Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 418, 2017
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 06 March 2017
  • AFNOR. 2003. NF EN 13946. Qualité de l'eau – Guide pour l'échantillonnage en routine et le prétraitement des diatomées benthiques de rivières. Paris: AFNOR. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR. 2004. Qualité de l'eau - Guide pour l'identification et le dénombrement des échantillons de diatomées benthiques de rivières, et leur interprétation. Paris: AFNOR. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR. 2007. NF T90-354 – Qualité de l'eau – détermination de l'indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Paris: AFNOR. [Google Scholar]
  • Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and Riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 257–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alric B, Jenny J-P., Berthon V, et al. 2013. Local forcings affect lake zooplankton vulnerability and response to climate warming. Ecology 94: 2767–2780. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA. 2012. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 22nd ed. Washington DC: APHA. [Google Scholar]
  • Bader H-P, Baccini P. Monitoring and control of regional material fluxes. In: Schulin R, Desaules A, Webster R, Von Steiger B, eds. Soil monitoring: early detection and surveying of soil contamination and degradation. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1993, pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Battarbee R, Jones V, Flower R, et al. Diatoms. In: Smol J, Birks HJ, Last W, Bradley R, Alverson K, eds. Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Netherlands: Springer, 2001, pp. 155–202. [Google Scholar]
  • B-Béres V, Török P, Kókai Z, Krasznai ET, Tóthmérész B, Bácsi I. 2014. Ecological diatom guilds are useful but not sensitive enough as indicators of extremely changing water regimes. Hydrobiologia 738, 191–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Berthon V, Bouchez A, Rimet F. 2011. Using diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess organic pollution and trophic level in rivers: a case study of rivers in south-eastern France. Hydrobiologia 673: 259–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Berthon V, Alric B, Rimet F, Perga M-E. 2014. Sensitivity and responses of diatoms to climate warming in lakes heavily influenced by humans. Freshw Biol 59: 1755–1767. [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs B, Gerbeaux P. 1993. Periphyton development in relation to macro-scale (geology) and micro-scale (velocity) limiters in two gravel-bed rivers, New-Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 27: 39–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cantonati M, Scola S, Angeli N, Guella G, Frassanito R. 2009. Environmental controls of epilithic diatom depth-distribution in an oligotrophic lake characterized by marked water-level fluctuations. Eur J Phycol 44: 15–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cattaneo A, Kerimian T, Roberge M, Marty J. 1997. Periphyton distribution and abundance on substrata of different size along a gradient of stream trophy. Hydrobiologia 354: 101–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cazaubon A, Rolland T, Loudiki M. 1995. Heterogeneity of periphyton in French Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia 300–301: 105–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CEMAGREF. 1982. Étude des méthodes biologiques d'appréciation quantitatives de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualité des Eaux Lyon. Lyon: Agence de l'Eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse CEMAGREF. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN. 2003. EN 13946: 2003. Water quality: guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization. [Google Scholar]
  • Coste M, Boutry S, Tison-Rosebery J, Delmas F. 2009. Improvements of the biological diatom index (BDI): description and efficiency of the new version (BDI-2006). Ecol Indic 9: 621–650. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DeVito J, Meik JM, Gerson MM, Formanowicz Jr. 2004. Physiological tolerances of three sympatric riparian wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) correspond with microhabitat distributions. Can J Zool 82: 1119–1125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dionisio-Sese ML, Miyachi S. 1992. The effect of sodium chloride on carbonic anhydrase activity in marine microalgae. J Phycol 28: 619–624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Egge JK. 1998. Are diatoms poor competitors at low phosphate concentrations? J Mar Syst 16: 191–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellwood NTW, Whitton BA. 2007. Importance of organic phosphate hydrolyzed in stalks of the lotic diatom Didymosphenia geminata and the possible impact of atmospheric and climatic changes. Hydrobiologia 592: 121–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eminson D, Moss B. 1980. The composition and ecology of periphyton communities in freshwaters: 1 the influence of host type and external environment on community composition. Br Phycol J 15: 429–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2003. Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance no. 3 Analysis of Pressures and Impacts. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg. [Google Scholar]
