Open Access
Issue |
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 413, 2014
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 11 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2014009 | |
Published online | 08 April 2014 |
- Aldridge D.C., 2000. The impacts of dredging and weed cutting on a population of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia : Unionidae). Biol. Conserv., 95, 247–257. [Google Scholar]
- Amyot J.-P. and Downing J.A., 1991. Endo- and epibenthic distribution of the unionid mollusk Elliptio complanata. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 10, 280–285. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer G., Hochwald S. and Silkenat W., 1991. Spatial distribution of freshwater mussels: the role of the host fish and metabolic rate. Freshwat. Biol., 26, 377–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Miller A.C. and Payne B.S., 1992. Survey for freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in the Lower Green and Barren Rivers. Technical Report, 62 p. [Google Scholar]
- Obermeyer B.K., 1998. A comparison of quadrats versus timed snorkel searches for assessing freshwater mussels. American Midland Naturalist, 139, 331–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piette R.R., 2005. Guidelines for sampling freshwater mussels in wadeable streams. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Research Program, Report No. 0092-01-09, Madison, 57 p. [Google Scholar]
- Pooler P.S. and Smith D.R., 2005. Optimal sampling design for estimating spatial distribution and abundance of a freshwater mussel population. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 525–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith D.R., Villella R.F., Lemarie D.P. and Von Oettingen S., 2000. How much excavation is needed to monitor freshwater mussels? Proceedings of the First Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Symposium, Ohio Biological Survey, 203–218. [Google Scholar]
- Smith D.R., Villella R.F. and Lemarie D.P., 2001. Survey protocol for assessment of endangered freshwater mussels in the Allegheny River. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 20, 118–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strayer D.L., Claypool S. and Sprague S.J., 1997. Assessing unionid populations with quadrats and timed searches. In: Cummings K.S., Buchanan A.S., Mayer C.A. and Naimo T.J. (eds.), Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II. Initiatives for the future. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 163–169. [Google Scholar]
- Strayer D.L. and Smith D.R., 2003. A guide to sampling freshwater mussel populations. American Fisheries Society, Monograph 8, 103 p. [Google Scholar]
- Van Damme D., 2011. Unio crassus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2011.2. www.iucnredlist.org . Accessed 15 April 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Vaughn C.C., Taylor C.M. and Eberhard K.J., 1997. A comparison of the effectiveness of timed searches vs. quadrat sampling in mussel surveys. In: Cummings K.S., Buchanan A.S., Mayer C.A. and Naimo T.J. (eds.), Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II. Initiatives for the future. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 157–162. [Google Scholar]
- Zettler M.L. and Jueg U., 2007. The situation of the freshwater mussel Unio crassus (Philipsson, 1788) in North-East Germany and its monitoring in terms of the EC Habitats Directive. Mollusca, 25, 165–174. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.