EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 423 (2022) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 423 (2022) 7 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 423, 2022
Management of habitats and populations/communities
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2022002
Published online 17 February 2022
  • Archdeacon T, Austring T, Diver T, Nolen M. 2013. Fish communities of the Lower Peralta Drain #2, Lower San Juan Drain, and Sabinal Drain, New Mexico. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM, 38. [Google Scholar]
  • Archdeacon TP. 2016. Reduction in spring flow threatens Rio Grande Silvery Minnow: trends in abundance during river intermittency. Trans Am Fish Soc 145: 754–765. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Archdeacon TP, Diver TA, Reale JK. 2020. Fish rescue during streamflow intermittency may not be effective for conservation of Rio Grande Silvery Minnow. Water 12: 3371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Archdeacon TP, Reale JK. 2020. No quarter: lack of refuge during flow intermittency results in catastrophic mortality of an imperiled minnow. Freshw Biol 65: 2108–2123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bestgen KR, Platania SP. 1990. Extirpation of Notropis simus simus (Cope) and Notropis orca Woolman (Pisces: Cyprinidae) from the Rio Grande in New Mexico, with notes on their life history. Occas Papers Museum Southwestern Biol 6: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Bestgen KR, Platania SP. 1991. Status and conservation of the Rio Grande silvery minnow, Hybognathus amarus. Southwest Nat 36: 225–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blythe TL, Schmidt JC. 2018. Estimating the natural flow regime of rivers with long‐standing development: the northern branch of the Rio Grande. Water Resour Res 54: 1212–1236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Braun CL, Pearson DK, Porter MD, Moring JB. 2015. Physical characteristics and fish assemblage composition at site and mesohabitat scales over a range of streamflows in the Middle Rio Grande, New Mexico, winter 2011-12, summer 2012. Scientific Investigations Report. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 90-. [Google Scholar]
  • Bricker SB, Longstaff B, Dennison W, et al. 2008. Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries: a decade of change. Harmful Algae 8: 21–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buhl KJ. 2020. Relative tolerance of different life stages of Rio Grande silvery minnow to elevated water temperatures. U.S. Geological Survey data release. [Google Scholar]
  • Caissie D. 2006. The thermal regime of rivers: a review. Freshw Biol 51: 1389–1406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Camargo JA, Alonso Á. 2006. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ Int 32: 831–849. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chester ET, Robson BJ. 2013. Anthropogenic refuges for freshwater biodiversity: their ecological characteristics and management. Biol Conserv 166: 64–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Collins SJ, Bellingham L, Mitchell GW, Fahrig L. 2019. Life in the slow drain: landscape structure affects farm ditch water quality. Sci Total Environ 656: 1157–1167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Colvin R, Giannico GR, Li J, Boyer KL, Gerth WJ. 2009. Fish use of intermittent watercourses draining agricultural lands in the Upper Willamette River Valley, Oregon. Trans Am Fish Soc 138: 1302–1313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costelloe JF, Russell KL. 2014. Identifying conservation priorities for aquatic refugia in an arid zone, ephemeral catchment: a hydrological approach. Ecohydrology 7: 1534–1544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowley DE. 2006. Strategies for ecological restoration of the Middle Rio Grande in New Mexico and recovery of the endangered Rio Grande silvery minnow. Rev Fish Sci 14: 169–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowley DE, Wissmar RC, Sallenave R. 2007. Fish assemblages and seasonal movements of fish in irrigation canals and river reaches of the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico (USA). Ecol Freshwat Fish 16: 548–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davey AJ, Kelly DJ. 2007. Fish community responses to drying disturbances in an intermittent stream: a landscape perspective. Freshw Biol 52: 1719–1733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davey AJ, Kelly DJ, Biggs BJ. 2006. Refuge‐use strategies of stream fishes in response to extreme low flows. J Fish Biol 69: 1047–1059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dudley RK, Platania SP, White GC. 2020. Rio Grande Silvery Minnow population monitoring during 2020. American Southwest Ichthyological Researchers, LLC, 1–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Fachada N, Rodrigues J, Lopes VV, Martins RC, Rosa AC. 2016. micompr: an R package for multivariate independent comparison of observations. R J 8, 405–420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernald AG, Guldan SJ. 2006. Surface water-groundwater interactions between irrigation ditches, alluvial aquifers, and streams. Rev Fish Sci 14: 79–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gorbach C. 1999. History and significance of the Low-Flow Conveyance Channel: what is its future. In: Ortega Klett, C.T. (ed.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual New Mexico Water Conference. New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, Santa Fe (NM), 156–160. [Google Scholar]
