Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 423, 2022
Anthropogenic impact on freshwater habitats, communities and ecosystem functioning
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 18 February 2022
  • Barbier EB, Knowler D, Gwatipedza J, Reichard SH, Ransom Hodges A. 2013. Implementing policies to control invasive plant species. BioScience 63: 132–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blair AC, Hufbauer RA. 2010. Hybridization and invasion: one of North America's most devastating invasive plants shows evidence for a history of interspecific hybridization. Evol Appl 3: 40–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brach AR, Song H. 2006. eFloras: New directions for online floras exemplified by the Flora of China Project. Taxon 55: 188–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Branquart E. 2011. Alert, black and watch lists of invasive species in Belgium. Harmonia version 1.2, Belgian Forum on Invasive species. Last accessed on 1 August 2020 from: [Google Scholar]
  • Brickell CD, Alexander C, Cubey JJ, et al., 2016. International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, Ninth Edition, Scripta Horticulturae 18, International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium, 190 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brickell C. 2016. RHS A-Z encyclopedia of plants and flowers, The Royal Horticultural Society, 4th edition, Dorling Kindersley, Ltd., 1120 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunel S. 2009. Pathway analysis: aquatic plants imported in 10 EPPO countries. Bull OEPP 39: 201–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciotir C, Szabo J, Freeland J. 2017. Genetic characterisation of cattail species and hybrids (Typha spp.) in Europe. Aquat Bot 141: 51–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delool RAH, Tilney-Bassett RAE. 1986. Germinal reversion in three variegated-leaf mutants of Antirrhinum majus L. J Hered 77: 236–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J. 2008. Plant invasions and ornamental horticulture: pathway, propagule pressure and the legal framework. In: Teixeira da Silva JA, ed. Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology. Advances and Topical Issues, First Edition, Volume V, Global Science Books, Ltd., 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Dullinger I, Wessely J, Bossdorf O, et al. 2017. Climate change will increase the naturalization risk from garden plants in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26: 43–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eckert CG, Dorken ME, Barrett SCH. 2016. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of sexual and clonal reproduction in aquatic plants. Aquat Bot 135: 46–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • eFloras. 2021. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO and Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. Last accessed on 19 November 2021 from: [Google Scholar]
  • Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 7043–7050. [Google Scholar]
  • EPPO. 2009. EPPO guidelines on the development of a Code of conduct on horticulture and invasive alien plants. Bull OEPP 39: 263–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2016. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 of 13 July 2016 adopting a list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union L 189/4. [Google Scholar]
  • European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2014. Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Official Journal of the European Union L 317/35. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment. 2017. Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1263 of 12 July 2017 updating the list of invasive alien species of Union concern established by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union L 182/37. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment. 2019. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1262 of 25 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 to update the list of invasive alien species of Union concern. Official Journal of the European Union L 199/1. [Google Scholar]
  • Evrard C, Van Hove C. 2004. Taxonomy of the American Azolla species (Azollaceae): A critical review. Syst Geogr Pl 74: 301–318. [Google Scholar]
  • Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.). 1993+. Flora of North America North of Mexico. 20+ vols. New York and Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Francis RA. 2012. Handbook of global freshwater invasive species. Earthscan, London, New York, 456p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ghahramanzadeh R, Esselink G, Kodde LP, et al. 2013. Efficient distinction of invasive aquatic plant species from non-invasive related species using DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 13: 21–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gravendeel B. 2016. New lady's tresses orchids in The Netherlands and Belgium. De Levende Natuur 117: 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  • Halford M, Heemers L, Dierickx M, Van Wesemael D, Mathys C, Mahy G. 2014a. How to implement a voluntary code of conduct on invasive alien plants in consultation with the horticultural sector. Lessons learned from the AlterIAS LIFE+ project [2010–2013]. Discussion paper. LIFE+ Information and Communication. AlterIAS Project. 