Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 419, 2018
Topical issue on Crayfish
Article Number 27
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 01 May 2018
  • Ackerfors H. 1999. The positive effects of established crayfish introductions in Europe. In: Gherardi F, Holdich DM, eds. Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 49–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Aydin H, Kokko H, Makkonen J, Kortet R, Kukkonen H, Jussila J. 2014. The signal crayfish is vulnerable to both the As and the PsI-isolates of the crayfish plague. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbaresi S, Gherardi F. 2000. The invasion of the alien crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe, with particular reference to Italy. Biol Invasions 2: 259–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bohman P, Edsman L, Sandström A, et al. 2015. Predicting harvest of non-native signal crayfish in lakes − a role for changing climate? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Bubb DH, Thom TJ, Lucas MC. 2004. Movement and dispersal of the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in upland rivers. Freshw Biol 49: 357–368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Capinha C, Brotons L, Anastácio P. 2013. Geographical variability in propagule pressure and climatic suitability explain the European distribution of two highly invasive crayfish. J Biogeogr 40: 548–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. 2016. The bad and the super-bad: prioritising the threat of six invasive alien to three imperilled native crayfishes. Biol Invasions 7: 1967–1988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crandall K, Buhay JE. 2008. Global diversity of crayfish (Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae − Decapoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 295–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cruz MJ, Rebelo R. 2007. Colonization of freshwater habitats by an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, in Southwest Iberian Peninsula. Hydrobiologia 575: 191–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dana ED, López-Santiago J, García-De-Lomas J, García-Ocaña DM, Gámez V, Ortega F. 2010. Long-term management of the invasive Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852) in a small mountain stream. Aquat Invasions 5: 317–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Buée M, et al. 2007. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 472–480 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dobrzycka-Krahel A, Skora ME, Raczynski M, Szaniawska A. 2017. The signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus − distribution and invasion in the southern Baltic coastal river. Pol J Ecol 65: 445–452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edgerton BF, Henttonen P, Jussila J, et al. 2004. Understanding the causes of disease in European freshwater crayfish. Conserv Biol 18: 1466–1474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Erkamo E, Ruokonen T, Alapassi T, et al. 2010. Evaluation of crayfish stocking success in Finland. Freshw Crayfish 17: 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths SW, Collen P, Armstrong JD. 2004. Competition for shelter among over-wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 65: 436–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guan RZ, Wiles PR. 1997. Ecological impact of introduced crayfish on benthic fishes in a British lowland river. Conserv Biol 11: 641–647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harlioglu MM, Harlioglu AG. 2006. Threat of non-native crayfish introductions into Turkey: global lessons. Rev Fish Biol Fish 16: 171–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hein CL, Vander ZMJ, Magnuson JJ. 2007. Intensive trapping and increased fish predation cause massive population decline of an invasive crayfish. Freshw Biol 52: 1134–1146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heinimaa S, Pursiainen M. 2008. Signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus at northerly latitudes: A search for the distribution limits. Freshw Crayfish 16: 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM, Harlioglu MM, Firkins I. 1997. Salinity adaptations of crayfish in British waters with particular reference to Austropotamobius pallipes, Astacus leptodactylus and Pacifastacus leniusculus. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 44: 147–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DMM, Reynolds JDD, Souty-Grosset C, Sibley PJJ. 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394–395: 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46: 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Järvenpää T, Kirjavainen J. 1992. Crayfish stockings in Finland. Finnish Fish Res 14: 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J, Mannonen A. 2004. Crayfisheries in Finland, a short overview. Bull Français la Pêche la Piscic 372–373: 263–273. [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J, Makkonen J, Kokko H, Mäkinen P. 2014. Numerous population crashes of Wild Signal Crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in Southern Finland. Freshw Crayfish 20: 73–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J, Vrezec A, Makkonen J, Kortet R, Kokko H. 2015a. Invasive crayfish and their invasive diseases in Europe with the focus on the virulence evolution of the crayfish plague invasive crayfish and their invasive diseases. In: Canning-Clode J, ed. Biological invasions in changing ecosystems. Berlin: De Gruyter Open Ltd, pp. 183–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J, Maguire I, Kokko H, Makkonen J. 2015b. Chaos and adaptation in the host-pathogen relationship in relation to the conservation: the case of the crayfish plague and the noble crayfish. In: Kawai T, Faulker Z, Scholtz G, eds. Freshwater crayfish: global overview. New Hampshire: Science Publishers, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirjavainen J, Sipponen M. 2004. Environmental benefit of different crayfish management strategies in Finland. Fish Manag Ecol 11: 213–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kirjavainen J, Westman K. 1994. Comparative growth from length composition and mark-recapture experiments for noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) and Signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in Finland. Nord J Freshw Res 69: 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 05. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge DM, Taylor CA, Holdich DM, Skurdal J. 2000. Nonindigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity: lessons from Europe. Fisheries 25: 7–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy JM, Hein CL, Olden JD, Jake Vander ZM. 2006. Coupling long-term studies with meta-analysis to investigate impacts of non-native crayfish on zoobenthic communities. Freshw Biol 51: 224–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mueller GA, Carpenter J, Thornbrugh D. 2006. Bullfrog tadpole (Rana catesbeiana) and red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) predation on early life stages of endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). Southwest Nat 51: 258–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nystrom P, Brönmak C, Graneli W. 1999. Influence of an exotic and a native crayfish species on a littoral benthic community. Oikos 85: 545–553. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ohtaka A, Gelder S, Kawai T, Saito K, Nakata K, Nishino M. 2005. New record and distribution of two North American branchiobdellidan species (Anelida:Clitellata) from introduced signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in Japan. Biol Invasions 7: 149–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peters JA, Lodge DM. 2009. Invasive species policy at the regional level: a multiple weak links problem. Fisheries 34: 373–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Piria M, Copp G, Dick J, et al. 2017. Tackling invasive alien species in Europe II: threats and opportunities until 2020. Manag Biol Invasion 8: 273–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenthal SK, Stevens SS, Lodge DM. 2006. Whole-lake effects of invasive crayfish (Orconectes spp.) and the potential for restoration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63: 1276–1285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruokonen TJ, Karjalainen J, Hämäläinen H. 2014. Effects of an invasive crayfish on the littoral macroinvertebrates of large boreal lakes are habitat specific. Freshw Biol 59: 12–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sandström A, Andersson M, Asp A, et al. 2014. Population collapses in introduced non-indigenous crayfish. Biol Invasions 16: 1961–1977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Holdich D, Nöel PY, Reynolds JD, Haffner PH. 2006. Atlas of crayfish in Europe. Paris: Museum national d’Histoire naturelle. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Anastácio PM, Aquiloni L, et al. 2016. The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe: impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Limnologica 58: 78–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Vesely L, Hrbek V, Kozák P, Buřič M, Sousa R, Kouba A. 2017. Salinity tolerance of marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418: 21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walther GR, Roques A, Hulme PE, et al. 2009. Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 686–693. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K. 1973. The population of crayfish, Astacus astacus L. in Finland and the introduction of the American crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Freshw Crayfish 1: 41–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K. 2002. Alien crayfish in Europe: negative and positive impacts and interactions with native crayfish. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollash S, Olenin S, eds. Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 76–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K, Savolainen R, Pursiainen M. 1999. Development of the introduced North American signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), population in a small Finnish forest lake in 1970–1997. Boreal Env Res 4: 387–407. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.