  • Gutiérrez-Jurado KY, Fernald AG, Guldan SJ, Ochoa CG. 2017. Surface water and groundwater interactions in traditionally irrigated fields in northern New Mexico, USA. Water 9. [Google Scholar]
  • Hale R, Coleman R, Sievers M, Brown TR, Swearer SE. 2018. Using conservation behavior to manage ecological traps for a threatened freshwater fish. Ecosphere 9: e02381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Halliday BT, Matthews TG, Iervasi D, et al. 2015. Potential for water-resource infrastructure to act as refuge habitat. Ecol Eng 84: 136–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamilton SK, Bunn SE, Thoms MC, Marshall JC. 2005. Persistence of aquatic refugia between flow pulses in a dryland river system (Cooper Creek, Australia). Limnol Oceanogr 50: 743–754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Healy DF. 1996. Water-quality assessment of the Rio Grande Valley, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas; occurrence and distribution of selected pesticides and nutrients at selected surface-water sites in the Mesilla Valley, 1994-95. Water-Resources Investigations Report. U.S. Geological Survey, Albuquerque (NM), 1–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Helmus AM, Fernald AG, VanLeeuwen DM, Abbott LB, Ulery AL, Baker TT. 2009. Surface sater seepage effects on shallow ground‐water quality along the Rio Grande in northern New Mexico. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45: 407–418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herzon I, Helenius J. 2008. Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning. Biol Conserv 141: 1171–1183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoagstrom CW, Remshardt WJ, Smith JR, Brooks JE. 2010. Changing fish faunas in two reaches of the Rio Grande in the Albuquerque Basin. Southwest Nat 55: 78–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hopper GW, Gido KB, Pennock CA, et al. 2020. Nowhere to swim: interspecific responses of prairie stream fishes in isolated pools during severe drought. Aquat Sci 82: 1–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Horwitz RJ, Keller DH, Overbeck PF, Platania SP, Dudley RK, Carson EW. 2018. Age and Growth of the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow, an Endangered, Short‐Lived Cyprinid of the North American Southwest. Trans Am Fish Soc 147: 265–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Labbe TR, Fausch KD. 2000. Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecol Appl 10: 1774–1791. [Google Scholar]
  • Lancaster J, Belyea LR. 1997. Nested hierarchies and scale-dependence of mechanisms of flow refugium use. J N Am Benthol Soc 16: 221–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang BK, Altenbach CS. 1994. Ichthyofauna of the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District irrigation system: Cochiti Dam to Elephant Butte State Park, July-August 1993. Albuquerque Projects Office, US Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, NM. Albuquerque Projects Office, US Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque (NM), 1–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Leigh C, Bush A, Harrison ET, et al. 2015. Ecological effects of extreme climatic events on riverine ecosystems: insights from Australia. Freshwat Biol 60: 2620–2638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Levings GW, Healy DF, Richey SF, Carter LF. 1998. Water Quality in the Rio Grande Valley Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas, 1992–1995. U.S. Geological Survey. [Google Scholar]
