Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 416, 2015
Topical issue on Crayfish
Article Number 04
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2014040
Published online 26 January 2015
  • Belle C.C. and Yeo D.C., 2010. New observations of the exotic Australian red-claw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens, 1868) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastactidae) in Singapore. Nature in Singapore, 3, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Bohman P., Edsman L., Martin P. and Scholtz G., 2013. The first Marmorkrebs (Decapoda: Astacida: Cambaridae) in Scandinavia. Bioinvas. Rec., 2, 227–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Capinha C., Brotons L. and Anastácio P., 2013. Geographical variability in propagule pressure and climatic suitability explain the European distribution of two highly invasive crayfish. J. Biogeogr., 40, 548–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C., 2013. Invaders for sale: trade and determinants of introduction of ornamental freshwater crayfish. Biol. Invasions, 15, 125–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. and Pfeiffer M., 2010. First evidence for an established Marmorkrebs (Decapoda, Astacida, Cambaridae) population in Southwestern Germany, in syntopic occurrence with Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817). Aquatic Invasions, 5, 405–412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dehus P., Phillipson S., Bohl E., Oidtmann B., Keller M. and Lechleiter S., 1999. German conservation strategies for native crayfish species with regard to alien species. In: Gherardi F. and Holdich D.M. (eds.), Crayfish in Europe as alien species: How to Make the Best of a Bad Situation? A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  • Duggan I.C., Rixon C.A. and MacIsaac H.J., 2006. Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish. Biol. Invasions, 8, 377–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edgerton B.F., Henttonen P., Jussila J., Mannonen A., Paasonen P., Taugbøl T., Edsman L. and Souty-Grosset C., 2004. Understanding the causes of disease in European freshwater crayfish. Conserv. Biol., 18, 1466–1474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edsman L., 2004. The Swedish story about import of live crayfish. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 281–288. [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z., 2010. The spread of the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Marmorkrebs (Procambarus sp.), in the North American pet trade. Aquatic Invasions 5, 447–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., Aquiloni L., Diéguez-Uribeondo J. and Tricarico E., 2011. Managing invasive crayfish: is there a hope? Aquat. Sci., 73, 185–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D. and Pöckl M., 2005. Roundtable session 2: does legislation work in protecting vulnerable species? Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 809–827. [Google Scholar]
  • Jaklic M. and Vrezec A., 2011. The first tropical alien crayfish species in European waters: the redclaw Cherax quadricarinatus (Von Martens, 1868) (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Crustaceana, 84, 651–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Janský V. and Mutkovič A., 2010. Rak Procambarus sp.(Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae) – Prvy Nález na Slovensku. Zbornik Slovenského Národneho Múzea (Acta rerum naturalium Musei Nationalis Slovaci Bratislava), 56, 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  • Kopecký O., Kalous L. and Patoka J., 2013. Establishment risk from pet-trade freshwater turtles in the European Union. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 410, 02. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A., Petrusek A. and Kozák P., 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 413, 05. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kozubíková E., Petrusek A., Duris Z. and Oidtmann B., 2007. Aphanomyces astaci, the crayfish plague pathogen, may be a common cause of crayfish mass mortalities in the Czech Republic. B. Eur. Assoc. Fish. Pat., 27, 79. [Google Scholar]
  • Lin Y., Chang C., Chen I., Chiu Y., Wu S. and Chen J., 2006. The survey of the imported aquatic invertebrates via the live aquarium ornamental trade in Taiwan. Taiwania, 51, 99. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller-Morgan T., 2010. A brief overview of the ornamental fish industry and hobby. In: Roberts H. (ed.), Fundamentals of Ornamental Fish Health, Blackwell Publishing, New York, pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Mrugała A., Kozubíková-Balcarová E., Chucholl C., Resino S.C., Viljamaa-Dirks S., Vukiæ J. and Petrusek A., 2014. Trade of ornamental crayfish in Europe as a possible introduction pathway for important crustacean diseases: crayfish plague and white spot syndrome. Biol. Invasions, 16, 2489−2494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • NonnisMarzano F., Scalici M., Chiesa S., Gherardi F., Piccinini A. and Gibertini G., 2009. The first record of the marbled crayfish adds further threats to fresh waters in Italy. Aquatic Invasions, 4, 401–404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Papavlasopoulou I., Perdikaris C., Vardakas L. and Paschos I., 2014. Enemy at the gates: introduction potential of non-indigenous freshwater crayfish in Greece via the aquarium trade. Cent. Eur. J. Biol., 9, 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J., Kalous L. and Kopecký O., 2014a. Risk assessment of the crayfish pet trade based on data from the Czech Republic. Biol. Invasions, 16, 2489–2494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J., Petrtýl M. and Kalous L., 2014b. Garden ponds as potential introduction pathway of ornamental crayfish. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 414, 13. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S., 2009. Invasive non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe: recommendations on managing them. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394-395, 03. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S. and Füreder L., 2011. Two indigenous European crayfish under threat-how can we retain them in aquatic ecosystems for the future? Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 33. [Google Scholar]
  • Perdikaris C., Kozák P., Kouba A., Konstantinidis E. and Paschos I., 2012. Socio-economic drivers and non-indigenous freshwater crayfish species in Europe. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 404, 01. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ploeg A., 2007. The volume of the ornamental fish trade, International transport of live fish in the ornamental aquatic industry. Ornamental Fish Int. J, 2, 48–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Ploeg A., 2013. Trade – the status of the ornamental aquatic industry. Ornamental Fish Int. J., 72, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Rixon C.A.M., Duggan I.C., Bergeron N.M.N., Ricciardi A. and Macisaac H.J., 2005. Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 1365–1381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M., Chiesa S., Gherardi F., Ruffini M., Gibertini G. and Nonnis Marzano F., 2009. The new threat to Italian inland waters from the alien crayfish “gang”: the Australian Cherax destructor Clark, 1936. Hydrobiologia, 632, 341–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soes D. and Koese B., 2010. Invasive crayfish in the Netherlands: a preliminary risk analysis. EIS-Nederland and Bureau Waardenburg, Waardenburg, The Netherlands, 69 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C. and Reynolds J., 2009. Current ideas on methodological approaches in European crayfish conservation and restocking procedures. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394-395, 01. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Svobodová J., Vlach P. and Fischer D., 2010. Legislativní ochrana raků v České republice a ostatních státech Evropy. VTEI, 52, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Tricarico E., Vilizzi L., Gherardi F. and Copp G.H., 2010. Calibration of FI-ISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Nonnative Freshwater Invertebrates. Risk Anal., 30, 285–292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turkmen G. and Karadal O., 2012. The survey of the imported freshwater decapod species via the ornamental aquarium trade in Turkey. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 11, 2824–2827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.