Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 419, 2018
Article Number 50
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018038
Published online 18 December 2018
  • Alba-Tercedor J, Jáimez-Cuéllar P, Álvarez M, Avilés J, Bonada N, Casas J, Mellado A, Ortega M, Pardo I, Prat N, Rieradevall M, Robles S, Sáinz-Cantero CE, Sánchez-Ortega A, Suárez ML, Toro M, Vidal-Abarca MR, Vivas S, Zamora-Muñoz C. 2002. Caracterización del estado ecológico de ríos mediterrâneos ibéricos mediante el índice IBMWP (antes BMWP'). Limnetica 21: 175–185. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA. 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed. Washington: American Public Association, 541 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage PD, Hogger J. 1994. Invertebrates ecology and survey. In: Ward D, Holmes N, Jose P, eds. The New Rivers and Wildlife Handbook. Bedfordshire: Sandy RSPB, pp. 151–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage PD, Moss D, Wright JF, Furse MT. 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites. Water Res 17: 333–347. [Google Scholar]
  • Artemiadou V, Lazaridou M. 2005. Evaluation score and interpretation index for the ecological quality of running waters in Central and Northern Hellas. Environ Monit Assess 110: 1–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bechter T, Baumann K, Birk S, Bolik F, Graf W, Pletterbauer F. 2018. LaRiMo − A simple and efficient GIS-based approach for large-scale morphological assessment of large European rivers. Sci Total Environ 628–629: 1191–1199. [Google Scholar]
  • Bennett C, Owen R, Birk S, Buffagni A, Erba S, Mengin N, Murray-Bligh J, Ofenböck G, Pardo I, van de Bund W, Wagner F, Wasson JG. 2011. Bringing European river quality into line: an exercise to intercalibrate macro-invertebrate classification methods. Hydrobiologia 667: 31–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S, Korte T, Hering D. 2006. Intercalibration of assessment methods for macrophytes in lowland streams: direct comparison and analysis of common metrics. Hydrobiologia 566: 417–430. [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A, Poikane S, van de Bund W, Zampoukas N, Hering D. 2012a. Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol Indic 18: 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S, van Kouwen L, Willby N. 2012b. Harmonising the bioassessment of large rivers in the absence of near-natural reference conditions − a case study of the Danube River. Freshw Biol 57: 1716–1732. [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S, Willby NJ, Kelly M, Bonne W, Borja A, Poikane S, van de Bund W. 2013. Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 454–455: 490–499. [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S, Böhmer J, Schöll F. 2016. XGIG Large River Intercalibration Exercise − Milestone 6 Report − Intercalibrating the national classifications of ecological status for very large rivers in Europe − Biological Quality Element: Benthic Invertebrates − Version 2, 228 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Erba S, Cazzola M, Murray-Bligh J, Soszka H, Genoni P. 2006. The STAR common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibration process: full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries. Hydrobiologia 566: 379–399. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Erba S, Furse MT. 2007. A simple procedure to harmonize class boundaries of assessment systems at the pan-European scale. Environ Sci Policy 10: 709–724. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Cazzola M, Erba S, Verzino L, Bordin F, Galbiati L, Moruzzi E, Balestrini R. 2016. Intercalibrating the Italian classification of ecological status based on aquatic macro-invertebrates in very large rivers. CNR-IRSA, Brugherio, 48 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Chatzinikolaou Y, Findik O, Ilia G, Lazaridou M. 2005. Comparative study of two benthic macroinvertebrate sampling methods: the 3-minute kick-and-sweep sampling method versus artificial substrate colonization in a large Mediterranean river in central Greece, in Fourth Symposium for European Freshwater Sciences (SEFS4) Krakow, Poland, pp. 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. PRIMER V6: user manual-tutorial. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, 190 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Csányi B, Szekeres J, György AI, Szalóky Z, Falka I. 2012. Methodology of macroinvertebrate survey on large rivers: a case study on the Romanian Lower Danube. Water Res Manage 2: 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  • EC 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327, 72 p. [Google Scholar]
