 1989. Effects of body size on the predator-prey interaction between pumpkinseed sunfish and gastropods. Ecological Monograph, 59, 405–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Papas Ph., 2007. Effects of macrophytes on aquatic invertebrates: a review, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Technical Report Series n°158. [Google Scholar]
  • Pechar L., 1995. Long-term changes in the fishpond management as “an unplanned ecosystem experiment”. Importance of zooplankton structure, nutrient and light for species composition of cyanobacterial blooms. Water Sci. Technol., 32, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Reshetnikov A.N., 2003. The introduced fish, rotan (Percottus glenii) depresses populations of aquatic animals (macroinvertebrates, amphibians and a fish). Hydrobiologia, 510, 83–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer M., 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia, 200/201, 475–487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer M., van Geest G.J., Zimmer K., Butler M.G., Hanson M.A., Declerck S. and De Meester L., 2006. Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richnes: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos, 112, 227–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sidinei T., Dibble E.D., Evangelista L.R., Higuti J. and Bini L.M., 2007. Influence of aquatic macrophyte habitat complexity on invertebrate abundance and richness in tropical lagoons. Freshw. Biol., 53, 358–367. [Google Scholar]
  • Sloey D.T., Schenk T. and Narf R., 1997. Distribution of aquatic invertebrates within a dense bed of Eurasian milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.). Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 12, 303–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spalek K., 2006. Threatened plant communities as an indicator of fishponds value: an example from Silesia (sw Poland). In: Nature Conservation. Concepts and Practice, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 195–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer D.L., Lutz C., Halcom H.M., Munger K. and Shaw W.H., 2003. Invertebrate communities associated with a native (Vallisneria americana) and an alien (Trapa natans) macrophyte in a large river. Freshw. Biol., 48, 1938–1949. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tachet H., Richoux Ph., Bournaud M. and Usseglio-Polatera Ph., 2000. Invertébrés d’eau douce. Systématique, biologie, écologie, CNRS éd. [Google Scholar]
  • Thorp A.G., Jones R.C. and Kelso D.P., 1997. A comparison of water-column macroinvertebrate communities in beds of differing submersed aquatic vegetation in the total freshwater potomac river. Estuaries, 20, 86–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Donk E., Gulati R.D., Iedema A. and Meulemans J.T., 1993. Macrophyte-related shifts in the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the differents trophic levels in a biomanipulated shallow lake. Hydrobiologia, 251, 19–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wildermuth H., 1992. Habitate und Habitatwahl der Grossen Moosjungfer (Leucorrhinia pectoralis) Charp. 1825 (Odonata, Libellulidae). Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz, 1, 3−21. [Google Scholar]
  • Wurts W.A., 2004. Organic fertization in culture ponds. World Aquaculture, 35, 64–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Zambrano L., Scheffer M. and Martinez-Ramos M., 2001. Catastrophic response of lakes to benthivorous fish introduction. Oikos, 94, 344–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.