EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 426 (2025) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 426 (2025) 10 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 426, 2025
Topical issue on Ecological, evolutionary and environmental implications of floating photovoltaics
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2025006
Published online 05 May 2025
  • AFNOR. 2016. Norme Française NFT 90–354. Water quality − Sampling, treatment and analysis of benthic diatoms from streams and canals, March. 1 19 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Barranguet C, Van Beusekom S, Veuger B, Neu T, Manders E, Sinke J, Admiraal W. 2004. Studying undisturbed autotrophic biofilms: still a technical challenge. Aquat Microb Ecol 34: 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B-Béres V, Lukács Á, Török P, Kókai Z, Novák Z, T-Krasznai E, Tóthmérész B, Bácsi I. 2016. Combined eco-morphological functional groups are reliable indicators of colonisation processes of benthic diatom assemblages in a lowland stream. Ecol Indic 64: 31–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B-Béres V, Stenger-Kovács C, Buczkó K, Padisák J, Selmeczy GB, Lengyel E, Tapolczai K. 2023. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater and marine diatoms. Hydrobiologia 850: 2707–2733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Becking LGMB, Canfield DE. 2015. Baas Becking's Geobiology: Or Introduction to Environmental Science. Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Cantonati M, Lowe RL. 2014. Lake benthic algae: toward an understanding of their ecology. Freshw Sci 33: 475–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CEMAGREF. 1982. Etude des méthodes biologiques d'appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Q.E. Lyon-A.F. Bassin Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, 218 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Cibils‐Martina L, Principe RE, Márquez JA, Gari EN, Albariño RJ. 2017. Succession of algal assemblages in headwaters: a comparison of pine afforested and natural grassland streams. Ecol Res 32: 423–434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR. 1993. Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18: 117–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • de Lima RLP, Paxinou K, Boogaard FC, Akkerman O, Lin F-Y. 2021. In-situ water quality observations under a large-scale floating solar farm using sensors and underwater drones. Sustainability 13. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunck B, Bortolini JC, Rodrigues L, Rodrigues LC, Jati S, Train S. 2013. Functional diversity and adaptative strategies of planktonic and periphytic algae in isolated tropical floodplain lake. Braz J Bot 36: 257–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Exley G, Armstrong A, Page T, Jones ID. 2021. Floating photovoltaics could mitigate climate change impacts on water body temperature and stratification. Sol Energy 219: 24–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Exley G, Page T, Thackeray SJ, Folkard AM, Couture R-M., Hernandez RR, Cagle AE, Salk KR, Clous L, Whittaker P, Chipps M, Armstrong A. 2022. Floating solar panels on reservoirs impact phytoplankton populations: a modelling experiment. J Environ Manage 324. [Google Scholar]
  • Farrar LW, Bahaj AS, James P, Anwar A, Amdar N. 2022. Floating solar PV to reduce water evaporation in water stressed regions and powering water pumping: case study Jordan. Energy Convers Manag 260: 115598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Finkel ZV, Vaillancourt CJ, Irwin AJ, Reavie ED, Smol JP. 2009. Environmental control of diatom community size structure varies across aquatic ecosystems. Proc R Soc B 276: 1627–1634. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzgerald SA, Gardner WS. 1993. An algal carbon budget for pelagic‐benthic coupling in Lake Michigan. Limnol Oceanogr 38: 547–560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fox J, Weisberg S. 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/ [Google Scholar]