  • EC 2005. Guidance on the Intercalibration Process 2004–2006. Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 31 p. [Google Scholar]
  • EC 2011. Guidance Document on the Intercalibration Process 2008–2011. European Communities, 103 p. [Google Scholar]
  • EC 2012. Commission Staff Working Document, European Overview (1/2) Accompanying the Document: “Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin Management Plans,” Brussels, 670 p. [Google Scholar]
  • EC 2015. Procedure to fit new or updated classification methods to the results of a completed intercalibration exercise. European Union, 33 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Erba S, Furse MT, Balestrini R, Christodoulides A, Ofenböck T, van de Bund W, Wasson J-G, Buffagni A. 2009. The validation of common European class boundaries for river benthic macroinvertebrates to facilitate the intercalibration process of the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 633: 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Erba S, Pace G, Demartini D, Di Pasquale D, Dörflinger G, Buffagni A. 2015. Land use at the reach scale as a major determinant for benthic invertebrate community in Mediterranean rivers of Cyprus. Ecol Indic 48: 477–491. [Google Scholar]
  • Feio MJ, Aguiar FC, Almeida SFP, Ferreira J, Ferreira MT, Elias C, Serra SRQ, Buffagni A, Cambra J, Chauvin C, Delmas F, Dörflinger G, Erba S, Flor N, Ferréol M, Gem M, Mancini L, Manolaki P, Marcheggiani S, Minciardi MR, Munné A, Papastergiadou E, Prat N, Puccinelli C, Rosebery J, Sabater S, Ciadamidaro S, Tornés E, Tziortzis I, Urbanič G, Vieira C. 2014. Least disturbed condition for European Mediterranean rivers. Sci Total Environ 476: 745–756. [Google Scholar]
  • Karaouzas I, Skoulikidis N, Andriopoulou A, Koutsodimou M, Kouvarda T, Gritzalis K. 2015. Effects of multiple stressors on the ecological status of a Mediterranean intermittent river. 11th Panhellenic Symposium on Oceanography and Fisheries, Mytilene, Lesvos Island, Greece, 681–684. [Google Scholar]
  • Kemitzoglou D. 2004. The effectiveness of the semi-quantitative sampling method using benthic macroinvertebrates. Dissertation Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, 86 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lazaridou M, Ntislidou C. 2015. Macroinvertebrate Assemblages and Biological Status of Rivers in Northern and Central Greece. In: Skoulikidis N, Dimitriou E, Karaouzas I, eds. The Rivers of Greece. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Heidelberg, 28: 327–354. [Google Scholar]
  • Lazaridou M, Ntislidou C, Karaouzas I, Skoulikidis N. 2018. Harmonization of a new assessment method for estimating the ecological quality status of Greek running waters. Ecol Indic 84: 683–694. [Google Scholar]
  • Pont D, Beers M, Buijse T, Delaigue O, Ferreira T, Jepsen N, Kovac V, Schabuss M, Segurado P, Schütz C, Vehanen T. 2009. River Fish Intercalibration Group WFD Intercalibration Phase 2 – Milestone 1 Report, 48 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Raven P, Holmes N, Dawson F, Everard M. 1998. Quality assessment using River Habitat Survey data. Aquatic Conserv 8: 477–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skoulikidis Ν. 2009. The environmental state of rivers in the Balkans − a review within the DPSIR framework. Sci Total Environ 407: 2501–2516. [Google Scholar]
  • Spitale D. 2017. Performance of the STAR_ICMi macroinvertebrate index and implications for classification and biomonitoring of rivers. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418: 20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft Inc. 2015. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 13. www.statsoft.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Wageningen Software Labs 2005. ASTERICS − AQEM-STAR Ecological River Classification System. Version 4. 0.3, July 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Willby N, Birk S, Poikane S, van de Bund W. 2014. Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Manual. Procedure to fit new or updated classification methods to the results of a completed intercalibration. Ispra, Italy, 28 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wright JF. 2000. An introduction to RIVPACS. In: Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW, Furse MT, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.