30 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Halford M, Heemers L, Dierickx M, Van Wesemael D, Mathys C, Mahy G. 2013. Perception of invasive alien plants by the horticultural sector in Belgium: the AlterIAS project and the changes of attitudes after four years of awareness-raising. Final report. University of Liège Gembloux Agro BioTech, Belgium. 31 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Halford M, Heemers L, Mathys C, Vanderhoeven S, Mahy G. 2011a. Socio-economic survey on invasive ornamental plants in Belgium. Final report. LIFE+ Information and Communication. AlterIAS project. Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, University of Liège Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech. 31 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Halford M, Heemers L, Van Wesemael D, et al. 2014b. The voluntary Code of conduct on invasive alien plants in Belgium: results and lessons learned from the AlterIAS LIFE+ project. Bull OEPP 44: 212–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Halford M, Mathys C, Heemers L, Vanderhoeven S, Branquart E, Mahy G. 2011b. The Code of conduct on invasive plants in Belgium. Plant Different. Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, University of Liège Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech. 10 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Heywood V, Brunel S. 2008. Code of conduct on horticulture and invasive alien plants. Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats, Standing Committee, 28th meeting Strasbourg, 24–27 November 2008. 35 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes C. 2011. The waterlily magician. The Garden 136: 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, et al. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45: 403–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • June-Wells M, Vossbrinck CR, Gibbons J, Bugbee G. 2012. The aquarium trade: a potential risk for non-native plant introductions in Connecticut, USA. Lake Reserv Manage 28: 200–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kabátová K, Vít P, Suda J. 2014. Species boundaries and hybridization in central-European Nymphaea species inferred from genome size and morphometric data. Preslia 86: 131–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Kay SH, Hoyle ST. 2001. Mail order, the internet and invasive aquatic weeds. J Aquat Plant Manage 39: 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Keller PK, Lodge DM. 2007. Species invasions from commerce in live aquatic organisms: Problems and possible solutions. BioScience 57: 428–436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumari M, Clarke HJ, Small I, Siddique KHM. 2009. Albinism in plants: A major bottleneck in wide hybridization, androgenesis and doubled haploid culture. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28: 393–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lambinon J, De Langhe J-E., Delvosalle L, Duvigneaud J. 1998. Flora van België, het Groothertogdom Luxemburg, Noord-Frankrijk en de aangrenzende gebieden. Derde druk, Nationale Plantentuin van België, Meise, 1091 p. [Google Scholar]
  • LaRue EA, Zuellig MP, Netherland MD, Heilman MA, Thum RA. 2013. Hybrid watermilfoil lineages are more invasive and less sensitive to a commonly used herbicide than their exotic parent (Eurasian watermilfoil). Evol Appl 6: 462–471. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lastrucci L, Fiorini G, Lunardi L, Viciani D. 2019. Herbarium survey on the genus Azolla (Salviniaceae) in Italy: distributive and taxonomic implications. Plant Biosyst 153: 710–719. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Les DH, Jacobs SWL, Tippery NP, Chen L, Moody M., Wilstermann-Hildebrand M. 2008. Systematics of Vallisneria (Hydrocharitaceae). Syst Bot 33: 49–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lev-Yadun S. 2014. Defensive masquerade by plants. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 113: 1162–1166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maas-van de Kamer H, Maas PJM. 2008. The Cannaceae of the world.Blumea 53: 247–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maki K, Galatowitsch S. 2004. Movement of invasive aquatic plants into Minnesota (USA) through horticultural trade. Biol Conserv 118: 389–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mennema J. 1994. Heimans, Heinsius en Thijsse's geïllustreerde flora van Nederland, België en Luxemburg en aangrenzend Duitsland en Frankrijk. 23rd edition, Uitgeverij Den Gulden Engel, Antwerpen, 1080 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Moody ML, Les DH, Ditomaso JM. 2008. The role of plant systematics in invasive aquatic plant management. J Aquat Plant Manage 46: 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Nunes AL, Tricarico E, Panov VE, Cardoso AC, Katsanevakis S. 2015. Pathways and gateways of freshwater invasions in Europe. Aquat Invasions 10: 359–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patra B, Acharya L, Mukherjee AK, Panda MK, Panda MC. 2008. Molecular characterization of ten cultivars of Canna lilies (Canna Linn.) using PCR based molecular markers (RAPDs and ISSRs). Int J Integr Biol 2: 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Peres CK, Lambrecht RW, Tavares DA, Chiba de Castro WA. 2018. Alien Express: The threat of aquarium e-commerce introducing invasive aquatic plants in Brazil. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16: 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  • Reed DH, Frankham R. 2003. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17: 230–237. [Google Scholar]
