EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 394-395 (2009) Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394-395 (2009) 04 References
Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 394-395, 2009
Regional European Crayfish Workshop: Future of Native Crayfish in Europe
Article Number 04
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2009016
Published online 24 December 2009
  • Bovbjerg R.V., 1956. Some factors affecting aggressive behavior in crayfish. Physiol. Zool., 29, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Brewis J.M. and Bowler K., 1982. Growth of the freshwater crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Northumbria. Freshw. Biol., 12, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M., Kozák P. and Vích P., 2008. Evaluation of different marking methods for spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus). Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 389, 02. [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M., Kozák P. and Kouba A., 2009a. Movement patterns and ranging behavior of the invasive spiny-cheek crayfish in a small reservoir tributary. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 174, 329–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M., Kouba A. and Kozák P., 2009b. Moulting and growth in relation to form alternation of male spiny-cheek crayfish, Orconectes limosus. Zool. Stud. (to appear). [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M., Kouba A. and Kozák P., 2009c. Intra-sex dimorphism in crayfish females. Zoology (submitted). [Google Scholar]
  • Chybowski L., 2007. Morphometrics, fecundity, density, and feeding intensity of the spiny-cheek crayfish, Orconectes limosus (Raf.) in natural conditions. Arch. Pol. Fish., 15, 175–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans L.H. and Edgerton B.F., 2002. Pathogens, Parasites and Commensals. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 377–438. [Google Scholar]
  • Figiel C.R. and Miller, 1995. The frequency of chelae autotomy and its influence on the growth and survival of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 68, 472–483. [Google Scholar]
  • Füreder L., Edsman L., Holdich D.M., Kozák P., Machino Y., Pöckl M., Renai B., Reynolds J.D., Schulz H., Schulz R., Sint D., Taugbol T. and Trouilhé M.C., 2006. Indigenous crayfish habitat and threats. In: Souty-Grosset C., Holdich D.M., Noël P., Reynolds J.D. and Haffner P. (eds.), Atlas of Crayfish in Europe, Publications Scientifiques du MNHN, Paris, 25–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., 2002. Behavior. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 258–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Hamr P., 2002. Orconectes. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 585–608. [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs H.H. Jr., 1981. The crayfishes of Georgia. Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 318, 549 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs H.H. Jr., 1989. An illustrated checklist of the American crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 480, 236 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs H.H. III., 2001. Decapoda. In: Thorp J.H. and Covich A.P. (eds.), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, second edition, Academic press, London, 955–1001. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., 2002. Background and Functional Morphology. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 3–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M. and Black J., 2007. The spiny-cheek crayfish, Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817) [Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae], digs into the UK. Aquat. Invasions, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., Haffner P., Noël P., Carral J., Füreder L., Gherardi F., Machino Y., Madec J., Pöckl M., Śmietana P., Taugbol T. and Vigneux E., 2006. Species files. In: Souty-Grosset C., Holdich D.M., Noël P., Reynolds J.D. and Haffner P. (eds.), Atlas of Crayfish in Europe, Publications Scientifiques du MNHN, Paris, 49–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Isely J.J. and Stockett P.E., 2001. Tag retention, growth, and survival of red swamp crayfish marked with a visible implant tag. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 21, 422–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P., Buřič M. and Policar T., 2006. The fecundity, time of egg development and juvenile production in spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus) under controlled conditions. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 380-381, 1171–1182. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P., Buřič M., Policar T., Hamáčková J. and Lepičová A., 2007. The effect of inter- and intra-specific competition on survival and growth rate of native juvenile noble crayfish Astacus astacus and alien spiny-cheek crayfish Orconectes limosus. Hydrobiologia, 590, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Lozan J.L., 2000. On the threat to the European crayfish: A contribution with the study of the activity behaviour of four crayfish species (Decapoda: Astacidae). Limnologica, 30, 156–166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariappan P., Balasundaram C. and Schmitz B., 2000. Decapod crustacean chelipeds: an overview. C. Biosciences, 25, 301–313. [Google Scholar]
  • Musil M., Buřič M., Policar T., Kouba A. and Kozák P., 2009. Comparison of day and night activity between noble (Astacus astacus) and spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus). Freshw. Crayfish, (to appear). [Google Scholar]
  • Nakata K. and Goshima S., 2003. Competition for shelter of preferred sizes between the native crayfish species Cambaroides japonicus and the alien crayfish species Pacifastacus leniusculus in Japan in relation to prior residence, sex difference, and body size. J. Crust. Biol., 23, 897–907. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nyström P., 2002. Ecology. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 192–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Payne J.F., 1978. Aspects of life histories of selected species of North American crayfishes. Fisheries, 3, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Pieplow U., 1938. Fischereiwissenschaftliche Monografie von Cambarus affinis Say. Zeitschrift für Ficherei und deren Hilfswissenschaften, 36, 349–440. [Google Scholar]
  • Pöckl M., Holdich D.M. and Pennerstorfer J., 2006. Identifying native and alien crayfish species in Europe, European Project CRAYNET, 47 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Powell M.L., Hammer H.S. and Watts S.A., 1998. Observation on the frequency of claw loss in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 29, 485–490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds J.D., 2002. Growth and reproduction. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 152–191. [Google Scholar]
  • Söderbäck B., 1991. Interspecific dominance relationship and aggressive interactions in the freshwater crayfishes Astacus astacus (L.) and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). Can. J. Zool., 69, 1321–1325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stein R.A., 1976. Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproductive activities. Can. J. Zool., 54, 220–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stucki T.P., 2002. Differences in live history of native and introduced crayfish species in Switzerland. Freshwater Crayfish, 13, 463–476. [Google Scholar]
  • Tierney A.J., Gunarante C., Jennison K., Monroy V. and Donnelly L., 2008. Behavioral correlates and alternate male forms (form I and form II) in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus. J. Crust. Biol., 28, 596–600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.