Insights from a nation-wide environmental relicensing of hydropower facilities in Sweden: a review of court verdicts from a biological perspective | Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems

Biological conservation, ecosystems restoration and ecological engineering

Open Access

Review

Issue		Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. Number 427, 2026 Biological conservation, ecosystems restoration and ecological engineering


Article Number		6
Number of page(s)		12
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2025034
Published online		05 February 2026

Acreman M, Arthington AH, Colloff MJ, Couch C, Crossman ND, Dyer F, Overton I, Pollino CA, Stewardson MJ, Young W. 2014. Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Front Ecol Environ 12: 466–473. [Google Scholar]
Albayrak I, Boes RM, Kriewitz-Byun CR, Peter A, Tullis BP. 2020. Fish guidance structures: hydraulic performance and fish guidance efficiencies. J Ecohydraulics 5: 113–131. [Google Scholar]
Algera DA, Rytwinski T, Taylor JJ, Bennett JR, Smokorowski KE, Harrison PM, Clarke KD, Enders EC, Power M, Bevelhimer MS, Cooke SJ. 2020. What are the relative risks of mortality and injury for fish during downstream passage at hydroelectric dams in temperate regions? A systematic review. Environ Evid 9:3. [Google Scholar]
Almeida RM, Schmitt RJP, Castelletti A, Flecker AS, Harou JJ, Heilpern SA, Kittner N, Kondolf GM, Opperman JJ, Shi Q, Gomes CP, McIntyre PB. 2022. Strategic planning of hydropower development: balancing benefits and socioenvironmental costs. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 56:101175. [Google Scholar]
Altanov VY, Jähnig SC, He F. 2025. A systematic map of hydropower impacts on megafauna at the land-water interface. Biol Conserv 305:111092. [Google Scholar]
Arheimer B, Lindström G. 2014. Electricity vs Ecosystems – understanding and predicting hydropower impact on Swedish river flow. Proc IAHS 364:313319. [Google Scholar]
Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ. 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16:13111318. [Google Scholar]
Benitez J-P, Sonny D, Colson D, Dierckx A, Ovidio M. 2025. Hydroelectric power plant and upstream fish migration: evaluation of the efficiency of a behavioural barrier. J Ecohydraulics 0(0): 1–14. [Google Scholar]
Birnie-Gauvin K, Tummers JS, Lucas MC, Aarestrup K. 2017. Adaptive management in the context of barriers in European freshwater ecosystems. J Environ Manag 204(Part 1): 436–441. [Google Scholar]
Bunt C, Castro-Santos T, Haro A. 2012. Performance of fish passage structures at upstream barriers to migration. River Res Appl 28: 457–478. [Google Scholar]
Calles O, Degerman E, Wickström H, Christiansson J, Gustafsson S, Näslund I. 2013. Anordningar för upp-och nedströmspassage av fisk vid vattenanläggningar – Underlag till vägledning om lämpliga försiktighetsmått och bästa möjliga teknik för vattenkraft. Havs-och vattenmyndighetens rapport 2013:14. Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, Gothenburg. (in Swedish, with English summary) [Google Scholar]
Calles O, Elghagen J, Nyqvist D, Harbicht A, Nilsson PA. 2021. Efficient and timely downstream passage solutions for European silver eels at hydropower dams. Ecol Eng 170:106350. [Google Scholar]
Castro-Santos T, Cotel A, Webb P. 2009. Fishway evaluations for better bioengineering: an integrative approach. Am Fish Soc Symp 69: 557–575. [Google Scholar]
County Administrative Boards (Dalarna-, Gävleborg- and Uppsala Counties). 2022. Omprövning av vattenkraften – Beskrivning av Dalälvens huvudavrinningsområde (Dno: 580–2022-1). Falun: County Administrative Board of Dalarna County. https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/download/18.8cd5a1b19362fb4fc2221d/1732536930547/Ompr%25C3%25B6vning%2520av%2520vattenkraften%2520Beskrivning%2520av%2520Dal%25C3%25A4lvens%2520huvudavrinningsomr%25C3%25A5de.pdf (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
