Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 422, 2021
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 10 May 2021
  • Andriantsoa R, Tönges S, Panteleit J, Theissinger K, Carneiro VC, Rasamy J, Lyko F. 2019. Ecological plasticity and commercial impact of invasive marbled crayfish populations in Madagascar. BMC Ecol 19: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Blake MA, Hart PJB. 1993. The behavioural responses of juvenile signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus to stimuli from perch and eels. Freshw Biol 29: 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Bond WJ. 1994. Keystone species. In: Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 237–253. [Google Scholar]
  • Borcherding J, Staas S, Krüger S, Ondračková M, Šlapanský L, Jurajda P. 2011. Non-native Gobiid species in the lower River Rhine (Germany): recent range extensions and densities. J Appl Ichthyol 27: 153–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Brandner J, Auerswald K, Cerwenka AF, Schliewen UK, Geist J. 2013. Comparative feeding ecology of invasive Ponto-Caspian gobies. Hydrobiologia 703: 113–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Bubb DH, O'Malley OJ, Gooderham AC, Lucas MC. 2009. Relative impacts of native and non-native crayfish on shelter use by an indigenous benthic fish. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 19: 448–455. [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M, Bláha M, Kouba A, Drozd B. 2015. Upstream expansion of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) − first record in the upper reaches of the Elbe river. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 416: 32. [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C, Pfeiffer M. 2010. First evidence for an established Marmorkrebs (Decapoda, Astacida, Cambaridae) population in Southwestern Germany, in syntopic occurrence with Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817). Aquat Invasions 5: 405–412. [Google Scholar]
  • Church K, Iacarella JC, Ricciardi A. 2017. Aggressive interactions between two invasive species: the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) and the spinycheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus). Biol Invasions 19: 425–441. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper MJ, Ruetz III CR, Uzarski DG, Shafer BM. 2009. Habitat use and diet of the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in coastal areas of Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. J Freshw Ecol 24: 477–488. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp GH, Bianco PG, Bogutskaya NG, Erös T, Falka I, Ferreira MT, Fox MG, Freyhof J, Gozlan RE, Grabowska J, Kováč V, Moreno-Amich R, Naseka AM, Penˇáz M, Povž M, Przybylski M, Robillard M, Russell IC, Stakėnas S, Šumer S, Vila-Gispert A, Wiesner C. 2005. To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J Appl Ichthyol 21: 242–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Crandall KA, Buhay JE. 2007. Global diversity of crayfish (Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae-Decapoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  • Degerman E, Nilsson PA, Nyström P, Nilsson E, Olsson K. 2007. Are fish populations in temperate streams affected by crayfish? − A field survey and prospects. Environ Biol Fishes 78: 231–239. [Google Scholar]
  • Dorn NJ, Mittelbach GG. 1999. More than predator and prey: A review of interactions between fish and crayfish. Vie Milieu-Life Environ 49: 229–237. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubs DOL, Corkum LD. 1996. Behavioral interactions between round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and mottled sculpins (Cottus bairdi). J Great Lakes Res 22: 838–844. [Google Scholar]
  • Gebauer R, Divíšek J, Buřič M, Večeřa M, Kouba A, Drozd B. 2018. Distribution of alien animal species richness in the Czech Republic. Ecol Evol 8: 4455–4464. [Google Scholar]
  • Gebauer R, Veselý L, Vanina T, Buřič M, Kouba A, Drozd B. 2019. Prediction of ecological impact of two alien gobiids in habitat structures of differing complexity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76: 1954–1961. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F. 2007. Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview. In: Gherardi F, ed. Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Invading nature: Springer series in invasion ecology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowska J, Pietraszewski D, Ondračková M. 2008. Tubenose goby Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) has joined three other Ponto-Caspian gobies in the Vistula River (Poland). Aquat Invasions 3: 261–265. [Google Scholar]
  • Hempel M, Thiel R. 2013. First records of the round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) in the Elbe River, Germany. BioInvasions Rec 2: 291–295. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill AM, Lodge DM. 1994. Diel changes in resource demand: competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes. Ecology 75: 2118–2126. [Google Scholar]
