Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 421, 2020
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2020029
Published online 21 August 2020
  • Abbas A. 1991. Feeding strategy of coypu (Myocastor coypus) in central western France. J Zool 224: 385–401. [Google Scholar]
  • Beran L. 2019. Distribution and recent status of freshwater mussels of family Unionidae (Bivalvia) in the Czech Republic. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 420: 45. [Google Scholar]
  • Carter J, Leonard BP. 2002. A review of the literature on the worldwide distribution, spread of, and efforts to eradicate the coypu (Myocastor coypus). Wildl Soc Bull 30: 162–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Colares IG, Oliveira RNV, Oliveira RM, Colares EP. 2010. Feeding habits of coypu (Myocastor coypus Molina 1978) in the wetlands of the Southern region of Brazil. Annals Braz Acad Sci 82: 671–678. [Google Scholar]
  • Deagle BE, Chiaradia A, McInnes J, Jarman SN. 2010. Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out? Conserv Genet 11: 2039–2048. [Google Scholar]
  • Diggins TP, Stewart KM. 2000. Evidence of large change in unionid mussel abundance from selective muskrat predation, as inferred by shell remains left on shore. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85: 505–520. [Google Scholar]
  • Downing JA, Rochon Y, Pérusse M, Harvey H. 1993. Spatial aggregation, body size, and reproductive success in the freshwater mussel Elliptio complanate . J N Am Benthol Soc 12: 148–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460–2461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Egusa S, Sakata H. 2009. Status of coypu control in Hyogo Prefecture. Jpn J Limnol 70: 273–276. (In Japanese with English summary) [Google Scholar]
  • Global Invasive Species Database. 2020. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/100_worst. Accessed on 30 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • Gosling LM, Baker SJ. 1991. Coypu. In Corbet GB, Harris S, eds. The handbook of British mammals. Oxford: Blackwell, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  • Guichón ML, Benítez VB, Abba A, Borgnia M, Cassini MH. 2003. Foraging behaviour of coypus Myocastor coypus: why do coypus consume aquatic plants? Acta Oecol 24: 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  • Haag WR. 2012. North American Freshwater Mussels. New York: Cambridge University Press, 505 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson JM, Mackay WC, Prepas EE. 1989. Effect of size-selective predation by muskrats (Ondatra zebithicus) on a population of unionid clams (Anodonta grandis simpsoniana). J Anim Ecol 58: 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Hong S, Do Y, Kim JY, Kim D-K, Joo G-J. 2015. Distribution, spread and habitat preferences of nutria (Myocastor coypus) invading the lower Nakdong River, South Korea. Biol Invasions 17: 1485–1496. [Google Scholar]
  • Ishida S, Kimura S, Karasawa T, Okazaki K, Hoshino T, Nagayasu N. 2015. Predation on unionid bivalves by the nutria Myocastor coypus in the Yodogawa River and its characteristics inferred from dead shell samples. Bull Osaka Mus Nat Hist 69: 29–40. (In Japanese with English summary) [Google Scholar]
  • Kawakami K, Horikoshi K, Suzuki H, Sasaki T. 2010. Impacts of predation by the invasive black rat Rattus rattus on the Bulwer's petrel Bulweria bulwerii in the Bonin Islands, Japan. In Kawakami K, Okochi I, eds. Restoring the Oceanic Island Ecosystem. Tokyo: Springer, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Kitamura J, Negishi JN, Nishio M, Sagawa S, Akino J, Aoki S. 2009. Host mussel utilization of the Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) in the Moo River in Himi. Jpn Ichthyol Res 56: 296–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Kitamura J. 2011. Host mussel utilization by Sarcocheilichthys variegatus variegatus (Cyprinidae, Sarcocheilichthyinae) in a drainage ditch and the Harai River of the Kushida River system, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 58: 195–198 (In Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Kitamura J, Uchiyama R. 2020. Bitterling fishes of Japan − Natural history and Culture. Tokyo: Yama-kei Publishers, 223 p. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • Kume M, Onoda Y, Negishi JN, Sagawa S, Nagayama S, Kayaba Y. 2012. Feeding damage by exotic species, nutria (Myocastor coypus), to unionid mussels in a floodplain water-body of the Kiso River, Japan. Biol Inland Waters 27: 41–47 (in Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Kurle CM, Croll DA, Tershy BR. 2008. Introduced rats indirectly change marine rocky intertidal communities from algae- to invertebrate-dominated. PNAS 105: 3800–3804. [Google Scholar]
