Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 420, 2019
Article Number 34
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 30 July 2019
  • Angiolini C, Nucci A, Frignani, F, Landi M. 2011. Using multivariate analyses to assess effects of fluvial on plant species distribution in a Mediterranean river. Wetlands 31: 167–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Angiolini C, Nucci A, Landi M, Bacchetta G. 2013. Distribution of endemic and alien plants along Mediterranean rivers: A useful tool to identify areas in need of protection? C R Biol 336: 416–423. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angiolini C, Viciani D, Bonari G, Lastrucci L. 2017. Habitat conservation prioritization: A floristic approach applied to a Mediterranean wetland network. Plant Biosyst 151: 598–612. [Google Scholar]
  • Antolini G, Auteri L, Pavan V, Tomei F, Tomozeiu R, Marletto V. 2015. A daily high-resolution gridded climatic data set for Emilia-Romagna, Italy, during 1961–2010. Int J Climatol 36: 1970–1986. [Google Scholar]
  • Azzella MM, Rosati L, Blasi C. 2013. Phytosociological survey as a baseline for environmental status assessment: the case of hydrophytic vegetation of a deep volcanic lake. Plant Sociol 50: 33–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker T, Dietz H, Billeter R, Buschmann H, Edwards PJ. 2005. Altitudinal distribution of alien plant species in the Swiss Alps. PPEES 7: 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  • Benavent-González A, Lumbreras A, Molina JA. 2014. Plant communities as a tool for setting priorities in biodiversity conservation: A novel approach to Iberian aquatic vegetation. Biodivers Conserv 23: 2135–2154. [Google Scholar]
  • Biondi E. 2011. Phytosociology today: Methodological and conceptual evolution. Plant Biosyst 145: 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Bolpagni R, Laini A, Stanzani C, Chiarucci A. 2018. Aquatic plant diversity in Italy: Distribution, drivers and strategic conservation actions. Front Plant Sci . DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00116. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonari G, Fajmon K, Malenovský I, Zelený D, Holuša J, Jongepierová I, Kočárek P, Konvička O, Uřičář J, Chytrý M. 2017. Management for both plant and insect diversity in semi-natural grasslands: Heterogeneity and tradition are crucial. Agric Ecosyst Environ 246: 243–252. [Google Scholar]
  • Braun-Blanquet J. 1932. Plant sociology: The study of plant communities. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • Bubíková K, Hrivnák R. 2018. Artificial ponds in Central Europe do not fall behind the natural ponds in terms of macrophyte diversity. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 419: 8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buldrini F, Pitoia F, Scabellone A, Cavalletti D, Chiarucci A, Pezzi G. 2017. Le aree umide del Parco Nazionale delle Foreste Casentinesi: Alcune considerazioni su flora e habitat. Quad Soc Studi Nat Romagna 45: 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Carmignani L, Conti P, Cornamusini G, Pirro A. 2013. Geological map of Tuscany (Italy). J Maps 9: 487–497. [Google Scholar]
  • Casazza G, Giordani P, Benesperi R, Foggi B, Viciani D, Filigheddu R, Farris E, Bagella S, Pisanu S, Mariotti MG. 2014. Climate change hastens the urgency of conservation for range-restricted plant species in the central-northern Mediterranean region. Biol Conserv 179: 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Castelli C, Sposimo P. 2005. L'archivio del repertorio naturalistico toscano. RENATO. Rassegna delle conoscenze sullo stato della biodiversità in Toscana. Attached CD-Rom. In Sposimo P, Castelli C, eds.La biodiversità in Toscana: specie e habitat in pericolo. Archivio del Repertorio Naturalistico Toscano. Regione Toscana, Direzione Generale Politiche Territoriali e Ambientali. Il Bandino, pp. 302 + CD-Rom, Firenze. [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers PA, Lacoul P, Murphy KJ, Thomaz SM. 2008. Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 9–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Chytrý M, Maskell LC, Pino J, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Font X, Smart SM. 2008a. Habitat invasions by alien plants: A quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. J Appl Ecol 45: 448–458. [Google Scholar]
  • Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová I, Tichý L, Danihelka J. 2008b. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89: 1541–1553. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Conti F, Manzi A, Pedrotti F. 1997. Liste Rosse Regionali delle Piante d'Italia. WWF, Associazione Italiana per il World Wildlife Fund, in collaboration with the Società Botanica Italiana, Camerino. [Google Scholar]
  • Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C. 2005. An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular Flora. Roma: Palombi Editor. [Google Scholar]