  • Falasco E, Piano E, Bona F. 2016. Suggestions for diatom-based monitoring in intermittent streams. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 417: 38. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Fauth JE, Bernardo J, Camara M, Resetarits WJ, Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA. 1996. Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: a conceptual approach. Am Nat 147: 282–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feminella JW, Hawkins CP. 1995. Interactions between stream herbivores and periphyton: a quantitative analysis of past experiments. J N Am Benthol Soc 14: 465–509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gottschalk S, Kahlert M. 2012. Shifts in taxonomical and guild composition of littoral diatom assemblages along environmental gradients. Hydrobiologia 694: 41–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. 1990. Generalized additive models. New York: Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Hlúbiková D, Novais MH, Dohet A, Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2014. Effect of riparian vegetation on diatom assemblages in headwater streams under different land uses. Sci Total Environ 475: 234–247. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoagland KD, Roemer SC, Rosowski JR. 1982. Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages, with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Am J Bot 69: 188–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hofmann G, Werum M, Lange-Bertalot H. 2011. Diatomeen im Süsswasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa: Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis: über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG. Königstein, Germany: Distributed by Koeltz Scientific Books, Ruggell. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson DA. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74: 2204–2214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson RE, Tuchman NC, Peterson CG. 1997. Changes in the vertical microdistribution of diatoms within a developing periphyton mat. J N Am Benthol Soc 16: 503–519. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H. 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia, Beih 64: 285–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H. 1993. 85 New taxa and much more than 100 taxonomic clarifications supplementary to Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Berlin, Stuttgart: J. Cramer, 454 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H. 2001. Diatoms of Europe: diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Vol. 2, Navicula sensu stricto, 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato, Frustulia. Königstein, Germany: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG. Distributed by Koeltz Scientific Books, Ruggell. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H, Krammer K. 2002. Diatoms of Europe: Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Vol. 3, Cymbella. Königstein, Germany: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG. Distributed by Koeltz Scientific Books, Ruggell. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H, Krammer K. 2003. Diatoms of Europe: Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Vol. 4, Cymbopleura, Delicata, Navicymbula, Gomphocymbellopsis, Afrocymbella. Königstein, Germany: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG. 3: Distributed by Koeltz Scientific Books, Ruggell. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange K, Liess A, Piggott JJ, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD. 2011. Light, nutrients and grazing interact to determine stream diatom community composition and functional group structure: Diatom responses to light, nutrients and grazing. Freshw Biol 56: 264–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lange K, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD. 2015. A trait-based framework for stream algal communities. Ecol Evol 6: 23. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Larras F, Bouchez A, Rimet F, Montuelle B. 2012. Using bioassays and species sensitivity distributions to assess herbicide toxicity towards benthic diatoms. PLoS ONE 7: e44458. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Larras F, Keck F, Montuelle B, Rimet F, Bouchez A. 2014. Linking diatom sensitivity to herbicides to phylogeny: a step forward for biomonitoring? Environ Sci Technol 48: 1921–1930. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Larson CA, Passy SI. 2012. Taxonomic and functional composition of the algal benthos exhibits similar successional trends in response to nutrient supply and current velocity. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80: 352–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P, Gallagher E. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecology 129: 271–280. [Google Scholar]
  • LEMA. 2006. LOI no. 2006-1772 du 30 décembre 2006 sur l'eau et les milieux aquatiques, Journal Officiel de la République Française 303. [Google Scholar]
  • Levkov Z. 2009. Diatoms of Europe: Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Vol. 5, Amphora sensu lato. Königstein, Germany: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG. Distributed by Koeltz Scientific Books, Ruggell. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcel R, Agnès B, Rimet F. 2013. Influence of herbicide contamination on diversity and ecological guilds of river diatoms. Cryptogamie, Algol 34: 169–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCormick PV. Resource competition and species coexistence in freshwater benthic algal assemblages. In: Stevenson J, Bothwell M, Lowe R, eds. Algal Ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. London: Academic Press, 1996, pp. 155–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Morin S, Duong TT, Herlory O, Feurtet-Mazel A, Coste M. 2008. Cadmium toxicity and bioaccumulation in freshwater biofilms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54: 173–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. 2015. Package "vegan." Community ecology package version 2.2"1. Available at: [Accessed: 14/02/2015]. [Google Scholar]
  • Passy SI. 2007. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquat Bot 86: 171–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passy SI, Larson CA. 2011. Succession in stream biofilms is an environmentally driven gradient of stress tolerance. Microb Ecol 62: 414–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Planas D. Acidification effects. In: Stevenson J, Bothwell M, Lowe R, eds. Algal Ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. London: Academic Press, 1996, pp. 497–530. [Google Scholar]
