Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 394-395, 2009
Regional European Crayfish Workshop: Future of Native Crayfish in Europe
Article Number 02
Number of page(s) 3
Published online 19 February 2010
  • Ballesteros I., Martín M.P. and Diéguez-Uribeondo J., 2006. First isolation of Aphanomyces frigidophilus (Saprolegniales) in Europe. Mycotaxon, 95, 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  • Ballesteros I., Martín M.P., Cerenius L., Söderhäll K., Tellería M.T. and Diéguez-Uribeondo J., 2007. Lack of specificity of the molecular diagnostic method for identification of Aphanomyces. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 385, 17–24. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cerenius L., Andersson G. and Söderhäll K., 2009. Aphanomyces astaci and crustaceans. In: Lamour K. and Kamoun S. (eds.), Oomycete Genetics and Genomics – Diversity, Interactions, and Research Tools, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  • Diéguez-Uribeondo J., Cerenius L., Dyková I., Gelder S., Henntonen P., Jiravanichpaisal P., Lom J. and Söderhäll K., 2006. Pathogens, parasites and ectocommensals. In: Souty-Grosset C., Holdich D.M., Noël P.Y., Reynolds J.D. and Haffner P. (eds.), Atlas of Crayfish in European, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, Collection Patrimoines Naturels. [Google Scholar]
  • Diéguez-Uribeondo J., García M.A., Cerenius L., Kozubíková E., Ballesteros I., Windels C., Weiland J., Kator H., Söderhäll K. and Martín M.P., 2009. Phylogenetic relationships among plant and animal parasites, and saprobionts in Aphanomyces (Oomycetes). Fungal Genet. Biol., 46, 365–376. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Edgerton B.F., Henttonen P., Jussila J., Mannonen A., Paasonen P., Taugbøl T., Edsman L. and Souty-Grosset C., 2004. Understanding the causes of disease in European freshwater crayfish. Conserv. Biol., 18, 1466–1474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hochwimmer G., Tober R., Bibars-Reiter R., Licek E. and Steinborn R., 2009. Identification of two GH18 chitinase family genes and their use as targets for detection of the crayfish-plague oomycete Aphanomyces astaci. BMC Microbiology, 9, 184. [Google Scholar]
  • Kozubíková E., Petrusek A., Filipová L., Kozák P., Ďuriš Z., Martín M.P., Diéguez-Uribeondo J. and Oidtmann B., 2009. Crayfish plague reservoirs: prevalence of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci in populations of invasive American crayfishes in the Czech Republic. Conserv. Biol., 23, 1204–1213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oidtmann B., Geiger S., Steinbauer P., Culas A. and Hoffmann R.W., 2006. Detection of Aphanomyces astaci in North American crayfish by polymerase chain reaction. Dis. Aquat. Org., 72, 53–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Söderhäll K. and Cerenius L., 1999. The crayfish plague fungus: Hystory and recent advances. Freshwater Crayfish, 12, 11–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Viljamaa-Dirks S. and Heinikainen S., 2006. Clinical evidence of a chronic crayfish plague (Aphanomyces astaci) infection in noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) populations, 16th Symposium of the International Association of Astacology, The Gold Coast, Queensland. [Google Scholar]
  • Vrålstad T., Knutsen A.K., Tengs T. and Holst-Jensen A., 2009. A quantitative TaqMan MGB real-time polymerase chain reaction based assay for detection of the causative agent of crayfish plague Aphanomyces astaci. Vet. Microbiol., 137, 146–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.