Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 18 January 2016
  • Abbe T.B. and Montgomery D.R., 1996. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers: Res. Manag., 12, 201–221. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson R.V., Gutierrez M.L. and Romana M.A., 2002. Turtle habitat use in a reach of the upper Mississippi River. J. Freshw. Ecol., 17, 171–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Angermeier P.L. and Karr J.R., 1984. Relationships between debris and fish habitat in a small warm water stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 113, 716–726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barko V.A. and Briggler J.T., 2006. Midland smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtles in the middle Mississippi River: Habitat associations, population structure, and implications for conservation. Chelonian Conserv. Biol., 5, 225–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barko V.A., Briggler J.T. and Ostendorf D.E., 2004. Passive fishing techniques: A cause of turtle mortality in the Mississippi River. J. Wildl. Manag., 68, 1145–1150. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Bayley P.B., 1995. Understanding large river floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience, 45, 153–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bodie R.J. and Semlitsch R.D., 2000. Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles. Oecologia, 122, 138–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bodie R.J., Semlitsch R.D. and Renken R.B., 2000. Diversity and structure of turtle assemblages: associations with wetland characters across a flood plain landscape. Ecography, 23, 444–456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brooks A.P., Gehrke P.C., Jansen J.D. and Abbe T.B., 2004. Experimental reintroduction of woody debris on the Williams River, NSW: geomorphic and ecological responses. River Res. Appl., 20, 513–536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buhlmann K.A., Akre T.S.B.Iverson J.B., Karapatakis D., Mittermeier R.A., Georges A., Rhodin A.G.J., Van Dijk P.P. and Gibbons J.W., 2009. A global analysis of tortoise and freshwater turtle distributions with identification of priority conservation areas. Chelonian Conserv. Biol., 8, 116–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaney A. and Smith C.L., 1950. Methods for collecting map turtles. Copeia, 1950, 323–333 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Congdon J.D., Greene J.L. and Gibbons J.W., 1986. Biomass of freshwater turtles: a geographic comparison. Am. Midl. Nat. 115, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Connor E.F. and Simberloff D., 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition. Ecology, 60, 1132–1140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diamond J.M., 1975. Assembly of species communities. In: Cody M.L. and Diamond J.M. (eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 342–444. [Google Scholar]
  • Dreslik M.J. and Phillips C.A., 2005. Turtle communities in the Upper Midwest, USA. J. Freshw. Ecol., 20, 149–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunning J.B., Danielson B.J. and Pulliam H.R., 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65, 169–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Echelle A.A. and Riggs C.D., 1972. Aspects of the early life histories of gars (Lepisosteus) in Lake Texoma. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 101, 106–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edds D.R., 1993. Fish assemblage structure and environmental correlates in Nepal’s Gandaki River. Copeia, 1993, 48–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ernest S.K., Brown J.H., Thibault K.M., White E.P. and Goheen J.R., 2008. Zero sum, the niche, and metacommunities: long-term dynamics of community assembly. Am. Nat., 172, 257–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ernst C.H. and Lovich J.E., 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA, 840 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Etnier D.A., and Starnes W.C., 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, 696 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Everett R.A. and Ruiz G.M., 1993. Coarse woody debris as a refuge from predation in aquatic communities. Oecologia, 93, 475–486. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fuasch K.D., Torgersen C.E., Baxter C.V. and Hiram W.L., 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience, 52, 483–498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fuselier L., and Edds D., 1994. Habitat partitioning among three sympatric species of map turtles, genus Graptemys. J. Herpetol., 28, 154–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Galat D.L., Fredrickson L.H., Humburg D.D., Bataille K.J., Bodie J.R., Dohrenwend J., Gelwicks G.T., Havel J.E., Helmers D.L., Hooker J.B., Jones J.R., Knowlton M.F., Kubisiak J., Mazourek J., Mccolpin A.C., Renken R.B. and Semlitsch R.D., 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large river wetlands. Bioscience, 48, 721–733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbons J.W. and Lovich J.E., 1990. Sexual dimorphism in turtles with emphasis on the slider turtle (Trachemys scripta). Herpetol. Monogr., 1990, 1–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grossman G.D., Moyle P.B. and Whitaker Jr. J.O., 1982. Stochasity in structural and functional characteristics of an Indiana stream fish assemblage: A test of community theory. Am. Nat., 120, 423–454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Iverson J.B., 1982. Biomass in turtle populations: a neglected subject. Oecologia, 55, 69–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Iverson J.B., 1992. Global correlates of species richness in turtles. Herpetolog. J., 2, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson D.A., Peres-Neto P.R. and Olden J.D., 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities – the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Johansen K., Hanson D., Lenfant C., 1970. Respiration in a primitive air breather, Amia calva. Respir. Physiol., 9, 162–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. and Sparks R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river- floodplain systems. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publications in Fishery and Aquatic Science 106, 110–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawton J.H., 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 60, 177–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lemmon P.E., 1957. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density. J. Forestry, 55, 667–668. [Google Scholar]
