| Issue |
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 425, 2024
Biological conservation, ecosystems restoration and ecological engineering
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 3 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2023025 | |
| Published online | 23 January 2024 | |
- Aldridge DC, Brian JI, Ćmiel A, et al. 2023. Fishing for hosts: larval spurting by the endangered thick-shelled river mussel, Unio crassus. Ecology 104 (5): 4026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Aldridge DC. 1997. Reproductive ecology of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus Pallas) and unionid mussels, PhD thesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University. [Google Scholar]
- Balon EK. 1962. Note on the number of Danubian bitterlings developmental stages in mussels. Věstník Československé Společnosti Zoologické 26: 250–256. [Google Scholar]
- Barankiewicz M, Svobodová J, Picek J, Semerádová S, Beránková T, Musil J. 2021. Metodika regulace an eradikace invazních druhů ryb: výběr vhodných metod v závislosti na charakteru vodního útvaru. Výzkumný ústav vodohospodářský, T. G. Masaryka, v.v.i., Praha, 61 p. [Google Scholar]
- Barnhart MC, Haag WR, Roston WN. 2008. Adaptations to host infection and larval parasitism in Unionoida. J N Am Benthol Soc 27: 370–394. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brian J, Reynolds S, Aldridge DC. 2022. Parasitism dramatically alters the ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Funct Ecol 36: 2029–2042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hellmann J, Byers J, Bierwagen B, Dukes J. 2008. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22 (3): 534–543. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondo T, Yamashita J, Kano M. 1984. Breeding ecology of five species of bitterling (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in a small creek. Physiol Ecol Jpn 21: 53–62. [Google Scholar]
- Lewisch E, Arnold F, Fuehrer HP, Harl J, Thielen F, El-Matbouli M. 2023. Parasites and their impact on thick-shelled river mussels Unio crassus from two populations in Luxembourg. Dis Aquat Organ 153: 31–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopes-Lima M, Sousa R, Geist J, et al. 2017. Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Biol Rev 92: 572–607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lusk S, Hanel L, Lojkásek B, Lusková V, Muška M. 2017. Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky. Příroda 34: 51–82. [Google Scholar]
- Methling C, Douda K, Reichard M. 2019. Intensity-dependent energetic costs in a reciprocal parasitic relationship. Oecologia 191 (2): 285–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills SC, Taylor MI, Reynolds JD. 2005. Benefits and costs to mussels from ejecting bitterling embryos: a test of the evolutionary equilibrium hypothesis. Anim Behav 70: 31–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Modesto V, Ilarri M, Souza AT, et al. 2018. Fish and mussels: Importance of fish for freshwater mussel conservation. Fish Fish 19: 244–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Prié V. 2017. Newly overlapping ranges: first records of Potomida littoralis (Cuvier, 1798) infestation by the European Bitterling Rhodeus amarus (Bloch, 1782). J. Conchol 42: 381–382. [Google Scholar]
- Rahel F, Olden J. 2008. Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22 (3): 521–533. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regulation 2016. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 16 grudnia 2016 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej zwierząt. Available from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20160002183 (Accessed 24.10.2023). [Google Scholar]
- Reichard M, Douda K, Przybylski M, et al. 2015. Population-specific responses to an invasive species. Proc Royal Soc B 282: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Reichard M, Liu H, Smith C. 2007. The co-evolutionary relationship between bitterling fishes and freshwater mussels: insights from interspecific comparisons. Evol Ecol Res 9: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Reichard M, Ondračková M, Przybylski M, Liu H, Smith C. 2006. The costs and benefits in an unusual symbiosis: experimental evidence that bitterling fish (Rhodeus sericeus) are parasites of unionid mussels in Europe. J Evolution Biol 19: 788–796. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reichard M, Polačik M, Tarkan AS, et al. 2010. The bitterling-mussel coevolutionary relationship in areas of recent and ancient sympatry. Evolution 64: 3047–3056. [Google Scholar]
- Reichard M, Vrtílek M, Douda K, Smith C. 2012. An invasive species reverses the roles in a host-parasite relationship between bitterling fish and unionid mussels. Biol Lett 8: 601–604. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds JD, Debuse VJ, Aldridge DC. 1997. Host specialization in an unusual symbiosis: European bitterlings spawning in freshwater mussels. Oikos 78: 539–545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rouchet R, Smith C, Liu H, et al. 2017. Avoidance of host resistance in the oviposition-site preferences of rose bitterling. Evol Ecol 31: 769–783. [Google Scholar]
- Smith C, Reichard M, Jurajda P, Przybylski M. 2004. The reproductive ecology of the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). J Zool 262 (2): 107–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith C, Reynolds JD, Sutherland WJ, Jurajda P. 2000. Adaptive host choice and avoidance of superparasitism in the spawning decisions of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48 (1): 29–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith C, Rippon K, Douglas A, Jurajda P. 2001. A proximate cue for oviposition site choice in the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Freshwater Biol 46: 903–911. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Spence R, Smith C. 2013. Rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus) embryos parasitise freshwater mussels by competing for nutrients and oxygen. Acta Zoologica 94: 113–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Soler J, Wantzen KM, Araujo R. 2019. Rhodeus amarus (Bloch, 1782): a new potential threat for Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793) (Unionoida, Margaritiferidae). Freshw Sci 38: 406–411. [Google Scholar]
- Sousa R, Bogan AE, Gonçalves DV, et al. 2020. Microcondylaea bonellii as a new host for the European bitterling Rhodeus amarus. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 421: 4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa R, Zając T, Halabowski D, et al. 2023. A roadmap for the conservation of freshwater mussels in Europe. Conserv Biol 37 (2): 13994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stadnichenko AP, Stadnichenko YA. 1980. The effect of bitterling larvae on the lamellibranch mollusc Unio rostratus gentilis Haas. Gidrobiologicheskii Zhurnal 17: 57–61. [Google Scholar]
- Tatoj K, Ćmiel AM, Kwaśna D, Lipińska AM, Zając K, Zając T. 2017. The endangered thick-shelled river mussel (Unio crassus): a new host species for the European bitterling (Rhodeus amarus). Biodivers Conserv 26: 1217–1224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Van Damme D, Bogutskaya N, Hoffmann RC, Smith C. 2007. The introduction of the European bitterling Rhodeus amarus to west and central Europe. Fish Fish 8: 79–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wiepkema PR. 1961. An ethological analysis of the reproductive behaviour of the bitterling (Rhodeus amarus Bloch). Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie 14: 103–199. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.