EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 422 (2021) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 422 (2021) 13 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 422, 2021
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 13
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021011
Published online 25 March 2021
  • Antal L, László B, Kotlík P, Mozsár A, Czeglédi I, Oldal M, Kemenesi G, Jakab F, Nagy SA. 2016. Phylogenetic evidence for a new species of Barbus in the Danube River basin. Mol Phylogenet Evol 96: 187–194. [Google Scholar]
  • Beerli P. 2009. How to use Migrate or why are Markov Chain Monte Carlo programs difficult to use. In Bertorelle G, Bruford MW, Hauffe HC, Rizzoli A, Venersi C, eds. Population Genetics for Animal Conservation, Vol. 17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42– 79. [Google Scholar]
  • Beerli P, Felsenstein J. 2001. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152: 763–773. [Google Scholar]
  • Benovics M, Vukić J, Šanda R, Rahmouni I, Šimková A. 2020. Disentangling the evolutionary history of peri-Mediterranean cyprinids using host-specific gill monogeneans. Int J Parasitol 50: 969–984. [Google Scholar]
  • Berrebi P. 1995. Speciation of the genus Barbus in the North Mediterranean basin: recent advances from biochemical genetics. Biol Conserv 72: 237–249. [Google Scholar]
  • Berrebi P, Tsigenopoulos C. 2003. Phylogenetic organisation of the genus Barbus sensu stricto − A review based on data obtained using molecular markers. In: Bǎnǎrescu PM, Bogutskaya NG, Eds. Freshwater fishes of Europe − Cyprinidae 2, Part II − Barbus, Vol. 5 II. AULA-Verlag GmbH, Wiebelsheim, pp. 11– 22. [Google Scholar]
  • Berrebi P, Chenuil A, Kotlík P, Machordom A, Tsigenopoulos C. 2014. Disentangling the evolutionary history of the genus Barbus sensu lato, a twenty years adventure. In: Professor Carlos Almaça (1934–2010) Maria Judite Alves, Alexandra Cartaxana, Alexandra Marçal Correia and Luis Filipe Lopes, eds. Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência Universidade de Lisboa. Rua da Escola Politécnica 56/58, 1250–102 Lisboa (Portugal), pp. 29– 55. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertoli M, Pizzul E, Devescovi V, Franz F, Pastorino P, Giulianini PG, Ferrari C, Nonnis Marzano F. 2019. Biology and distribution of Danube barbel (Barbus balcanicus) (Osteichthyes: Cyprinidae) at the Northwestern limit of its range. Eur Zool J 86: 280–293. [Google Scholar]
  • Bianco PG, Delmastro G. 2004. Threatened fishes of the world: Barbus caninus Bonaparte, 1839 (Cyprinidae). Environ Biol Fish 71: 352. [Google Scholar]
  • Bianco PG, Ketmaier V. 2005. Anthropogenic changes in the freshwater fish fauna of Italy, with reference to the central region and Barbus graellsii, a newly established alien species of Iberian origin. J Fish Biol 59: 190–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Brkić Ž. 2017. The relationship of the geological framework to the Quaternary aquifer system in the Sava River valley (Croatia). J Croat Geol Surv Croat Geol Soc 70: 201–213. [Google Scholar]
  • Buj I, Šanda R, Marčić Z, Ćaleta M, Mrakovčić M. 2014. Combining morphology and genetics in resolving taxonomy − a systematic revision of spined loaches (Genus Cobitis; Cypriniformes, Actinopterygii) in the adriatic watershed. PLoS ONE 9: e99833. [Google Scholar]
  • Buj I, Marčić Z, Ćaleta M, Šanda R, Geiger MF, Freyhof J, Machordom A, Vukić J. 2017. Ancient connections among the European rivers and watersheds revealed from the evolutionary history of the genus Telestes (Actinopterygii; Cypriniformes). PLoS ONE 12: e0187366. [Google Scholar]
  • Buj I, Marčić Z, Čavlović K, Ćaleta M, Tutman P, Zanella D, Duplić A, Raguž L, Ivić L, Horvatić S, Mustafić P. 2019. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis helps to untangle the taxonomic puzzle of chubs (genus Squalius: Cypriniformes: Actinopteri) in the Adriatic basin of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Zool J Linn Soc 20: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Buj I, Raguž L, Marčić Z, Ćaleta M, Duplić A, Zanella D, Mustafić P, Ivić L, Horvatić S, Karlović R. 2020. Plitvice Lakes National park harbors ancient, yet endangered diversity of trout (genus Salmo). J Appl Ichthyol https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14120 [Google Scholar]
  • Buonerba L, Zaccara S, Delmastro GB, Lorenzoni M, Salzburger W, Gante GF. 2015. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors act at different spatial and temporal scales to shape population structure, distribution and speciation in Italian Barbus (Osteichthyes: Cyprinidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 89: 115–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Ćaleta M, Marčić Z, Buj I, Zanella D, Mustafić P, Duplić A, Horvatić S. 2019. A review of extant Croatian freshwater fish and lampreys − annotated list and distribution. Croat J Fish 77: 137–234. [Google Scholar]
  • Doadrio I, Carmona JA, Machordom A. 2002. Haplotype diversity and phylogenetic relationships among the Iberian barbels (Barbus, Cyprinidae) reveal two evolutionary lineages. J Hered 93: 140–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Drummond AJ, Ho SY, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol 4: e88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1969–1973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fu YX, Li WH. 1993. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gante HF. 2011. Diversification of Circum-Meditteranean Barbels, Changing Diversity in Changing Environment, In: Grillo O, ed. InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/changing-diversity-in-changing-environment/diversification-of-circum-mediterranean-barbels , 283–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivić L, Buj I, Raguž L, Marčić Z, Ćaleta M, Zanella D, Mustafić P, Horvatić S. 2020. Diversity and structure of trout populations (Salmo sp., Salmonidae, Actinopteri) in the Žumberak-SamoborskoGorje Nature Park in Croatia. Fundam Appl Limnol https://doi.org/10.1127/fal/2020/1283 [Google Scholar]
