Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 416, 2015
Article Number 34
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2015032
Published online 07 December 2015
  • Arthaud F., Vallod D., Wezel A., Robin J. and Bornette G., 2013. Short-term succession of aquatic plant species richness along ecosystem productivity and dispersal gradients in shallow lakes. J. Veg. Sci., 24, 148–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Azous A.L., Reinhelt L.E. and Burkey J., 2000. Managing wetland hydroperiod: issues and concerns. In: Azous A.L. and Horner R.R. (eds.), Wetlands and urbanization: implications for the future. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp. 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Bajer P.G., Sullivan G. and Sorensen P.W., 2009. Effects of a rapidly increasing population of common carp on vegetative cover and waterfowl in a recently restored Midwestern shallow lake. Hydrobiologia, 632, 235–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berger L., 2000. Płazy i gady Polski, PWN, Warszawa-Poznań, 148 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. and Mustoe S.H. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London, 277 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Binckley C.A. and Resetarits W.J., 2007. Effects of forest canopy on habitat selection in treefrogs and aquatic insects: Implications for communities and metacommunities. Oecologia, 153, 951–958. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boone M.D., Scott D.E. and Niewiarowski P.H., 2002. Effects of hatching time for larval ambystomatid salamanders. Copeia, 2002, 511–517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Broyer J. and Calenge C., 2010. Influence of fish-farming management on duck breeding in French fish pond systems. Hydrobiologia, 637, 173–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Broyer J. and Curtet L., 2011. The influence of fish farming intensification on taxonomic richness and biomass density of macrophyte-dwelling invertebrates in French fishponds. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 400, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Broyer J. and Curtet L., 2013. The influence of macrophyte beds on ducks breeding on fishponds of the Dombes region France. Wildfowl, 60, 136–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Burgett A.A. and Chase J.M., 2015. Landscape context influences the abundance of amphibians and the strength of their food web interactions in small ponds. Oikos, 124, 629–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M., 2001. Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, PRIMER-E, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, 172 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cramp S. and Simmons K.E.L., 1977. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the Western Palearctic, Volume I. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 732 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Elphick C.S., Taft O. and Lourenço P.M., 2010. Management of rice fields for birds during the non-growing season. Waterbird, 33, 181–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geldhauser F. and Gerstner P., 2011. Der Teichwirt. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 288 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Guareschi S., Abellán P., Laini A., Green A.J., Sánchez-Zapata J. A., Velasco J. and Millán A., 2014. Cross-taxon congruence in wetlands: assessing the value of waterbirds as surrogates of macroinvertebrate biodiversity in Mediterranean Ramsar sites. Ecol. Indic., 49, 204–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guziur J., Białowąs H. and Milczarzewicz W., 2003. Rybactwo Stawowe. Oficyna Wydawnicza Hoża, Warszawa, 382 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartel T., Nemes S., Cogalniceanu D., Öllerer K., Schweiger O., Moga C.I. and Demeter L., 2007. The effect of fish and aquatic habitat complexity on amphibians. Hydrobiologia, 583, 173–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Horváth L., Tamás G. and Seagrave C., 1992. Carp and pond fish culture, Fishing News Books. Oxford, 154 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hudson M.S., 1983. Waterfowl production on three age-classes of stock ponds in Montana. J. Wildl. Manage., 47, 112–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Indermaur L., Schaub M., Jokela J., Tockner K., Schmidt B.R., 2010. Differential response to abiotic conditions and predation risk rather than competition avoidance determine breeding site selection by anurans. Ecography, 33, 887–895. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson W.C., Werner B., Guntenspergen G.R., Voldseth R.A., Millett B., Naugle D.E., Tulbure M., Carroll R.W.H., Tracy J. and Olawsky C., 2010. Prairie wetland complexes as landscape: functional units in a changing climate. Bioscience, 60, 128–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jost L., 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113, 363–375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jurajda P., Ondračková M. and Reichard M., 2004. Managed flooding as a tool for supporting natural fish reproduction in man-made lentic water bodies. Fish. Manag. Ecol., 11, 237–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kloskowski J., 2010. Fish farms as amphibian habitats: factors affecting amphibian species richness and community structure at carp ponds in Poland. Environ. Conserv., 37, 187–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kloskowski J., 2011. Consequences of the size structure of fish populations for their effects on a generalist avian predator. Oecologia, 166, 517–530. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kloskowski J., Nieoczym M., Polak M. and Pitucha P., 2010. Habitat selection by breeding waterbirds at ponds with size-structured fish populations. Naturwissenschaften, 97, 673–682. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kneitel J.M., 2014. Inundation timing, more than duration, affects the community structure of Californian vernal pool mesocosms. Hydrobiologia, 732, 71–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koji S., Ito K., Akaishi D., Watanabe K., Nomura S., Utsunomiya D., Pei H., Tuno N., Hidaka K. and Nakamura K., 2014. Responses of aquatic insect, terrestrial arthropod, and plant biodiversity to the V-furrow direct seeding management in rice fields. In: Usio N. and Miyashita T. (eds.), Social-ecological restoration in paddy-dominated landscapes. Springer, Tokyo, pp. 173–195. [Google Scholar]