de Bie J, Peirson G, Kemp PS. 2018. Effectiveness of horizontally and vertically oriented wedge-wire screens to guide downstream moving juvenile chub (Squalius cephalus). Ecol Eng 123: 127–134. [Google Scholar]
Fjeldstad H.P, Pulg U, Forseth T. 2018. Safe two-way migration for salmonids and eel past hydropower structures in Europe: a review and recommendations for best-practice solutions. Marine and Freshwater Research 69:1834–1847. [Google Scholar]
FAO/DVWK (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/ Deutschen Verbandes für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e. V.). 2002. Fish passes: design, dimensions, and monitoring. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
Fryxell KA, Jansson M, Källström V. 1931. Sveriges utbyggda vattenkraft år 1930. Specialundersökning av Kommerskollegium. Stockholm: Kungl. Boktryckeriet. P. A. Norstedt & söner. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
Göthe E, Degerman E, Sandin L, Segersten J, Tamario C, McKie BG. 2019. Flow restoration and the impacts of multiple stressors on fish communities in regulated rivers. J Appl Ecol 56: 1687–1702. [Google Scholar]
Government Offices of Sweden. 2024. Förutsättningarna för vattenkraftens omprövning förbättras. Press release 2024-08-22. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden. https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2024/08/forutsattningarna-for-vattenkraftens-omprovning-forbattras2/ (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
Hagelin A, Museth J, Greenberg LA, Kraabøl M, Calles O, Bergman E. 2019. Upstream fishway performance by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) spawners at complex hydropower dams-is prior experience a success criterion? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 78: 124–134. [Google Scholar]
Harbicht AB, Watz J, Nyqvist D, Virmaja T, Carlsson N, Aldvén D, Nilsson PA, Calles O. 2022. Guiding migrating salmonid smolts: experimentally assessing the performance of angled and inclined screens with varying gap widths. Ecol Eng 174:106438. [Google Scholar]
He F, Zarfl C, Tockner K, Olden JD, Campos Z, Muniz F, Svenning J-C, Jähnig SC. 2024. Hydropower impacts on riverine biodiversity. Nat Rev Earth Environ 5: 755–772. [Google Scholar]
ICES WGEEL 2024. Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL). ICES Scientific Reports. 6:90. 146 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.27233457. [Google Scholar]
Jakobsson E. 2002. Industrialization of rivers: a water system approach to hydropower development. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy 14: 41–56. [Google Scholar]
Jaktén Langert W, Käll F, Adill A. 2025. Biologisk recipientkontroll för Ringhals kärnkraftverk. Aqua notes, 2025:9. [Google Scholar]
Jones PE, Champneys T, Vevers J, Börger L, Svendsen J-C, Consuegra S, Jones J, Garcia de Leaniz C. 2021. Selective effects of small barriers on riverresident fish. J Appl Ecol 58: 1487–1498. [Google Scholar]
Jonsson B, Waples RS, Friedland K. 1999. Extinction considerations for diadromous fishes. ICES J Mar Sci 56: 405–409. [Google Scholar]
Katopodis C, Williams JG. 2012. The development of fish passage research in a historical context. Ecol Eng 48: 8–18. [Google Scholar]
Kiernan JD, Moyle PB, Crain PK. 2012. Restoring native fish assemblages to a regulated California stream using the natural flow regime concept. Ecol Appl 22: 1472–1482. [Google Scholar]
Knott J, Müller M, Pander J, Geist J. 2023. Bigger than expected: species-and size-specific passage of fish through hydropower screens. Ecol Eng 188:106883. [Google Scholar]
Köhler B, Ruud A. 2019. How are environmental measures realized in European hydropower? A case-study of Austria, Sweden and Switzerland. HydroCen Report 6. Norwegian Research Centre for Hydropower Technology, Trondheim. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2603532 [Google Scholar]
