Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 409, 2013
Article Number 06
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013047
Published online 10 June 2013
  • Adams J.A., Tuchman N.C. and Moore P.A., 2005. Effects of CO2-altered detritus on growth and chemically mediated decisions in crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 330–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alderman D.J., Holdich D. and Reeve I., 1990. Signal crayfish as vectors in crayfish plague in Britain. Aquaculture, 86, 3–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Armstrong D.P. and Seddon P.J., 2008. Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown K.M., 1998. The role of shell strength in selective foraging by crayfish for gastropod prey. Freshw. Biol., 40, 255–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carter I. and Newbery, P., 2004. Reintroduction as a tool for population recovery of farmland birds. Ibis, 146, 221–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Conant S., 1988. Saving endangered species by translocation: are we tinkering with evolution? Bioscience, 254–257. [Google Scholar]
  • Correia A.M., 2003. Food choice by the introduced crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 40, 517–528. [Google Scholar]
  • Dick J.T.A., 1995. The cannibalistic behaviour of two Gammarus species (Crustacea: Amphipoda). J. Zool. 236, 697–706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorn N.J. and Wojdak J.M., 2004. The role of omnivorous crayfish in littoral communities. Oecologia, 140, 150–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F. and Barbaresi S., 2007. Feeding preferences of the invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. BFPP-Connaissance Et Gestion Du Patrimoine Aquatique, 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., Acquistapace P. and Santini G., 2001. Foraging by a threatened species – the white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes. Archiv. Fur. Hydrobiologie, 152, 339–351. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., Acquistapace P. and Santini G., 2004. Food selection in freshwater omnivores: a case study of crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes. Archiv. Fur. Hydrobiologie, 159, 357–376. [Google Scholar]
  • Guan R.Z. and Wiles P.R., 1998. Feeding ecology of the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in a British lowland river. Aquaculture, 169, 177–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey G.L., Moorhouse, T.P., Clifford, N.J., Henshaw, A.J., Johnson, M.F., Macdonald, D.W., Reid, I. and Rice, S.P., 2011. Evaluating the role of invasive aquatic species as drivers of fine sediment-related river management problems: The case of the signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Prog. Phys. Geog., 35, 517–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hodder, K.H. and Bullock J.M., 1997. Translocations of native species in the UK: implications for biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol., 547–565. [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN 2012. IUCN Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson M.F., Rice S.P. and Reid I., 2011. Increase in coarse sediment transport associated with disturbance of gravel river beds by signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 36, 1680–1692. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kindemba V., Whitehouse A. and Peay S., 2009. Using GIS to prioritise and identify regional Ark sites for whiteclawed crayfish: South west aggregate and mineral extraction sites. Buglifethe Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough, 19 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P., Füreder L., Kouba A., Reynolds J. and Souty-Grosset C., 2011. Current conservation strategies for European crayfish. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 401, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Lewis S. and Holdich D., 2002. Pacifastacus. Biology Freshwater Crayfish, 511–540. [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge D.M., Kershner M.W., Aloi J.E. and Covich A.P., 1994. Effects of an omnivorous crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on a freshwater littoral food-web. Ecology, 75, 1265–1281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Macneil C., Dick J.T.A. and Elwood R.W., 1997. The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus spp. (Crustacea:amphipoda): problems and perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. Biol. Rev., 72, 349–364. [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews M., Reynolds J. and Keatinge M., 1993. Macrophyte reduction and benthic community alteration by the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). Freshw. Crayfish 9, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  • Nilsson E., Olsson K., Persson A., Nyström P., Svensson G. and Nilsson U., 2008. Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes. Oecologia, 157, 641–651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nyström P. and Strand J.A., 1996. Grazing by a native and an exotic crayfish on aquatic macrophytes. Freshw. Biol., 36, 673–682. [Google Scholar]
  • Nyström P., Bronmark C. and Graneli W., 1996. Patterns in benthic food webs: A role for omnivorous crayfish? Freshw. Biol., 36, 631–646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nyström P., Bronmak C. and Graneli W., 1999. Influence of an exotic and a native crayfish species on a littoral benthic community. Oikos, 85, 545–553. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S., 2009. Selection criteria for “ark sites” for white-clawed crayfish. Crayfish Conservation in the British Isles, 63. [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S. and Rogers D., 1998. The peristaltic spread of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in the River Wharfe, Yorkshire, England. Freshw. Crayfish, 12, 665–676. [Google Scholar]
  • Renai B. and Gherardi F., 2004. Predatory efficiency of crayfish: comparison between indigenous and non-indigenous species. Biol. Invasions, 6, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds J.D. and O’Keeffe C., 2005. Dietary patterns in stream- and lake-dwelling populations of Austropotamobius pallipes. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 715–730. [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M. and Gibertini G., 2007. Feeding habits of the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (Decapoda, Astacidae) in a brook in Latium (central Italy). Ital. J. Zool., 74, 157–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seddon P.J., Armstrong D.P. and Maloney R.F., 2007. Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology, Conserv. Biol., 21, 303–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty–Grosset C. and Reynolds J., 2009. Current ideas on methodological approaches in European crayfish conservation and restocking procedures. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394–395, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Stenroth P., Holmqvist N., Nyström P., Berglund O., Larsson P. and Graneli W., 2008. The influence of productivity and width of littoral zone on the trophic position of a large-bodied omnivore. Oecologia, 156, 681–690. [Google Scholar]
  • Usio N. and Townsend C.R., 2002. Functional significance of crayfish in stream food webs: roles of omnivory, substrate heterogeneity and sex. Oikos, 98, 512–522. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Usio N., Kamiyama R., Saji A. and Takamura N., 2009. Size-dependent impacts of invasive alien crayfish on a littoral marsh community. Biol. Conserv., 142, 1480–1490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanni M.J., 2002. Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 341–370. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitledge G.W. and Rabeni C.F., 1997. Energy sources and ecological role of crayfishes in an Ozark stream: insights from stable isotopes and gut analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54, 2555–2563. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.