Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 410, 2013
Article Number 03
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 02 August 2013
  • Arizaga J., Mendiburu A., Alonso D., Cuadrado J.E., Jauregi J.I. andSanchez J.M., 2010. Common Kingfishers Alcedo atthis along the coast of northern Iberia during the autumn migration period. Ardea, 98, 161–167. [CrossRef]
  • Britton J.R., Harvey J.P., Cowx I.G., Holden T., Feltham M.J., Wilson B.R. and Davies M.J., 2003. Key factor analysis to assess cormorant depredation on inland fisheries in the UK. In: Cowx I.G. (ed.), Interactions between fish and birds: Implication for management, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 14–27.
  • Carss D.N. andMarquiss M., 1999. Skeletons in the cupboard? Quantifying bird predation on Atlantic salmon: atlas vertebra: length equations revisited. J. Zool., 248, 272–276. [CrossRef]
  • Čech M. andČech P., 2011. Diet of the Common Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) in relation to habitat type: a summary of results from the Czech Republic. Sylvia, 47, 33–47.
  • Čech M. andVejřík L., 2011. Winter diet of Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) on the River Vltava: estimate of size and species composition and potential for fish stock losses. Folia Zool., 60, 129–142.
  • Chandler D. and Llewellyn I., 2010. Kingfisher. New Holland Publishers, London.
  • Cramp S., 1985. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the Western Palearctic. Volume IV: Terns to Woodpeckers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 960 p.
  • Cowx I.G. (ed.), 2003. Interactions between fish and birds: Implication for management. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 348 p.
  • Davies C., Shelley J., Harding P., Mclean I., Gardiner R. and Peirson G. (eds.), 2004. Freshwater Fishes in Britain – the species and their distribution. Harley Books, Colchester, 176 p.
  • Feltham M.J., 1990. The diet of red-breasted merganser (Mergus serrator) during the smolt run in N.E. Scotland: the importance of salmon (Salmo salar) smolts and parr. J. Zool., 222, 285–292. [CrossRef]
  • Feltham M.J., 1995. Predation of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts and parr by red-breasted mergansers, Mergus serrator L., on two Scottish rivers. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 2, 289–298. [CrossRef]
  • Feltham M.J. andMarquiss M., 1989. The use of the first vertebrae in separating and estimating the size of trout (Salmo trutta) and salmon (Salmo salar) in bone remains. J. Zool., 219, 113–122. [CrossRef]
  • Friedland K.D., Reddin D.G. andCocik J.F., 1993. Marine survival of North American and European Atlantic salmon: effects of growth and environment. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 50, 481–492. [CrossRef]
  • Hagemeiger W.J.M. and Blair M.J., 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: their distribution and abundance. Poyser, London, 903 p.
  • Hallet C., 1977. Contribution a l’etude du regime alimentaire du Martin-Pêcheur (Alcedo atthis) dans la Vallée de la Lesse. Aves, 14, 128–144.
  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 9. [MathSciNet]
  • Mills C.A., 1987. The life history of the minnow Phoxinus phoxinus (L.) in a productive stream. Freshwater Biol., 17, 53–67. [CrossRef]
  • Miranda R. andEscala M.C., 2002. Guía de identificación de restos óseos de los Ciprínidos presentes en España. Serie Zool., 28, 1–241.
  • Moreno-Opo R., 2003. Martín Pescador Común, Alcedo atthis. In: Martí R. and Del Moral J.C. (eds.), Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España, DGCN-SEO/BirdLife, Madrid, 342–343.
  • Newton I. (ed.), 1989. Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic Press, London.
  • Prenda J., Arenas M.J., Freitas D., Santos-Reis M. andCollares-Pereira M.J., 2002. Bone Length of lberian Freshwater Fish, as a Predictor of Length and Biomass of Prey Consumed by Piscivores. Limmetica, 21, 15–24.
  • Raven P., 1986. The size of minnow prey in the diet of young Kingfisher Alcedo atthis. Bird Study, 33, 6–11. [CrossRef]
  • Reynolds S.J. andHinge M.D.C., 1996. Foods brought to the nest by breeding Kingfishers Alcedo atthis in the New Forest of southern England. Bird Study, 43, 96–102. [CrossRef]
  • Russell I.C., Dare P.J., Eaton D.R. and Armstrong J.D., 1996. Assessment of the problem of fish eating birds in inland fisheries in England and Wales. Directorate of Fisheries Research, Lowestoft, 48 p.
  • Seber G.A.F., 1982. The Estimation of Animal Abundance. Griffin, London.
  • Tucker G.M. and Heath M.F., 1994. Birds in Europe: their Conservation Status. Birdlife International, Cambridge, 374 p.
  • Tucker G.M. and Heath M.F., 2004. Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge, 374 p.
  • Vilches A., Miranda R. andArizaga J., 2012a. Fish prey selection by the Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis in Northern Iberia. Acta Ornithol., 47, 167–175. [CrossRef]
  • Vilches A., Miranda R., Arizaga J. andGalicia D., 2012b. Habitat selection for breeding Common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis L.) in rivers from northern Iberia. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 48, 289–294. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Wilson B.R., Feltham M.J., Davies J.M., Holden T., Cowx I.G., Harvey J.P. and Britton J.R., 2003. A quantitative assesment of the impact of Goosander, Mergus merganser, on salmonid population in two upland rivers in England and Wales. In: Cowx I.G. (ed.), Interactions between fish and birds: Implication for management, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 119–135.
  • Winfield I.J., Crawshaw D.H. and Durie N.C., 2003. Management of the cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo, and endangered whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus, populations IF Haweswater, UK. In: Cowx I.G. (ed.), Interactions between fish and birds: Implication for management, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 335–344.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.