Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 411, 2013
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 16
Published online 07 November 2013
  • Acreman M.C. and Ferguson A.J.D., 2010. Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Fresh. Biol., 55, 32–48. [CrossRef]
  • Admiraal W., Barranguet C., van Beusekom S.A.M., Bleeker E.A.J., van den Ende F.P., van der Geest H.G., Groenendijk D., Ivorra N., Kraak M.H.S. and Stuijfzand S.C., 2000. Linking ecological and ecotoxicological techniques to support river rehabilitation. Chemosphere, 41, 289–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Al-Shami S.A., Rawi C.S.M., Ahmad A.H., Hamid S.A. and Nor S.A.M., 2011. Influence of agricultural, industrial and anthropogenic stresses on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates in Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74, 1195–1202. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Argerich A., Puig M.A. and Pupilli E., 2004. Effect of floods of different magnitude on the macroinvertebrate communities of Matarranya stream (Ebro river basin, NE Spain). Limnetica, 23, 283–294.
  • Arthington A.H., Robert J.N., Michael E.M. and Christer N., 2010. Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities. Fresh. Biol., 55, 1–16. [CrossRef]
  • Assogbadjo A.E., GlèlèKakaï R., Vodouhê F.G., Djagoun C.A.M.S., Codjia J.T.C. and Sinsin B., 2012. Biodiversity and socioeconomic factors supporting farmers’ choice of wild edible trees in the agroforestry systems of Benin (West Africa). Forest Policy and Economics, 14, 41–49. [CrossRef]
  • Azrina M.Z., Yap C.K., Ismail A.R., Ismail A. and Tan S.G., 2006. Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 64, 337–347. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Bonada N., Zamora-Muñoz C., Rieradevalla M. and Prat N., 2004. Ecological profiles of caddisfly larvae in Mediterranean streams: implications for bioassessment methods. Environmental Pollution, 132, 509–521. [CrossRef]
  • Borja Á., Elliott M., Carstensen J., Heiskanen A.S. and van de Bund W., 2010. Marine management – Towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 2175–2186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Braukmann U. and Biss R., 2004. Conceptual study – An improved method to assess acidification in German streams by using benthic macroinvertebrates. Limnologica Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 34, 433–450. [CrossRef]
  • Brunke M., 2004. Stream typology and lake outlets – a perspective towards validation and assessment from northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). Limnologica Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 34, 460–478. [CrossRef]
  • Camargo J.A., Gonzalo C. and Alonso Á., 2011. Assessing trout farm pollution by biological metrics and indices based on aquatic macrophytes and benthic macroinvertebrates: A case study. Ecological Indicators, 11, 911–917. [CrossRef]
  • Chen C.H., Liu W.L. andLiaw S.L., 2011. Integrated dynamic policy management methodology and system for strategic environmental assessment of golf course installation policy in Taiwan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 66–76. [CrossRef]
  • Décamps H., 2011. River networks as biodiversity hotlines. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334, 420–234. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Direction of Statistics Arad, Timiş Deva, 2002. According to the Natura 2000 Management Plan – Mureş Lower Gorge and Lipovei Hills – RO SPA0029 [in Romanian].
  • Durance I. and Ormerod S.J., 2007. Climate change effects on upland stream macroinvertebrates over a 25-year period. Global Change Biology, 13, 942–957. [CrossRef]
  • Gerth W.J., Herlihy A.T., Sifneos J.C., 2013. Large-scale macroinvertebrate assemblage patterns from least-disturbed wadeable stream sites across the 48 contiguous US states. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 408, 02. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • González J.M., Basaguren A. and Pozo J., 2002. Size-mass relationships of stream invertebrates in a northern Spain stream. Hydrobiologia, 489, 131–137. [CrossRef]
  • Graf W., Grasser U. and Waringer J., 1995. [Trichoptera]. Bundesministerium für Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Wien, 280 p. [in German].
  • Graf W., Grasser U. and Waringer J., 2002. [Trichoptera]. Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land – und Forstwirtschaft, Wien, 388 p. [in German].
  • Graf W., Murphy J., Dahl J., Zamora-Muñoz C. and López-Rodríguez M.J., 2008. Distribution and ecological preferences of european freshwater organisms – Trichoptera. Pensoft, Bulgaria, 230 p.
  • Hershey A.E., Fortino K., Peterson B.J. and Ulseth A.J., 2007. Stream Food Webs. Methods in Stream Ecology (Second Edition), chapter 27.
