Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 427, 2026
Freshwater ecosystems management strategies
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2026001
Published online 02 February 2026
  • Abangan AS, Kopp D, Faillettaz R. 2023. Artificial intelligence for fish behavior recognition may unlock fishing gear selectivity. Front Mar Sci 2023: 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Ainsworth RF, Cowx IG, Funge-Smith SJ. 2023. Putting the fish into inland fisheries – a global allocation of historic inland fish catch. Fish Fish 24: 263–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Almero VJD, Palconit MGB, Alejandrino JD, Concepcion RS, Vicerra RRP, Sybingco E, Bandala AA, Dadios EP. 2021. Development of a raspberry Pi-based underwater camera system for inland freshwater aquaculture, in 2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), 2021, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • Andres KJ, Sethi SA, Duskey E, Lepak JM, Rice AN, Estabrook BJ, Fitzpatrick KB, George E, Marcy-Quay B, Paufve MR, Perkins K, Scofield AE. 2020. Seasonal habitat use indicates that depth may mediate the potential for invasive round goby impacts in inland lakes. Freshw Biol. 65: 1337–1347. [Google Scholar]
  • Bajaba SZ, Hugo S, van Wyk AJ, Marr SM, Vine NG, Weyl OLF. 2021. Can bait improve the efficiency of underwater video monitoring of fish in headwater streams? A case study from the Rondegat River, South Africa, Afr J Aquat Sci 46: 246–249. [Google Scholar]
  • Banda M, Kanyerere G, Rusuwa B. 2005. The status of the chambo in Malawi: fisheries and biology, in The Chambo Restoration Strategic Plan. WorldFish Center Conference Proceedings Vol. 71, 112 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbarossa V, Bosmans J, Wanders N, King H, Bierkens MFP, Huijbregts MAJ, Schipper AM. 2021. Threats of global warming to the world's freshwater fishes. Nat Commun 12: 1701. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beng KC, Corlett RT. 2020. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodivers Conserv 29: 2089–2121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bergman DA, Moore PA. 2003 Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, orconectes rusticus and orconectes virilis, in different habitats. Biol Bull 205: 26–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Block BA. 2005. Physiological ecology in the 21st century: advancements in biologging science. Integr Comp Biol 45: 305–320. [Google Scholar]
  • Boavida I, Costa MJ, Portela MM, Godinho F, Tuhtan J, Pinheiro A. 2021. Do cyprinid fish use lateral flow-refuges during hydropeaking? River Res Appl 39: 554-560. [Google Scholar]
  • Borgstrøm R, Opdahl J, Svenning MA, Länsman M, Orell P, Niemelä E, Erkinaro J, Dempson JB. 2010. Temporal changes in ascendance and in-season exploitation of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, inferred by a video camera array. Fish Manag Ecol 17: 454–463. [Google Scholar]
  • Boussarie G, Teichert N, Lagarde R, Ponton D. 2016. BichiCAM, an underwater automated video tracking system for the study of migratory dynamics of benthic diadromous species in streams. River Res Applic 32: 1392–1401. [Google Scholar]
  • Broom CJ, Weyl OLF, South J. 2022. Habitat associations of imperilled fishes after conservation intervention in the Cape Fold Ecoregion, South Africa. J Fish Biol 1: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Broom CJ, Weyl OLF, South J. 2023. Fish community, stressors and conservation in the Rondegat River (Olifants-Doring system, Western Cape, South Africa). Fishes Mediterranean Environ 2023.001: 21. [Google Scholar]
  • Bürgi K, Bouveyron C, Lingrand D, Derijard B, Precioso F, Sabourault C. 2025. Towards a fully automated underwater census for fish assemblages in the Mediterranean Sea. Ecol Inform 85: 102959. [Google Scholar]
