Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 422, 2021
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021024
Published online 21 June 2021
  • Berezina NA, Gubelit YI, Polyak YM, Sharov AN, Kudryavtseva VA, Lubimtsev VA, Petukhov VA, Shigaeva TD. 2016. An integrated approach to the assessment of the eastern gulf of Finland health: a case study of coastal habitats. J Mar Syst 171: 159–171 [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Weatherby A. 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aquat Conserv 15: 693–714 [Google Scholar]
  • Boeker C, Lueders T, Mueller M, Pander J, Geist J. 2016. Alteration of physico-chemical and microbial properties in freshwater substrates by burrowing invertebrates. Limnologica 59:131–139 [Google Scholar]
  • Brown SC, Smith K, Batzer D. 1997. Macroinvertebrate responses to wetland restoration in northern New York. Environ Entomol 26: 1016–1024 [Google Scholar]
  • Chen T, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Fei Y, Ding Y, Gao F. 2016. Different combination of fishes, benthic animals and aquatic plants control of eutrophication water bodies by mesocosm experiment. Chin J Environ Eng 10: 5511‑5520. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke SJ, Wharton G. 2001. Sediment nutrient characteristics and aquatic macrophytes in lowland English rivers. Sci Total Environ 266: 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  • De Meester L, Declerck S, Stoks R, Louette G, Van De Meutter F, De Bie T, Michels E, Brendonck L. 2005. Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquat Conserv 15: 715–725. [Google Scholar]
  • Duan X, Wang Z, Xu M. 2010. Benthic macroinvertebrate and application in the assessment of stream ecology. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Eivers RS, Duggan IC, Hamilton DP, Quinn JM. 2018. Constructed treatment wetlands provide habitat for zooplankton communities in agricultural peat lake catchments. Wetlands 38: 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  • García-Chicote J, Armengol X, Rojo C. 2018. Zooplankton abundance: a neglected key element in the evaluation of reservoir water quality. Limnologica 69: 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J, Hawkins SJ. 2016. Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26: 942–962 [Google Scholar]
  • González-Ortegón E, Walton MEM, Moghaddam B, Vilas C, Prieto A, Kennedy HA, Pedro Cañavate J, Le Vay L. 2015. Flow regime in a restored wetland determines trophic links and species composition in the aquatic macroinvertebrate community. Sci Total Environ 503–504: 241‑250. [Google Scholar]
  • Granéli W, Solander D. 1988. Influence of aquatic macrophytes on phosphorus cycling in lakes. Hydrobiologia 170: 245–266. [Google Scholar]
  • Hassall C. 2014. The ecology and biodiversity of urban ponds. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev Water 1: 187–206. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill MJ, Biggs J, Thornhill I, Briers RA, Gledhill DG, White JC, Wood PJ, Hassall C. 2017. Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes. Glob Change Biol 23: 986–999. [Google Scholar]
  • http://www.fao.org/giahs/background/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • http://www.fao.org/giahs/giahsaroundtheworld/designated-sites/asia-and-the-pacific/huzhou-mulberry-dyke-fish-pond-system/zh/ [Google Scholar]
  • Kail J, Brabec K, Poppe M, Januschke K. 2015. The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: a meta-analysis. Ecol Indic 58: 311–321. [Google Scholar]
  • Lu J, Fu Z, Yin Z. 2008. Performance of a water hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes) system in the treatment of wastewater from a duck farm and the effects of using water hyacinth as duck feed. J Environ Sci 20: 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  • Lu Q, Chen H, Shao X, Wang Y, Tao M, He J, Tang L. 2013. Ecological characteristics of macrobenthic communities and its relationships with environmental factors in Hangzhou Xixi Wetland. Acta Ecol Sin 33: 2803–2815. [Google Scholar]
  • Ma T, Huang Q, Wang H, Wang Z, Wang C, Huang S. 2008. Selection of benthic macroinvertebrate-based multimetrics and preliminary establishment of biocriteria for the bioassessment of the water quality of Taihu Lake, China. Acta Ecol Sin 28: 1192–1200. [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran AE. 2003. Measuring Biological Diversity. Wiley-Blackwell: 1 edition [Google Scholar]
  • McDonald RI, Kareiva P, Rtt F. 2008. The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 141: 1695–1703. [Google Scholar]
  • McMeans BC, Mccann KS, Humphries M, Rooney N, Fisk AT. 2015. Food web structure in temporally-forced ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 30: 662–672. [Google Scholar]
  • Olguín EJ, Sánchez-Galván G, Melo FJ, Hernández VJ, González-Portela RE. 2017. Long-term assessment at field scale of floating treatment wetlands for improvement of water quality and provision of ecosystem services in a eutrophic urban pond. Sci Total Environ 584-585: 561–571. [Google Scholar]
  • Pander J, Geist J. 2013. Ecological indicators for stream restoration success. Ecol Indic 30: 106–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Pedersen ML, Friberg N, Skriver J, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Larsen SE. 2007. Restoration of skjern river and its valley—short-term effects on river habitats, macrophytes and macroinvertebrates. Ecol Eng 30: 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations. 2014. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations. 2018. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Key Facts. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-KeyFacts.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Salánki J, Farkas A, Kamardina T, Rózsa KS. 2003. Molluscs in biological monitoring of water quality. Toxicol Lett 140: 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  • Schindler DW. 2006. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnol Oceanogr 51: 356–363. [Google Scholar]
  • Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR. 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 16083–16088. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith VH, Schindler DW. 2009. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends Ecol Evol 24: 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson J, Hart D, Charles D, Nightengale T, Winter D. 2005. Effects of removal of a small dam on downstream macroinvertebrate and algal assemblages in a Pennsylvania stream. Freshw Sci 24: 192–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Turker H, Eversole AG, Brune DE. 2003. Comparative Nile tilapia and silver carp filtration rates of partitioned aquaculture system phytoplankton. Aquaculture 220: 449‑457. [Google Scholar]
  • Vymazal J. 2007. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380: 48–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang H, Liang Y. 2001. A preliminary study of oligochaetes in Poyang Lake, the largest freshwater lake of China, and its vicinity, with description of a new species of Limnodrilus . Hydrobiologia 463: 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu J, Wang R, Yu J, Yu Z, Shen X. 1999. Macrozoobenthos communities of West Lake after drawing fresh water from Qiantang River. Environ Pollut Control 21: 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Xie P, Liu J. 2001. Practical success of biomanipulation using filter-feeding fish to control cyanobacteria blooms: a synthesis of decades of research and application in a subtropical hypereutrophic lake. Sci World J 1: 337–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang W, Sun T, Yang Z. 2016. Does the implementation of environmental flows improve wetland ecosystem services and biodiversity? A literature review. Restorat Ecol 24: 731–742. [Google Scholar]
  • Yao J, Sánchez-Pérez JM, Sauvage S, Teissier S, Attard E, Lauga B, Duran R, Julien F, Bernard-Jannin L, Ramburn H, Gerino M. 2017. Biodiversity and ecosystem purification service in an alluvial wetland. Ecol Eng 103: 359–371. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao Y, Fang Y, Jin Y, Huang J, Ma X, He K, He Z, Wang F, Zhao H. 2015. Microbial community and removal of nitrogen via the addition of a carrier in a pilot-scale duckweed-based wastewater treatment system. Bioresour Technol 179: 549–558. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao Z, Shi H, Liu Y, Zhao H, Su H, Wang M, Zhao Y. 2014. The influence of duckweed species diversity on biomass productivity and nutrient removal efficiency in swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 167: 383–389. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.