Lenvin F. 2022. Omprövning av vattenverksamhet: Effektivitet och moderna miljövillkor på bekostnad av vattenkraftsproduktion? Bachelor thesis. Karlstad: Karlstad Business School, Karlstad University. https://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1730265/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Google Scholar]
Li P, Zhu DZ, Li R, Wang Y, Crossman JA, Kuhn WL. 2022. Production of total dissolved gas supersaturation at hydropower facilities and its transport: a review. Water Res 223:119012. [Google Scholar]
Limburg KE, Waldman JR. 2009. Dramatic declines in North Atlantic diadromous fishes. BioScience 59: 955–965. [Google Scholar]
Lindblom E, Holmgren K. 2016. Den småskaliga vattenkraftens miljöpåverkan och samhällsnytta. En syntesstudie. IVL Rapport B 2258. IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, Stockholm. (In Swedish) https://www.ivl.se/download/18.34244ba71728fcb3f3f8bd/1591705067948/B2258.pdf [Google Scholar]
Lindström A, Ruud A. 2017. Whose hydropower? From conflictual management into an era of reconciling environmental concerns; a retake of hydropower governance towards win-win solutions? Sustainability 9:1262. [Google Scholar]
Lucas M, Baras E, Thom TJ, Duncan A, Slavik O. 2001. Migration of freshwater fishes. Oxford: Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
Löfgren S, Kahlert M, Johansson M, Bergengren J. 2009. Classification of two Swedish forest streams in accordance with the European Union Water Framework Directive. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 38: 394–400. [Google Scholar]
Malm Renöfält B, Jansson R, Nilsson C. 2010. Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55: 49–67. [Google Scholar]
Mallen-Cooper M. 1999. Developing fishways for non-salmonid fishes; a case study from the Murray River in Australia. In: Odeh M, ed. Innovations in Fish Passage Technology, Bethesda MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 173–195. [Google Scholar]
Nilsson C, Jansson R, Zinko U. 1997. Long-term responses of river-margin vegetation to water-level regulation. Science 276: 798–800. [Google Scholar]
Noonan MJ, Grant JW, Jackson CD. 2012. A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish Fish 13: 450–464. [Google Scholar]
Nyqvist D, Greenberg LA, Goerig E, Calles O, Bergman E, Ardren WR, Castro-Santos T. 2016. Migratory delay leads to reduced passage success of Atlantic salmon smolts at a hydroelectric dam. Ecol Freshw Fish 26: 707–718. [Google Scholar]
Nyqvist D, Nilsson PA, Alenäs I, Elghagen J, Hebrand M, Karlsson S, Kläppe S, Calles O. 2017. Upstream and downstream passage of migrating adult Atlantic salmon: remedial measures improve passage performance at a hydropower dam. Ecol Eng 102: 331–343. [Google Scholar]
Nyqvist D, Elghagen J, Heiss M, Calles O. 2018. An angled rack with a bypass and a nature-like fishway pass Atlantic salmon smolts downstream at a hydropower dam. Mar Freshw Res 69: 1894–1904. [Google Scholar]
Nyqvist D, Calles O, Carlson P, Holmgren K, Malm-Renöfält B, Widén Å, Bergengren J, Näslund J. 2025. Balancing hydropower production and ecologyecological impacts, mitigation measures, and programmatic monitoring. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 426:24. [Google Scholar]
Näslund J, Wickström H, Degerman E, Sundin J. 2022. Negative influence of a threatened species on ecological status classification: a case study of the influence of European eel within the Swedish fish index VIX. Ecol Indic 144:109537. [Google Scholar]
Ödmann E, Bucht E, Nordström M. 1982. Vildmarken och välfärden. Stockholm: Liber Förlag. (in Swedish) https://libris.kb.se/bib/7267735 [Google Scholar]
Össbo Å. 2023a. Back to square one. Green sacrifice zones in Sápmi and Swedish policy responses to energy emergencies. Arct Rev Law Polit 14: 112–134. [Google Scholar]
Össbo Å. 2023b. Hydropower company sites: a study of Swedish settler colonialism. Settl Colon Stud 13: 115–132. [Google Scholar]