  • Camacho AM, Perotto-Baldivieso HL, Tanner EP, Montemayor AL, Gless WA, Exum J, Yamashita TJ, Foley AM, DeYoung RW, Nelson SD. 2023. The broad scale impact of climate change on planning aerial wildlife surveys with drone-based thermal cameras. Sci Rep 13: 4455. [Google Scholar]
  • Cappo M, Harvey ES, Shortis MR. 2006. Counting and measuring fish with baited video techniques-an overview, in AFSB Conference and Workshop Cutting-Edge Technologies in Fish and Fisheries Science. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Caravaggi A, Banks PB, Burton AC, Finlay CMV, Haswell PM, Hayward MW, Rowcliffe MJ, Wood MD. 2017. A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 3: 109–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Castañeda RA, Mandrak NE, Barrow S, Weyl OLF. 2020. Occupancy dynamics of rare cyprinids after invasive fish eradication. Aquat Conserv: March Freshw Ecosyst 30: 1424–1436. [Google Scholar]
  • Cerato S, Davis AR, Coleman D, Wong MLY. 2019. Reversal of competitive dominance between invasive and native freshwater crayfish species under near-future elevated water temperature. 178. Aquat Invasions 14: 518–530. [Google Scholar]
  • Chaudoin AL, Feuerbacher OG, Bonar SA, Barrett PJ. 2015. Underwater videography outperforms above-water videography and in-person surveys for monitoring the spawning of devils hole pupfish. North Am J Fish Manag 35: 1252–1262. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Schreer JF. 2002. Determination of fish community composition in the untempered regions of a thermal effluent canal – the efficacy of a fixed underwater videography system. Environ Monit Assess 73: 109–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Schramm HL. 2007. Catch-and-release science and its application to conservation and management of recreational fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 73–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crook D, Wedd D, Adair B, King A, Mooney T, Harford A, Humphrey C. 2021. Fish migration in Magela Creek and potential impacts of mining-related solutes. Darwin, Australia: Charles Darwin University, ISBN 8-1-922684-14-1. [Google Scholar]
  • Dadios EP, Almero VDJ, Concepcion II R, Vicerra RRP, Bandala AA, Sybingco E. 2022. Low-cost underwater camera: design and development. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform 26: 851–858. [Google Scholar]
  • Delisle ZJ, Flaherty EA, Nobbe MR, Wzientek CM, Swihart RK. 2021. Next-generation camera trapping: systematic review of historic trends suggests keys to expanded research applications in ecology and conservation. Front Ecol Evol 9: 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • de Visser C, Johansson LF, Kulkarni P, Mei H, Neerincx P, van der Velde KJ, Horvatovich P, van Gool AJ, Swertz MA, Hoen PAC, Niehues A. 2023. Ten quick tips for building FAIR workflows. PLOS Comput Biol 19(9): e1011369. [Google Scholar]
  • Ditria EM, Sievers M, Lopez-Marcano S, Jinks EL, Connolly RM. 2020. Deep learning for automated analysis of fish abundance: the benefits of training across multiple habitats. Environ Monit Assess 192: 698. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunkley K, Dunkley A, Drewnicki J, Keith I, Herbert-Read JE. 2023. A low-cost, long-running, open-source stereo camera for tracking aquatic species and their behaviours. Methods Ecol Evol 14: 2549–2556. [Google Scholar]
  • Ebner BC, Fulton CJ, Cousins S, Donaldson J, Kennard MJ, Meynecke J, Schaffer J. 2015. Filming and snorkelling as visual techniques to survey fauna in difficult to access tropical rainforest streams. Mar Freshw Res 66: 120–126. [Google Scholar]
  • Ebner BC, Donaldson J, Allen GR, Keith P. 2017. Visual census, photographic records and the trial of a video network provide first evidence of the elusive Sicyopterus cynocephalus in Australia. Cybium 41: 117–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Ellender BR, Wasserman RJ, Chakona A, Skelton PH, Weyl OLF. 2017. A review of the biology and status of Cape Fold Ecoregion freshwater fishes. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 27(4): 867–879. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernández MV, Macchi PJ, Sosnovsky A, Zattara EE, Lallement ME, Milano D. 2021. Spawning aggregation behaviour in the Creole perch, Percichthys trucha (Percichthyidae): a target species for conservation. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 31(11): 3248–3260. [Google Scholar]
