EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 419 (2018) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 419 (2018) 4 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 419, 2018
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017052
Published online 31 January 2018
  • Adámek Z, Jirásek J. 1986. Biological value and food biology of commercial fishes of the Mušov and Věstonice reservoirs. Folia Univ Agric Brno 1–71. [Google Scholar]
  • Adámek Z, Jurajda P, Prášek V, Sukop I. 2010. Seasonal diet pattern of non-native tubenose goby (Proterorhinus semilunaris) in the lowland reservoir (Mušov, Czech Republic). Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 397: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Almquist G, Strandmark AK, Appelberg M. 2010. Has the invasive round goby caused new links in Baltic food webs? Environ Biol Fish 89: 79–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amundsen PA, Gabler HM, Staldvik FJ. 1996. A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data − modification of the Costello (1990) method. J Fish Biol 48: 607–614. [Google Scholar]
  • Balshine S, Verma A, Chant V, Theysmeyer T. 2005. Competitive interactions between round gobies and logperch. J Great Lakes Res 31: 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp GH, Kováč V, Ojaveer H, Rosenthal H. 2005. The introduction, establishment, dispersal and impact of introduced non-native fishes. J Appl Ichtyol 21: 241–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costello MJ. 1990. Predator feeding strategy and prey importance: new graphical analysis. J Fish Biol 36: 261–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Craig JF. 1982. Some aspects of the feeding, growth and population dynamics of perch, Perca fluviatilis L., in Windermere, University of Lancaster: Doctoral Dissertation, 141 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig JF. 2000. Percid fishes, systematics, ecology and exploitation, Oxford UK: Blackwell Science. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crane DP, Farrell JM, Einhouse DW, Lantry JR, Markham JL. 2015. Trends in body condition of native piscivores following invasion of Lakes Erie and Ontario by the round goby. Freshw Biol 60: 111–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Didenko AV, Gurbyk AB. 2016. Spring diet and trophic relationships between piscivorous fishes in Kaniv Reservoir (Ukraine). Folia Zool 65: 15–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dillon AK, Stepien CA. 2001. Genetic and biogeographic relationships of the invasive round (Neogobius melanostomus) and tubenose (Proterorhinus marmoratus) gobies in the Great Lakes versus Eurasian populations. J Great Lakes 27: 267–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dörner H, Berg S, Jacobsen L, Hulsmann S, Brojerg M, Wagner A. 2003. The feeding behaviour of large perch Perca fluviatilis (L.) in relation of food availability: a comparative study. Hydrobiologia 506: 427–434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dörner H, Wagner A. 2003. Size-dependent predator-prey relationships between perch and their fish prey. J Fish Biology 62: 1021–1032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayden TA, Miner JG. 2009. Rapid dispersal and establishment of a benthic Ponto-Caspian goby in Lake Erie: diel vertical migration of early juvenile round goby. Biol Invasion 11: 1767–1776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hempel M, Neukamm R, Thiel R. 2016. Effects of introduced round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) on diet composition and growth of zander (Sander lucioperca), a main predator in European brackish waters. Aquat Invasion 11: 167–178. [Google Scholar]
  • Hensler SR, Jude DJ. 2007. Diel vertical migration of round goby larvae in the great lakes. J Great Lakes Res 33: 295–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Horppila J, Ruuhijarvi J, Rask M, Karppinen C, Nyberg K, Olin M. 2000. Seasonal changes in the diets and relative abundances of perch and roach in the littoral and pelagic zones of a large lake. J Fish Biol 56: 51–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Huyse T, Vanhove MPM, Mombaerts M, Volckaert FAM, Verreycken H. 2015. Parasite introduction with an invasive goby in Belgium double trouble. Parasitol Res 114: 2789–2793. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hyslop EJ. 1980. Stomach content analysis-a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17: 411–429. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobsen L, Berg S, Broberg M, Jepsen N, Skov C. 2002. Activity and food choice of piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) in a eurytopic shallow lake: a radio-telemetry study. Freshw Biol 47: 2370–2379. [Google Scholar]
  • Janáč M, Jurajda P, Kružiková L, Roche K, Prášek V. 2013. Reservoir to river passage of age-0+ year fishes, indication of a dispersion pathway for a non-native species. J Fish Biol 82: 994–1010. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson TB, Bunnell DB, Knight CT. 2005. A potential new energy pathway in central Lake Erie: the round goby connection. J Great Lakes Res 31: 238–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kornis MS, Sharma S, Vander Zanden MJ. 2013. Invasion success and impact of an invasive fish, round goby, in Great Lakes tributaries. Divers Distrib 19: 184–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kratochvíl M, Peterka J, Kubečka J, Matěna J, Vašek M, Vaníčková I, Seďa J. 2008. Diet of larvae and juvenile perch, Perca fluviatilis performing diel vertical migrations in deep reservoir. Folia Zool 57: 313–323. [Google Scholar]