  • De Meester L, Declerck S, Stoks R Louette G, Van de Meutter F, De Bie T, Michels E, Brendonck L. 2005. Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquat Conserv 15: 715–725. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 81: 163–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dufrène M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67: 345–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Dwire KA, Kauffman JB, Baham JE. 2006. Plant species distribution in relation to water-table depth and soil redox potential in montane riparian meadows. Wetlands 26: 131–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edvardsen A, Økland RH. 2006. Variation in plant species composition in and adjacent to 64 ponds in SE Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Aquat Bot 85: 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Foggi B, Lastrucci L, Papini P, Vergari S, Gennai M, Gervasoni D, Viciani D, Ferretti G. 2011. Vegetation of the Verdiana River valley in the northern Apennines, Italy. Lazaroa 32: 153–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Galassi DM, Fiasca B, Del Tosto D. 2011. Patterns of copepod diversity (Copepoda: Cyclopoida, Harpacticoida) in springs of central Italy: Implications for conservation issues. Crustaceana monographs, studies on freshwater Copepoda: A volume in honour of Bernard Dussart. Leiden: Brill NV, pp. 199–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerdol R, Tomaselli M. 1987. Mire vegetation in the Apuanian Alps (Italy). Folia Geobot Phytotax 22: 25–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerdol R, Tomaselli M. 1993. The vegetation of wetlands in the northern Apennines (Italy). Phytocoenologia 21: 421–469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gigante D, Acosta ATR, Agrillo E, Armiraglio S, Assini S, Attorre F, Bagella S, Buffa G, Casella L, Giancola C, Giusso Del Galdo GP, Marcenò C, Pezzi G, Prisco I, Venanzoni R, Viciani D. 2018. Habitat conservation in Italy: The state of the art in the light of the first European Red List of Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats. Rend Lincei Sci Fis Nat 29: 251–265. [Google Scholar]
  • Gigante D, Landucci F, Venanzoni R. 2013. The reed die-back syndrome and its implications for floristic and vegetational traits of Phragmitetum australis . Plant Sociol 50: 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Gourmelon F, Bioret F, Le Berre I. 2001. Land-use changes and implications for management of a small protected island off the coast of Bretagne. J Coast Conserv 7: 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammersmark CT, Rains MC, Wickland AC, Mount JF. 2009. Vegetation and water-table relationships in a hydrologically restored riparian meadow. Wetlands 29: 785–797. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hrivnák R, Kochjarová J, Oťaheľová H, Paľove-Balang P, Slezák M, Slezák P. 2014. Environmental drivers of macrophyte species richness in artificial and natural aquatic water bodies – Comparative approach from two central European regions. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 50: 269–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, Criado MG, Gubbay S, Arts GHP. 2016. European Red List of Habitats. European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamrani A, Jalili A, Naqinezhad A, Atta, F, Maassoumi AA, Shaw SC. 2011. Relationships between environmental variables and vegetation across mountain wetland sites, N. Iran. Biologia 66: 76–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Kercher SM, Zedler JB. 2004. Flood tolerance in wetland angiosperms: A comparison of invasive and non invasive species. Aquat Bot 80: 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Lastrucci L, Gonnelli V, Foggi B. 2005. Flora e vegetazione di alcune aree umide dell'altopiano della “Pianca” nell'alta Val Marecchia (Provincia di Arezzo, Toscana). Inform Bot Ital 36: 429–442. [Google Scholar]
  • Lastrucci L, Foggi B, Gonnelli V, Gusmeroli E. 2006. La vegetazione delle aree umide dei substrati ultramafici dell'Alta Valtiberina (Arezzo, Italia centrale). Studia Botanica 24: 9–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Lastrucci L, Bonari G, Angiolini C, Casini F, Giallonardo T, Gigante D, Landi M, Landucci F, Venanzoni R, Viciani D. 2014. Vegetation of lakes Chiusi and Montepulciano (Siena, central Italy): Updated knowledge and new discoveries. Plant Sociol 51: 29–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Lastrucci L, Lazzaro L, Guidi T, Gonnelli V, Giordani P, Benesperi R. 2015. Different components of plant diversity suggest the protection of a large area for the conservation of a riparian ecosystem. Biologia 70: 1033–1041. [Google Scholar]
  • Lepš J, Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lougheed VL, Crosbie B, Chow-Fraser P. 2001. Primary determinants of macrophyte community structure in 62 marshes across the Great Lakes basin: Latitude, land use, and water quality effects. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 1603–1612. [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Oregon: MJM, Gleneden Beach. [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2011. PC-ORD for Windows. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data V. 6.0. [Google Scholar]
  • Middleton BA. 2013. Rediscovering traditional vegetation management in preserves: Trading experiences between cultures and continents. Biol Conserv 158: 271–279. [Google Scholar]
  • Middleton BA, Holsten B, van Diggelen R. 2006. Biodiversity management of fens and fen meadows by grazing, cutting and burning. Appl Veg Sci 9: 307–316. [Google Scholar]
  • Naqinezhad A, Jalili A, Attar F, Ghahreman A, Wheeler BD, Hodgson JG, Shaw SC, Maassoumi A. 2009. Floristic characteristics of the wetland sites on dry southern slopes of the Alborz Mts., N. Iran: The role of altitude in floristic composition. Flora 204: 254–269. [Google Scholar]