  • Fetterplace LC, Ljungberg P, Benavente Norrman E, Bohlin F, Sörman L, Johannesson P, Rooth D, Königson S. 2023. AquaticVID: a low cost, extended battery life, plug-and-go video system for aquatic research. Res Ideas Outcomes 9: e114134. [Google Scholar]
  • Feyrer F, Portz D, Odum D, Newman KB, Sommer T, Contreras D, Baxter R, Slater SB, Sereno D, Nieuwenhuyse EV. 2013. SmeltCam: underwater video codend for trawled nets with an application to the distribution of the imperiled delta smelt. PLoS ONE 8(7): e67829. [Google Scholar]
  • Fleissner ER, Putland RL, Mensinger AF. 2022. The effect of boat sound on freshwater fish behavior in public (motorized) and wilderness (nonmotorized) lakes. Environ Biol Fish 105: 1065–1079. [Google Scholar]
  • Friard O, Gamba M. 2016. BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7: 1325–1330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Friesen RG, Chivers DP. 2006. Underwater video reveals strong avoidance of chemical alarm cues by prey fishes. Ethology 112: 339–345. [Google Scholar]
  • Glassman DM, Chhor A, Vermaire JC, Bennett JR, Cooke SJ. 2022. Does bait type and bait container configuration influence the performance of remote underwater video systems in temperate freshwater lakes for assessing fish community structure? Hydrobiologia 849: 1981–1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Groves PA, Chandler JA. 1999. Spawning habitat used by fall chinook salmon in the Snake River. North Am J Fish Manag 19: 912–922. [Google Scholar]
  • Halafo JS, Hecky RE, Taylor WD. 2004. The artisanal fishery of Metangula, Lake Malawi/Niassa, East Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 29: 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannweg B, Marr SM, Bloy LE, Weyl OLF. 2020a. Habitat utilisation of Pseudobarbus afer and Sandelia capensis in headwaters of the Swartkops River, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 45: 364–371. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannweg B, Marr SM, Bloy LE, Weyl OLF. 2020b. Using action cameras to estimate the abundance and habitat use of threatened fish in clear headwater streams. Afr J Aquat Sci 45: 372–377. [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson KC, Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Philipp DP. 2007. Effects of different angling practices on post-release behaviour of nest-guarding male black bass, Micropterus spp. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey ES, McLean DL, Frusher S, Haywood MDD, Newman SJ, Williams A. 2013. The use of BRUVs as a tool for assessing marine fisheries and ecosystems: a review of the hurdles and potential. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, and The University of Western Australia, 2012. ISBN: 978-1-74052-265-6. [Google Scholar]
  • Harwood M, Stebbing PD, Dunn AM, Cole ZK, Bradbeer SJ, Aston B, South J. 2025. Rapid assessment of population dynamics and monitoring methods for invasive narrow clawed crayfish Pontastacus leptodactylus in a freshwater reservoir. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 426: 22. [Google Scholar]