  • Kázmér M. 1990. Birth, life and death of the Pannonian Lake. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 79: 171–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotlík P, Tsigenopoulos S, Rab P, Berrebi P. 2002. Two new Barbus species from the Danube River basin, with redescription of Barbus petenyi (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Folia Zool 51: 227–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M, Freyhof J. 2007. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland and Freyhof, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Levin BA, Gandlin AA, Simonov ES, Levina MA, Barmintseva AE, Japoshvili B, Mugue NS, Mumladze L, Mustafayev NJ, Pashkov AN, Roubenyan HR, Shaplovalov MI, Doadrio I. 2019. Phylogeny, phylogeography and hybridization of Caucasian barbels of the genus Barbus (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 135: 31–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Machordom A, Doadrio I. 2001. Evolutionary history and speciation modes in the cyprinid genus Barbus . Proc Royal Soc B 268: 1297–1306. [Google Scholar]
  • Marková S, Sanda R, Crivelli A, Shumka S, Wilson IF, Vukic J. 2010. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data reveal the evolutionary historyof Barbus (Cyprinidae) in the ancient lake systems of the Balkans. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55: 488–500. [Google Scholar]
  • Meraner A, Venturi A Ficetola GF, Rossi A, Candiotto A, Gandolfi A. 2013. Massive invasion of exotic Barbus barbus and introgressive hybridization with endemic Barbus plebejus in Northern Italy: where, how and why? Mol Ecol 22: 5295–5312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mrakovčić M, Brigić A, Buj I, Ćaleta M, Mustafić P, Zanella D. 2006. Red Book of Freshwater Fish of Croatia. Ministry of Culture, State Institute for Nature Protection, Republic of Croatia, Zagreb. [Google Scholar]
  • Patwardhan A, Ray S, Roy A. 2014. Molecular markers in phylogenetic studies: a review. J Phylogenet Evol Biol 2: 131. [Google Scholar]
  • Perea S, Bohme M, Župančič P, Freyhof J, Šanda R, Ozulug M, Abdoli A, Doadrio I. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical patterns in Circum-Mediterranean Subfamily Leuciscinae (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) inferred from both mitochondrial and nuclear data. BMC Evol Biol 10: 265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 37–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sagonas K, Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Parmakelis A, Pafilis P, Valakosa ED. 2014. Molecular systematics and historical biogeography of the green lizards (Lacerta) in Greece: Insights from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 76: 144–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Schenekar T, Lerceteau-Köhler E, Weiss S. 2014. Fine-scale phylogeographic contact zone in Austrian brown trout Salmo trutta reveals multiple waves of post-glacial colonization and a pre-dominance of natural versus anthropogenic admixture. Conserv Genet 15: 561–572. [Google Scholar]
  • Simonović P, Marić S, Tošić A, ŠkrabaJurlina D, Nikolić V. 2018. Morphological and molecular differentiation between Rheophilic Barbels Barbus spp. (Cyprinidae) from headwaters at the divide between drainage areas of the Danube, Vardar and Struma Rivers, Central Balkans. Acta Zool Bulg 70: 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4 [Computer software and manual]. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. [Google Scholar]
  • Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tobe SS, Kitchener AC, Linacre AM. 2010. Reconstructing mammalian phylogenies: a detailed comparison of the cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit I mitochondrial genes. PLoS ONE 5: e14156. [Google Scholar]
  • Tominaga A, Hidetoshi O, Matsui M. 2010. Phylogeny and phylogeography of the sword-tailed newt, Cynopsensicauda (Amphibia: Caudata), as revealed by nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54: 910–921. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsigenopoulos CS, Berrebi P. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of North Mediterranean freshwater barbs (genus Barbus: Cyprinidae) Inferred from cytochrome b sequences: biogeographic and systematic implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol 14: 165–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsigenopoulos CS, Rab P, Naran D, Berrebi P. 2002. Multiple origins of polyploidy in the phylogeny of southern African barbs (Cyprinidae) as inferred from mtDNA markers. Heredity 88: 466–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Velkova-Jordanoska L, Panov S, Kostov V, Stojanovski S, Kostoski G. 2013. Molecular identification of the four species of the genus Barbus in lakes and rivers of R. Macedonia. Nat Montenegrina 12: 687–699. [Google Scholar]
  • Zardoya R, Doadrio I. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Iberian cyprinids: systematic and biogeographical implications. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 265: 1365–1372. [Google Scholar]
  • Zardoya R, Doadrio I. 1999. Molecular evidence on the evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of European Cyprinids. J Mol Evol 49: 227–237. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaccara S, Quadroni S, De Santis V, Vanetti I, Carosi A, Britton R, Lorenzoni M. 2019. Genetic and morphological analyses reveal a complex biogeographic pattern in the endemic barbel populations of the southern Italian peninsula. Ecol Evol 9: 10185–10197. [Google Scholar]
  • Žutinić P, Jelić D, Jelić M, Buj I. 2014. A contribution to understanding the ecology of the large spot barbel −sexual dimorphism, growth and population structureof Barbus balcanicus (Actinopterygii; Cyprinidae) in Central Croatia. North-West. J Zool 10: 158–166. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.