  • Magoulick DD, Kobza RM. 2003. The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshw Biol 48: 1186–1198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marcus MD, Covington S, Liu B, Smith NR. 2010. Use of existing water, sediment, and tissue data to screen ecological risks to the endangered Rio Grande silvery minnow. Sci Total Environ 409: 83–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marshall JC, Menke N, Crook DA, et al. 2016. Go with the flow: the movement behaviour of fish from isolated waterhole refugia during connecting flow events in an intermittent dryland river. Freshw Biol 61: 1242–1258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McAda DP, Barroll P. 2002. Simulation of ground-water flow in the Middle Rio Grande basin between Cochiti and San Acacia, New Mexico. Water-Resources Investigations Report. U.S. Geological Survey, Albuquerque (NM), 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  • McCallum ES, Nikel KE, Mehdi H, et al. 2019. Municipal wastewater effluent affects fish communities: A multi-year study involving two wastewater treatment plants. Environ Pollut 252: 1730–1741. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehdi H, Lau SC, Synyshyn C, et al. 2021. Municipal wastewater as an ecological trap: Effects on fish communities across seasons. Sci Total Environ 759: 143430. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ochoa CG, Fernald AG, Guldan SJ, Tidwell VC, Shukla MK. 2012. Shallow aquifer recharge from irrigation in a semiarid agricultural valley in New Mexico. J Hydrol Eng 18: 1219–1230. [Google Scholar]
  • Olden JD, Naiman RJ. 2010. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwat Biol 55: 86–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parkos JJ, Ruetz CR, Trexler JC. 2011. Disturbance regime and limits on benefits of refuge use for fishes in a fluctuating hydroscape. Oikos 120, 1519–1530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patiño-Gomez C, McKinney DC, Maidment DR. 2007. Sharing water resources data in the binational Rio Grande/Bravo Basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133: 416–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Perkin JS, Gido KB, Costigan KH, Daniels MD, Johnson ER. 2015. Fragmentation and drying ratchet down Great Plains stream fish diversity. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 25: 639–655. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pires DF, Beja P, Magalhães MF. 2014. Out of pools: movement patterns of Mediterranean stream fish in relation to dry season refugia. River Res Appl 30: 1269–1280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pires DF, Pires AM, Collares‐Pereira MJ, Magalhães MF. 2010. Variation in fish assemblages across dry‐season pools in a Mediterranean stream: effects of pool morphology, physicochemical factors and spatial context. Ecol Freshwat Fish 19: 74–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team, 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • Rayner TS, Jenkins KM, Kingsford RT. 2009. Small environmental flows, drought and the role of refugia for freshwater fish in the Macquarie Marshes, arid Australia. Ecohydrology 2: 440–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rolls RJ, Leigh C, Sheldon F. 2012. Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems: ecological principles and consequences of alteration. Freshw Sci 31: 1163–1186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Papadopulos & Associates I. 2001. Assessment of flow conditions and seepage on the Rio Grande and adjacent channels, Isleta to San Marcial, summer 2001. Boulder (CO): S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc., 305. [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2016. Final biological and conference opinion for Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and non-federal water management and maintenance activities on the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque (NM). [Google Scholar]
  • Vadas RLJ, Beecher HA, Boessow SN, Kohr JH. 2016. Coastal Cutthroat Trout redd counts impacted by natural water supply variations. N Am J Fish Manag 36: 900–912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vander Vorste R, Obedzinski M, Nossaman Pierce S, Carlson SM, Grantham TE. 2020. Refuges and ecological traps: Extreme drought threatens persistence of an endangered fish in intermittent streams. Global Change Biol 26: 3834–3845. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner RJ, Boulger RW, Oblinger CJ, Smith BA. 2006. Guidelines and standard procedures for continuous water-quality monitors: station operation, record computation, and data reporting. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston (VA), 96. [Google Scholar]
  • Walters AW. 2016. The importance of context dependence for understanding the effects of low-flow events on fish. Freshw Sci 35: 216–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems, Third ed. Academic Press, San Diego (CA). 1006 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Worthington TA, Echelle AA, Perkin JS, et al. 2018. The emblematic minnows of the North American Great Plains: a synthesis of threats and conservation opportunities. Fish Fish 19: 271–307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zuñiga-Palacios J, Zuria I, Castellanos I, Lara C, Sánchez-Rojas G. 2021. What do we know (and need to know) about the role of urban habitats as ecological traps? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 146559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.