  • Haubrock PJ, Ahmed DA, Cuthbert RN, Stubbington R, Domisch S, Marquez JR, Beidas A, Amatulli G, Kiesel J, Shen LQ, Soto I, Angeler DG, Bonada N, Cañedo-Argüelles M, Csabai Z, Datry T, de Eyto E, Dohet A, Drohan E, England J, Feio MJ, Forio MAE, Goethals P, Grad W, Heino J, Hudgins EJ, Jähnig SC, Johnson RK, Larrañaga A, Leitner P, L'Hoste L, Lizee M, Maire A, Rasmussen JJ, Schäfer RB, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Vannevel R, Várbíró G, Wiberg-Larsen P, Haase P. 2022. Invasion impacts and dynamics of a European-wide introduced species. Glob Change Biol 28: 4620–4632. [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins PR, Hortle KG, Phommanivong S, Singsua Y. 2018. Underwater video monitoring of fish passage in the Mekong River at Sadam Channel, Khone Falls, Laos. River Res Applic 34: 232–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Hitt NP, Rogers KM, Snyder CD, Dolloff CA. 2021. Comparison of underwater video with electrofishing and dive counts for stream fish abundance estimation. Trans Am Fish Soc 150: 24–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holubová M, Čech M, Vašek M, Peterka J. 2019. Density dependent attributes of fish aggregative behaviour. PeerJ 7: e6378. [Google Scholar]
  • Hopper GW. 2019. Stream flow mediates biomass, associations, and nutrient cycling of dominant animal functional groups (Unpublished doctoral thesis). USA: Kansas State University. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson PN, Rayton MD, Nass BL, Arterburn JE. 2007. Enumeration of salmonids in the okanogan basin using underwater video, Technical Report, US Department of Energy [https://www.cbfish.org/Document.mvc/Viewer/P105814] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson NS, Higgs D, Binder TR, Marsden JE, Buchinger T, Brege L, Bruning T, Farha S, Krueger CC. 2018. Evidence of sound production by spawning lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in lakes Huron and Champlain. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 75(3): 429–438. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones RE, Griffin RA, Rees SC, Unsworth RKF. 2019. Improving visual biodiversity assessments of motile fauna in turbid aquatic environments. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 17: 544–554. [Google Scholar]
  • Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Mehler K, Hinchey EK, Wick M, Bakowska M, Mrozinska N. 2021. Rapid assessment of Dreissena population in Lake Erie using underwater videography. Hydrobiologia 848: 2421–2436. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelaher BP, Peddemors VM, Hoade B, Colefax AP, Butcher PA. 2019. Comparison of sampling precision for nearshore marine wildlife using unmanned and manned aerial surveys. J Unmanned Veh Syst 8(1): 30–43. [Google Scholar]
  • King AJ, George A, Buckle DJ, Novak PA, Fulton CJ. 2018. Efficacy of remote underwater video cameras for monitoring tropical wetland fishes. Hydrobiologia 807: 145–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Langlois T, Goetze J, Bond T, Monk J, Abesamis RA, Asher J, Barrett N, Bernard ATF, Bouchet PJ, Birt MJ, Cappo M, Currey-Randall LM, Driessen D, Fairclough DV, Fullwood LAF, Gibbons BA, Harasti D, Heupel MR, Hicks J, Holmes TH, Huveneers C, Ierodiaconou D, Jordan A, Knott NA, Lindfield S, Malcolm HA, McLean D, Meekan M, Miller D, Mitchell PJ, Newman SJ, Radford B, Rolim FA, Saunders BJ, Stowar M, Smith ANH, Travers MJ, Wakefield CB, Whitmarsh SK, Williams J, Harvey ES. 2020. A field and video annotation guide for baited remote underwater stereo-video surveys of demersal fish assemblages. Methods Ecol Evol 11: 1401–1409. [Google Scholar]
  • Lennox RJ, Whoriskey FG, Verhelst P, Vandergoot CS, Soria M, Reubens J, Rechisky EL, Power M, Murray T, Mulder I, Markham JL, Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Lindley ST, Knott NA, Kessel ST, Iverson S, Huveneers C, Heidemeyer M, Harcourt R, Griffin LP, Friess C, Filous A, Fetterplace LC, Danylchuk AJ, Daly R, Cowley P, Cooke SJ, Chávez EJ, Blaison A, Whoriskey K. 2024. Globally coordinated acoustic aquatic animal tracking reveals unexpected, ecologically important movements across oceans, lakes and rivers. Ecography 2024: e06801. [Google Scholar]
  • Limaye S. 2019. Monitoring long island alewife populations: evaluating the efficiency of a new fishway at beaver lake in Mill Neck, NY (Unpublished masters thesis). USA: Hofstra University. [Google Scholar]
  • Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE. 2010. The science and application of ecological monitoring, Biol Conserv 143(6): 1317–1328. [Google Scholar]
  • Lindenmayer DB, Lavery T, Scheele BC. 2022. Why we need to invest in large-scale, long-term monitoring programs in landscape ecology and conservation biology. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 7: 137–146. [Google Scholar]
  • Lintermans M, Thiem J, Broadhurst B, Ebner BC, Clear R, Starrs D, Frawley K, Norris R. 2013. Constructed homes for threatened fishes in the Cotter River catchment: Phase 1 Report, ACTEW Corporation [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245026008_Constructed_homes_for_threatened_fishes_in_the_ Cotter_River_catchment_Phase_1_Report]. [Google Scholar]
  • Loffredo JR. 2018. Spatial and food web dynamics of non-native northern crayfish Orconectes virilis in Buffalo Lake, WA (Unpublished masters thesis). USA: Washington State University. [Google Scholar]
  • Longo GO, Hay ME, Ferreira CEL, Floeter SR. 2018 Trophic interactions across 61 degrees of latitude in the Western Atlantic. Global Ecol Biogeogr 28: 107–117. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopez LK, Hendry K, Wong MY, Davis AR. 2019. Insight into invasion: interactions between a critically endangered and invasive crayfish. Austral Ecol 44: 78–85. [Google Scholar]
  • MacNeil MA, Chapman DD, Heupel M, Simpfendorfer CA, Heithaus M, Meekan M, Harvey E, Goetze J, Kiszka J, Bond ME, Currey-Randall LM, Speed CW, Sherman CS, Rees MJ, Udyawer V, Flowers KI, Clementi G, Valentin-Albanese J, Gorham T, Adam MS, Ali K, Pina-Amargós F, Angulo-Valdés JA, Asher J, Barcia LG, Beaufort O, Benjamin C, Bernard ATF, Berumen ML, Bierwagen S, Bonnema E, Bown RMK, Bradley D, Brooks E, Brown JJ, Buddo D, Burke P, Cáceres C, Cardeñosa D, Carrier JC, Caselle JE, Charloo V, Claverie T, Clua E, Cochran JEM, Cook N, Cramp J, D'Alberto B, de Graaf M, Dornhege M, Estep A, Fanovich L, Farabaugh NF, Fernando D, Flam AL, Floros C, Fourqurean V, Garla R, Gastrich K, George L, Graham R, Guttridge T, Hardenstine RS, Heck S, Henderson AC, Hertler H, Hueter R, Johnson M, Jupiter S, Kasana D, Kessel ST, Kiilu B, Kirata T, Kuguru B, Kyne F, Langlois T, Lédée EJI, Lindfield S, Luna-Acosta A, Maggs J, Manjaji-Matsumoto BM, Marshall A, Matich P, McCombs E, McLean D, Meggs L, Moore S, Mukherji S, Murray R, Kaimuddin M, Newman SJ, Nogués J, Obota C, O'Shea O, Osuka K, Papastamatiou YP, Perera N, Peterson B, Ponzo A, Prasetyo A, Quamar LMS, Quinlan J, Ruiz-Abierno A, Sala E, Samoilys M, Schärer-Umpierre M, Schlaff A, Simpson N, Smith ANH, Sparks L, Tanna A, Torres R, Travers MJ, Bergmann MZ, Vigliola L, Ward J, Watts AM, Wen C, Whitman E, Wirsing AJ, Wothke A, Zarza-Gonzâlez E, Cinner JE. 2020. Global status and conservation potential of reef sharks. Nature 583: 801–806. [Google Scholar]
  • Magneville C, Leréec Le Bricquir ML, Dailianis T, Skouradakis G, Claverie T, Villéger S. 2023. Long-duration remote underwater videos reveal that grazing by fishes is highly variable through time and dominated by non-indigenous species. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 9: 311–322. [Google Scholar]
  • Magneville C, Brissaud C, Fleuré V, Loiseau N, Claverie T, Villéger S. 2024. A new framework for estimating abundance of animals using a network of cameras. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 22: 268–280. [Google Scholar]
  • Mallet D, Pelletier D. 2014. Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: a review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012). Fish Res 154: 44–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Marchand F, Magnan P, Boisclair D. 2002. Water temperature, light intensity and zooplankton density and the feeding activity of juvenile brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Freshw Biol 47: 2153–2162. [Google Scholar]
