Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2016011
Published online 19 April 2016
  • Chen L., Zhang X. and Liu Z., 2010. The response of a phytoplankton community to ecosystem restoration in Huizhou West Lake. J. Wuhan Bot. Res., 28, 453–459. (In Chinese with English abstract, DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.40453). [Google Scholar]
  • Dorenbosch M. and Bakker E.S., 2011. Herbivory in omnivorous fishes: effect of plant secondary metabolites and prey stoichiometry. Freshwater Biol., 56, 1783–1797. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gross E.M., 2003. Allelopathy of aquatic autotrophs. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 22, 313–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • James W.F., Barko J.W. and Butler M.G., 2004. Shear stress and sediment resuspension in relation to submerged macrophyte biomass. Hydrobiologia, 515, 181–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E., Lauridsen T.L., Kairesalo T. and Perrow M.R., 1998. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. In: Jeppesen, E., Søndergaard Ma., Søndergaard M. and Christoffersen K. (eds.), The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, Springer Verlag, New York, 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E., Søndergaard M., Lauridsen T.L., Davidson T.A., Liu Z.W., Mazzeo N., Trochine C., Özkan K., Jensen H.S., Trolle D., Starling F., Lazzaro X., Johansson L.S., Bjerring R., Liboriussen L., Larsen S.E., Landkildehus F. and Meerhoff M., 2012. Biomanipulation as a restoration tool to combat eutrophication: recent advances and future challenges. Advan. Ecol. Res., 47, 411–487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jin X.C. and Tu Q.Y., 1990. The standard methods for observation and analysis in lake eutrophication, 2nd ed. Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Lauridsen T.L. and Lodge D.M., 1996. Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 794–798. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu W., Hu W., Chen Y., Gu X., Hu Z., Chen Y. and Ji J., 2007. Temporal and spatial variation of aquatic macrophytes in West Taihu Lake. Acta Ecol. Sin., 27, 159–170. (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Z.W., Zhong P., Zhang X., Ning J., Larsen S.E. and Jeppesen E., 2014. Successful restoration of a tropical shallow eutrophic lake: strong bottom-up but weak top-down effects recorded. In: Kattel G. (eds). Australia-China wetland network research partnership. Proceedings of the Australia-China Wetland Network Research Partnership Symposium, Nanjing, China, 78–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Pípalová I., 2002. Initial impact of low stocking density of grass carp on aquatic macrophytes. Aquat. Bot., 73, 9–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips D. and Gregg J.W., 2003. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia, 136, 261–269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer M. and Jeppesen E., 1998. Alternative stable states. In: Jeppesen E., Søndergaard M. and Christoffersen K. (eds.). The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Springer-Verlag, New York, 397–406. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang L., Li K., Liu Z. andMiddelburg J.J., 2010. Sedimented cyanobacterial detritus as a source of nutrient for submerged macrophytes (Vallisneria spiralis and Elodea nuttallii): an isotope labeling experiment using 15N. Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 1912–1917. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang M., Yu J., He H., Li K., Chen F., Guan B., Hu Y., Su Y., Du Y. and Liu Z., 2012. Effects of ecological restoration on water quality of Wuli Bay, Lake Taihu. Ecol. Sci., 31: 240–244. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.