Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 404, 2012
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 16
Published online 22 May 2012
  • Adebisi A.A., 1981. The physico-chemical hydrology of tropical seasonal river-Upper Ogun River. Hydrobiologia, 79, 157–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Adeniji H.A.,1975. Limnology and biological production in the pelagic zone of Jebba Lake, Nigeria, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Ibadan, 234 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Adeniji, H.A., 1979. Seasonal variation in the pelagic primary productivity of the Kainji Lake and the River Niger below the Dam, Kainji Lake Annual Report, 79, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Adeniyi H.A., 1978. Preliminary studies of fisheries limnology of Bakolori Lake, Nigeria, Report presented to Sokoto Rima River Basin Development Authority, 19 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ajani E.K., 2001. Effects of biotic and abiotic components of the habitat on fish productivity in Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ibadan, 277 p. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA, 1987. American Public Health Association: Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water Washington DC, 1076 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ayodele I.A. and Ajani E.K., 1999. Essentials of fish farming (aquaculture), Odufuwa Publishers, Ibadan. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnett, B.E., 1983. Oligochaetes as indicators of pollution in the Humber with special reference to Turbicoides. Int. J. Environ., 34, 12–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Bidwell A., 1979a. The effect of water level fluctuation on the biology of Lake Kainji, Nigeria. The Nigerian Field, 41, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  • Bidwell A., 1979b. Observation on the biology of the nymphs of Povilla adusta (Ephemeroptera) in Lake Kainji. Hydrobiologia, 67, 1022–1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown J.H., 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat., 124, 225–279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Charpenter B. and Morin A., 1994. Effect of current velocity on the ingestion rate of blackfly. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51, 1615–1618. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernicoff S., Fox H. and Venkatakrishnan R., 1997. Essentials of Geology, Worth Publishers, New York, 21–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Chester T., Strong J. and Ayers P., 1999. SGM: The Waterfalls, Assessed from on the 22nd of February, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M., 1994. Change in Marine communities: An Approach to Statistical analysis and interpretation, Natural Environmental Reseach Council, Bournemouth, 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Cowley P.D. and Whitefield A.K., 2001. Ichthyofaunal characteristics of a typical temporarily open/closed estuary in the south-east coast of South Africa. Ichthyology, 71, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Durand J.R. and Leveque C., 1980. Flora et Fauna aquatiques de L. Afrique, SaleloSoundanienne, Tomes I and ORSTROM. [Google Scholar]
  • Edmonton W.T., 1959. Freshwater biology, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1248 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Edokpayi C.A., Okenyi J.C., Ogbeigu A.E. and Osemen E.C., 2000. The effects of human activities on the macrobenthic invertebrates of Ibekuma stream, Ekpoma. Nigeria. Biosci. Res., 12, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Edung S., 2001. Dynamics in the epibenthic larvae in relation to minor petroleum spill in the Cross River Estuary, M. Sci. thesis, Universty of Calabar, Nigeria, 45 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Egborge A.B., 1981. Biodiversity and chemistry of Warri River, Ben Miller, Warri, Nigeria, 23–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Elvira M., 1987. Taxonomic revision of the Genus Chondrostoma (Agassi, 1835) (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Cybium, 11, 111–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Erkakan F., Nalbant T.T. and Ozeren S.C., 2007. Seven new species of Barbatula three new species of Schistura and a new species of Seminemacheilus (Ortariophysi: Balitoridae: Nemachellinae) from Turkey. Journal of Fisheries International, 2, 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Ewa-Oboho I.O., 1999. Seasonal variation and community structure of epibenthic algae on the roots of mangrove Rhizophora mangle at a shallow tropical estuary. J. Trop. Ecol., 34, 160–167. [Google Scholar]
  • Ewa-Oboho I.O. and Oladimeji S., 2004. Benthic – pelagic production in the mouth Cross River Estuary. Tropical J. Appl. Ecol., 41, 162–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Faroque S., 1989. Riverine angiosperm of West Africa. J. Trop. Ecol., 32, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer G. and Harris M., 2003. Waterfalls of Ontario. Waterfallogy 101, retrieved from http://www.startica/user/mharris/waterfallogy.htm/ on the 17/01/06. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer W., Schneider M. and Bauchot M.L., 1987. MediterraneeetMer Noire Zone De Peche 37 Revision Volumn II Vertebrates FAO Rome, 763–1578. [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison T.D. and Whitefield A.K., 1995. Fish community structure in three temporarily open/closed estuaries of the Natal coast. Ichthyology, 64, 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Hawking J.H., 2000. A prelimnary guide to keys and zoological information to identify invertebrates from Australian inland waters, In: Darling M. (ed.), Freshwater Research Australia, 2 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoyos, C. and Comin, F.A., 1999. The importance of inter-annual variability for management. Hydrobiologia, 395/396, 281–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ikpi G.U. and Offem B.O., 2011. Fish fauna of Agbokum waterfalls in South-eastern Nigeria. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 1, 299–307. [Google Scholar]