  • Poulíčková A, Hašler P, Lysáková M, Spears B. 2008. The ecology of freshwater epipelic algae: an update. Phycologia 47: 437–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pound KL, Lawrence GB, Passy SI. 2013. Wetlands serve as natural sources for improvement of stream ecosystem health in regions affected by acid deposition. Glob Change Biol 19: 2720–2728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pringle CM. 1990. Nutrient spatial heterogeneity: effects on community structure, physiognomy, and diversity of stream algae. Ecology 71: 905–920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • Reichardt E. 1999. Zur Revision der Gattung Gomphonema: Die Arten um G. affine/insigne, G. angustatum/micropus, G. acuminatum sowie gomphonemoide Diatomeen aus dem Oberoligozän in Böhmen. Königstein, Germany: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG. Distributed by Koeltz Scientific Books, Ruggell. [Google Scholar]
  • Reyjol Y, Spyratos V, Basilico L. 2013. Bioindication: des outils pour évaluer l'état écologique des milieux aquatiques – perspectives en vue du 2e cycle DCE-Eaux de surface continentales. Paris: ONEMA. [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F. 2009. Benthic diatom assemblages and their correspondence with ecoregional classifications: case study of rivers in north-eastern France. Hydrobiologia 636: 137–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F. 2012. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia 683: 1–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F, Bouchez A. 2011. Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers: lotic mesocosm approaches. Ecol Indic 11: 489–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F, Bouchez A. 2012. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 406: 01. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F, Ector L, Cauchie H-M., Hoffmann L. 2009. Changes in diatom-dominated biofilms during simulated improvements in water quality: implications for diatom-based monitoring in rivers. Eur J Phycol 44: 567–577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG. 1990. The diatoms: biology & morphology of the genera. Cambridge/England, New York: Cambridge University Press, 747 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sabater S. 2000. Diatom communities as indicators of environmental stress in the Guadiamar River, SW. Spain, following a major mine tailings spill. J Appl Phycol 12: 113–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Song X. 2007. Trends in benthic algal community response to a small-scale gradient of current velocities along a streambed transect. PhD thesis, College of Bowling Green State University, United States. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinman AD. Effects of grazers on freshwater benthic algae. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RJ, Thorp JH, eds. Algal Ecology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996, pp. 341–373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steinman AD., McIntire, C.D. 1986. Effects of current velocity and light energy on the structure for periphyton assemblage in laboratory streams. J Phycol 22: 352–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steinman AD, McIntire CD, Gregory SV, Lamberti GA. 1989. Effects of irradiance and grazing on lotic algal assemblages. J Phycol 25: 478–485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stenger-Kovács C, Lengyel E, Crossetti LO, Üveges V, Padisák J. 2013. Diatom ecological guilds as indicators of temporally changing stressors and disturbances in the small Torna-stream, Hungary. Ecol Indic 24: 138–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson J. 2014. Ecological assessments with algae: a review and synthesis. J Phycol 50: 437–461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson RJ, Peterson CG, Kirschtel DB, King CC, Tuchman NC. 1991. Density-dependent growth, ecological strategies, and effects of nutrients and shading on benthic diatom succession in streams. J Phycol 27: 59–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tison J, Park YS, Coste M, et al. 2005. Typology of diatom communities and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: a study on the French hydrosystem scale. Water Res 39: 3177–3188. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tison J, Park YS, Coste M, et al. 2007. Predicting diatom reference communities at the French hydrosystem scale: a first step towards the definition of the good ecological status. Ecol Model 203: 99–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Torrisi M, Rimet F, Cauchie H-M., Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2006. Bioindication par les diatomées épilithiques et épiphytes dans la rivière sÛre (luxembourg). Belg J Bot 139: 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Dam H, Mertens A, Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Netherland J Aquat Ecol 28: 117–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Videau C, Khalanski M, Penot M. 1980. Physiological response to chlorination of the unicellular marine alga Dunaliella primolecta Butcher. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 47: 113–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wasson JG, Chandesris A, Pella H, Blanc L. 2002. Les hydro-écorégions de France métropolitaine. Approche régionale de la typologie des eaux courantes et éléments pour la définition des peuplements de référence d'invertébrés. Lyon: Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement, CEMAGREF, BEA/LHQ, pp. 1–190. [Google Scholar]
  • WFD. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, Official Journal of the European Communities: 22/12/2000. [Google Scholar]
  • Wood SN. 2008. Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat 70: 495–518. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Wood SN. 2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc B 73: 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Wood S, Wood MS. 2015. Package “mgcv”. R package version 1.7-29. Available at: [Accessed: 14/02/2015]. [Google Scholar]
  • Zarauz L, Irigoien X, Fernandes JA. 2008. Modelling the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on plankton distribution in the Bay of Biscay, during three consecutive years (2004–06). J Plankton Res 30: 857–872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zelinka M, Marvan P. 1961. Zur Prazisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewasser. Arch Hydrobiol 57: 389–407. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.