  • Marr SM, Impson ND, Tweddle D. 2012. An assessment of a proposal to eradicate non-native fish from priority rivers in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 37(2): 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Marston BR. 2014. Situk River Steelhead Stock Assessment, 2014-2015, Regional Operational Plan SF.1J.2014.09, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, Yakutat [https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/FedAidPDFs/ROP.SF.1J.2014.09.pdf] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin AL, Moore PA. 2007. Field observations of agonism in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: shelter use in a natural environment. Ethology 113: 1192–1201. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin B, Irwin ER. 2010. A digital underwater video camera system for aquatic research in regulated rivers. North Am J Fish Manag 30: 1365–1369. [Google Scholar]
  • Mena-Valenzuela P, Valdiviezo-Rivera J, Mena-Olmedo J, Aguirre WE. 2022. The first observation of copulation in Andean catfish Astroblepus ubidiai (Siluriformes, Astroblepidae), in Lago San Pablo, Imbabura, Ecuador. J Fish Biol. 101(5): 1348–1352. [Google Scholar]
  • Moore A, Scott A. 1988. Observations of recently emerged sea trout, Salmo trutta L., fry in a chalk stream, using a low-light underwater camera. J Fish Biol 33: 959–960. [Google Scholar]
  • Morán-López R, Uceda-Tolosa O. 2017. Image techniques in turbid rivers: A ten-year assessment of cyprinid stocks composition and size. Fish Res 195: 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  • Morán-López R, Uceda-Tolosa O. 2020. Biomechanics of fish swimming and leaping under waterfalls: a realistic field, image-based biophysical model with bioengineering implications. Bioinspir Biomim 15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ab9b64. [Google Scholar]
  • Moran CJ, Rzucidlo CL, Ellerby DJ, Gerry SP. 2019. Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Freshw Biol 64: 926–932. [Google Scholar]
  • Musslewhite JG. 2020. Neva Lake Sockeye Salmon Stock Assessment, 2019, Annual Report for Study 18-607, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Subsistence Management, Fisheries Resource Monitoring Program [https://www.hia-env.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Neva-18-607-2019-annual-report-002.pdf]. [Google Scholar]
  • Negrea C, Thompson DE, Juhnke SD, Fryer DS, Loge FJ. 2014. Automated detection and tracking of adult pacific lampreys in underwater video collected at Snake and Columbia River Fishways. North Am J Fish Manag 34. (1): 111-118. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Hea Miller SB, Davis AR, Wong MYL. 2022a. Further insights into invasion: field observations of behavioural interactions between an invasive and critically endangered freshwater crayfish using Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV). Biology 12: 18. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Hea Miller SB, Davis AR, Wong MYL. 2022b. Does habitat complexity and prior residency influence aggression between invasive and native freshwater crayfish? Ethology 128: 443–452. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Malley BP, Dillon RA, Paddock RW, Hansson S, Stockwell JD. 2018. An underwater video system to assess abundance and behavior of epibenthic Mysis. Limnol Oceanogr: Methods 16(12): 868-880. [Google Scholar]
  • Ovalle JC, Vilas C, Antelo LT. 2022. On the use of deep learning for fish species recognition and quantification on board fishing vessels. Mar Policy 139: 105015. [Google Scholar]
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. 2021a. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372: n71. [Google Scholar]
  • Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, McKenzie JE. 2021b. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372: n160. [Google Scholar]
