EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 421 (2020) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 421 (2020) 1 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 421, 2020
Topical issue on Crayfish
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2019042
Published online 10 December 2019
  • Atashbar B, Agh N, Manaffar R, Van Stappen G. 2016. Morphometric and preliminary genetic characteristics of Branchinecta orientalis populations from Iran (Crustacea: Anostraca). Zootaxa 4109: 31–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Baric S, Höllrigl A, Füreder L, Dalla Via J. 2005a. Mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA analyses of Austropotamobius pallipes populations in South Tyrol (Italy) and Tyrol (Austria). Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 376–377: 599–612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baric S, Höllrigl A, Petutschnig J, Kerschbamer C, Dalla Via J. 2005b. Update of the molecular phylogeny of the Austropotamobius pallipes species complex by including specimens from South Tyrol (Italy) and Carinthia (Austria). Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 376–377: 627–636. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Becking LE, de Leeuw CA, Knegt B, Maas DL, de Voogd NJ, Abdunnur Suyatna IPK. 2016. Highly divergent mussel lineages in isolated Indonesian marine lakes. PeerJ 4: DOI 10.7717/peerj.2496. [Google Scholar]
  • Benzer SS, Benzer R, Gunal C. 2017. Artificial neural networks approach in morphometric analysis of crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) in Hirfanlı Dam Lake. Biologia 72: 527–535. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger C, Štambuk A, Maguire I, Weiss S, Füreder L. 2017. Integrating genetics and morphometrics in species conservation − a case study on the stone crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium . Limnologica 69: 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertocchi S, Brusconi S, Gherardi F, Buccianti A, Scalici M. 2008. Morphometrical characterization of the Austropotamobius pallipes species complex. J Nat Hist 42: 2063–2077. [Google Scholar]
  • Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 456 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardini A, Jansson A-U, Elton S. 2007. A geometric morphometric approach to the study of ecogeographical and clinal variation in vervet monkeys. J Biogeogr 34: 1663–1678. [Google Scholar]
  • Caumul R, Polly PD. 2005. Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 59: 2460–2472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cataudella R, Paolucci M, Delaunay C, Ropiquet A. 2010. Genetic variability of Austropotamobius italicus in the Marches region: Implications for conservation. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 2: 261–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers CL, Payne JF, Kennedy ML. 1979. Geographic variation in the Dwarf Crayfish, Cambarellus puer Hobbs (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 36: 39–55. [Google Scholar]
  • de Melo MS, Masunari S. 2017. Sexual dimorphism in the carapace shape and length of the freshwater palaemonid shrimp Macrobrachium potiuna (Müller, 1880) (Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae): geometric and traditional morphometric approaches. Anim Biol 67: 93–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deniz (Bök) TD, Harlıoğlu MM, Deval MC. 2010. A study on the morphometric characteristics of Astacus leptodactylus inhabiting the Thrace region of Turkey. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 397: 05. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Đuretanović S, Jaklič M, Milošković A, Radajković N, Radenković, Simić V, Magure I. 2017. Morphometric variations among Astacus astacus populations from different regions of the Balkan Peninsula. Zoomorphology 136: 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • García-Dávila CR, Magalhães C, Guerrero JCH. 2006. Morphometric variability in populations of Palaemonetes spp. (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae) from the Peruvian and Brazilian Amazon Basin. Iheringia Série Zool 95: 327–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghia D, Nardi PA, Negri A, et al. 2006. Syntopy of A. pallipes and A. italicus: genetic and morphometrical investigation. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 380–381: 1001–1018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grandjean F, Romain D, Avila-Zarza C, Bramard M, Souty-Grosset C, Mocquard JP. 1997. Morphometry, sexual dimorphism and size at maturity of the white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes pallipes (Lereboullet) from a wild French population at Deux-Sèvres (Decapoda, Astacidea). Crustaceana 70: 31–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Haddaway NR, Mortimer RJG, Christmas M, Grahame JW, Dunn AM. 2012. Morphological diversity and phenotypic plasticity in the threatened British white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes). Aquat conserv 22: 220–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Helms BS, Vaught RC, Suciu SK, Santos SR. 2015. Cryptic diversity within two endemic crayfish species of the Southeastern US revealed by molecular genetics and geometric morphometrics. Hydrobiologia 755: 283–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Hidayani AA, Trijuno DD, Fujaya Y, Tauhid Umar M. 2018. The morphology and morphometric characteristics of the male swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) from the East Sahul Shelf, Indonesia. Aquac Aquar Conserv Legis 11: 1724–1736. [Google Scholar]
