Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 426, 2025
Ecological, evolutionary and environmental implications of floating photovoltaicst
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2024023
Published online 15 January 2025
  • Anonymous. 2020. The Rulebook on the proclamation and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species in Republic of Srpska (Official Gazette of RS, no. 65/20). [Google Scholar]
  • Bănărescu PM. 2004. Distribution pattern of the aquatic fauna of the Balkan Peninsula. In: Griffiths HI, Kryštufek B, Reed JM, ed. Balkan biodiversity: pattern and process in the European hotspot. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 203–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16: 37–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Berger C, Füreder L. 2013. Linking species conservation management and legal species protection: a case study on stone crayfish. Freshw Crayfish 19: 161–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Bláha M, Patoka J, Japoshvili B, Let M, Buřič M, Kouba A, Mumladze L. 2021. Genetic diversity, phylogenetic position and morphometric analysis of Astacus colchicus (Decapoda, Astacidae): a new insight into Eastern European crayfish fauna. Integr Zool 16: 368–378. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bubb DH, Thom TJ, Lucas MC. 2006. Movement, dispersal and refuge use of co-occurring introduced and native crayfish. Freshw Biol 51: 1359–1368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Council of Europe. 1979. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Heritage, Appendix, III., Bern, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • Council of Europe. 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (Habitats Directive). [Google Scholar]
  • Crandall KA, De Grave S. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. J Crust Biol 37: 615–653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. JModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9: 772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • de Leeuw A, Morton A, van Baak CGC, Vincent SJ. 2018. Timing of arrival of the Danube to the Black Sea: Provenance of sediments from DSDP site 380/380A. Terra Nova. 114–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotech 3: 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  • Füreder L, Edsman L, Holdich D, Kozak P, Machino Y, Pockl M, Renai B, Reynolds J, Schulz RW, Schulz HK. et al. 2006. Indigenous crayfish habitat and threats. In: Atlas of Crayfish in Europe, Souty-Grosset C, Holdich DM, Noel PY, Reynolds JD, Haffner P, ed. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France, 25–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Füreder L, Gherardi F, Souty-Grosset C. 2017. Austropotamobius torrentium (errata version published in 2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T2431A121724677. Accessed on 28 February 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Groza M-I, Cupșa D, Lovrenčić L, Maguire I 2021. First record of the stone crayfish in the Romanian lowlands. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 422: 27. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59: 307–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc B 270: 313–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM. 2002. Distribution of crayfish in Europe and some adjoining countries. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 367: 611–650. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ion MC, Bloomer CC, Bărăscu TI, Oficialdegui FJ, Shoobs NF, Williams BW, Scheers K, Clavero M, Grandjean F, Collas M, et al. 2024. World of Crayfish™: a web platform towards real-time global mapping of freshwater crayfish and their pathogens. PeerJ 12: e18229. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kerby JL, Riley SP, Kats LB, Wilson P. 2005. Barriers and flow as limiting factors in the spread of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in southern California streams. Biol Conserv 126: 402–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klobučar GI, Podnar M, Jelić M, Franjević D, Faller M, Štambuk A, Gottstein S, Simić V, Maguire I. 2013. Role of the Dinaric Karst (western Balkans) in shaping the phylogeographic structure of the threatened crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium. Freshw Biol 58: 1089–1105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: Update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Lovrenčić L, Bonassin L, Boštjančić LL, Podnar M, Jelić M, Klobučar G, Jaklič M, Slavevska-Stamenković V, Hinić J, Maguire I 2020a. New insights into the genetic diversity of the stone crayfish: taxonomic and conservation implications. BMC Evol Biol 20: 1–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lovrenčić L, Pavić V, Majnarić S, Abramović L, Jelić M, Maguire I. 2020b. Morphological diversity of the stone crayfish − traditional and geometric morphometric approach. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 421: 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Marčić Z, Buj I, Duplić A, Ćaleta M, Mustafić P, Zanella D, Mrakovčić M. 2011. A new endemic cyprinid species from the Danube drainage. J Fish Biol 79: 418–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L. 2019. Introducing a new Austropotamobius crayfish species (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacidae): a Miocene endemism of the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Zool Anz 279: 94–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petrusek A, Filipova L, Kozubíková-Balcarová E, Grandjean F. 2017. High genetic variation of invasive signal crayfish in Europe reflects multiple introductions and secondary translocations. Freshw Sci 36: 838–850. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinform 19: 1572–1574. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A. 2017. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol 34: 3299–3302 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schubart CD, Huber MGJ. 2006. Genetic comparisons of German populations of the stone crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium (Crustacea: Astacidae). Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 380–381: 1019–1028. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Holdich DM, Noël PY, Reynolds JD, Haffner P. 2006. Atlas of Crayfish in Europe, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. Patrim Nat 64: 187. [Google Scholar]
  • Stanković D, Zorić K, Đuretanović S, Stamenković G, Ilić M, Marković V, Marić S. 2024. A new perspective on the molecular dating of the stone crayfish with an extended phylogeographic information on the species. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05613-3 [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120 [Google Scholar]
  • Trontelj P, Machino Y, Sket B. 2005. Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in the crayfish genus Austropotamobius inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34: 212–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Veith M, Kosuch J, Vences M. 2003. Climatic oscillations triggered post-Messinian speciation of Western Palearctic brown frogs (Amphibia, Ranidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 26: 310–327. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K, Pursiainen M, Vilkman R. 1978. A new folding trap model which prevents crayfish from escaping. Freshw. Crayfish 4: 235–242. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.