EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 421 (2020) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 421 (2020) 11 References
Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 421, 2020
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2020002
Published online 12 February 2020
  • Alexander TJ, Vonlanthen P, Periat G, Degiorgi F, Raymond JC, Seehausen O. 2015. Estimating whole-lake fish catch per unit effort. Fish Res 172: 287–302. [Google Scholar]
  • Argillier C, Caussé S, Gevrey M, et al. 2013. Development of a fish-based index to assess the eutrophication status of European lakes. Hydrobiologia 704: 193–211. [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, et al. 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol Indic 18: 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Bíró P. 1981. A Balaton halállományának strukturális változásai. In: Kárpáti I, ed. A Balaton kutatás újabb eredményei II. VEAB Monográfia 16. Veszprém: VEAB, pp. 239–275. [Google Scholar]
  • Bíró P. 1997. Temporal variations in Lake Balaton and its fish populations. Ecol Freshw Fish 6: 196–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Blabolil P, Logez M, Ricard D, et al. 2016. An assessment of the ecological potential of Central and Western European reservoirs based on fish communities. Fish Res 173: 80–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Blabolil P, Říha M, Ricard D, et al. 2017. A simple fish-based approach to assess the ecological quality of freshwater reservoirs in Central Europe. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418: 53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Breine J, Van Thuyne G, De Bruyn L. 2015. Development of a fish-based index combining data from different types of fishing gear. A case study of reservoirs in Flanders (Belgium). Belg J Zool 145: 17–39. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN 2003. EN 14011:2003. Water quality − Sampling of fish with electricity. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN 2005. EN 14757:2005. Water quality − Sampling of fish with multi-mesh gillnets. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization. [Google Scholar]
  • Daday J. 1897. XII. Fische (Pisces) In: Entz G, ed. Resultate der Wissenschaftlichen Erforschung des Balatonsees. Wien: Commissionsverlag Von Ed. Hölzel, pp. 216–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Deceliere-Vergés C, Argillier C, Lanoiselée C, De Bortoli J, Guillard J. 2009. Stability and precision of the metrics obtained using CEN multi-mesh gillnets in natural and artificial lakes in France. Fish Res 99: 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • EC − European Commission 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. OJEC L206: 7–50. [Google Scholar]
  • EC − European Commission 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. OJEC L237: 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • EEA 2012. European waters − Assessment of status and pressures. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • Emmrich M, Winfield IJ, Guillard J, et al. 2012. Strong correspondence between gillnet catch per unit effort and hydroacoustically derived fish biomass in stratified lakes. Freshw Biol 57: 2436–2448. [Google Scholar]
  • Entz G, Sebestyén O. 1942. A Balaton élete. Budapest: Királyi Magyar Természettudományi Társulat. [Google Scholar]
  • Erős T, Specziár A, Bíró P. 2009. Assessing fish assemblages in reed habitats of a large shallow lake − a comparison between gillnet sampling and electrofishing. Fish Res 96: 70–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Gassner H, Wanzenböck J, Zick D, Tischler G, Pamminger-Lahnsteiner B. 2005. Development of a fish based lake typology for natural Austrian lakes >50 ha based on the reconstructed historical fish communities. Internat Rev Hydrobiol 90: 422–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hankó B. 1931. Magyarország halainak eredete és elterjedése. A Debreceni Tisza István Egyetem Állattani Intézetének Közleményei 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Herman O. 1887. A magyar halászat könyve. II. kötet. Budapest: A Királyi Magyar Természettudományi Társulat. [Google Scholar]
  • Istvánovics V, Clement A, Somlyódy L, Specziár A, Tóth GL, Padisák J. 2007. Updating water quality targets for shallow Lake Balaton (Hungary), recovering from eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 581: 305–318. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppensen E, Jensen JP, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen T, Landkildehus F. 2000. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshw Biol 45: 201–2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppensen E, Søndergaard M, Jensen JP, et al. 2005. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading − an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. Freshw Biol 50: 1747–1771. [Google Scholar]
  • Karr JR. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly F, Harrison TD. 2016. The Water Framework Directive: advances in fish classification tools in Ireland. Biol Environ 116B: 205–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Launois L, Veslot J, Irz P, Argillier C. 2011. Development of a fish-based index (FBI) of biotic integrity for French lakes using hindcasting approach. Ecol Indic 11: 1572–1583. [Google Scholar]
