Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 400, 2011
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 25 April 2011
  • Balci P. and Kennedy J.H., 2003. Comparison of chironomids and other macroinvertebrates associated with Myriophyllum spicatum and Heteranthera dubia. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 18, 235–247. [CrossRef]
  • Blois-Heulin C., Crowley P.H., Arrington M. and Johnson D.M., 1990. Direct and indirect effects of predators on the dominant invertebrates of two freshwater littoral communities. Oecologia, 84, 295–306. [PubMed]
  • Broyer J. and Curtet L., 2010. The influence of macrophyte beds on duck breeding in fishponds of the Dombes region, France. Wildfowl, 60, 136–149.
  • Broyer J., Curtet L., Maillier S. and Bove J.J., 1997. Incidences de la gestion des étangs piscicoles de la Dombes sur la flore aquatique remarquable. Écologie, 28, 323–336.
  • Broyer J., Curtet L., Bouniol J. and Vieille J., 2009. L’habitat de Leucorrhinia pectoralis Charpentier 1825 (Odonata, Libellulidae) dans les étangs piscicoles de la Dombes. Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon, 78, 77–84.
  • Buczyńska E., Buczyński P., Lechowski L. and Stryjecki R., 2007. Fishpond complexes as refugia of aquatic invertebrates (Odonata, Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Tridoptera, Hydrachonidia): a case study of the pond complex in Zalesie Kańskie (Central East Poland). Nature Conservation, 64, 39–55.
  • Bukacińska N., Bukaciński D., Cygan J.P., Dobrowolski K.A. and Kaczmarek W., 1996. The importance of fishponds to waterfowl in Poland. Acta Hydrobiologica, 37, 57–73.
  • Burnham K.P. and Anderson D.R., 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information – theoretical approach, 2nd edition, Springer, New York.
  • Cheruvelil K.S., Soranno P.A. and Madsen J.D., 2001. Epiphytic macro-invertebrates along a gradient of Eurasian watermilfoil cover. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 39, 67–72.
  • Crowder L. and Cooper W., 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology, 63, 1802–1813. [CrossRef]
  • Deák C., Gor D. and Lakatos G., 2008. Phytophilous macrofauna assessments in an important aquatic bird area: the Kis-Balaton Protection System. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, 54, 75–83.
  • Diehl S., 1992. Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexity. Ecology, 73, 1646–1661. [CrossRef]
  • Diehl S. and Kornijów R., 1998. Influence of submerged macrophytes on trophic interactions among fish and macroinvertebrates. In: Jeppessen E., Sondergaard M. and Christoffersen K. (eds.), Structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes, Springer, New York, 24–26.
  • Downing J.A. and Cyr H., 1985. The quantitative estimation of epiphytic invertebrate populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic. Sci., 42, 1568–1578.
  • Dvorak J.A. and Best E.P.H., 1982. Macro-invertebrate communities associated with macrophytes of Lake Vechten and functional relationship. Hydrobiologia, 95, 115–126. [CrossRef]
  • Fisher J.C., 2005. Predation and bed position effects on hydrilla-dwelling periphyton and macroinvertebrates in the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana, M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University.
  • Gee J.H.R., Smith B.D., Lee K.M. and Griffiths S.W., 1997. The ecological basis of freshwater pond management for biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation Marine Freshwater Ecosystems, 7, 91–104. [CrossRef]
  • Hanson J.M., 1990. Macro-invertebrate size-distributions of two contrasting freshwater macrophyte communities. Freshw. Biol., 24, 481–491. [CrossRef]
  • Hartel T., Nemes S., Cogalniceanu D., Ollerer K., Schneiger O., Moga C.I. and Demeter L., 2007. The effect of fish and aquatic habitat complexity on amphibians. Hydrobiologia, 583, 173–182. [CrossRef]
  • Humphries P., 1996. Aquatic macrophytes, macro-invertebrates associations and water levels in a lowland Tasmanian river. Hydrobiologia, 321, 219–233. [CrossRef]
  • Jolivet S., 2006. Inventaire des invertébrés aquatiques du parc naturel régional de la Brenne : insectes aquatiques des étangs brennous, Opie, Parc naturel régional de la Brenne.
  • Joly P., Miaud C., Lehmann A. and Grolet D., 2001. Habitat matrix effect on pond occupancy in newts. Conserv. Biol., 15, 239–248.
  • Juget J., Amoros C., Fanget R. and Rostan J.C., 1972. Les communautés d’invertébrés des étangs piscicoles de la réserve biologique de la Dombes. Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes et des Archéologues de l’Ain, 86, 11–41.
  • Keast A., 1984. The introduced aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum as a habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Can. J. Zool., 62, 1289–1303. [CrossRef]
  • Kornijów R. and Kairesalo T., 1994. Elodea canadensis sustains rich environment for macroinvertebrates. Verhandlungen International Vereinigung Limnologie, 25, 2270–2275.