  • Kvach Y, Oguz MC. 2009. Communities of metazoan parasites of two fishes of the Proterorhinus genus (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae). Helmintologia 46: 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Kvach Y, Ondračková M, Jurajda P. 2016. First report of metacercariae of Cyathocotyle prussica parasitizing a fish host in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. Helminthologia 53: 257–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lelek A. 1987. The freshwater fishes of Europe, Aula-Verlag GmbH Wiesbaden: Threatened fishes of Europe. [Google Scholar]
  • Lohniský K. 1960. A contribution to the knowledge of perch (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758) diet. Věst Čs Spol Zool 24: 139–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Lusk S, Halačka K. 1995. The first finding of the tubenose goby, Proterorhinus marmoratus, in the Czech Republic. Folia Zool 44: 90–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Lusk S, Lusková V, Halačka K, Lojkásek B. 2000. Changes in the species composition of the ichtyofauna in the territory of the Czech Republic after 1990. Biodiv ichtyof ČR 3: 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Mikl L, Adámek Z, Všetičková L, Janáč M, Roche K, Šlapanský L, Jurajda P. 2017. Response of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages to round (Neogobius melanostomus, Pallas 1814) and tubenose (Proterorhinus semilunaris, Heckel 1837) goby predation pressure. Hydrobiologia 785: 219–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naseka AM, Boldyrev VS, Bogutskaya NG, Delitsyn VV. 2005. New data on the historical and expanded range of Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) (Teleostei: Gobiidae) in eastern Europe. J Applied Ichtyhol 21: 300–305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Natarajan AV, Jhingran AG. 1961. Index of preponderance − a model of grading the food elements in the stomach analysis of fishes. Indian J Fish 8: 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Olson MH. 1996. Predator-prey interactions in size-structured fish communities: implications of prey growth. Oecelogia 108: 757–763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paine RT. 1976. Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology 57: 858–873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Plachocki D, Kobak J, Kakareko T. 2012. First report on the importance of alien gobiids in the diet of native piscivorous fishes in the lower Vistula River (Poland). Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 41: 83–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prášek V, Jurajda P. 2005. Expansion of Proterorhinus marmoratus in the Morava River basin (Czech Republic, Danube River watershed). Folia Zool 54: 189–192. [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Roche KF, Janáč M, Jurajda P. 2013. A review of Gobiid expansion along the Danube-Rhine corridor − geopolitical change as a driver for invasion. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 411: 01–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roseman EF, Schaeffer JS, Bright E, Fielder DG. 2014. Angler-caught piscivore diets reflect fish community changes in Lake Huron. Trans Am Fish Soc 143: 1419–1433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Rezsu ET. 2009. Feeding guilds and food resource partitioning in a lake fish assemblage: an ontogenetic approach. J Fish Biol 75: 247–267. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR. 1986. Foraging theory, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Stepien CA, Brown JE, Neilson ME, Tumeo MA. 2005. Genetic diversity of invasive species in the Great Lakes versus their Eurasian source populations: insights for risk analysis. Risk Anal 25: 1043–1060. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Szaloky Z, Bammer V, Gyorgy AI, Pehlivanov L, Schabuss M, Zornig H, Weiperth A, Eros T. 2015. Offshore distribution of invasive gobies (Pisces: Gobiidae) along the longitudinal profile of the Danube River. Fundam Appl Limnol 187: 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  • Taraborelli AC, Fox MG, Johnson TB, Schaner T. 2010. Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population structure, biomass, prey consumption and mortality from predation in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 36: 625–632. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vašek M, Všetičková L, Roche K, Jurajda P. 2014. Diet of two invading gobiid species (Proterorhinus semilunaris and Neogobius melanostomus) during the breeding and hatching season: no field evidence of extensive predation on fish eggs and fry. Limnologica 46: 31–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vlček V. 1984. Rivers and reservoirs, Academia Praha CR: Geographical lexicon of CR. [Google Scholar]
  • Všetičková L, Janáč M, Vašek M, Roche K, Jurajda P. 2014. Non-native western tubenose gobies Proterorhinus semilunaris show distinct site, sex and age-related differences in diet. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 414: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Walters CJ, Juanes F. 1993. Recruitment limitation as a consequence of natural selection for use of restricted feeding habitats and predation risk taking by juvenile fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50: 2058–2070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zapletal T, Adámek Z, Jurajda P, Roche K, Všeticková L, Mares J. 2016. Consumption of plant material by perch (Perca fluviatilis). Folia Zool 65: 95–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zick D, Gassner H, Jagsch A, Patzner RA. 2006. Auswirkung und Populationsentwicklung des eingeschleppten Flussbarsches (Perca fluviatilis) im Grundlsee (Steiermark). Öesterr Fisch 59: 20–27. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.