  • Hildrew A., 2009. Chapter 4 Sustained Research on Stream Communities: A Model System and The Comparative Approach. Advances in Ecological Research, 41, 175–312. [CrossRef]
  • INS, 2009. National Institute of Statistics according to the Regional Thematic Analysis – Demographic evolution of the West Region, material provided by the West Regional Agency of Development (WRAD), Romania, 109 p. [in Romanian].
  • Jović A., Paunović M., Stojanović B., Milošević S. and Nikolić V., 2006. Aquatic invertebrates of the Ribnica and Lepenica rivers: composition of the community and water quality. Arch. Biol. Sci., 58, 115–119. [CrossRef]
  • Kazanciand N. and Dügel M., 2008. Prediction of global climate change impact on structure of aquatic insect assemblages by using species optimum and tolerance values of temperature. Rev. Hydrobiol., 2, 73–80.
  • King A.J., Ward K.A., O’connor P., Green D., Tonkin Z., and Mahoney J. 2010. Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment. Fresh. Biol., 55, 17–31. [CrossRef]
  • Kubosova K., Brabec K., Jarkovsky J. and Syrovatka V., 2010. Selection of indicative taxa for river habitats: a case study on benthic macroinvertebrates using indicator species analysis and the random forest methods. Hydrobiologia, 651, 101–114. [CrossRef]
  • Langheinrich U., Böhme D., Wegener U. and Lüderitz V., 2002. Streams in the Harz National Parks (Germany) – a hydrochemical and hydrobiological evaluation. Limnologica Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 32, 309–321. [CrossRef]
  • Li L., Zheng B. and Liu L., 2010. Biomonitoring and Bioindicators Used for River Ecosystems: Definitions, Approaches and Trends. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, 1510–1524. [CrossRef]
  • Lukáš J. and Krno I., 2003. Caddisflies (Trichoptera) of the Gidra River Basin. Acta Zoologica Universitatis Comenianae, 45, 69–75.
  • Malicky H., 2008. The distribution of four morphotypes of Hydropsyche contubernalis McL. (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae), a possible object for genetical studies on subspecific differentiation. Braueria, 35, 41–42.
  • Management Plan, 2007. Natura 2000 Management Plan – Mureş Lower Gorge and Lipovei Hills – RO SPA0029 [in Romanian].
  • Management Plan, 2010. Natura 2000 Management Plan – Mureş Lower Gorge and Lipovei Hills – RO SPA0029 [in Romanian].
  • Marcer A., Garcia V., Escobar A. and Pons X., 2010. Handling historical information on protected-area systems and coverage. An information system for the Natura 2000 European context. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 956–964. [CrossRef]
  • Mobes-Hansen B. and Waringer J.A., 1998. The Influence of Hydraulic Stress on Microdistribution Patterns of Zoobenthos in a Sandstone Brook (Weidlingbach, Lower Austria). Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol., 83, 381–396. [CrossRef]
  • Ohl C., Johst K., Meyerhoff J., Beckenkamp M., Grüsgen V. and Drechsler M., 2010. Long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER) for biodiversity protection – A complex systems approach for the study of dynamic human–nature interactions. Ecological Complexity, 7, 170–178. [CrossRef]
  • Pastuchová Z., 2006. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in conditions of low-discharge streams of the Cerová vrchovina highland in Slovakia. Limnologica Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 36, 241–250. [CrossRef]
  • Paulsa S., Grafb W., Haasea P., Lumbschc T.H. and Waringer J., 2008. Grazers, shredders and filtering carnivores – The evolution of feeding ecology in Drusinae (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae): Insights from a molecular phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46, 776–791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pinto R., de Jonge V.N., Neto J.M., Domingos T., Marque J.C. and Patrício J., 2011. Towards a DPSIR driven integration of ecological value, water uses and ecosystem services for estuarine systems. Ocean & Coastal Management, 30, 1–16.
  • Pîrvu M., Pacioglu O., 2012. The ecological requirements of caddisflies larvae (Insecta: Trichoptera) and their usefulness in water quality assessment of a river in south-west Romania. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 407, 03. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Renöfält B.M., Jansson R. and Nilsson C., 2010. Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Fresh. Biol., 55, 49–67. [CrossRef]
  • RSY, 2008. Romanian Statistical Yearbook according to the Regional Thematic Analysis – Demographic evolution of the West Region, material provided by the West Regional Agency of Development (WRAD), Romania, 109 p. [in Romanian].