  • Pedersen SLK. 2021. Evaluation and use of a monitoring method to estimate Atlantic salmon spawning run, (Unpublished masters thesis). Norway: The Arctic University of Norway. [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips B, Shipley ON, Halvorsen J, Sternlicht JK, Gallagher AJ. 2019. First in situ observations of the sharpnose sevengill shark (Heptranchias perlo), from the Tongue of the Ocean, Bahamas. J Ocean Sci Found 32: 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Pledger AG, Rice SP, Millett J. 2014. Reduced bed material stability and increased bedload transport caused by foraging fish: a flume study with juvenile Barbel (Barbus barbus). Earth Surf Process Landforms 39: 1500–1513. [Google Scholar]
  • Pratt TE, Smokorowski KE, Muirhead JR. 2005. Development and experimental assessment of an underwater video technique for assessing fish-habitat relationships. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164: 547–571. [Google Scholar]
  • Raugstad T. 2019. Using underwater filming to study activity and fighting behavior in Astacus astacus (Unpublished masters thesis). Norway: Universitetet I Oslo. [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson KM, Galarowicz TL, O'Neill P, Chadderton WL, Claramunt RM, Herbert M, Tucker AJ. 2019. Monitoring shallow benthic fish assemblages in the Laurentian Great Lakes using baited photoquadrats: enhancing traditional fisheries monitoring methods. J Great Lakes Res 45(2): 333-339. [Google Scholar]
  • Satoh S, Saeki T, Kohda M, Awata S. 2022. Cooperative breeding in Neolamprologus bifasciatus, a cichlid fish inhabiting the deep reefs of Lake Tanganyika. Ecol Freshw Fish 31: 640–649. [Google Scholar]
  • Shortis MR, Otis T. 2014. Progress toward automation of salmon escapement counts. CEUR Workshop Proc 1307. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/rmit.27391260. [Google Scholar]
  • Skorulis A, Wong M, Davis A. 2021. Assessing trap bias in the endemic Australian genus of freshwater crayfish, Euastacus. Mar Freshw Res 73(1): 100-109. [Google Scholar]
  • Šmejkal M, Baran R, Blabolil P, Vejřík L, Prchalová M, Bartoň D, Mrkvička T, Kubečka J. 2017. Early life-history predator-prey reversal in two cyprinid fishes. Sci Rep 7: 6924. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith A. 2022. Seasonal microhabitat preference for minnows in low order streams, (Unpublished masters thesis). Canada: The University of Guelph. [Google Scholar]
  • Soom J, Pattanaik V, Leier M, Tuhtan JA. 2022. Environmentally adaptive fish or no-fish classification for river video fish counters using high-performance desktop and embedded hardware. Ecol Inform 72: 101817. [Google Scholar]
  • Spears BM, Gunn IDM, Carvalho L, Winfield IJ, Dudley B, Murphy K, May L. 2009. An evaluation of methods for sampling macrophyte maximum colonisation depth in Loch Leven, Scotland. Aquat Botany 91(2): 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Starrs D, Ebner BC, Fulton CJ. 2015. Ceasefire: minimal aggression among Murray River crayfish feeding upon patches of allochthonous material. Aust J Zool 63(2): 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  • Struthers DP, Danylchuk AJ, Wilson ADM, Cooke SJ. 2015. Action cameras: bringing aquatic and fisheries research into view. Fisheries 40: 502–512. [Google Scholar]
  • Sundin J, Morgan R, Finnøen MH, Dey A, Sarkar K, Jutfelt F. 2019. On the observation of wild zebrafish (Danio rerio) in India. Zebrafish 16(6): 546–553. [Google Scholar]
  • Svenning MA, Lamberg A, Dempson B, Strand R, Hanssen ØK, Fauchald P. 2017. Incidence and timing of wild and escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norwegian rivers inferred from video surveillance monitoring. Ecol Freshw Fish 26: 360–370. [Google Scholar]
