Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 426, 2025
Freshwater ecosystems management strategies
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2025002
Published online 14 March 2025
  • Angermeier PL, Schlosser IJ. 1989. Species‐area relationship for stream fishes. Ecology 70: 1450–1462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bánki O, Roskov Y, Döring M, Ower G, Hernández Robles DR, Plata Corredor CA, Stjernegaard Jeppesen T, Örn A, Pape T, Hobern D, Garnett S, Little H, DeWalt RE, Ma K, Miller J, Orrell T, Aalbu R, Abbott J, Adlard R, et al. 2025. Catalogue of Life (Version 2025-02-13). Catalogue of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Burgman MA, Fox JC. 2003. Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6: 19–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boettiger C, Lang DT, Wainwright PC. 2012. Rfishbase: exploring, manipulating and visualizing FishBase data from R. J Fish Biology 81: 2030–2039. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Collen B, Whitton F, Dyer EE, Baillie JE, Cumberlidge N, Darwall WR, Pollock C, Richman N, Soulsby A, Böhm M. 2014. Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism. Global Ecol Biogeogr 23: 40–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa MJ, Duarte G, Segurado P, Branco P. 2021. Major threats to European freshwater fish species. Sci Total Environ 797: 149105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • de Jager A, Vogt J. 2007. Rivers and Catchments of Europe − Catchment Characterisation Model (CCM). 121–144. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), [Dataset] PID: http://data.europa.eu/89h/fe1878e8-7541-4c66-8453-afdae7469221 [Google Scholar]
  • Doadrio I, Sousa-Santos C, Robalo J, Perea S. 2024. Description of three new species of the genus Cobitis L., 1758. Limnetica 43: 177–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81: 163–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J, Brooks E. 2011. European Red List of Freshwater Fishes. European Commission: Directorate-General for Environment, Brooks, Publications Office. URL: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/85903 [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Pauly D. 2024a. FishBase. URL: https://www.fishbase.se/ [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Pauly D. 2024b. FishBase: The SPECIES Table. URL: https://www.fishbase.se/ [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2024. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2024-1. URL: https://www.iucnredlist.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • Lehner B, Grill G. 2013. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems. Hydrol Processes 27: 2171–2186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lomolino. 2001. The species-area relationship: new challenges for an old pattern. Prog Phys Geogr: Earth Environ 25: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ, Guilhaumon F. 2019. sars: an R package for fitting, evaluating and comparing. Ecography 42: 1446–1455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mustafic P, Marcic Z, Duplic A, Mrakovcic M, Caleta M, Zanella D, Buj I, Podnar M, Dolenec Z. 2008. A new loach species of the genus Cobitis in Croatia. Folia Zoolog 57: 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Oberdorff T, Tedesco PA, Hugueny B, Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Brosse S, Dürr HH. 2011. Global and regional patterns in riverine fish species richness: a review. Int J Ecol 2011:967631. [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2021. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform. [Google Scholar]
  • Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PTJ, Kidd KA, Maccormack TJ, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, Smol JP, Taylor WW, Tockner K, Vermaire JC, Dudgeon D, Cooke S. 2019. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev 94: 849–873. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt-Kloiber A, Bremerich V, De Wever A, Jähnig S, Martens K, Strackbein J, Tockner K, Hering D. 2019. The Freshwater Information Platform: a global online network providing data, tools and resources for science and policy support. Hydrobiologia 838: 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tedesco PA, Beauchard O, Bigorne R, Blanchet S, Buisson L, Conti L, Cornu JF, Dias MS, Grenouillet G, Hugueny B, Jézéquel C, Leprieur F, Brosse S, Oberdorff T. 2017. A global database on freshwater fish species occurrence in drainage basins. Sci Data 4: 170141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tedesco PA, Leprieur F, Hugueny B, Brosse S, Dürr HH, Beauchard O, Busson F, Oberdorff T. 2012. Patterns and processes of global riverine fish endemism. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21: 977–987. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vorste RV, McElmurray P, Bell S, Eliason K, Brown BL. 2017. Does stream size really explain biodiversity patterns in lotic systems? A call for mechanistic explanations. Diversity 9: 26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.