EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 418 (2017) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 418 (2017) 56 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 418, 2017
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 56
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017045
Published online 22 November 2017
  • Appelget J, Smith Jr. LL. 1951. The determination of age and rate of growth from vertebrae of the channel catfish, Ictalurus lacustris punctatus. Trans Am Fish Soc 80: 119–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F, Anastácio PM. 2015. Live bait capture and crayfish trapping as potential vectors for freshwater invasive fauna. Limnologica 51: 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F, Ilhéu M, Anastácio PM. 2015. Angling web forums as an additional tool for detection of new fish introductions: the first record of Perca fluviatilis in continental Portugal. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 416: 03. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F, Gimeno I, Lanao M, Touya V, Durán C, Peribáñez MA, Anastácio PM. 2016. The role of waterfowl and fishing gear on zebra mussel larvae dispersal. Biol Invasions 18: 115–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cannamela DA, Brader JDD, Johnson W. 1978. Feeding habits of catfishes in Barkley and Kentucky lakes. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, vol. 32, pp. 686–691. [Google Scholar]
  • Dames HR, Coon TG, Robinson JW. 1989. Movements of channel and flathead catfish between the Missouri River and a tributary, Perche Creek. Trans Am Fish Soc 118: 670–679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doadrio I. 2001. Atlas y libro rojo de los peces continentales de Espana. Madrid, Spain: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza. [Google Scholar]
  • Elvira B, Almodóvar A. 2001. Freshwater fish introductions in Spain: facts and figures at the beginning of the 21st century. J Fish Biol 59: 323–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Filipe A, Marques T, Tiago P, Ribeiro F, Da Costa LM, Cowx I, Collares-Pereira M. 2004. Selection of priority areas for fish conservation in Guadiana River Basin, Iberian Peninsula. Conserv Biol 18: 189–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Filipe AF, Araujo MB, Doadrio I, Angermeier PL, Collares-Pereira MJ. 2009. Biogeography of Iberian freshwater fishes revisited: the roles of historical versus contemporary constraints. J Biogeogr 36: 2096–2110. [Google Scholar]
  • Filipe AF, Magalhães MF, Collares-Pereira MJ. 2010. Native and introduced fish species richness in Mediterranean streams: the role of multiple landscape influences. Divers Distrib 16: 773–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gago J, Anastácio P, Gkenas C, Banha F, Ribeiro F. 2016. Spatial distribution patterns of the non-native European catfish, Silurus glanis, from multiple online sources − a case study for the River Tagus (Iberian Peninsula). Fish Manag Ecol 23: 503–509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goolsby JA, De Barro PJ, Makinson JR, Pemberton RW, Hartley DM, Frohlich DR, 2006. Matching the origin of an invasive weed for selection of a herbivore haplotype for a biological control programme. Mol Ecol 15: 287–297. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gozlan R, Britton J, Cowx I, Copp G. 2010. Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. J Fish Biol 76: 751–786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins JA, Nesler TP. 1991. Nonnative fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin: an issue paper. Final Report of Colorado State University Larval Fish Laboratory to Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Hermoso VH, Garrido FB, Marín JP. 2008. Spatial distribution of exotic fish species in the Guadiana river basin, with two new records. Limnetica 27: 189–194. [Google Scholar]
  • Hubbs C, Edwards RJ, Garrett GP. 2008. An annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Hubley Jr. RC. 1963. Movement of tagged channel catfish in the upper Mississippi River. Trans Am Fish Soc 92: 165–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S. 2008. Fish invasions in the world's river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. PLoS Biol 6: e 28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ligas A. 2008. First record of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818), in central Italian waters. J Appl Ichthyol 24: 632–634. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • López V, Franch N, Pou Q, Clavero M, Gaya N, Queral, JM. 2012. Atles dels peixos del delta de l'Ebre. Collecció tècnica, 3. Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament d'Agricultura, Ramaderia, Pesca i Medi Natural. Parc Natural del Delta de l'Ebre. 1a edició. Barcelona, Spain, 224 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsh PC, Brooks JE. 1989. Predation by ictalurid catfishes as a deterrent to re-establishment of hatchery-reared razorback suckers. Southwest Nat 34: 188–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marta P, Bochechas J, Collares-Pereira MJ. 2001. Importance of recreational fisheries in the Guadiana River Basin in Portugal. Fish Manag Ecol 8: 345–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCammon GW. 1956. A tagging experiment with channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in the lower Colorado River. Calif Fish Game 42: 323–335. [Google Scholar]