Perers R, Lundin U, Leijon M. 2007. Development of synchronous generators for Swedish hydropower: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11: 1008–1017. [Google Scholar]
Pettersson Å, Bladh J. 2024. Låt vattenkraften fortsätta leverera. Dagens Industri 2024–11-27 (updated 2024–11-28). https://www.di.se/debatt/lat-vattenkraften-fortsatta-leverera/ (Accessed: 2025-04-18) (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
Pike C, Crook V, Gollock M. 2020. Anguilla anguilla. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species e.T60344A152845178. [Google Scholar]
Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O’Keeffe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55: 147–170. [Google Scholar]
Poole GC, Berman CH. 2001. An ecological perspective on in-stream temperature: natural heat dynamics and mechanisms of human-caused thermal degradation. Environ Manag 27: 787–802. [Google Scholar]
Riksdag of Sweden. 2009. Offentlighets- och sekretesslag (2009:400). Svensk författningssamling SFS nr: 2009:400. Stockholm: Justitiedepartementet L6, Sveriges riksdag. (In Swedish) https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/offentlighets-och-sekretesslag-2009400_sfs-2009-400/ [Google Scholar]
Rogosch JS, Boehm HIA, Tingley RW, Wright KD, Webb EB, Paukert CP. 2024. Evaluating effectiveness of restoration to address current stressors to riverine fish. Freshw Biol 69: 607–622. [Google Scholar]
Sandberg S. 2024. Fortums syn på regeringens förslag till omprövning av svensk vattenkraft. Solna: Fortum. https://www.fortum.com/se/om-oss/nyheter/blogg/Fortums-syn-p%C3%A5-regeringens-f%C3%B6rslag-till-ompr%C3%B6vning-av-svensk-vattenkraft (Accessed: 2025-04-18) (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
Schäfer T. 2021. Legal protection schemes for free-flowing rivers in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 13:6423. [Google Scholar]
Schiavon A, Comoglio C, Candiotto A, Spairani M, Hölker F, Tarena F, Watz J, Nyqvist D. 2024. Navigating the drought: upstream migration of a small-sized Cypriniformes (Telestes muticellus) in response to drying in a partially intermittent mountain stream. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 425:6. [Google Scholar]
Schmutz S, Mielach C. 2013. Measures for ensuring fish migration at transversal structures. Vienna: ICPDR-International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River. https://www.icpdr.org/resources/measures-ensuring-fish-migration-transverse-structures [Google Scholar]
Silva AT, Lucas MC, Castro-Santos T, Katopodis C, Baumgartner LJ, Thiem JD, Aarestrup K, Pompeu PS, O’Brien GC, Braun DC, Burnett NJ, Zhu DZ, Fjeldstad H-P, Forseth T, Rajaratnam N, Williams JG, Cooke SJ. 2018. The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. Fish Fish 19:340362. [Google Scholar]
Sjöholm J, Käll F. 2024. Uppvandring av ålyngel i Viskan-Årsrapport för 2023. Aqua Notes, 2024: 30. Department of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54612/a.2goiejce1u (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
Streib L, Kattwinkel M, Heer H, Ruzika S, Schäfer RB. 2020. How does habitat connectivity influence the colonization success of a hemimetabolous aquatic insect? A modeling approach. Ecol Modell 416:108909. [Google Scholar]
Stoffers T, Altermatt F, Baldan D, Bilous O, Borgwardt F, Buijse AD, Bondar-Kunze E, Cid N, Erős T, Ferreira MT, Funk T, Haidvogl G, Hohensinner S, Kowal J, Nagelkerke LA, Neuburg J, Peller T, Schmutz S, Singer GA, Unfer G, Vitecek S, Jähnig SC, Hein T. 2024. Reviving Europe’s rivers: seven challenges in the implementation of the nature restoration law to restore free-flowing rivers. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 11: e1717. [Google Scholar]
Svensson BS. 2000. Hydropower and instream flow requirements for fish in Sweden. Fish Manag Ecol 7: 145–155. [Google Scholar]
