| Issue |
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 427, 2026
Biological conservation, ecosystems restoration and ecological engineering
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 6 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2025034 | |
| Published online | 05 February 2026 | |
Review Paper
Insights from a nation-wide environmental relicensing of hydropower facilities in Sweden: a review of court verdicts from a biological perspective
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Resources, Stångholmsvägen 2, SE-17893, Drottningholm, Sweden
* Corresponding authors: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
16
November
2025
Accepted:
21
December
2025
Abstract
Hydropower, utilized for centuries, is promoted globally as renewable energy. The many ecological costs associated with hydropower facilities can be mitigated, but the perceived socio-economic benefits often outweigh environmental concern. The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD), implemented in 2000, established a framework for community action in the field of water policy. It constitutes an instrument to compel hydropower facilities to align with environmental requirements. Based on the WFD and national law, a National Plan for Modern Environmental Conditions for Hydropower (NAP) was formulated in Sweden to renegotiate the environmental permits of around 2000 hydropower plants and dams. The NAP process commenced in 2022 and is estimated to last approximately 20 year. In this review, we assessed the 33 court cases completed until the end of 2024, out of which 22 resulted in permit withdrawal and dam removal, while 11 received decisions requiring remedial measures. The primary focus of remedial measures was re-establishing longitudinal connectivity; other environmental aspects received less attention, and monitoring requirements were almost non-existent. We recommend measures using adaptive design, prioritizing functionality, and monitoring over detailed technical specifications. In addition, greater attention should be given also to aquatic habitats in affected reaches: addressing e.g., flow, water levels, and temperature. In conclusion, this nation-wide process provides a unique opportunity to implement measures that could benefit entire riverine ecosystems.
Key words: Dam removal / environmental law / fish migration / hydroelectric production / river connectivity
© J. Sundin et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