  • Mehta SV, Haigh RG, Homans FR, Polasky S, Venette RC. 2007. Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management. Ecol Econ 61: 237–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moyle P. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Moyle PB, Light T. 1996. Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol Conserv 78: 149–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olden J, Poff N. 2005. Long-term trends of native and non-native fish faunas in the American Southwest. Anim Biodivers Conserv 28: 75–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Paruch W. 1986. Identification of Wisconsin catfishes (Ictaluridae): a key based on pectoral fin spines. Wis Acad Sci Arts Lett 74: 58–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez-Bote JL. 2006. Peces introducidos en Extremadura. Análisis histórico y tendencias de futuro. Rev Estud Extrem 62: 485–494. [Google Scholar]
  • Perry Jr. WG. 1969. Food habits of blue and channel catfish collected from a brackish-water habitat. Prog Fish Cult 31: 47–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rabitsch W, Milasowszky N, Nehring S, Wiesner C, Wolter C, Essl F. 2013. The times are changing: temporal shifts in patterns of fish invasions in central European fresh waters. J Fish Biol 82: 17–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro F, Veríssimo A. 2014. Full westward expansion of Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Iberian Peninsula. J Appl Ichthyol 30: 540–542. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro F, Chaves ML, Marques TA, da Costa LM. 2006. First record of Ameiurus melas (Siluriformes, Ictaluridae) in the Alqueva reservoir, Guadiana basin (Portugal). Cybium 30: 283–284. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro F, Collares-Pereira MP, Moyle PB. 2009a. Non-native fish in the fresh waters of Portugal, Azores and Madeira Islands: a growing threat to aquatic biodiversity. Fish Manag Ecol 16: 255–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro F, Gante HF, Sousa G, Filipe AF, Alves MJ, Magalhães MF. 2009b. New records, distribution and dispersal pathways of Sander lucioperca in Iberian freshwaters. Cybium 33: 255–256. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro F, Rylková K, Moreno-Valcárcel R, Carrapato C, Kalous L. 2015. Prussian carp Carassius gibelio: a silent invader arriving to the Iberian Peninsula. Aquat Ecol 49: 99–104. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774. [Google Scholar]
  • Savini D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Marchini A, Tricarico E, Gherardi F, Olenin S, Gollasch S. 2010. The top 27 animal alien species introduced into Europe for aquaculture and related activities. J Appl Ichthyol 26: 1–7. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN. 2003. Assessing response rates and non response bias in web and paper surveys. Res High Educ 44: 409–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simberloff D. 2001. Inadequate solutions for a global problem? Trends Ecol Evol 16: 323–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sneed KE. 1951. A method for calculating the growth of channel catfish, Ictalurus lacustris punctatus. Trans Am Fish Soc 80: 174–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tucker CS, Hargreaves JA. 2004. Biology and culture of channel catfish, vol. 34. San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier Publishing Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Uzunova E, Zlatanova S. 2007. A review of the fish introductions in Bulgarian freshwaters. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 37: 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Venturelli PA, Hyder K, Skov C. 2017. Angler apps as a source of recreational fisheries data: opportunities, challenges and proposed standards. Fish Fish 18: 578–595. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 360: 1847–1857. [Google Scholar]
  • Welcomme RL. 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 213: 120. [Google Scholar]
  • Wong LL, Peatman E, Lu J, Kucuktas H, He S, Zhou C, Na-Nakorn U, Liu Z. 2011. DNA barcoding of catfish: species authentication and phylogenetic assessment. PLoS One 6: 17812. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ziebell CD. 1973. Ultrasonic transmitters for tracking channel catfish. Prog Fish Cult 35: 28–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zogaris S, Chatzinikolaou Y, Koutsikos N, Economou AN, Oiokonomou E, Michaelides G, Hadjisterikotis E, Beaumont WRC, Ferreira MT. 2012. Freshwater fish assemblages in Cyprus with emphases on the effects of dams. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 42: 165–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.