Open Access
| Issue |
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 422, 2021
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 14 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021010 | |
| Published online | 25 March 2021 | |
- Bankowska A, Klosowska M, Stryjecki R, Zawal A. 2015. New and rare water mite (Hydrachnidia) species in Polish fauna found in the Krąpiel River and valley water bodies in Ińskie Lake District. Acta Biol 22: 15–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Buczyńska E, Buczyński P, Zawal A, Stępień E. 2016. Environmental factors affecting micro-distribution of larval caddisflies (Trichoptera) in a small lowland reservoir under different types of watershed usage. Fundam Appl Limnol 188: 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Cantonati M, Füreder L, Gerecke R, Jüttner I, Cox EJ. 2012. Crenic habitats, hotspots for freshwater biodiversity conservation: toward an understanding of their ecology. Freshw Sci 31: 463–480. [Google Scholar]
- De Luca DA, Destefanis E, Forno MG, Lasagna M, Masciocco L. 2014. The genesis and the hydrogeological features of the Turin Po Plain fontanili, typical lowland springs in Northern Italy. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73: 409–427. [Google Scholar]
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron. [Google Scholar]
- Jongman RH, terBraak CJF, van Tongeren OFR. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
- Külköylüoğlu O, Yılmaz F. 2006. Ecological requirements of Ostracoda (Crustacea) in three types of springs in Turkey. Limnologica 36: 172–180. [Google Scholar]
- Malmqvist B. 2002. Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47: 679–694. [Google Scholar]
- Meisch C. 2000. Crustacea, Ostracoda. In Schwoerbel J, Zwick P, eds. Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 8 (3), SpektrumAkademischerVerlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, 522 p. [Google Scholar]
- Meisch C, Smith RJ, Martens K. 2019. A subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). Eur J Taxon 492, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
- Mezquita F, Tapia G, Roca JR. 1999. Ostracoda from springs on the eastern Iberian Peninsula: ecology, biogeography and palaeolimnological implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeoecol 148: 65–85. [Google Scholar]
- Pakulnicka J, Buczyński P, Dąbkowski P, Buczyńska E, Stępień E, Stryjecki R, Szlauer-Łukaszewska A, Zawal A. 2016. Aquatic beetles (Coleoptera) in springs of a small lowland river: habitat factors vs landscape factors. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 417: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Pieri V, Caserini C, Gomarasca S, Martens K, Rossetti G. 2007. Water quality and diversity of the Recent ostracod fauna in lowland springs from Lombardy (northern Italy). In: Ostracodology—Linking Bio-and Geosciences, Springer, Dordrecht, 79–87. [Google Scholar]
- Roca JR, Baltanás A. 1993. Ecology and distribution of Ostracoda in Pyrenean springs. J Crustacean Biol 13: 165–174. [Google Scholar]
- Rosati M, Cantonati M, Primicerio R, Rossetti G. 2014. Biogeography and relevant ecological drivers in spring habitats: a review on ostracods of the Western Palearctic. Int Rev Hydrobiol 99: 409–424. [Google Scholar]
- Rossetti G, Pieri V, Bolpagni R, Nizzoli D, Viaroli P. 2020. Variability in environmental conditions strongly impacts ostracod assemblages of lowland springs in a heavily anthropized area. Water 12: 3276. [Google Scholar]
- Rossetti G, Pieri V, Martens K. 2005. Recent ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) found in lowland springs of the provinces of Piacenza and Parma (Northern Italy). In: Aquatic Biodiversity II, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 287– 296. [Google Scholar]
- Sarı PK, Külköylüoğlu O. 2008. Comparative ecology of Ostracoda (Crustacea) in two rheocrene springs (Bolu, Turkey). Ecol Res 23: 821–830. [Google Scholar]
- Scharf BW, Heitkamp U, Hartmann G, Müller A. 2004. ZurOstracodenfauna des Harzes und seiner Vorländer. Mitt Naturw Ver Goslar 7: 195–218. [Google Scholar]
- Sokal RR, Rohlf FG. 1995. Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, New York, 850 p. [Google Scholar]
- Steinmann P. 1915. Praktikumder Süßwasserbiologie. Borntraeger. [Google Scholar]
- Stryjecki R, Zawal A, Stępień E, Buczyńska E, Buczyński P, Czachorowski S, Szenejko M, Śmietana P. 2016. Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of water bodies of the Krąpiel River valley: interactions in the spatial arrangement of a river valley. Limnology 17: 247–261. [Google Scholar]
- Stutz HL, Shiozawa DK, Evans RP. 2010. Inferring dispersal of aquatic invertebrates from genetic variation: a comparative study of an amphipod and mayfly in Great Basin springs. J N Am Benthol Soc 29: 1132–1147. [Google Scholar]
- Szoszkiewicz K, Gebler D. 2012. Polish version of the rivers hydromorphological condition evaluation system (River Habitat Survey) new practical applications. Gospodarka Wodna 4: 141–146. [Google Scholar]
- TerBraak CJF. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179. [Google Scholar]
- TerBraak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO 4. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Thienemann A. 1922. HydrobiologischeUntersuchungen an Quellen (I-IV). Arch Hydrobiol 14: 151–190. [Google Scholar]
- Zawal A, Stryjecki R, Stępień E, Buczyńska E, Buczyński P, Czachorowski S, Pakulnicka J, Śmietana P. 2017. The influence of environmental factors on water mite assemblages (Acari, Hydrachnidia) in a small lowland river: an analysis at different levels of organization of the environment. Limnology 18: 333–343. [Google Scholar]
- Zawal A, Stryjecki R, Buczyńska E, Buczyński P, Pakulnicka J, Bańkowska A, Czernicki T, Janusz K, Szlauer-Łukaszewska A, Pešić V. 2018. Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of riparian springs in a small lowland river valley: what are the key factors for species distribution? Peer J 6: e 4797. [Google Scholar]
- Zhai M, Nováček O, Výravský D, Syrovátka V, Bojková J, Helešic J. 2015. Environmental and spatial control of ostracod assemblages in the Western Carpathian spring fens. Hydrobiology 745: 225–239. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.