  • Lindeman P.V., 1999. Surveys of basking map turtles Graptemys spp. In three river drainages and the importance of deadwood abundance. Biol. Conserv., 88, 33-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindeman P.V., 2000. Resource use of five sympatric turtle species: effects of competition, phylogeny, and morphology. Can. J. Zool., 78, 992–1008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lovich J., 1988. Aggressive basking behavior in eastern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta picta). Herpetologica, 44, 197–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews W.J. and Hill L.G., 1980. Habitat partitioning in the fish community of a southwestern river. The Southwest. Nat., 25, 51–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews W.J. and Styron Jr. J.T., 1981. Tolerance of headwater vs. mainstream fishes for abrupt physiochemical changes. Am. Midl. Nat., 105, 149–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meffe G.K. and Sheldon A.L., 1988. The influence of habitat structure on fish assemblage composition in southeastern blackwater streams. Am. Midl. Nat., 120, 225–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michener W.K. and Haeuber R.A., 1998. Flooding: Natural and managed disturbances. Bioscience, 48, 677–680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moll D., 1976. Food and feeding strategies of the Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica ouachitensis). Am. Midl. Nat., 96, 478–482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service., 2003. Fish assemblages as indicators of the biological condition of streams and watersheds. Wetland Science Institute Technical Note. Laurel, MD, USA, 50 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.W., 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology, 74, 2215–2230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prentice H.C. and Cramer W., 1990. The plant community as a niche bioassay: environmental correlates of local variation in Gypsophila fastigiata. J. Ecol., 78, 313–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pressey R.L., Cabeza M.Watts M.E.Cowling R.M. and Wilson K.A., 2007. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 583–592. [Google Scholar]
  • Pringle C.M., Naiman R.J., Bretschko G., Karr J.R., Oswood M.W., Webster J.R., Welcomme R.L. and Winterbourn M.J., 1988. Patch dynamics in lotic systems: the stream as a mosaic. J. N. Am. Bentholog. Soc., 7, 503–524. [Google Scholar]
  • Riedle J.D. 2014. Aquatic vertebrate assemblages in the Middle Trinity River Basin with an emphasis on turtles. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA. 118 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Riedle J.D., Kazmaier R.T., Killian J. and Littrell W.B., 2015. Assemblage structure of an eastern Texas aquatic turtle community. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., 10, 695–702. [Google Scholar]
  • Riedle J.D., Shipman P.A., Fox S.F. and Leslie D.M., 2006. Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma. Southwest. Nat., 51, 35–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson A.I. and Crook D.A., 1999. Relationships between riverine fish and woody debris: implications for lowland rivers. Mar. Freshw. Res., 50, 941–953. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robison H.W. and Buchanan T.M., 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, 536 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Schlosser I.J., 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. Bioscience, 41, 704–712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schlosser I.J., 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiol., 303, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Semlitsch R.D. and Bodie J.R., 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv. Biol., 17, 1219–1228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shipman P.A. and Riedle J.D., 2008. Status and distribution of the alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) in southeastern Missouri. Southeast. Nat., 7, 331–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Subalusky A.L., Fitzgerald L.A. and Smith L.L., 2009. Ontogenetic niche shifts in the American alligator establish functional connectivity between aquatic systems. Biol. Conserv., 142, 1507–1514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor C.M., 1997. Fish species richness and incidence patterns in isolated and connected stream pools: effects of pool volume and spatial position. Oecologia, 110, 560–566. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor C.M. and Warren M.L., 2001. Dynamics in species composition of stream fish assemblages: environmental variability and nested subsets. Ecology, 82, 2320–2330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Telfair R.C., 1988. Conservation of the Catfish Creek ecosystem: a national natural landmark in eastern Texas. Tex. J. Sci., 40, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Schaffers A.P., 2004. Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology, 85, 834–846. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • terBraak C.J.F. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci., 57, 255–289. [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C.R., 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream ecology. J. N. Am. Bentholog. Soc., 8, 36–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vellend M., 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol., 85, 183–205. [Google Scholar]
  • Welcomme R.L., 1979. Fisheries ecology of floodplain rivers. Longman Group, New York, 240 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Welty J.J., Beechie T., Sullivan K., Hyink D.M., Bilby R.E., Andrus C. and Press G., 2002. Riparian aquatic interaction simulator (RAIS): a model of riparian forest dynamics for the generation of large woody debris and shade. For. Ecol. Manag., 162, 299–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winemiller K.O., Tarim S., Shormann D. and Cotner J.B., 2000. Fish assemblage structure in relation to environmental variation among Brazos River oxbow lakes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 129, 451–468. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.