  • Huber MGJ, Schubart CD. 2005. Distribution and reproductive biology of Austropotamobius torrentium in Bavaria and documentation of a contact zone with the alien crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus . Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 376–377: 759–776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with procrustes methods. Evolution 52: 1363–1375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 1909–1920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingenberg CP. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 353–357. [Google Scholar]
  • Klobučar GIV, Podnar M, Jelić M, et al. 2013. Role of the Dinaric Karst (western Balkans) in shaping the phylogeographic structure of the threatened crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium . Freshwater Biol 58: 1089–1105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Larson ER, Abbott CL, Usio N, et al. 2012. The signal crayfish is not a single species: Cryptic diversity and invasions in the Pacific Northwest range of Pacifastacus leniusculus . Freshw Biol 57: 1823–1838. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawing AM, Polly PD. 2010. Geometric morphometrics: recent applications to the study of evolution and development. J Zool 280: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Erben R, Klobučar GIV, Lajtner J. 2002. Year cycle of Austropotamobius torrentium (Schrank) in streams on Medvednica mountain (Croatia). Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 367: 943–957. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Dakić L. 2011. Comparative analyses of Astacus leptodactylus morphological characteristics from Croatia and Armenia. Biologia 66: 491–498. [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Jelić M, Klobučar G. 2011. Update on the distribution of freshwater crayfish in Croatia. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 401: 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Klobučar G. 2011. Size structure, maturity size, growth and condition index of stone crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium) in North-West Croatia. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 401: 12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Marn N, Klobučar G. 2017. Morphological evidence for hidden diversity in the threatened stone crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium (Schrank, 1803) (Decapoda: Astacoidea: Astacidae) in Croatia. J Crustac Biol 37: 7–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Klobučar G, Žganec K, Jelić M, Lucić A, Hudina S. 2018. Recent changes in distribution pattern of freshwater crayfish in Croatia − threats and perspectives. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 419: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Malavé BM, Styga JM, Clotfelter ED. 2018. Size, shape, and sex-dependent variation in force production by crayfish chelae. J Morphol 279: 312–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Mathews LM, Adams L, Anderson E, Basile M, Gottardi E, Buckholt MA. 2008. Genetic and morphological evidence for substantial hidden biodiversity in a freshwater crayfish species complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48: 126–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Mijošek T, Jelić M, Mijošek V, Maguire I. 2017. Molecular and morphometric characterisation of the invasive signal crayfish populations in Croatia. Limnologica 63: 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Mound LA, Wheeler GS, Williams DA. 2010. Resolving cryptic species with morphology and DNA; thrips as a potential biocontrol agent of Brazilian peppertree, with a new species and overview of Pseudophilothrips (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa 2432: 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Oda S, Hanazato T, Fujii K. 2007. Change in phenotypic plasticity of a morphological defence in Daphnia galeata (Crustacea: Cladocera) in a selection experiment. J Limnol 66: 142–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Palma J, Andrade JP. 2002. Morphological study of Diplodus sargus, Diplodus puntazzo, and Lithognathus mormyrus (Sparidae) in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Fish Res 57: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Parsons KJ, Beren W, Robinson TH. 2003. Getting into Shape: An Empirical Comparison of Traditional Truss-Based Morphometric Methods with a Newer Geometric Method Applied to New World Cichlids. Environ Biol Fish 67: 417–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L, Pérez-Moreno JL, Panaiotu C, et al. 2019. A journey on plate tectonics sheds light on European crayfish phylogeography. Ecol Evol 9: 1957–1971. [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L. 2019. Introducing a new Austropotamobius crayfish species (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacidae): A Miocene endemism of the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Zool Anz 279: 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S. 2009. Invasive non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe: Recommendations on managing them. Knowl Managt Aquatic Ecosyst 394−395: 03. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Perry WL, Jacks AM, Fiorenza D, Young M, Kuhnke R. 2013. Effects of water velocity on the size and shape of rusty crayfish, Orconectes rusticus . Freshw Sci 32: 1398–1409. [Google Scholar]
  • Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks. Syst Zool 39: 40–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Rohlf FJ. 2015. The tps series of software. Hystrix 26: 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Rudolph E, Colihueque N, Yañez M. 2016. Morphological and genetic analysis in morphologically divergent river and lake specimens of the freshwater crayfish Samastacus spinifrons (Philippi, 1882) (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Crustaceana 89: 877–899. [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M, Gibertini G. 2009. Sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic variation in the carapace of A. pallipes (Lereboullet, 1858). Ital J Zool 76: 179–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M, Macale D, Gibertini G. 2010. Allometry in the ontogenesis of Austropotamobius pallipes species complex (Decapoda: Astacidae): The use of geometric morphometrics. Ital J Zool 77: 296–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M, Bravi R. 2012. Solving alpha-diversity by morphological markers contributes to arranging the systematic status of a crayfish species complex (Crustacea, Decapoda). J Zool Syst Evol Res 50: 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Singhal S, Hoskin CJ, Couper P, Potter S, Moritz C. 2018. A Framework for Resolving Cryptic Species: A Case Study from the Lizards of the Australian Wet Tropics. Syst Biol 67: 1061–1075. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sint D, Dalla Via J, Füreder L. 2005. Morphological variations in Astacus astacus L. and Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet) populations. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 376–377: 637–652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sint D, Dalla Via J, Füreder L. 2006. The genus Austropotamobius in the Ausserfern Region (Tyrol, Austria) with an overlap in the distribution of A. torrentium and A. pallipes populations. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 380–381: 1029–1040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sint D, Dalla Via J, Füreder L. 2007. Phenotypical characterization of indigenous freshwater crayfish populations. J Zool 273: 210–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Reynolds JD. 2009. Current ideas on methodological approaches in European crayfish conservation and restocking procedures. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394–395: 01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stillman JH, Colbourne JK, Lee CE, et al. 2008. Recent advances in crustacean genomics. Integr Comp Biol 48: 852–868. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Streissl F, Hödl W. 2002. Growth, morphometrics, size at maturity, sexual dimorphism and condition index of Austropotamobius torrentium Schrank. Hydrobiologia 477: 201–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Tanaka G. 2009. Adaptive modifications of carapace outlines in the Cytheroidea (Ostracoda: Crustacea). Biol J Linn Soc 97: 810–821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tofilski A. 2008. Using geometric morphometrics and standard morphometry to discriminate three honeybee subspecies. Apidologie 39: 558–563. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Trontelj P, Machino Y, Sket B. 2005. Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in the crayfish genus Austropotamobius inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34: 212–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Viscosi V, Lepais O, Gerber S, Fortini P. 2009. Leaf morphological analyses in four European oak species (Quercus) and their hybrids: A comparison of traditional and geometric morphometric methods. Plant Biosyst 143: 564–574. [Google Scholar]
  • Vlach P, Valdmanová L. 2015. Morphometry of the stone crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium) in the Czech Republic: allometry and sexual dimorphism. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst. 416: 16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Weinländer M, Füreder L. 2009. The continuing spread of Pacifastacus leniusculus in Carinthia (Austria). Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394–395: 17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wills MA. 1998. A phylogeny of recent and fossil Crustacea derived from morphological characters. In Fortey A, Thomas RH, eds. Arthropod Relationships. Dordrecht: Springer, 189–209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yampolsky LY, Schaer TMM, Ebert D. 2014. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation for temperature tolerance in freshwater zooplankton. Proc Biol Sci 81: 20132744. [Google Scholar]
  • Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, 443. [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmermann G, Bosc P, Valade P, Cornette R, Ameziane N, Debat V. 2011. Geometric morphometrics of carapace of Macrobrachium australe (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) from Reunion Island. Acta Zool 93: 492–500. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.