Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 420, 2019
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 46
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 01 November 2019
  • Arthington AH, Dulvy NK, Gladstone W, Winfield IJ. 2016. Fish conservation in freshwater and marine realms: status, threats and management. Aquat Conserv 26: 838–857. [Google Scholar]
  • Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. 1996–2004. GENETIX 4.04, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Montpellier: Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, Université de Montpellier II. [Google Scholar]
  • Covaciu-Marcov SD, Cupşa D, Telcean IC, Sas-Kovács I, Ferenţi S. 2018. Two new populations of the European mudminnow, Umbra krameri (Actinopterygii: Esociformes: Umbridae), in south-western Romania with the first record in the Banat region. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 48: 251–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Čolić S. 2018. Genetic characterization of the European mudminnow (Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792) population from the Matura River drainage, Bosnia and Herzegovina. MA Thesis, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. [Google Scholar]
  • Delić A, Grlica ID, Razlog-Grlica J. 1997. Nova nalazišta crnke (Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792) u Hrvatskoj [New records of the European mudminnow (Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792) in Croatia]. Ribarstvo 55: 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J. 2011. Umbra krameri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011:e.T22730A9380477. Downloaded on 01 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J, Brooks E. 2011. European Red List of Freshwater Fishes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • Goudet J. 2002. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Available: Accessed 15 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Govedič M. 2010. Ribe reke Drave med Mariborom in Hrvaško mejo 35 let po izgradnji hidroelektrarn [Fish of Drava River between Maribor and Croatian border 35 years after construction of hydro power plants]. In Zajc P, Colnarič N, Vreš B, eds. Book of Abstracts–International conference on the Drava River − Life in the river basin, Jovan Hadži Institute of Biology Scientific Research Centre SASA, Municipality Dravograd, RRA Koroška − Regional Development Agency for Koroška, Ljubljana–Dravograd, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. 2002. SPAGeDi a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618. [Google Scholar]
  • Hey J, Nielsen R. 2007. Integration within the Felsenstein equation for improved Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 2785–2790. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M, Freyhof, J. 2007. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Kottelat, Cornol, and Freyhof, Berlin, 646 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuehne ML, Olden DJ. 2014. Ecology and conservation of mudminnow species worldwide. Fisheries 39: 341–351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leiner S. 1995. The status of the European mudminnow, Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792, in Croatia (Pisces: Umbridae). Ann Nat His Mus Wien 97B: 486–490. [Google Scholar]
  • Machordom A, Doadrio I. 2001. Evidence of a Cenozoic Betic-Kabilian connection based on freshwater fish phylogeography (Luciobarbus, Cyprinidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 18: 252–263. [Google Scholar]
  • Maitland PS. 2000. Guide to Freshwater Fish of Britain and Europe. London: Hamlyn, 256 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Marić S, Razpet A, Nikolić V, Simonović P. 2011. Genetic differentiation of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) populations in Serbia, based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses. Genet Sel Evol 43: 2. [Google Scholar]
  • Marić S, Snoj A, Sekulić N, Krpo-Ćetković J, Šanda R, Jojić V. 2015. Genetic and morphological variability of the European mudminnow Umbra krameri (Teleostei, Umbridae) in Serbia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina − a basis for future conservation activities. J Fish Biol 86: 1534–1548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marić S, Stanković D, Wanzenbock J, et al. 2017. Phylogeography and population genetics of the European Mudminnow (Umbra krameri) with a time-calibrated phylogeny for the family Umbridae. Hydrobiologia 792: 151–168. [Google Scholar]
  • Meirmans PG. 2014. Nonconvergence in Bayesian estimation of migration rates. Mol Ecol Resour 14: 726–733. [Google Scholar]
  • Miljanović B, Sipos S, Pankov N, Bajić A, Muller T. 2016. New Record of Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792 in Serbia. In Melovski Lj, ed. Book of Abstracts–5TH Congress of Ecologists of the Republic of Macedonia with international participation, Macedonian Ecological Society, Skopje, 89. [Google Scholar]
  • Movchan YV. 1995. Observations on the distribution of Umbra krameri WALBAUM, 1792, in the Ukraine. Ann Nat His Mus Wien 97B: 491–495. [Google Scholar]
