Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 424, 2023
Biological conservation, ecosystems restoration and ecological engineering
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 17 May 2023
  • Baras E, Lambert H, Philippart J-C. 1994. A comprehensive assessment of the failure of Barbus barbus spawning migrations through a fish pass in the canalized River Meuse (Belgium). Aquat Living Resour 7: 181–189. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Baudoin J-M, Burgun V, Chanseau M, Larinier M, Ovidio M, Sremski W, Steinbach P, Voegtle B. 2015. Assessing the passage of obstacles by fish, 200 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Belliard J, Beslagic S, Delaigue O, Tales E. 2018. Reconstructing long-term trajectories of fish assemblages using historical data: the Seine River basin (France) during the last two centuries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 23430–23450. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benitez J-P, Ovidio M. 2017. The influence of environmental factors on the upstream movements of rheophilic cyprinids according to their position in a river basin. Ecol Freshw Fish 27: 660–671. [Google Scholar]
  • Benitez J-P, Nzau Matondo B, Dierckx A, Ovidio M. 2015. An overview of potamodromous fish upstream movements in medium-sized rivers, by means of fish passes monitoring. Aquat Ecol 49: 481–497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benitez J-P, Dierckx A, Nzau Matondo B, Rollin X, Ovidio M. 2018. Movement behaviours of potamodromous fish within a large anthropised river after the reestablishment of the longitudinal connectivity. Fish Res 207: 140–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benitez J-P, Dierckx A, Rimbaud G, Nzau Matondo B, Renardy S, Rollin X, Gillet A, Dumonceau F, Poncin P, Philippart J-C, Ovidio M. 2022. Assessment of Fish Abundance, Biodiversity and Movement Periodicity Changes in a Large River over a 20-Year Period. Environments 9: 22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA. 2007. Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshw Biol 52: 738–751. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boavida I, Jesus JB, Pereira V, Santos C, Lopes M, Cortes RMV. 2018. Fulfilling spawning flow requirements for potamodromous cyprinids in a restored river segment. Sci Total Environ 635: 567–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Britton JR, Pegg J. 2011. Ecology of European Barbel Barbus Barbus: implications for river, fishery, and conservation management. Rev Fish Sci 19: 321–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter SR, Stanley EH, Vander Zanden MJ. 2011. State of the World's freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36: 75–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Consuegra S, O'Rorke R, Rodriguez-Barreto D, Fernandez S, Jones J, Garcia de Leaniz C. 2021. Impacts of large and small barriers on fish assemblage composition assessed using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Sci Total Environ 790: 148054. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa MJ, Vasconcelos R, Costa JL, Cabral HN. 2007. River flow influence on the fish community of the Tagus estuary (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 587: 113–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Leeuw JJ, Winter HV. 2008. Migration of rheophilic fish in the large lowland rivers Meuse and Rhine, the Netherlands. Fish Manag Ecol 15: 409–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Epler P, Bartel R, Duc M, Olejarski D. 2004. The passage of fish through the fishway at Roznow dam in the1997–2003 period. Arch Pol Fish 12: 177–186. [Google Scholar]
  • Fredrich F, Ohmann S, Curio B, Kirschbaum F. 2003. Spawning migrations of the chub in the River Spree, Germany: Spawning migrations of chub. J Fish Biology 63: 710–723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fullerton AH, Burnett KM, Steel EA, Flitcroft RL, Pess GR, Feist BE, Torgersen CE, Miller DJ, Sanderson BL. 2010. Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities. Freshw Biol 55: 2215–2237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grimardias D, Chasserieau C, Beaufils M, Cattanéo F. 2022. Ecological connectivity of the upper Rhône River: upstream fish passage at two successive large hydroelectric dams for partially migratory species. Ecol Eng 178: 106545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huet M. 1949. Aperçu des relations entre la pente et les populations piscicoles des eaux courantes. Schweiz Z Hydrol 11: 332–351. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotusz J, Witkowski A, Baran M, Błachuta J. 2006. Fish migrations in a large lowland river (Odra R., Poland) − based on fish pass observations. Folia Zool 55: 386–398. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Pichon C, Tales É, Gorges G, Baudry J, Boët P. 2016. Using a continuous riverscape survey to examine the effects of the spatial structure of functional habitats on fish distribution. J Freshw Ecol 31: 1–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Legrand M, Briand C, Buisson L, Artur G, Azam D, Baisez A, Barracou D, Bourré N, Carry L, Caudal A-L., Charrier F, Corre J, Croguennec E, Der Mikaélian S, Josset Q, Le Gurun L, Schaeffer F, Laffaille P. 2020. Contrasting trends between species and catchments in diadromous fish counts over the last 30 years in France. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 421: 7. