Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 413, 2014
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2014009
Published online 08 April 2014
  • Aldridge D.C., 2000. The impacts of dredging and weed cutting on a population of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia : Unionidae). Biol. Conserv., 95, 247–257. [CrossRef]
  • Amyot J.-P. and Downing J.A., 1991. Endo- and epibenthic distribution of the unionid mollusk Elliptio complanata. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 10, 280–285. [CrossRef]
  • Bauer G., Hochwald S. and Silkenat W., 1991. Spatial distribution of freshwater mussels: the role of the host fish and metabolic rate. Freshwat. Biol., 26, 377–386. [CrossRef]
  • Miller A.C. and Payne B.S., 1992. Survey for freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in the Lower Green and Barren Rivers. Technical Report, 62 p.
  • Obermeyer B.K., 1998. A comparison of quadrats versus timed snorkel searches for assessing freshwater mussels. American Midland Naturalist, 139, 331–339. [CrossRef]
  • Piette R.R., 2005. Guidelines for sampling freshwater mussels in wadeable streams. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Research Program, Report No. 0092-01-09, Madison, 57 p.
  • Pooler P.S. and Smith D.R., 2005. Optimal sampling design for estimating spatial distribution and abundance of a freshwater mussel population. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 525–537. [CrossRef]
  • Smith D.R., Villella R.F., Lemarie D.P. and Von Oettingen S., 2000. How much excavation is needed to monitor freshwater mussels? Proceedings of the First Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Symposium, Ohio Biological Survey, 203–218.
  • Smith D.R., Villella R.F. and Lemarie D.P., 2001. Survey protocol for assessment of endangered freshwater mussels in the Allegheny River. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 20, 118–132. [CrossRef]
  • Strayer D.L., Claypool S. and Sprague S.J., 1997. Assessing unionid populations with quadrats and timed searches. In: Cummings K.S., Buchanan A.S., Mayer C.A. and Naimo T.J. (eds.), Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II. Initiatives for the future. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 163–169.
  • Strayer D.L. and Smith D.R., 2003. A guide to sampling freshwater mussel populations. American Fisheries Society, Monograph 8, 103 p.
  • Van Damme D., 2011. Unio crassus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2011.2. www.iucnredlist.org . Accessed 15 April 2012.
  • Vaughn C.C., Taylor C.M. and Eberhard K.J., 1997. A comparison of the effectiveness of timed searches vs. quadrat sampling in mussel surveys. In: Cummings K.S., Buchanan A.S., Mayer C.A. and Naimo T.J. (eds.), Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II. Initiatives for the future. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 157–162.
  • Zettler M.L. and Jueg U., 2007. The situation of the freshwater mussel Unio crassus (Philipsson, 1788) in North-East Germany and its monitoring in terms of the EC Habitats Directive. Mollusca, 25, 165–174.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.