  • Koskimies P. and Väisänen R.A., 1991. Monitoring bird populations. A manual of methods applied in Finland, Zool. Mus., Finnish Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Helsinki, Helsinki, 144 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Loman J., 2002. Temperature, genetic and hydroperiod effects on metamorphosis of brown frogs Rana arvalis and R. temporaria in the field. J. Zool., 258, 115–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lougheed V.L., Crosbie B. and Chow-Franser P., 1998. Predictions on the effect of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exclusion on water quality, zooplankton, and submerged macrophytes in a Great Lakes wetland. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 1189–1197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma Z., Wang Y., Gan X., Li B., Cai Y. and Chen J., 2009. Waterbird population changes in the wetlands at Chongming Dongtan in the Yangtze River Estuary, China. Environ. Manag., 43, 1187–1200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsuzaki S.I.S., Usio N., Takamura N. and Washitani I., 2009. Contrasting impacts of invasive engineers on freshwater ecosystems: An experiment and meta-analysis. Oecologia, 158, 673–686. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCullagh P. and Nelder J.A., 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London, 532 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Moser M.E., 1986. Prey profitability for adult Grey Herons (Ardea cinerea) and the constraints on prey size when feeding young nestlings. Ibis, 128, 392–405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Murtaugh P.A., 2009. Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data. Ecol. Lett., 12, 1061–1068. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nieoczym M. and Kloskowski J., 2014. The role of body size in the impact of common carp Cyprinus carpio on water quality, zooplankton, and macrobenthos in ponds. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 99, 212−221. [Google Scholar]
  • Nieoczym M. and Kloskowski J., 2015. Responses of epibenthic and nektonic macroinvertebrate communities to a gradient of fish size in ponds. J. Limnol., 74, 50–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Opuszyński K., 1987. Freshwater pond ecosystems managed under a moderate European climate. In: Michael G.R. (ed.), Managed Aquatic Ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 63–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Paton P.W.C. and Crouch W.B., 2002. Using the phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol., 16, 194–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pechmann J.H.K., Scott D.E., Gibbons J.W. and Semlitsch R.D., 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 1, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Rannap R., Lõhmus A. and Briggs L., 2009. Restoring ponds for amphibians: A success story. Hydrobiologia, 634, 87–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ranoszek E., 1983. Test for methods of number estimation of breeding water birds. Not. Orn., 24, 177−201. [Google Scholar]
  • Santoul F. and Mastrorillo S., 2003. Interaction between fish and waterbird communities: a case study of two gravel pits in south-west France. Vie et Milieu, 53, 131–133. [Google Scholar]
  • Shulse C.D., Semlitsch R.D., Trauth K.M. and Gardner J.E., 2012. Testing wetland features to increase amphibian reproductive success and species richness for mitigation and restoration. Ecol. Appl., 22, 1675–1688. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Szücs I., Stundi L. and Váradi L., 2007. Carp farming in Central and Eastern Europe and a case study in multifunctional aquaculture. In: Leung P.S., Lee C-S. and O’Bryan P.J. (eds.), Species and system selection for sustainable aquaculture. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, pp. 389–413. [Google Scholar]
  • Švažas S. and Stanevičius V., 1998. Waterfowl of the large fish pond systems in Lithuania. Acta Zool. Lit., 8, 69–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Turski R., Uziak S. and Zawadzki S., 2008. Gleby. In: Uziak S. and Turski S. (eds.), Środowisko Przyrodnicze Lubelszczyzny. Lubelskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Lublin, pp. 217–315. [Google Scholar]
  • Vignoli L., Bologna M.A. and Luiselli L., 2007. Seasonal patterns of activity and community structure in an amphibian assemblage at a pond network with variable hydrology. Acta Oecol., 31, 185–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walls S.C., Waddle J.H., Barichivich W.J., Bartoszek I.A., Brown M.E., Hefner J.M., and Schuman M. J., 2014. Anuran site occupancy and species richness as tools for evaluating restoration of a hydrologically-modified landscape. Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 22, 625–639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber M.J. and Brown M.L., 2015. Biomass-dependent effects of age-0 common carp on aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia, 742, 71–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wellborn G.A., Skelly D.K. and Werner E.E., 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 337–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weller M.W., 1988. Issues and approaches in assessing cumulative impacts on waterbird habitat in wetlands. Environ. Manage. 12, 695–701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wezel A., Oertli B., Rosset V., Arthaud F., Leroy B., Smith R., Angélibert S., Bornette G., Vallod D. and Robin J., 2014. Biodiversity patterns of nutrient-rich fish ponds and implications for conservation. Limnology, 15, 213–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittaker R.H., 1972. Evolution and measurements of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213-251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittingham M.J., Stephens P.A., Bradbury R.B. and Freckleton R.P., 2006. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J. Anim. Ecol., 75, 1182–1189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams M., 1990. Understanding wetlands. In: Williams M. (ed.), Wetlands, a threatened landscape. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.