Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 400, 2011
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2011023
Published online 25 April 2011
  • Araujo F.G., Pinto B.C.T. and Teixeira T.P., 2009. Longitudinal patterns of fish assemblages in a large tropical river in southeastern Brazil: evaluating environmental influences and some concepts in river ecology. Hydrobiologia, 618, 89–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown L.R., 2000. Fish communities and their associations with environmental variables, lower San Joaquin River drainage, California. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 57, 251–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen Y.Y., 1998. Fauna Sinica (Osteichthyes): Cypriniformes, II, Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Chu X.L., Zheng B.S. and Dai D.Y., 1999. Fauna Sinica (Osteichthyes): Siluriform, Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Ding R.H., 1994. The Fishes of Sichuan, China, Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology, Chengdu (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Eaton J.G. and Scheller R.M., 1996. Effects of climate warming on fish thermal habitat in streams of the United States. Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1109–1115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edds D.R., 1993. Fish assemblage structure and environmental correlates in Nepal’s Gandaki River. Copeia, 1, 48–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feyrer F. and Healey M.P., 2003. Fish community structure and environmental correlates in the highly altered southern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 66, 123–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fialho A.P., Oliveira L.G., Tejerina-Garro F.L. and de Mérona B., 2008. Fish-habitat relationship in a tropical river under anthropogenic influences. Hydrobiologia, 598, 315–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fu C.Z., Wu J.H., Chen J.K., Wu Q.H. and Lei G.C., 2003. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yangtze River basin of China: patterns, threats and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv., 12, 1649–1685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gasith A. and Resh V.H., 1999. Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Ann. Rev. Ecolog. Syst., 30, 51–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Godinho F.N., Ferreira M.T. and Santos J.M., 2000. Variation in fish community composition along an Iberian river basin from low to high discharge: relative contributions of environmental and temporal variables. Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 9, 22–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • He Y.F., Wang J.W., Lek S., Cao W.X. and Lek A., 2011. Structure of endemic fish assemblages in the upper Yangtze River Basin. River Res. Appl., 27, 59–75. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Hocutt C.H. and Stauffer J.R., 1975. Influence of gradient on the distribution of fishes in Conowingo Creek, Maryland and Pennsylvania. Chesap. Sci., 16, 143–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ibanez C., Oberdorff T., Teugels G., Mamononekene V., Lavoué S., Fermon Y., Paugy D. and Toham A.K., 2007. Fish assemblages structure and function along environmental gradients in rivers of Gabon (Africa). Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 16, 315–334 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson D.A., Peres-Neto P.R. and Olden J.D., 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities-the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lammert M. and Allan J.D., 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environ. Manage., 23, 257–270. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews W.J., 1998. Patterns in freshwater fish ecology, Chapman and Hall, Norwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews W.J. and Hill L.G., 1979. Influence of physico-chemical factors on habitat selection by red shiners, Notropis lutrensis (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Copeia, 1, 70–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oberdorff T., Pont D., Hugueny B. and Porcher J.P., 2002. Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of ‘river health’ in France. Freshw. Biol., 47, 1720–1734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Platts W.S., 1979. Relationships among stream order, fish populations, and aquatic geomorphology in an Idaho river drainage. Fisheries, 4, 5–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L.R. and Allan J.D., 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology, 76, 606–627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shahnawaz A., Venkateshwarlu M., Somashekar D.S. and Santosh K., 2010. Fish diversity with relation to water quality of Bhadra River of Western Ghats (INDIA). Environ. Monitor. Assess., 161, 83–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tejerina-Garro F.L., Fortin R. and Rodriguez M.A., 1998. Fish community structure in relation to environmental variation in floodplain lakes of the Araguaia River, Amazon Basin. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 51, 399–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak C.J.F. and Smilauer P., 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5), Ithaca, NY, Microcomputer Power. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu J.M., Wang Q.Q., Liu F., Liu C.C., Zhang F.T. and Wang J.W., 2010. Fish Resources of early life in Chishui section of the Chishui River. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 19, 1270–1276 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Wu L., 1989. The Fishes of Guizhou Province, Guizhou People’s Publishing House, Guiyang (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Yue P.Q., 2000. Fauna Sinica (Osteichthyes): Cypriniformes, III, Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.