Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 425, 2024
Management of habitats and populations/communities
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2024001
Published online 26 February 2024
  • Bianchini I, Cunha-Sationo MB, Milan JAM, Rodrigues CJ, Dias JHP. 2010. Growth of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royal under controlled conditions. Hydrobiologia 644: 301–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dayan FE, Netherland MD. 2005. Hydrilla, the perfect aquatic weed, becomes more noxious than ever. Outlooks Pest Manag 16: 277–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doyle R, Grodowitz M, Smart M, Owens C. 2007. Separate and interactive effects ofcompetition and herbivory on the growth, expansion, and tuber formation of Hydrilla verticillata. Biol Control 41: 327–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program − Habitat Conservation Program. 2012. RECON Environmental Inc., Hicks and Company, Zara Environmental LLC, and BIO-WEST. San Antonio (TX): Edwards Aquifer Authority. Available at: https://www.edwardsaquifer.net/pdf/Final_HCP.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards RW, Brown MW. 1960. An aerial photographic method for studying the distribution of aquatic macrophytes in shallow rivers. J Ecol 48: 161–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan: Report 3. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Flook JM. 1975. Additions and corrections to the flora of Texas. Sida 6: 114. [Google Scholar]
  • Getsinger KD, Fox AM, Haller WT. 1996. Herbicide Application Technique Development for Flowing Water: Summary of Research Accomplishments. Miscellaneous Paper A-96-3 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. [Google Scholar]
  • Glomski LN, Netherland MD. 2012. Does hydrilla grow an inch per day? Measuring short-term changes in shoot length to describe invasive potential. J Aquat Plant Manag 50: 54–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Groeger AW, Brown PF, Tietjen TE, Kelsey TC. 1997. Water quality of the San Marcos River. Texas J Sci 49: 279–294. [Google Scholar]
  • Haller WT, Richardson R. 2020. Hydrilla − Chapter 2.2. In: Gettys LA, Haller WT, Petty DG,eds. Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook, 4th Edition. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation, Marietta, GA. Available: http://www.aquatics.org/bmp.html [Google Scholar]
  • Hardy T, Kollaus K, Tower K. 2010. Evaluation of the Proposed Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program Drought of Record Minimum Flow Regimes in the Comal and San Marcos River Systems (p. 81). Texas State University: River Systems Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Hardy T, Kollaus K, Tolman K, Heard T, Howard M. 2016. Ecohydraulics in appliedriver restoration: a case study in the San Marcos River, Texas, USA. J Appl Water Eng Res 4: 2–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Havel JE, Kovalenko KE, Thomaz SM, Amalfitano S, Kats LB. 2015. Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future. Hydrobiologia 750: 147–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hofstra D, Champion P, Clayton J. 2010. Predicating invasive success of Hydrillaverticillata (L.f.) Royal in flowing water. Hydrobiologia 656: 213–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hussner A, Stiers I, Verhofstad MJJM, Bakker ES, Grutters BMC, Haury J, van Valkenburg JLCH, Brundu G, Newman J, Clayton JS, Anderson LWJ, Hofstra D. 2017. Management and control methods of invasive alien freshwater aquatic plants: a review. Aquat Bot 136: 112–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson JT. 2019. Ex situ phenology of Zizania Texana, an endangered aquatic macrophyte, under different water velocities. Aquat Bot 153: 88–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Langeland KA. 1996. Hydrilla verticillata (L.F.) Royle (Hydrocharitaceae), “The Perfect Aquatic Weed.” Castanea 61: 293–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemke DE. 1989. Aquatic macrophytes of the upper San Marcos River, Hays Co., Texas. Southwest Nat 34: 289–291. [Google Scholar]