  • Tickner D, Opperman JJ, Abell R, Acreman M, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Cooke SJ, Dalton J, Darwall W, Edwards G, Harrison I, Hughes K, Jones T, Leclère D, Lynch AJ, Leonard P, McClain ME, Muruven D, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, Robinson J, Tharme RE, Thieme M, Tockner K, Wright M, Young L. 2020. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. BioScience 70(4): 330–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tweddle D, Magasa J. 1989. Assessment of multispecies cichlid fisheries of the Southeast Arm of Lake Malawi, Africa. ICES J Mar Sci 45: 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Tweedie J, Cockburn J, Villard P. 2018. Bioenergetics models as a means to evaluate channel habitat availability [powerpoint slides]. Canada: Department of Geography, University of Guelph. [http://www.allsetinc.com/website_nc/files/presentations_2018/NC2018_T3C_John_Tweedie_Jaclyn_Cockburn.pdf]. [Google Scholar]
  • Unger S, Hickman C. 2019. Report on the short-term scavenging of decomposing native and non-native trout in appalachian streams. Fishes 4: 17. [Google Scholar]
  • Unger S, Jachowski CMB, Diaz L, Williams LA. 2020. Shelter Guarding Behavior of the Eastern Hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) in North Carolina Streams. Southeast Nat 19(4): 742–758. [Google Scholar]
  • Usvyatsov S, Watmough J, Litvak MK. 2012. Age and population size estimates of overwintering shortnose sturgeon in the Saint John River, New Brunswick, Canada. Trans Am Fish Soc 141: 1126–1136. [Google Scholar]
  • van Wyk AJ, Hugo S, Ado AP, Weyl OLF. 2017. Improved Benefit Sharing and Monitoring in Lake Niassa Technical Report Final Report on September 2017 Surveys. 10.13140/RG.2.2.14060.28807. [Google Scholar]
  • van Wyk AJ. 2019. Evaluation of Baited Remote Underwater Video Systems (BRUVS) for monitoring fish communities in Lake Malawi/Niassa (Unpublished masters thesis). South Africa: Rhodes University. [Google Scholar]
  • Weyl OLF. 2005. Capture fisheries in Malawi and their contribution to national fish supply. Aquaculture Development in Malawi (ADiM) report. Grahamstown, South Africa: Enviro-Fish Africa (Pty) Ltd.. [Google Scholar]
  • Weyl OLF, Ribbink AJ, Tweddle D. 2010. Lake Malawi: fishes, fisheries, biodiversity, health and habitat. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 13: 241–254. [Google Scholar]
  • Weyl OLF, Ellender BR, Woodford DJ, Jordaan MS. 2013. Fish distributions in the Rondegat River, Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, and the immediate impact of rotenone treatment in an invaded reach. Afr J Aquat Sci 38: 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Weyl OLF, Finlayson B, Impson ND, Woodford DJ, Steinkjer J. 2014. Threatened endemic fishes in South Africa's Cape Floristic Region: a new beginning for the Rondegat River. Fisheries 39(6): 270–279. [Google Scholar]
  • Weyl OLF, Barrow S, Bellignan T, Dalu T, Ellender BR, Elser K, Impson D, Gouws J, Jordaan M, Villet M, Wasserman RJ, Woodford DJ. 2016. Monitoring of invertebrate and fish recovery following river rehabilitation using rotenone in the Rondegat River. WRC Report No. 2261/1/16, ISBN 978-1-4312-0788-6. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitmarsh SK, Fairweather PG, Huveneers C. 2017. What is Big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video. Rev Fish Biol Fish 27: 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Widmer L, Heule E, Colombo M, Rueegg A, Indermaur A, Ronco F, Salzburger W. 2019. Point-Combination Transect (PCT): incorporation of small underwater cameras to study fish communities. Methods Ecol Evol 10: 891–901. [Google Scholar]
  • Wohlin C. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering, in Proceedings 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2014), pp. 321–330, London, UK, May 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • Work K, Jennings CJ. 2019. Underwater video surveys provide a more complete picture of littoral fish populations than seine samples in clear Florida springs. Mar Freshw Res 70: 1178–1184. [Google Scholar]
  • Yamane H, Nagata Y, Watanabe K. 2016. Exploitation of the eggs of nest associates by the host fish Pseudobagrus nudiceps. Ichthyol Res 63: 23–30. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.