SwAM (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management). 2024. Strömmen- Fakta om nationell plan för moderna miljövillkor för vattenkraften i Sverige. Gothenburg: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. https://havbipub.havochvatten.se/dv/ui/project.jsp?pageid=visualAnalyzer&reportmode=full&reportpath=%2F%40Catalog%2Fshared%2FHemsidan%2FNAP%2FDV%2FStr%C3%B6mmen%20 (Accessed: 2025-02-01) (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
SwAM (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management). 2020. Vägledning för fisk-och faunapassager. Gothenburg: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. https://www.havochvatten.se/arbete-i-vatten-och-energiproduktion/vattenkraftverk-och-dammar/miljo–och-skyddsatgarder/vagledning-for-fisk–och-faunapassager.html(Accessed 2025-04-21) (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
SwAM (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management), SEA (Swedish Energy Agency), SvK (Svenksa kraftnät). 2019. Förslag till nationell plan för omprövning av vattenkraft. Med beskrivning av vattenmiljö och effektiv tillgång till vattenkraftsel samt identifierade behov för fortsatt arbete. Gothenburg: Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
Swedish National Heritage Board. 2021. Dammar som fornlämning – Vägledning för tillämpning av fornlämningsbegreppet enligt kulturmiljölagen (1988:950) samt allmänt om hantering av dammar i KML- och MB-beslut. Visby: Swedish National Heritage Board. [Google Scholar]
Tomanova S, Courret D, Richard S, Tedesco PA, Mataix V, Frey A, Lagarrigue T, Chatellier L, Tétard S. 2021. Protecting the downstream migration of salmon smolts from hydroelectric power plants with inclined racks and optimized bypass water discharge. J Environ Manag 284:112012. [Google Scholar]
Tomanova S, Tissot L, Tétard S, Richard S, Mercier O, Mataix V, Frey A, Lagarrigue T, Tedesco PA, Courret D. 2023. Bypass discharge, approach velocities and bar spacing: the three key-parameters to efficiently protect silver eels with inclined racks. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 424:15. [Google Scholar]
Watz J, Nilsson P, Degerman E, Tamario C, Calles O. 2019. Climbing the ladder: an evaluation of three different anguillid eel climbing substrata and placement of upstream passage solutions at migration barriers. Anim Conserv 22: 452–462. [Google Scholar]
Weber C, Åberg U, Buijse AD, Hughes FMR, McKie BG, Piégay H, Roni P, Vollenwieder S, Haertel-Borer S. 2018. Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 5: e1257. [Google Scholar]
Westerberg H, Wickström H. 2016. Stock assessment of eels in the Baltic: reconciling survey estimates to achieve quantitative analysis. ICES J Mar Sci 73: 75–83. [Google Scholar]
Widén Å, Ahonen J, Renöfält BM, Jansson R. 2022a. Ljungan inför miljöprövning av vattenkraften: naturvärden, flöden och strömhabitat samt möjliga miljönyttor. Report Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
Widén Å, Malm Renöfält B, Degerman E, Wisaeus D, Jansson R. 2022b. Environmental flow scenarios for a regulated river system: projecting catchmentwide ecosystem benefits and consequences for hydroelectric production. Water Resour Res 58: e2021WR030297. [Google Scholar]
Widén Å, Segersten J, Donadi S, Degerman E, Malm-Renöfält B, Karlsson Tiselius A, Lundbäck S, Jansson R. 2022c. Sveriges torrfåror: geografi, naturvärden och metoder för miljöförbättringar. Umeå, Sweden: Report Umeå University. [Google Scholar]
Widén Å, Malm-Renöfält B, Jansson R. 2023. Restaurering av Juktån. Umeå, Sweden: Report Umeå University. [Google Scholar]
Williamson MJ, Allen BE, Brand JA, Pike C, Sergeant C, Grzesiok C, Wright RM, Piper AT. 2025. Improving eel pass efficiency: the role of crest shape and water flow in facilitating upstream juvenile eel migration. J Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.70017 [Google Scholar]
Zaidel PA, Roy AH, Houle KM, Lambert B, Letcher BH, Nislow KH, Smith C. 2021. Impacts of small dams on stream temperature. Ecol Indic 120:106878. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.