  • Reichard SH. 2004. Conflicting values and common goals: codes of conduct to reduce the threat of invasive species. Weed Technol 18: 1503–1507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reichard SH, White P. 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. BioScience 51: 103–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roy HE, Hesketh H, Purse BV, Eilenberg J, Santini A, Scalera R, Stentiford GD, Adriaens T, Bacela-Spychalska K, Bass D, Beckmann KM, Bessell P, Bojko J, Booy O, Cardoso AC, Essl F, Groom Q, Harrower C, Kleespies R, Martinou AF, van Oers MM, Peeler EJ, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Roques A, Schaffner F, Schindler S, Schmidt BR, Schönrogge K, Smith J, Solarz W, Stewart A, Stroo A, Tricarico E, Turvey KMA, Vannini A, Vila M, Woodward S, Wynns AA, Dunn AM. 2017. Alien pathogens on the horizon: Opportunities for predicting their threat to wildlife. Conserv Lett 10: 477–484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santamaría L. 2002. Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecol 23: 137–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schröder R, Prasse R. 2013. Do cultivated varieties of native plants have the ability to outperform their wild relatives? PLoS ONE 8: e71066. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stace C. 2010. New flora of the British Isles. Third edition Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1232 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sykes WR. 1969. Gunnera tinctoria and Gunnera manicata. J Royal New Zealand Inst Horticult 1: 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Thum RA, Mercer AT, Weisel DJ. 2012. Loopholes in the regulation of invasive species: genetic identifications identify mislabelling of prohibited aquarium plants. Biol. Invasions 14: 929–937. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, et al. 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159, Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten. [Google Scholar]
  • Vallejo-Marín M. 2012. Mimulus peregrinus (Phrymaceae): A new British allopolyploid species. PhytoKeys 14: 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderhoeven S, Adriaens T, D’hondt B, et al. 2015. A science-based approach to tackle invasive alien species in Belgium − the role of the ISEIA protocol and the Harmonia information system as decision support tools. Manag Biol Invasions 6: 197 –208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderhoeven S, Piqueray J, Halford M, Nulens G, Vincke J, Mahy G. 2011. Perception and understanding of invasive alien species issues by nature conservation and horticulture professionals in Belgium. Environ Manage 47: 425–442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • van Valkenburg JLCH, Duistermaat H, Boer E. 2013. Image-driven electronic identification keys for invasive plant species in the Netherlands. Bull OEPP 43: 250–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verbrugge LNH, Leuven RSEW, van Valkenburg JLCH, van den Born RJG. 2014. Evaluating stakeholder awareness and involvement in risk prevention of aquatic invasive plant species by a national code of conduct. Aquat Invasions 9: 369–381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verloove F. 2021. Manual of the alien plants of Belgium. Botanic Garden of Meise, Belgium. Last accessed on 7 November 2021 from: [Google Scholar]
  • Wang C-J, Wan J-Z, Qu H, Zhang Z-X. 2017. Climatic niche shift of aquatic plant invaders between native and invasive ranges: a test using 10 species across different biomes on a global scale. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418: 27. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Wasekura H, Horie S, Fujii S, Maki M. 2016. Molecular identification of alien species of Vallisneria (Hydrocharitaceae) species in Japan with a special emphasis on the commercially traded accessions and the discovery of hybrid between nonindigenous V. spiralis and native V. denseserrulata. Aquat Bot 128: 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • WCSP. 2020. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Last accessed on 1 August 2020 from: [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM. 2009. Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 136–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson SB, Mecca LA. 2003. Seed production and germination of eight cultivars and the wild-type of Ruellia tweediana: A potentially invasive ornamental. J Environ Hort 21: 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Yakandawala D, Yakandawala K, Sathurusinghe A, Gunasekara S. 2013. Is the blooming ornamental aquatic plant industry a threat to the aquatic ecosystems of Sri Lanka? Sri Lanka Forester 35: 1–104. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.