  • LeBlanc DJ. 1994. Nutria. In: Timm RM, ed. Prevention and control of wildlife damage, University of Nebraska − Lincoln, Nebraska, B71–B80. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopes-Lima M, Hattori A, Kondo T, et al. 2020. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the rising sun (Far East Asia): phylogeny, systematics, and distribution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 146: 106755. [Google Scholar]
  • McLain DC, Ross MR. 2005. Reproduction based on local patch size of Alasmidonta heterodon and dispersal by its darter host in the Mill River, Massachusetts, USA. J N Am Benthol Soc 24: 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Mori I. 2002. A mass predation of unionid clams (Anodonta woodiana) by the feral nutria population. Bull Okayama Pref Nat Conserv Cent 10: 63–67 (in Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Nagayama S, Harada M, Kayaba Y. 2015. Can floodplains be recovered by flood-channel excavation? An example from Japanese lowland rivers. Ecol Civ Eng 17: 67–77 (in Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Nagayama S, Tashiro T, Kitamura J. 2017. Inland Water Landscape: Structural and Functional Changes in the Ecosystem. In Shimizu H, Takatori C, Kawaguchi N, eds. Labor Forces and Landscape Management − Japanese Case Studies. Singapore: Springer, 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Negishi JN, Kayaba Y, Sagawa S. 2008a. Ecological consequences of changing riverscape: terrestrialization of floodplain and freshwater mussels. Civ Eng J 50: 38–41 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • Negishi JN, Kayaba Y, Tsukahara K, Miwa Y. 2008b. Unionoid mussels as imperiled indicator organisms: habitat degradation processes and restoration approaches. Ecol Civ Eng 11: 195–211 (in Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Negishi JN, Sagawa S, Kayaba Y, Sanada S, Kume M, Miyashita T. 2012a. Mussel responses to flood pulse frequency: the importance of local habitat. Freshw Biol 57: 1500–1511. [Google Scholar]
  • Negishi JN, Sagawa S, Sanada S, Kume M, Ohmori T, Miyashita T, Kayaba Y. 2012b. Using airborne scanning laser altimetry (LiDAR) to estimate surface connectivity of floodplain water bodies. River Res Appl 28: 258–267. [Google Scholar]
  • Neves RJ, Odom MC. 1989. Muskrat predation on endangered freshwater mussels in Virginia. J Wildl Manag 53: 934–941. [Google Scholar]
  • Nishio M, Kawamoto T, Kawakami R, Edo K, Yamazaki Y. 2015. Life history and reproductive ecology of the endangered Itasenpara bitterling Acheilognathus longipinnis (Cyprinidae) in the Himi region, central Japan. J Fish Biol 87: 616–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Owen CT, Mcgregor MA, Cobbs GA, Alexander JE Jr. 2011. Muskrat predation on a diverse unionid mussel community: impacts of prey species composition, size and shape. Freshw Biol 56: 554–564. [Google Scholar]
  • Panzacchi M, Bertolino S, Cocchi R, Genovesi P. 2007. Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis. Wildl Biol 13: 159–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM. 2010. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35: 25–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Prigioni C, Balestrieri A, Remonti L. 2005. Food habits of the coypu, Myocastor coypus, and its impact on aquatic vegetation in a freshwater habitat of NW Italy. Folia Zool 54: 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  • Sagawa S, Kayaba Y, Kume M, Mori S. 2011. Comprehension of floodplain in the Kiso River and its restoration project. Civ Eng J 53: 6–9 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • Shiels AB, Pitt WC, Sugihara RT, Witmer GW. 2014. Biology and impacts of Pacific Island invasive species. 11. Rattus rattus, the black rat (Rodentia: Muridae). Pac Sci 68: 145–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Sone K, Koyasu K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Oda S. 2006. Agricultural damage caused by feral coypus (Myocastor coypus) in Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Mamm Sci 46: 151–159 (in Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 645–651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Uehara K. 2007. Studies on methods for breeding the endangered Itasenpara bitterling, Acheilognathus longipinnis . Dissertation, Kinki University. [Google Scholar]
  • Vaughn CC. 2018. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 810: 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC. 2001. The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 46: 1431–1446. [Google Scholar]
  • Yabe T, Hashimoto T, Takiguchi M, Aoki M, Kawakami K. 2009. Seabirds in the stomach contents of black rats Rattus rattus on Higashijima, the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands, Japan. Mar Ornithol 37: 293–295. [Google Scholar]
  • Zahner-Meike E, Hanson JM. 2001. Effect of muskrat predation on naiads. In Bauer G, Wächtler K, eds. Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida, Ecological Studies 145, Springer, Berlin, pp 163–184. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.