  • Novikmec M, Hamerlík L, Kočický D, Hrivnák R, Kochjarová J, Oťaheľová H, Paľove-Balang P, Svitok M. 2016. Ponds and their catchments: size relationships and influence of land use across multiple spatial scales. Hydrobiologia 774: 155–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Nucci A, Angiolini C, Landi M, Bacchetta G. 2012a. Influence of bedrock-alluvial transition on plant species distribution along a Mediterranean river corridor. Plant Biosyst 146: 564–575. [Google Scholar]
  • Nucci A, Angiolini C, Landi M, Bacchetta G. 2012b. Regional and local patterns of riparian flora: Comparison between insular and continental Mediterranean rivers. Ecoscience 19: 213–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peck J. 2004. Using PC-Ord for Multivariate Data Analysis. Unpublished training course manual. [Google Scholar]
  • Peruzzi L. 2010. Checklist dei generi e delle famiglie della flora vascolare italiana. Inform Bot Ital 42: 151–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Pesaresi S, Biondi E, Casavecchia S. 2017. Bioclimates of Italy. J Maps 13: 955–960. [Google Scholar]
  • Pignatti S. 1982. Flora d'Italia, Vol. 1-3. Bologna: Edagricole. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyšek P, Bacher S, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Wild J, Celesti-Grapow L, Gassó N, Kenis M, Lambdon PW, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Roques A, Sádlo J, Solarz W, Vilà M, Hulme PE. 2010. Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19: 317–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from [Google Scholar]
  • Rolon AS, Maltchik L. 2006. Environmental factors as predictors of aquatic macrophyte richness and composition in wetlands of southern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 556: 221–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Rolon AS, Lacerda T, Maltchik L, Guadagnin DL. 2008. Influence of area, habitat and water chemistry on richness and composition of macrophyte assemblages in southern Brazilian wetlands. J Veg Sci 19: 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossi G, Montagnani C, Gargano D, Peruzzi L, Abeli T, Ravera S, Cogoni A, Fenu G, Magrini S, Gennai M, Foggi B, Wagensommer RP, Venturella G, Blasi C, Raimondo FM, Orsenigo S, eds. 2013. Lista Rossa della Flora Italiana. 1. Policy Species e altre specie minacciate. Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell'Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare. [Google Scholar]
  • Santamaría L. 2002. Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecol 23: 137–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Short FT, Kosten S, Morgan PA, Malone S, Moore GE. 2016. Impacts of climate change on submerged and emergent wetland plants. Aquat Bot 135: 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Šmilauer P, Lepš J. 2014. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2012. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: Software for ordination, version5.0. Ithaca, USA: Microcomputer Power. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuscan Region 2000. Legge Regionale 6 aprile 2000, n. 56 Norme per la conservazione e la tutela degli habitat naturali e seminaturali, della flora e della fauna selvatiche. Regione Toscana. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Eck WHJM, Van de Steeg HM, Blom CWPM, De Kroon H. 2004. Is tolerance to summer flooding correlated with distribution patterns in river floodplains? A comparative study of 20 terrestrial grassland species. Oikos 107: 393–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Viciani D, Gabellini A. 2006. La vegetazione dell'Alpe di Catenaia (Arezzo, Toscana) ed i suoi aspetti di interesse botanico-conservazionistico. Webbia 61: 167–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viciani D, Gabellini A, Gonnelli V, De Dominicis V. 2002. La vegetazione della Riserva Naturale Alpe della Luna (Arezzo, Toscana) ed i suoi aspetti di interesse botanico-conservazionistico. Webbia 57: 153–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viciani D, Gabellini A, Gonnelli V, De Dominicis V. 2004. La vegetazione della Riserva Naturale Alta Valle del Tevere – Monte Nero (Arezzo, Toscana) ed i suoi aspetti di interesse botanico-conservazionistico. Atti Soc Tosc Sci Nat, Mem, Ser B 109: 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Viciani D, Gonnelli V, Sirotti M, Agostini N. 2010. An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of the “Parco Nazionale delle Foreste Casentinesi, Monte Falterona e Campigna” (Northern Apennines Central Italy). Webbia 65: 3–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viciani D, Gennai M, Lastrucci L, Gabellini A, Armiraglio S, Caccianiga M, Andreis C, Foggi B. 2016. The Quercus petraea-dominated communities in Italy: floristic, coenological and chorological diversity in an European perspective. Plant Biosyst 150: 1376–1394. [Google Scholar]
  • Viciani D, Geri F, Agostini N, Gonnelli V, Lastrucci L. 2018. Role of a geodatabase to assess the distribution of plants of conservation interest in a large protected area: A case study for a major national park in Italy. Plant Biosyst 152: 631–641. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiher E, Keddy P. 1995. The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73: 323–335. [Google Scholar]
  • Zivkovic L, Biondi E, Pesaresi S, Lasen C, Spampinato G, Angelini P. 2017. The third report on the conservation status of habitats (Directive 92/43/EEC) in Italy: Processes, methodologies, results and comments. Plant Sociol 54: 51–64. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.