Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 408, 2013
Article Number 01
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 01 March 2013
  • AFNOR, 2009. Qualité de l’eau. Prélèvement des macro-invertébrés aquatiques en rivières peu profondes. XP T 90-333. Afnor, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous, 2003. Rivers and Lakes - Typology, Reference Conditions and Classification Systems. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Guidance. Document No. 10. [Google Scholar]
  • ASCONIT, 2012. Mise au point d’un indice de bio-indication de la qualité de l’eau à partir des macro-invertébrés benthiques. Annual Report year 2011. Direction Régionale de l’Environnement et Office de l’Eau Guadeloupe, 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Bailey R., Norris R. and Reynoldson T., 2003. Bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems using the reference condition approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B. and Stribling J.B., 2009. Biological Data Analysis. In: A Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish. Second Edition. Rep. EPA/841-B-99–002, US EPA, Off. Water, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Bass D., 2003. A comparison of freshwater macroinvertebrate communities on small Caribbean islands. BioScience, 53, 1094–1100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., Boyero L., Covich A.P., Dobson M., Lake S. and Pearson R.G., 2008. Are tropical streams ecologically different from temperate streams? In: Dudgeon D. (ed.), Tropical Stream Ecology, Academic Press, San Diego, 257–284. [Google Scholar]
  • Céréghino R. and Park Y.S., 2009. Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: commentary. Environ. Modell. Softw., 24, 945–947. [Google Scholar]
  • Chaves M.L., Costa J.L., Chainho P., Costa M.J. and Prat N., 2011. Are Water Framework Directive stream types biologically relevant? The case of the Mondego river, Portugal. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Lim., 47, 119–131. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K., Mao C.X. and Chang J., 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and compared incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology, 85, 2717–2727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Compin A. and Céréghino R., 2007. Spatial patterns of macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in streams in relation to physical variables and land-cover in Southwestern France. Landscape Ecol., 22, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar]
  • Cruiskshank M.M. and Tomlison R.W., 1996. Application of CORINE land cover methodology to the UK. Some issues raised from Northern Ireland. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 4/5, 235–248. [Google Scholar]
  • Delgado C., Pardo I. and García L., 2010. A multimetric diatom index to assess the ecological status of coastal Galician rivers (NW Spain). Hydrobiologia, 644, 371–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ENSAT (Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agronomie de Toulouse), 1995. Étude faunistique des rivières martiniquaises. ENSA-Toulouse Technical Report, 1–216. [Google Scholar]
  • European Council, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Gabriels W., Lock K., De Pauw N. and Goethals P.L.M., 2010. Multimetric Macroinvertebrate Index Flanders (MMIF) for biological assessment of rivers and lakes in Flanders (Belgium). Limnologica, 40, 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Gonçalves V., Raposeiro P. and Costa A.C., 2008. Benthic diatoms and macroinvertebrates in the assessment of the ecological status of Azorean stream. Limnetica, 27, 317–328. [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Feld C.K., Moog O. and Ofenböck T., 2006. Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives. Hydrobiologia, 566, 311–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huryn A.D. and Wallace J.B., 1987. Local geomorphology as a determinant of macrofaunal production in a mountain stream. Ecology, 68, 1932–1942. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes S.J., 2005. Application of the Water Framework Directive to Macaronesian freshwater systems. Biol. Environ., 105, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
  • INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques), 2009. Populations légales 2009 des Départements d’Outre-Mer (DOM). [Google Scholar]
  • Jongman R.H.G., Ter Braak C.J.F. and van Tongerenm O.F.R., 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly F.L., Harrison A.J., Allen M., Connor L. and Rosell R., 2012. Development and application of an ecological classification tool for fish in lakes in Ireland. Ecol. Indic., 18, 608–619. [Google Scholar]
  • Lepš J. and Šmilauer P., 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–282. [Google Scholar]
  • Lions J., Allier D., Pinson S. and Vittecoq B., 2008. Identification des zones à risque de fond géochimique élevé dans les cours d’eau et les eaux souterraines en Martinique. Technical Report BRGM RP-56748-FR, 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lücke J.D. and Johnson J., 2009. Detection of ecological change in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages using single metric, multimetric or multivariate approaches. Ecol. Indic., 9, 659–669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mondy C.P., Villeneuve B., Archaimbault V. and Usseglio-Polatera P., 2012. A new macroinvertebrate-based multimetric index (I2M2) to evaluate ecological quality of French wadeable streams fulfilling the WFD demands: A taxonomical and trait approach. Ecol. Indic., 18, 452–467. [Google Scholar]
  • Sandin L. and Johnson R.K., 2000. Ecoregions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of Swedish streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 462–474. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith G.C., Covich A.P. and Brasher A.M.D., 2003. An ecological perspective on the biodiversity of tropical island streams. BioScience, 53, 1048–1051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stark B.P., 2000. Notes on the Anacroneuria (Plecoptera: Perlidae) of Guyana with the description of a new species. Aquat. Insect, 22, 305–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Starmühlner F., 1977. Contribution to the knowledge of the freshwater fauna of La Reunion (Mascarene). Cah ORSTOM, Ser. Hydrobiol., 11, 239–250. [Google Scholar]
  • Tate C.M. and Heiny J.S., 1995. The ordination of benthic invertebrate communities in the South Platte River Basin in relation to environmental factors. Fresh. Biol., 33, 439–454. [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak C.J. and Smilauer F.P., 1998. Reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: software for canonical community ordination (version 4), Ithaca, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • van de Bund W. and Solimini A., 2006. Ecological Quality Ratios for ecological quality assessment in inland and marine waters. EU project REBECCA Deliverable 10, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallin M., Wiederholm T. and Johnson R.K., 2003. Guidance on establishing reference conditions and ecological status class boundaries for inland surface waters. Final Report to the European Commission from CIS Working Group 2.3 – REFCOND. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu D. and Legg D., 2007. Structures of benthic insect communities in two southeastern Wyoming (USA) streams: similarities and differences among spatial units at different local scales. Hydrobiologia, 579, 279–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.