  • Lauridsen TL, Landkildehus F, Jeppesen E, Jørgensen TB, Søndergaard M. 2008. A comparison of methods for calculating Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) of gill net catches in lakes. Fish Res 93: 204–211. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukács K. 1932. A Balaton halainak gyakoriságáról. Magy Biol Kut Int Munk 5: 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Mehner T, Diekmann M, Brämick U, Lemcke R. 2005. Composition of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human-use intensity. Freshw Biol 50: 70–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Olin M, Rask M, Ruuhijärvi J, Tammi J. 2013. Development and evaluation of the Finnish fish-based lake classification method. Hydrobiologia 713: 149–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Pehlivanov LZ, Apostolou AJ, Wolfram G. 2017. Development of Bulgarian Fish Based Index for ecological classification and monitoring of natural riparian lakes (Type L5/L-EC-1). Acta Zool Bulg 8: 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Poikane S, Zampoukas N, Borja A, Davies SP, van de Bund W, Birk S. 2014. Intercalibration of ecological assessment methods in the European Union: lessons learned and way forward. Environ Sci Pol 44: 237–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poikane S, Birk S, Böhmer J, et al. 2015. A hitchhiker‘s guide to European lake ecological assessment and intercalibration. Ecol Indic 52: 533–544. [Google Scholar]
  • Poikane S, Ritterbusch D, Argillier C, et al. 2017. Response of fish communities to multiple pressures: development of a total anthropogenic pressure intensity index. Sci Tot Environ 586: 502–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pont D, Hugueny B, Rogers C. 2007. Development of a fish-based index for the assessment of river health in Europe: the European fish index. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 427–439. [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M, Mrkvičká T, Peterka J, Čech M, Berec L, Kubečka J. 2011. A model of gillnet catch in relation to the catchable biomass, saturation, soak time and sampling period. Fish Res 107: 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Ritterbusch D, Brämick U, Mehner T. 2014. A typology for fish-based assessment of the ecological status of lowland lakes with the description of the reference fish communities. Limnologica 49: 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmutz S, Cowx IG, Haidvogl G, Pont D. 2007. Fish-based methods for assessing European running waters: a synthesis. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 369–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Šmejkal M, Ricard D, Prchalová M, et al. 2015. Biomass and abundance biases in European standard gillnet sampling. PLOS ONE: e0128469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A. 2001. A halak mozgási aktivitásának hatása a kopoltyúhálós mintavételezések eredményeire: a CPUE napszakos és évszakos változásai a Balatonban. Hidrol Közl 81: 459–461. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A. 2010. A Balaton halfaunája: a halállomány összetétele, az egyes halfajok életkörülményei és a halállomány korszerű hasznosításának feltételrendszere. Acta Biol Debr Suppl Oecol Hung 23 (Hydrobiol Monogr vol. 2.): 7–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Takács P. 2007. Balaton és befolyói halállományának monitorozása az EU VKI irányelveinek figyelembevételével. In: Mahunka S, Banczerowski J, eds. A Balaton kutatásának 2006. évi eredményei. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, pp. 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Turcsányi B. 2014. Effect of stocking strategy on distribution and recapture rate of common carp Cyprinus carpio L., in a large and shallow temperate lake: implications for recreational put-and-take fisheries management. J Appl Ichthyol 30: 887–894. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Turcsányi B. 2017. Management of pikeperch stocking in Lake Balaton: effect of season, area, fish size and method of release on the rate and distribution of recaptures. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418: 52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Vörös L. 2001. Long-term dynamics of Lake Balaton's chironomid fauna and its dependence on the phytoplankton production. Arch Hydrobiol 152: 119–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Tölg L, Bíró P. 2000. A Balaton halfaunájának vizsgálata. Halászatfejlesztés 24: 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Erős T, György ÁI, Tátrai I, Bíró P. 2009. A comparison between the Nordic gillnet and whole water column gillnet for characterizing fish assemblages in shallow Lake Balaton. Ann Limnol − Int J Limnol 45: 171–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, György ÁI, Erős T. 2013. Within-lake distribution patterns of fish assemblages: the relative roles of spatial, temporal and random environmental factors in assessing fish assemblages using gillnets in a large and shallow temperate lake. J Fish Biol 82: 840–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoddard JL, Larsen DP, Hawkins CP, Johnson RK, Norris RH. 2006. Setting the expectation for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecol Appl 16: 1267–1276. [Google Scholar]
  • Unger E. 1925. A Balaton halai és halászata. In: Wlassics T, ed. Balatoni kalauz. Budapest: Balatoni Társaság, pp. 78–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Virág Á. 1998. A Balaton múltja és jelene. Eger: Egri Nyomda Kft. [Google Scholar]
  • Virbickas T, Stakėnas S. 2016. Composition of fish communities and fish-based method for assessment of ecological status of lakes in Lithuania. Fish Res 173: 70–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Vutskits GY. 1897. A Balaton halai és gyakoriságuk. Természettud. Közl 29: 593–595. [Google Scholar]
  • Winfield IJ, Fletcher JM, James JB, Bean CW. 2009. Assessment of fish populations in still waters using hydroacoustics and survey gill netting: Experiences with Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) in the UK. Fish Res 96: 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Wootton RJ. 1998. Ecology of teleost fishes. Second edition. Fish and Fisheries Series 24. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Zale AV, Parrish DL, Sutton TM. (eds.) 2013. Fisheries techniques, 3rd edition. American Fisheries Society. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.