  • Ruiz-García A.R., Márquez-Rodríguez J. and Ferreras-Romero M., 2012. Implications of anthropogenic disturbance factors on the Trichoptera assemblage in a Mediterranean fluvial system: Are Trichoptera useful for identifying land-use alterations? Ecological Indicators, 14, 114–123. [CrossRef]
  • Savić A., Ranđelović V., Ðorđević M., Karadžić B., Ðokić M., Krpo-Ćetković J., 2013. The influence of environmental factors on the structure of caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblage in the Nišava River (Central Balkan Peninsula). Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 409, 03.
  • Schetke S., Haase D. and Kötter T., 2012. Towards sustainable settlement growth: A new multi-criteria assessment for implementing environmental targets into strategic urban planning. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 195–210. [CrossRef]
  • Schmeraa D. and Erös T., 2011. The role of sampling effort, taxonomical resolution and abundance weight in multivariate comparison of stream dwelling caddisfly assemblages collected from riffle and pool habitats. Ecological Indicators, 11, 230–239. [CrossRef]
  • Simanonok M.P., Anderson C.B., Pastur G.M., Lencinas M.V. and Kennedy J.H., 2011. A comparison of impacts from silviculture practices and North American beaver invasion on stream benthic macroinvertebrate community structure and function in Nothofagus forests of Tierra del Fuego. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 263–269. [CrossRef]
  • Sîrbu I. and Benedek A.M., 2004. Practical ecology. L. Blaga University Press, Sibiu, Romania, 260 p. [in Romanian].
  • Stan G., 1995. Statistical methods with applications in entomological research. Bul. Inf. Soc. Lepid. Rom., 6, 67–96 [in Romanian].
  • Sundermann A., Pauls S.U., Clarke R.T. and Haase P., 2008. Within-stream variability of benthic invertebrate samples and EU Water Framework Directive assessment results. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 173, 21–34. [CrossRef]
  • Tamazian A., Chousa J.P. and Vadlamannati K.C., 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37, 246–253. [CrossRef]
  • Thorp J.H. and Rogers D.C., 2011. Caddisflies: Insect Order Trichoptera. Field Guide to Freshwater Invertebrates of North America, Chap. 25.
  • Tisdell C., 2011. Biodiversity conservation, loss of natural capital and interest rates. Ecological Economics, 70, 2511–2515. [CrossRef]
  • Tscherninga K., Helminga K., Krippnera B., Siebera S., Gomez S. and Gomez P., 2012. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making? Land Use Policy, 29, 102–110. [CrossRef]
  • TSEDA-TCC, 2009. Economic and social development strategy of Timiş County. Timiş Social and Economic Development Agency – Timiş County Council, Romania, 344 p. [in Romanian]
  • Varnosfaderany M.N., Ebrahimi E., Mirghaffary N. and Safyanian A., 2010. Biological assessment of the Zayandeh Rud River, Iran, using benthic macroinvertebrates. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 40, 226–232. [CrossRef]
  • Velázquez J., Tejera R., Hernando A. and Núñez M.V., 2010. Environmental diagnosis: Integrating biodiversity conservation in management of Natura 2000 forest spaces. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18, 309–317. [CrossRef]
  • Wallace I.D., 1990. A review of the Trichoptera of Great Britain. Research & Survey in Nature Conservation, 32, 1–59.
  • Wallace I.D., Wallace B. and Philipson G.N., 2003. Case-bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland. Freshwater Biological Association, UK, 308 p.
  • Waringer J. and Graf W., 1997. Atlas der Österreichischen Köcherfliegenlarven. Facultas Universitätsverlag, Wien, 320 p. [in German].
  • Wildsmith M.D., Rose T.H., Potter I.C., Warwick R.M. and Clarke K.R., 2011. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of environmental deterioration in a large microtidal estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 525–538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Winkelmann C., Worischka S., Koop J.H.E. and Benndorf J., 2007. Predation effects of benthivorous fish on grazing and shredding macroinvertebrates in a detritus-based stream food web. Limnologica – Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 37, 121–128. [CrossRef]
  • WRAD, 2009. Regional thematic analysis - demographic evolution of the west region. West Regional Agency for Development, Romania, 109 p. [in Romanian].
  • Xing Y., Horner M.R.W., El-Haram M.A. and Bebbington J., 2009. A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development. Accounting Forum, 33, 209–224. [CrossRef]
  • Yoshimura M., 2008. Longitudinal patterns of benthic invertebrates along a stream in the temperate forest in Japan: in relation to humans and tributaries. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 1, 95−107. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.