  • Gorjian S, Sharon H, Ebadi H, Kant K, Scavo FB, Tina GM. 2021. Recent technical advancements, economics and environmental impacts of floating photovoltaic solar energy conversion systems. J Clean Prod 278: 124285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jöbgen A, Palm A, Melkonian M. 2004. Phosphorus removal from eutrophic lakes using periphyton on submerged artificial substrata. Hydrobiologia 528: 123–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly MG, Whitton BA. 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J Appl Phycol 7: 433–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khan MJ, Singh R, Shewani K, Shukla P, Bhaskar PV, Joshi KB, Vinayak V. 2020. Exopolysaccharides directed embellishment of diatoms triggered on plastics and other marine litter. Sci Rep 10: 18448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kling HJ. 1993. Asterionella formosa Ralfs: the process of rapid size reduction and its possible ecological significance. Diatom Res 8: 475–479. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1991. Freshwater flora of Central Europe. Bacillariophyceae: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In Ettl H, Gerloff I, Heyning H, Mollenhauer D, eds. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 2. Stuttgart: G. Fischer. [Google Scholar]
  • Lacerda ALDF, Rodrigues LDS, Van Sebille E, Rodrigues FL, Ribeiro L, Secchi ER, Kessler F, Proietti MC. 2019. Plastics in sea surface waters around the Antarctic Peninsula. Sci Rep 9: 3977. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H, Hofmann G, Werum M, Cantonati M, Gabriele H, Marcus W. 2017. Freshwater benthic diatoms of Central Europe: over 800 common species used in ecological assessment, Kelly M, ed., Koeltz Botanical Books, Schmitten-Oberreifenberg/Germany, 942 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecointe C, Coste M, Prygiel J. 1993. OMNIDIA: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269-270: 509–513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Z, Ma C, Li X, Deng Z, Tian Z. 2023. Aquatic environment impacts of floating photovoltaics and implications for climate change challenges. J Environ Manage 346: 118851. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marcel R, Berthon V, Castets V, Rimet F, Thiers A, Labat F, Fontan B. 2017. Modelling diatom life forms and ecological guilds for river biomonitoring. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 1. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Negro AI. 1994. Comparación de las comunidades fitoplanctónicas en dos embalses de reciente creación: Riaño y Valparaíso (España). Limnetica 10: 115–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nemes-Kókai Z, Borics G, Csépes E, Lukács Á, Török P, T-Krasznai E, Bácsi I, B-Béres V. 2024. Role of microhabitats in shaping diversity of periphytic diatom assemblages. Hydrobiologia 851: 959–972. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nobre R, Boulêtreau S, Colas F, Azémar F, Tudesque L, Parthuisot N, Favriou P, Cucherousset J. 2023. Potential ecological impacts of floating photovoltaics on lake biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 188: 113852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nobre R, Rocha SM, Healing S, Ji Q, Boulêtreau S, Armstrong A, Cucherousset J. 2024. A global study of freshwater coverage by floating photovoltaics. Sol Energy 267: 112244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nobre RLG, Vagnon C, Boulêtreau S, Colas F, Azémar F, Tudesque L, Parthuisot N, Millet P, Cucherousset J. 2025. Floating photovoltaics strongly reduce water temperature: a whole-lake experiment. J Environ Manage 375: 124230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oemke MP, Burton TM. 1986. Diatom colonisation dynamics in a lotic system. Hydrobiologia 139: 153–166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista HBA, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill MO, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M-H., Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak CJF, Weedon J. 2001. Vegan: Community Ecology Package, version 2. 6–8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. [Google Scholar]
  • Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA. 2022. Renewable energy and climate change. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 158: 112111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira PMB, Almeida RM, Cardoso SJ. 2024. Effects of floating photovoltaics on aquatic organisms: a review. Hydrobiologia (in press) [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Y, Stevenson RJ, Hill BH, Herlihy AT, Collins GB. 1996. Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment. J North Am Benthol Soc 15: 481–495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passy SI. 2007. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behaviour along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquat Bot 86: 171–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peszek Ł, Zgrundo A, Noga T, Kochman-Kędziora N, Poradowska A, Rybak M, Puchalski C, Lee J. 2021. The influence of drought on diatom assemblages in a temperate climate zone: a case study from the Carpathian Mountains, Poland. Ecol Indic 125: 107579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M, Charles DF. 2007. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecol Indic 7: 48–70. [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 1998. What factors influence the species composition of phytoplankton in lakes of different trophic status? In Alvarez-Cobelas M, Reynolds CS, Sánchez-Castillo P, Kristiansen J, eds. Phytoplankton and Trophic Gradients. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 11–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riato L, Leira M. 2020. Heterogeneity of epiphytic diatoms in shallow lakes: implications for lake monitoring. Ecol Indic 111: 105988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riato L, Hill RA, Herlihy AT, Peck DV, Kaufmann PR, Stoddard JL, Paulsen SG. 2022. Genus-level, trait-based multimetric diatom indices for assessing the ecological condition of rivers and streams across the conterminous United States. Ecol Indic 141: 109131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F, Bouchez A. 2012. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 01. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosa-Clot P. 2020. FPV and environmental compatibility. In: Floating PV Plants. Elsevier, pp. 101–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Rühland KM, Paterson AM, Smol JP. 2015. Lake diatom responses to warming: reviewing the evidence. J Paleolimnol 54: 1–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sahu A, Yadav N, Sudhakar K. 2016. Floating photovoltaic power plant: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66: 815–824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soininen J. 2007. Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms − a review. Diatom Res 22: 473–490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soininen J, Teittinen A. 2019. Fifteen important questions in the spatial ecology of diatoms. Freshw Biol 64: 2071–2083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sommer U. 1988. Growth and survival strategies of planktonic diatoms. In: Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–260. [Google Scholar]
  • Spillias S, Kareiva P, Ruckelshaus M, McDonald-Madden E. 2020. Renewable energy targets may undermine their sustainability. Nat Clim Chang 10: 974–976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stenger-Kovács C, Buczkó K, Hajnal É, Padisák J. 2007. Epiphytic, littoral diatoms as bioindicators of shallow lake trophic status: Trophic Diatom Index for Lakes (TDIL) developed in Hungary. Hydrobiologia 589: 141–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sutherland WJ, Atkinson PW, Butchart SHM, Capaja M, Dicks LV, Fleishman E, Gaston KJ, Hails RS, Hughes AC, Le Anstey B, Le Roux X, Lickorish FA, Maggs L, Noor N, Oldfield TEE, Palardy JE, Peck LS, Pettorelli N, Pretty J, Spalding MD, Tonneijck FH, Truelove G, Watson JEM, Wentworth J, Wilson JD, Thornton A. 2022. A horizon scan of global biological conservation issues for 2022. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37: 95–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taurozzi D, Cesarini G, Scalici M. 2022. Epiplastic microhabitats for epibenthic organisms: a new inland water frontier for diatoms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30: 17984–17993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tudesque L, Grenouillet G, Gevrey M, Khazraie K, Brosse S. 2012. Influence of small-scale gold mining on French Guiana streams: Are diatom assemblages valid disturbance sensors? Ecol Indic 14: 100–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tudesque L, Pool TK, Chevalier M. 2019. Planktonic diatom community dynamics in a tropical flood-pulse lake: the Tonle Sap (Cambodia). Diatom Res 34: 1–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang T, Chang P, Huang Y, Lin T, Yang S, Yeh S, Tung C, Kuo S, Lai H, Chen C. 2022. Effects of floating photovoltaic systems on water quality of aquaculture ponds. Aquac Res 53: 1304–1315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weckstrom J, Korhola A, Blom T. 1997. The relationship between diatoms and water temperature in thirty subarctic Fennoscandian lakes. Arct Alp Res 29: 75. [Google Scholar]
  • Winter JG, Duthie HC. 2000. Epilithic diatoms as indicators of stream total N and total P concentration. J North Am Benthol Soc 19: 32–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang H, Flower RJ. 2012. Effects of light and substrate on the benthic diatoms in an oligotrophic lake: a comparison between natural and artificial substrates. J Phycol 48: 1166–1177. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao T, Grenouillet G, Pool T, Tudesque L, Cucherousset J. 2016. Environmental determinants of fish community structure in gravel pit lakes. Ecol Freshw Fish 25: 412–421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.