Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 404, 2012
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 07 June 2012
  • Bernerth H. and Stein S., 2003. Crangonyx pseudogracilis und Corophium robustum (Amphipoda) zwei neue einwanderer im hessischen main sowie erstnachweis für Deutschland von C. robustum. Lauterbornia, 48, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Berthold E. and Kaiser I., 2004. Weitere Funde von Crangonyx pseudogracilis und Chelicocorophium robustum (Amphipoda) im Main. Lauterbornia, 50, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Crawford GI., 1937. An amphipod, Eucrangonyx gracilis S.I. Smith, new to Britain. Nature, 139, 327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dick J.T.A., Faloon S.E. and Elwood R.W., 1998. Active brood care in an amphipod: influences of embryonic development, temperature and oxygen. Anim. Behav., 56, 663–672. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dick J.T.A., MacNeil C. and Anderson R., 1999. The Distribution of Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Bousfield, 1958) (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Northern Ireland, with Notes on Its Ecology and Behaviour. Ir. Nat. J., 26, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Gledhill T., Sutcliffe D.W. and Williams W.D., 1993. British freshwater Crustacea Malacostraca: a key with ecological notes. Sci. Publ. Freshw. Biol. Assoc. Ambleside., 52, 1–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowski M., Bacela K. and Konopacka A., 2007. How to be an invasive gammarid – comparison of life history traits. Hydrobiologia, 590, 75–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guerao G., 2003. Some observations on the life history of the freshwater amphipod Echinogammarus longisetosus (Pinkster, 1973) (Gammaridae) from Catalonia (Spain, N Iberian peninsula). Anim. Biodivers. Conserv., 26, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes J.M.C., 1975. Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield a freshwater amphipod new to Ireland. Ir. Nat. J., 18, 25. [Google Scholar]
  • Holsinger J.R., 1976. The freshwater amphipod crustaceans (Gammaridae) of North America, USEPA Off. Res., and Dev., Aq. Biol. Sect., Cincinnati, Ohio, 89 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hynes H.B.N., 1955. The reproductive cycle of some freshwater Gammaridae. J. Anim. Ecol., 24, 352–387. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirkpatrick A.J., Gerhardt A., Dick J.T., Laming P. and Berges J.A., 2006. Suitability of Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Crustacea: Amphipoda) as an early warning indicator in the multispecies freshwater biomonitor. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 13, 242–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • MacNeil C., Elwood R.W. and Dick J.T.A., 1999. Differential microdistributions and interspecific interactions in coexisting Gammarus and Crangonyx amphipods. Ecography, 22, 415–423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin T.R., 1986. Effects of water quality on the biology of freshwater peracarids, University of Nottingham, unpublished Ph.D. thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin T.R. and Holdich D.M., 1986. The acute lethal toxicity of heavy metals to peracarid crustaceans (with particular reference to fresh-water asellids and gammarids). Water Res., 20, 1137–1147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S., 1993. A revision of the genus Echinogammarus (Stebbing, 1899) with some notes on related genera, Mem. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Verona., IIa Serie., A, Biologica, Sezione Scienze della vita, 10 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S. and Platvoet D., 1983. Further observations on the distribution and biology of two alien amphipods, Gammarus tigrinus (Sexton, 1939), and Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield, 1958, in the Netherlands (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bull. Zool. Mus., Univ. Amst., 9, 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S., Dieleman J. and Platvoet D., 1980. The present position of Gammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939, in the Netherlands, with the description of a newly discovered amphipod species, Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Bousfield, 1958) (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bull. Zool. Mus., Univ. Amst., 7, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S., Scheepmaker M., Platvoet D. and Broodbakker N., 1992. Drastic changes in the amphipod fauna (Crustacea) of Dutch inland waters during the last 25 years. Bijdr. Dierkd., 61, 193–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Silfverberg H., 1999. A provisional list of Finnish Crustacea. Memoranda Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica, 75, 15–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Slothouber Galbreath J., Smith J.E., Terry R.S., Becnel J.J. and Dunn A.M., 2004. Invasion success of Fibrillanosema crangonycis, n. sp., n.g., a novel vertically transmitted microsporidian parasite from the invasive amphipod host Crangonyx pseudogracilis. Int. J. Parasitol., 34, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  • Slothouber Galbreath J., Smith J.E., Becnel J.J., Butlin R.K. and Dunn A.M., 2010. Reduction in post-invasion genetic diversity in Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Amphipoda: Crustacea): a genetic bottleneck or the work of hitchhiking vertically transmitted microparasites? Biol. Invasions, 12, 191–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Sutcliffe D.W. and Carrick T.R., 1981. Effect of temperature on the duration of egg development, and moulting and growth in juveniles of Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in the laboratory. Freshw. Biol., 11, 511–522. [Google Scholar]
  • Tattersal W.M., 1937. Occurrence of Eucrangonyx gracilis. Nature, 139, 593. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tittizer T., Schöll F., Banning M., Haybach A. and Schleuter M., 2000. Aquatische neozoen im makrozoobenthos der binnenwasserstraßen Deutschlands. Lauterbornia, 39, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Väinölä R., Witt J.D.S., Grabowski M., Bradbury J.H., Jazdzewski K. and Sket B., 2008. Global diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda; Crustacea) in freshwater. In: Balian E. et al. (eds.), Freshwater animal diversity assessment. Hydrobiologia, 595, 241–255. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J. and Holsinger J.R., 2003. Systematics of the freshwater amphipod genus Crangonyx (Crangonyctidae) in North America, Memoir number 6, Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville, 274 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.