  • Hossain MS, Kouba A, Buřič M. 2019. Morphometry, size at maturity, and fecundity of marbled crayfish (Procambarus virginalis). Zool Anz 281: 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  • Hossain MS, Patoka J, Kouba A, Buřič M. 2018. Clonal crayfish as biological model: a review on marbled crayfish. Biologia 73: 841–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Jude DJ. 1997. Round gobies: cyberfish of the third millennium. Gt Lakes Res Rev 3: 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Kessel NV, Dorenbosch M, Spikmans F. 2009. First record of Pontian monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814), in the Dutch Rhine. Aquat Invasions 4: 421–424. [Google Scholar]
  • Kornis MS, Mercado-Silva N, Vander Zanden MJ. 2012. Twenty years of invasion: a review of round goby Neogobius melanostomus biology, spread and ecological implications. J Fish Biol 80: 235–285. [Google Scholar]
  • Kornis MS, Sharma S, Jake Vander Zanden M. 2013. Invasion success and impact of an invasive fish, round goby, in Great Lakes tributaries. Divers Distrib 19: 184–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 05. [Google Scholar]
  • Kubec J, Kouba A, Buřič M. 2019. Communication, behaviour, and decision making in crayfish: a review. Zool Anz 278: 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee VA, Johnson TB. 2005. Development of a bioenergetics model for the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus). J Great Lakes Res 31: 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Lipták B, Mrugała A, Pekárik L, Mutkovič A, Gruľa D, Petrusek A, Kouba A. 2016. Expansion of the marbled crayfish in Slovakia: beginning of an invasion in the Danube catchment? J Limnol 75: 305–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Lipták B, Veselý L, Ercoli F, Bláha M, Buřič M, Ruokonen TJ, Kouba A. 2019. Trophic role of marbled crayfish in a lentic freshwater ecosystem. Aquat Invasions 14: 299–309. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayden R, Page L, Burr B. 1992. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America North of Mexico. Copeia 920–925. [Google Scholar]
  • Mikl L, Adámek Z, Všetičková L, Janáč M, Roche K, Šlapanský L, Jurajda P. 2017. Response of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages to round (Neogobius melanostomus, Pallas 1814) and tubenose (Proterorhinus semilunaris, Heckel 1837) goby predation pressure. Hydrobiologia 785: 219–232. [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Buřič M, Kolář V, Bláha M, Petrtýl M, Franta P, Tropek R, Kalous L, Petrusek A, Kouba A. 2016. Predictions of marbled crayfish establishment in conurbations fulfilled: evidences from the Czech Republic. Biologia 71: 1380–1385. [Google Scholar]
  • Perello MM, Simon TP, Thompson HA, Kane DD. 2015. Feeding ecology of the invasive round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814), based on laboratory size preference and field diet in different habitats in the western basin of Lake Erie. Aquat Invasions 10: 463–474. [Google Scholar]
  • Polačik M, Janáč M, Jurajda P, Adámek Z, Ondračková M, Trichkova T, Vassilev M. 2009. Invasive gobies in the Danube: invasion success facilitated by availability and selection of superior food resources. Ecol Freshw Fish 18: 640–649. [Google Scholar]
  • Polačik M, Jurajda P, Blažek R, Janáč M. 2015. Carcass feeding as a cryptic foraging mode in round goby Neogobius melanostomus. J Fish Biol 87: 194–199. [Google Scholar]
  • Ray WJ, Corkum LD. 1997. Predation of zebra mussels by round gobies, Neogobius melanostomus. Environ Biol Fishes 50: 267–273. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds JD. 2011. A review of ecological interactions between crayfish and fish, indigenous and introduced. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 401: 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Roche K, Janáč M, Šlapanský L, Mikl L, Kopeček L, Jurajda P. 2015. A newly established round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population in the upper stretch of the river Elbe. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 416: 33. [Google Scholar]
  • Savino JF, Riley SC, Holuszko MJ. 2007. Activity, aggression, and habitat use of ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) and round goby (Apollonia melanostoma) under laboratory conditions. J Great Lakes Res 33: 326–334. [Google Scholar]
  • Sih A. 1980. Optimal foraging: partial consumption of prey. The American Naturalist 116: 281–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Stein RA. 1977. Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58: 1237–1253. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas CL, Taylor CA. 2013. Scavenger or predator? Examining a potential predator–prey relationship between crayfish and benthic fish in stream food webs. Freshw Sci 32: 1309–1317. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderploeg HA, Nalepa TF, Jude DJ, Mills EL, Holeck KT, Liebig JR, Grigorovich IA, Ojaveer H. 2002. Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59: 1209–1228. [Google Scholar]
  • Verliin A, Kesler M, Svirgsden R, Taal I, Saks L, Rohtla M, Hubel K, Eschbaum R, Vetemaa M, Saat T. 2017. Invasion of round goby to the temperate salmonid streams in the Baltic Sea. Ichthyol Res 64: 155–158. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.