  • Li HL, Wang YY, Zhang Q, Wang P, Zhang MX, Yu FH. 2015. Vegetative propagule pressure and water depth affect biomass and evenness of submerged macrophyte communities. PLoS One 10: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Li J, Yu H, Luan Y. 2015. Meta-analysis of the copper, zinc, and cadmium absorptioncapacities of aquatic plants in heavy metal-polluted water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12: 14958–14973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Q, Han Y, Chen K, Huang X, Li K, He H. 2021. Effects of water depth on the growth of the submerged macrophytes Vallisneria natans and Hydrilla verticillata: implications for water level management. Water 13 (18): 2590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Louback-Franco N, Dianez MS, Souza DC, Thomaz SM. 2020. A native species does not prevent the colonization success of an introduced submerged macrophyte, even at low propagule pressure. Hydrobiologia 847: 1619–1629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Madsen TV, Sand-Jensen K. 1991. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation in aquatic macrophytes. Aquat Bot 41: 5–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mohr S, Berghahn R, Feibicke M, Meinecke S, Ottenströer T, Schmiedling I, Schmiediche R, Schmidt R. 2007. Effects of the herbicide metazachlor on macrophytes and ecosystem function in freshwater pond and stream mesocosms. Aquat Toxicol 82: 73–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nawrocki JJ. 2011. Environmental and Physiological Factors Affecting Submersed Aquatic Weed Management. M.S. thesis. North Carolina State University. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/handle/1840.16/7126. Accessed August 23, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • Owens CS, Smart RM, Dick GO. 2008. Resistance of Vallisneria to invasion from hydrilla fragments. J Aquat Plant Manag 46: 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Owens CS, Madsen JD, Smart RM, Stewart. 2001. Dispersal of native and non-native aquatic plant species in the San Marcos River, Texas. J Aquat Plant Manag 39: 75–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Poole JM, Bowles DE. 1999. Habitat characterizations of Texas wild rice (Zizania texana),an endangered aquatic macrophyte from the San Marcos River, Texas, USA. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw 9: 291–302. [Google Scholar]
  • Poole J, Hutchinson JT, Hathcock CR, Han D. 2022. A thirty-year assessment of theendangered aquatic macrophyte, Zizania texana, endemic to the upper reach of the San Marcos River in Central Texas, USA. Aquat Bot 177: 103482. [Google Scholar]
  • Power P. 1996. Direct and indirect effects of floating vegetation mats on Texas wildrice (Zizania texana). Southwest Nat 41: 462–464. [Google Scholar]
  • Pulzatto MM, Cunha ER, Dainez-Filho MS, Thomaz SM. 2019. Association between the success of an invasive macrophyte, environmental variables and abundance of a competing native macrophyte. Front Plant Sci 10: 514. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. New York: Freeman and Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Steward KK. 1980. Retardation of hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) regrowth through chemicalcontrol of vegetative reproduction. Weed Sci 28: 245–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steward KK, Van TK. 1987. Comparative studies of monoecious and dioecious hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) biotypes. Weed Sci 35: 204–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thiébaut G, Martinez L. 2015. An exotic macrophyte bed may facilitate the anchorage of exotic propagules during the first stage of invasion. Hydrobiologia 746: 183–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • United Stated Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. San Marcos and Comal Springs and Associated Aquatic Ecosystems (revised) Recovery Plan. USFWS Region 2, Albuquerque, NM. 134 pp. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Documents/R2ES/San_Marcos_(%26)_Comal_Springs_Aquatic_Ecosystems_Revised_Recovery_Plan_Feb_14_1996.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2021. National Water Information System Data, USGS Water Data for the Nation. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/. [Google Scholar]
  • Van TK, Steward KK. 1990. Longevity of monoecious hydrilla propagules. J Aquat Plant Manag 28: 74–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Waller SS, Lewis JK. 1979. Occurrence of C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathways in North American grasses. J Range Manag 32: 12–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wood KA, Stillman RA, Clarke RT, Daunt F, O'Hare MT. 2012. Measuring submerged macrophyte standing crop in shallow rivers: a test of methodology. Aquat Bot 102: 28–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu H, Wang L, Liu C, Fan S. 2018. Coverage of native plants is key factor influencing the invasibility of freshwater ecosystems by exotic plants in China. Front Plant Sci 9: 250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.