  • Mrakovčić M, Kerovec M. 1990. Umbra krameri. Ekološki glasnik 5/6: 68–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Mrakovčić M, Brigić A, Buj I, Ćaleta M, Mustafić P, Zanella D. 2006. Red Book of Freshwater Fishes in Croatia. Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Croatia, State Institute for Nature Protection, Zagreb, 253 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Petronić S, Panić G, Radošević D, Travar J. 2010. Rijetke i ugrožene biljne i životinjske vrste u posebnom rezervatu prirode “Gromiželj”. [Rare and endangered plant and animal species in the Special Natural Reserve “Gromizelj”]. In Šiljegović S, ed. Book of Abstracts–5TH Conference on integrative protection, Republic Institute for Protection of Cultural, Historical and Nature Heritage of Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, 199–206. [Google Scholar]
  • Povž M. 1990. Velika senčica (Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792) − nova vrsta ribe Sloveniji [Mudminnow (Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792) − New fish species in Slovenia]. Varstvo Narave 16: 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Povž M, Gregori A, Gregori M. 2015. Sladkovodne ribe in piškurji v Sloveniji [Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys in Slovenia]. Zavod Umbra, Ljubljana, 293 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959. [Google Scholar]
  • Quinzin MC, Mayer F, Elvinger N, Mardulyn P. 2015. Theoretical expectations of the Isolation–Migration model of population evolution for inferring demographic parameters. Methods Ecol Evol 6: 610–620. [Google Scholar]
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. 2018. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol 67: 901–904. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds JD, Webb TJ, Hawkins LA. 2005. Life history and ecological correlates of extinction risk in European freshwater fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62: 854–862. [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson ZL, Coombs JA, Hudy M, Nislow KH, Letcher BH, Whiteley AR. 2017. Experimental test of genetic rescue in isolated populations of brook trout. Mol Ecol 26: 4418–4433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sambrook J, Fritseh EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1626 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sekulić N, Budakov L, Branković D. 1998. Distribution of the European mudminnow Umbra krameri (Umbridae) in Serbia. Ital J Zool 65: 381–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sekulić N, Marić S, Galamboš L, Radošević D, Krpo-Ćetković J. 2013. New distribution data and population structure of the European mudminnow Umbra krameri in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Fish Biol 83: 659–666. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Simonović P. 2001. Ribe Srbije [Fishes of Serbia]. Belgrade: NNK International, Institute for nature conservation of Serbia, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 247 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Takács P, Erős T, Specziár A, et al. 2015. Population genetic patterns of threatened European Mudminnow (Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792) in a fragmented landscape: implications for conservation management. PLoS ONE 10: e0138640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface, flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876–4882. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vähä JP, Erkinaro J, Niemelä E, Primmer CR. 2007. Life-history and habitat features influence the within-river genetic structure of Atlantic salmon. Mol Ecol 16: 2638–2654. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WFD, Wills PM, Shipley P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 535–538. [Google Scholar]
  • Vuković T, Ivanović B. 1971. Slatkovodne ribe Jugoslavije [Freshwater Fishes of Yugoslavia]. Zemaljski muzej Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo, 268 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wanzenböck J. 2004. European mudminnow (Umbra krameri) in the Austrian floodplain of the River Danube: conservation of an indicator species for endangered wetland ecosystems in Europe. In Akçakaya HR, Burgman MA, Kindvall O, Wood CC, Sjögren-Gulve P, Hatfield JS, Mccarthy MA, eds. Species Conservation and Management: Case Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 200–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Whiteley AR, Fitzpatrick SW, Funk WC, Tallmon DA. 2015. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 30: 42–49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilhelm A. 2003. Growth of the mudminnow (Umbra krameri Walbaum) in river Ér. Tiscia 34: 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson GA, Rannala B. 2003. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163: 1177–1191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Winkler KA, Weiss S. 2009. Nine new tetranucleotide microsatellite DNA markers for the European mudminnow Umbra krameri . Conserv Genet 10: 1155–1157. [Google Scholar]
  • Zanella, D. 1997. Rasprostranjenost i zaštita vrste Umbra krameri Walbaum, Pisces [Distribution and protection of the species Umbra krameri Walbaum, Pisces]. BSc thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.