Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 418, 2017
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 31
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 11 August 2017
  • Abilhoa V, Bornatowski H, Vitule JRS. 2013. Occurrence of the alien invasive loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus in the Iguaçu River basin in southern Brazil: a note of concern. J Appl Ichthyol 29: 257–259. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Allen S. 1984. Occurrence of juvenile weatherfish Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Pisces: Cobitidae) in the Yarra River. Victorian Nat 101: 240–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Banarescu P. 1990. Zoogeography of fresh waters. General distribution and dispersal of freshwater animals, Vol. I. Wiesbaden: Aula-Verlag, 511 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Beggel S, Cerwenka AF, Brandner J, Geist J. 2015. Shell morphological versus genetic identification of quagga mussel (Dreissena bugensis) and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Aquat Invasions 10: 93–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen W, Ma X, Shen Y, Mao Y, He S. 2015. The fish diversity in the upper reaches of the Salween River, Nujiang River, revealed by DNA barcoding. Sci Rep 5: 17437. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Collins RA, Armstrong KF, Meier R, et al. 2012. Barcoding and border biosecurity: identifying cyprinid fishes in the aquarium trade. PLoS ONE 7: e28381, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Council of the European Union. 1992. Directive 92/43/ EEC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21st May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Communities L206, 750 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 564–567. [Google Scholar]
  • Franch N, Clavero M, Garrido M, et al. 2008. On the establishment and range expansion of oriental weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) in NE Iberian Peninsula. Biol Invasions 10: 1327–1331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J. 2013. Misgurnus fossilis, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013, e.T40698A10351495, accessed on: 2016/16/08. [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J, Korte E. 2005. The first record of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus in Germany. J Fish Biol 66: 568–571. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geiger MF, Herder F, Monaghan MT, et al. 2014. Spatial heterogeneity in the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot affects barcoding accuracy of its freshwater fishes. Mol Ecol Resour 14: 1210–1221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartvich P, Lusk S, Rutkayová J. 2010. Threatened fishes of the world: Misgurnus fossilis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cobitidae). Environ Biol Fishes 87: 39–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 544–548. [Google Scholar]
  • Juliano RO, Guerrero R III, Ronquillo I. 1989. The introduction of exotic aquatic species in the Philippines. In: de Silva SS, ed. Exotic aquatic organisms in Asia. Manila, Philippines: Asian Fisheries Society, pp. 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Kano Y, Kawaguchi Y, Yamashita T, Shimatani Y. 2010. Distribution of the oriental weatherloach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) on paddy fields and its implications for conservation in Sado Island, Japan. Ichthyol Res 57: 180–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knebelsberger T, Dunz AR, Neumann D, Geiger MF. 2015. Molecular diversity of Germany's freshwater fishes and lampreys assessed by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 15: 562–572. [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M. 2012. Conspectus cobitidum: an inventory of the loaches of the world (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cobitoidei). Raffles Bull Zool Suppl 26: 1–199. [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M, Freyhof J. 2007. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Cornol: Publications Kottelat, 646 p. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger data sets. Mol Biol Evol 33: 1870–1874. [Google Scholar]
  • Lelek A. 1987. Threatened fishes of Europe. The freshwater fishes of Europe, Vol. 9. Wiesbaden: Aula-Verlag, 343 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer L, Hinrichs D. 2000. Microhabitat preferences and movements of the weatherfish, Misgurnus fossilis, in a drainage channel. Environ Biol Fishes 58: 297–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nichols JT. 1943. The freshwater fishes of China. Natural history of Central Asia, Vol. IX. New York, NY: The American Museum of Natural History. [Google Scholar]
  • Riffel M, Schenk M, Schreiber A. 1994. Electrophoretic differentiation between European loach (Misgurnus fossilis L.) and oriental weatherfish (Misgurnus mizolepis Günther), an autochtonous and a feral species of central European freshwater fish. Z Angew Zool 80: 473–483. [Google Scholar]
  • Sal'nikov VB. 1998. Anthropogenic migration of fish in Turkmenistan. J Ichthyol 38: 591–602. [Google Scholar]
  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1626 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Simon TP, Bright G, Veraldi F, Smith JR, Stahl JR. 2006. New records for the alien oriental weatherfish, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, in the Lake Michigan basin, Indiana (Cypriniformes: Cobitidae). Proc Indiana Acad Sci 115: 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  • van Kessel N, Dorenbosch M, Crombaghs B, Niemeijer B, Binnendijk E. 2013. First record of Asian weather loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor, 1842) in the River Meuse basin. Bioinvasions Rec 2: 167–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zieritz A, Gum B, Kuehn R, Geist J. 2012. Identifying freshwater mussels (Unionoida) and parasitic glochidia larvae from host fish gills: a molecular key to the North and Central European species. Ecol Evol 2: 740–750. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.