  • Imoobe T.O.T. and Adeyinka T.O., 2010. Crustaceans of Jamieson River, Nigeria. Ph.D. thesis of the University of Benin, Benin, Nigeria. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeje C.Y. and Fernando C.H., 1985. A practical guide to the identification of Nigerian zooplankton, Kainji Lake Research Institute, New Bussa, 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Karlman S.G., 1982. The annual flood regime as a regulatory mechanism for phytoplankton production in Kainji Lake, Nigeria. Hydrobiologia, 86, 93–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kellog L.L., 1994. Save our streams. Monitor’s guide to aquatic macroinvertebrates, Izaac Walton League of America Gaithersburg Maryland, 60 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs C.J., 1978. Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, Harper intellectual edition, New York, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Krinitskii L., 1972. Protected Areas in the worlds industrially advanced regions: importance, progress and problems, Second World Conference on National Parks, 5–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Kurasawa H. and Shiraishi Y., 1954. Studies on the biological production of Lake Suwa, Research Institute of Natural Resources, 22–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Lewis W.M., 1996. Tropical lakes, How attitude makes a difference. In: Schiemer F. and Boland K.T. (eds.), Perspective in Tropical Limnology, SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Lenat D.R., Penrose D.L. and Eaglesor A.W., 1981. Variable effects of sediment addition on stream benthos. Hydrobiologia, 79, 187–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson S.M. and Lieberman D.M., 2002. The influence of flow and other environmental factors on benthic invertebrates in the Sacramento River, USA. Hydrobiologia, 489, 117–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Offem B.O., Akegbejo-Samsons Y., OmoniyiI T. and Ikpi G.U., 2008. Dynamics of the limnological features and diversity of zooplankton populations of the Cross River System SE Nigeria. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 393, 2–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Ogbeibu A.E. and Oribhabor B.J., 2002. Ecological impact of River impoundment, using macro- invertebrates as indicators. Water Res., 36, 2427–2434. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oke O.O., 1990. Limnology and macrobenthos of Owena reservoir, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria, 23 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Padisak J. and Reynolds C.S., 1998. Selection of phytoplankton associations in Lake Balaton, Hungary in response to eutrophication and restoration measures, with special reference to the Cyanoprokaryotes. Hydrobiologia, 384, 46–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Pennack R.W., 1949. The dynamics of fresh-water populations. Ecol. Monogr., 16, 342–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Prescott G.W., 1982. Algae of the West Great Lakes Area, W.M.C. Brown Company Publishers, Dubugue Press, Towa, 200–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Rader R.B. and Ward J.B., 1988. Influence on regulation of environmental condition and the macroinvertebrate communities in the Upper Colorado River. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage., 2, 597–599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schlosser I.J., 1987. A conceptual framework for fish communities in small warmwater streams. In community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. In: Mathews W.J., Heins D.C. (eds.), University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Schoener T.W., 1988. Ecologicalinteractions. In: Myer R.R. and Giller P.S. (eds.), Chapman and Hall, London, 255– 299. [Google Scholar]
  • Sendacz S., Kubo E. and Cestarolli M.A., 1985. Limnologia de reservatios do estado do Sao Paulo, Brasil. VIII zooplankton, 145–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma O.P., 1986. Text book of algae, TATA McGrawhill Publishing Comp. Ltd., New Delhi, 396 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva E.I.L., 2004. Phytoplankton Characteristics, Trophic Evolution and Nutrient Dynamics inan Urban Eutrophic Lake: Kandy Lake in Sri Lanka. In: Reddy M.V. (ed.), Restoration and Management of Tropical Eutrophic Lakes, Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, 123 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva E.I.L., 2005. Ecology of phytoplankton in tropical waters: introduction to the topic and ecosystem changes from Sri Lanka. Pollution, 4, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoyneva M.P., 2003. Steady-state phytoplankton assemblage in shallow Bulgarian wetlands. Hydrobiologia, 502, 169–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sugunan V.V., 2000. Ecology and fishery management of reservoirs in India. Hydrobiologia, 430, 121–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teugels G.G., 1982. Prelimnary results of morphological study of five African species of the subgenus Clarias ( Pisces: Clariidae). J. Nat. Hist., 16, 439– 553. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teugels, G.G., Reid, M. and King, R.P., 1992. Fishes of the Cross River Basin. Taxonomy, Zoogeography, ecology and conservation. Annales Musée Royal d’Afrique Centrale, 266, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Tokeshi M. and Schmid P.E., 2002. Niche division and abundance: an evolutionary perspective. Popul. Ecol., 44, 189–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tressler W.L., Tiffany L.H. and Spencer W.P., 1940. Limnological studies of Buckeye Lake Ohio. J. Sci., 40, 261–266. [Google Scholar]
  • Tumwesigwe C., Yusuf S.K. and Makanga B., 2000. Structure and composition of macro-invertebrates of a tropical forest stream. Western Uganda African Journal of Ecology, 38, 72–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, J.L., 1970. The fish population of impounded Kainji Lake, FAO Technical Report, No. 1, 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  • UNESCO, 1978. Phytoplankton Mannual, UNESCO, Paris, 337 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Victor R. and Ogbeibu A.E., 1991. Macro-invertebrates communities in the erosional biotope of an urban stream in Nigeria. Tropical Zoology, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Vorwerk P.D., Whitefield A.K., Cowley P.D. and Paterson A.W., 2001. A survey of Eastern Cape estuaries with particular reference to the ichthyofuana. Ichthyology, 72, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Vyverman W., 1996. The Indo-Malaysian North-Australian phycogeographical region revised. Hydrobiologia, 118, 107–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Welcome R.L., 2003. River fisheries in Africa. The relationship to flow regimes. NAGA, 26, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitfield A.K. and Blaber S.J.M., 1979. The distribution of freshwater cichlids Sarotherodon massambicus in estuarine systems. Environ Biol. Fishes, 4, 77– 81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Willen T., 1959. The phytoplankton Gordon, A bay of Lake Maleren. OIKOS, 10, 241–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J.H., 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, Pretice-Hall International, London, 45–48. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.