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas MC, Batley E. 1996. Seasonal movements and behaviour of adult barbel Barbus barbus, a Riverine cyprinid fish: implications for river management. J Appl Ecol 33: 1345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mameri D, Rivaes R, Oliveira JM, Pádua J, Ferreira MT, Santos JM. 2019. Passability of potamodromous species through a fish lift at a large hydropower plant (Touvedo, Portugal). Sustainability 12: 172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Noonan MJ, Grant JWA, Jackson CD. 2012. A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency: effectiveness of fish passage facilities. Fish Fish 13: 450–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Philippart JC. 2008. Movement patterns and spawning activity of individual nase Chondrostoma nasus (L.) in flow-regulated and weir-fragmented rivers. J Appl Ichthyol 24: 256–262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Baras E, Goffaux D, Birtles C, Philippart JC. 1998. Environmental unpredictability rules the autumn migration of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in the Belgian Ardennes. Hydrobiologia 371: 263–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Parkinson D, Philippart J-C, Baras E. 2007. Multiyear homing and fidelity to residence areas by individual barbel (Barbus barbus). Belg J Zool 137: 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Sonny D, Dierckx A, Watthez Q, Bourguignon S, de le Court B, Detrait O, Benitez JP. 2017. The use of behavioural metrics to evaluate fishway efficiency. River Res Applic 33: 1484–1493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Sonny D, Watthez Q, Goffaux D, Detrait O, Orban P, Nzau Matondo B, Renardy S, Dierckx A, Benitez J-P. 2020. Evaluation of the performance of successive multispecies improved fishways to reconnect a rehabilitated river. Wetlands Ecol Manage 28: 641–654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Renardy S, Dierckx A, Nzau Matondo B, Benitez J-P. 2021. Improving bypass performance and passage success of Atlantic salmon smolts at an old fish-hostile hydroelectric power station: a challenging task. Ecol Eng 160: 106148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ovidio M, Dierckx A, Benitez J-P. 2023. Movement behaviour and fishway performance for endemic and exotic species in a large anthropized river. Limnologica 99: 126061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pachla LA, Hartmann PB, Massaro MV, Pelicice FM, Reynalte‐Tataje DA. 2022. Recruitment of migratory fish in free‐flowing rivers with limited floodplain development. Aquat Conserv aqc. 3860. [Google Scholar]
  • Pander J, Mueller M, Geist J. 2013. Ecological functions of fish bypass channels in streams: migration corridor and habitat for rheophilic species. River Res Appl 29: 441–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Philippart JC. 1989. Ecologie des populations de poissons et caractéristiques physiques et chimiques des rivières dans le bassin de la Meuse Belge. Bulletin de la société géographique de Liège 25: 175–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M, Horký P, SlavíK O, VetešNíK L, Halačka K. 2011. Fish occurrence in the fishpass on the lowland section of the River Elbe, Czech Republic, with respect to water temperature, water flow and fish size. Folia Zool 60: 104–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rasmussen JE, Belk MC. 2017. Individual movement of stream fishes: linking ecological drivers with evolutionary processes. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 25: 70–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Romão F, Branco P, Quaresma AL, Amaral SD, Pinheiro AN. 2018. Effectiveness of a multi-slot vertical slot fishway versus a standard vertical slot fishway for potamodromous cyprinids. Hydrobiologia 816: 153–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Romão F, Quaresma AL, Santos JM, Branco P, Pinheiro AN. 2019. Cyprinid passage performance in an experimental multislot fishway across distinct seasons. Mar Freshw Res 70: 881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roscoe DW, Hinch SG. 2010. Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions. Fish Fish 11: 12–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva AT, Lucas MC, Castro-Santos T, Katopodis C, Baumgartner LJ, Thiem JD, Aarestrup K, Pompeu PS, O'Brien GC, Braun DC, Burnett NJ, Zhu DZ, Fjeldstad H-P., Forseth T, Rajaratnam N, Williams JG, Cooke SJ. 2018. The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. Fish Fish 19: 340–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Slavík O, Horký P, Bartoš L. 2009. Occurrence of cyprinids in fish ladders in relation to flow. Biologia 64: 999–1004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoffers T, Buijse AD, Verreth JAJ, Nagelkerke LAJ. 2022. Environmental requirements and heterogeneity of rheophilic fish nursery habitats in European lowland rivers: current insights and future challenges. Fish Fish 23: 162–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thiem JD, Binder TR, Dumont P, Hatin D, Hatry C, Katopodis C, Stamplecoskie KM, Cooke SJ. 2013. Multispecies fish passage bhaviour in a vertical slot fishway on the Richelieu River, Quebec, Canada. River Res Appl 29: 582–592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tummers JS, Hudson S, Lucas MC. 2016. Evaluating the effectiveness of restoring longitudinal connectivity for stream fish communities: towards a more holistic approach. Sci Total Environ 569–570: 850–860. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Veiga P, Vieira L, Bexiga C, Sá R, Erzini K. 2006. Structure and temporal variations of fish assemblages of the Castro Marim salt marsh, southern Portugal. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 70: 27–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weibel D, Peter A. 2013. Effectiveness of different types of block ramps for fish upstream movement. Aquat Sci 75: 251–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winter ER, Hindes AM, Lane S, Britton JR. 2021. Movements of common bream Abramis brama in a highly connected, lowland wetland reveal sub‐populations with diverse migration strategies. Freshw Biol 66: 1410–1422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.