  • Kornijów R., Gulati R.D. and van Donk E., 1990. Hydrophyte macroinvetebrate interactions in Zwemlust, a lake undergoing biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia, 200/201, 467–474. [CrossRef]
  • Linhart J., Uvira V., Rulik M. and Rulikova K., 1998. A study of the composition of phytomacrofauna in Batrachium aquatile vegetation. Acta Universitatis Palackionae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Biologica, 36, 39–60.
  • Lutz M., 2001. Les étangs de pisciculture en Europe Est-Centrale. Typologie des systèmes d’exploitation et impacts des modalités de gestion sur l’avifaune, Ph.D. thesis, University of Strasbourg.
  • Markwell K.A. and Fellows C.S., 2008. Habitat and biodiversity of on-farm water storages: A case study in South-East Queensland, Australia. Environ. Manag., 41, 234–249. [CrossRef]
  • Morin P.J., 1984. The impact of fish exclusion on the abundance and species composition of larval odonates: results of short-term experiments in a North Carolina form pond. Ecology, 65, 53–60. [CrossRef]
  • Morin A., Stephenson J., Skrike J. and Solimini A.G., 2004. Sieve retention probabilities of stream benthic invertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 383–391. [CrossRef]
  • Nicolet P., Biggs J., Fox G., Hodson M.J., Reynolds C., Whitfield M. and Williams P., 2004. The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales. Biol. Conserv., 120, 261–278. [CrossRef]
  • Oertli B., Auderset Joye D., Castella E., Juge R., Cambin D. and Lachavanne B., 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 104, 59–70. [CrossRef]
  • Osenberg C.W. and Mittebach G.G., 1989. Effects of body size on the predator-prey interaction between pumpkinseed sunfish and gastropods. Ecological Monograph, 59, 405–432. [CrossRef]
  • Papas Ph., 2007. Effects of macrophytes on aquatic invertebrates: a review, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Technical Report Series n°158.
  • Pechar L., 1995. Long-term changes in the fishpond management as “an unplanned ecosystem experiment”. Importance of zooplankton structure, nutrient and light for species composition of cyanobacterial blooms. Water Sci. Technol., 32, 187–196.
  • Reshetnikov A.N., 2003. The introduced fish, rotan (Percottus glenii) depresses populations of aquatic animals (macroinvertebrates, amphibians and a fish). Hydrobiologia, 510, 83–90. [CrossRef]
  • Scheffer M., 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia, 200/201, 475–487. [CrossRef]
  • Scheffer M., van Geest G.J., Zimmer K., Butler M.G., Hanson M.A., Declerck S. and De Meester L., 2006. Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richnes: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos, 112, 227–231. [CrossRef]
  • Sidinei T., Dibble E.D., Evangelista L.R., Higuti J. and Bini L.M., 2007. Influence of aquatic macrophyte habitat complexity on invertebrate abundance and richness in tropical lagoons. Freshw. Biol., 53, 358–367.
  • Sloey D.T., Schenk T. and Narf R., 1997. Distribution of aquatic invertebrates within a dense bed of Eurasian milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.). Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 12, 303–313. [CrossRef]
  • Spalek K., 2006. Threatened plant communities as an indicator of fishponds value: an example from Silesia (sw Poland). In: Nature Conservation. Concepts and Practice, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 195–198.
  • Strayer D.L., Lutz C., Halcom H.M., Munger K. and Shaw W.H., 2003. Invertebrate communities associated with a native (Vallisneria americana) and an alien (Trapa natans) macrophyte in a large river. Freshw. Biol., 48, 1938–1949. [CrossRef]
  • Tachet H., Richoux Ph., Bournaud M. and Usseglio-Polatera Ph., 2000. Invertébrés d’eau douce. Systématique, biologie, écologie, CNRS éd.
  • Thorp A.G., Jones R.C. and Kelso D.P., 1997. A comparison of water-column macroinvertebrate communities in beds of differing submersed aquatic vegetation in the total freshwater potomac river. Estuaries, 20, 86–95. [CrossRef]
  • Van Donk E., Gulati R.D., Iedema A. and Meulemans J.T., 1993. Macrophyte-related shifts in the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the differents trophic levels in a biomanipulated shallow lake. Hydrobiologia, 251, 19–26. [CrossRef]
  • Wildermuth H., 1992. Habitate und Habitatwahl der Grossen Moosjungfer (Leucorrhinia pectoralis) Charp. 1825 (Odonata, Libellulidae). Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz, 1, 3−21.
  • Wurts W.A., 2004. Organic fertization in culture ponds. World Aquaculture, 35, 64–65.
  • Zambrano L., Scheffer M. and Martinez-Ramos M., 2001. Catastrophic response of lakes to benthivorous fish introduction. Oikos, 94, 344–350. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.