Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 410, 2013
Article Number 02
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013057
Published online 08 August 2013
  • Angilletta M.J., Niewiarowski P.H., Dunham A.E., Leaché A.D. andPorter W.P., 2004. Bergmann’s clines in ectotherms: illustrating a life-history perspective with sceloporine lizards. Am. Nat., 164, 168–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arnold E.N., 2003. Reptiles and amphibians of Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 198 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bomford M., 2006. Risk Assessment for the Establishment of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia: Recalibration and Refinement of Models, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, 130 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bomford M., 2008. Risk Assessment Models for Establishment of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, 191 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bomford M., Kraus F., Barry S.C. andLawrence E., 2009. Predicting establishment success for alien reptiles and amphibians: a role for climate matching. Biol. Invasions, 11, 713–724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bureau of Rural Sciences, 2008. Climatch v1.0 software. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australia. Available online: http://adl.brs.gov.au:8080/Climatch/climatch.jsp [Accessed 28.9. 2012]. [Google Scholar]
  • Burgert R.J.F., Ottburg F.G.W.A., Roessink I., Jansman H.A.H., van der Grift E.A. and Griffioen A.J., 2011. Invasion of the turtles? Exotic turtles in the Netherlands: a risk assessment. Alterra, Wageningen, 95 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cadi A. andJoly P., 2003. Competition for basking places between the endangered European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced red-eared turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans). Can. J. Zool., 81, 1392–1398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadi A. andJoly P., 2004. Impact of the introduction of the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) on survival rates of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis). Biodivers. Conserv., 13, 2511–2518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadi A., Delmas V., Prévot-Julliard A.C., Joly P., Pieau C. andGirondot M., 2004. Successful reproduction of the introduced slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) in the south of France. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 14, 237–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Copp G.H., Vilizzi L. andGozlan R.E., 2010. The demography of introduction pathways, propagule pressure and occurrences of non-native freshwater fish in England. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 20, 595–601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DAISIE, 2012. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. Available online: http://www.europe-aliens.org. [Accessed 5.10. 2012]. [Google Scholar]
  • Doody J.S., West P., andGeorges A., 2003. Beach selection in nesting pig-nosed turtles Carettochelys insculpta. J. Herpetol., 37, 178–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dukes J.S. andMooney H.A., 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 135–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • EC, 1997. Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein. Official Journal of the European Union L 61 of 3.3.1997, 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Ernst C., Lovich J. and Barbour R., 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, 578 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ernst R., Massemin D. andKowarik I., 2011. Non-invasive invaders from the Caribbean: the status of Johnstone’s Whistling frog (Eleutherodactylus johnstonei) ten years after its introduction to Western French Guiana. Biol. Invasions, 13, 1767–1777. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ficetola G.F., Thuiller W. andPadoa-Schioppa E., 2009. From introduction to the establishment of alien species: bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction localities in the slider turtle. Divers. Distrib., 15, 108–116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Franke J. and Telecky T.M., 2001. Reptiles as pets. An examination of the trade in live reptiles in the United States. Washington DC, p. 178. [Google Scholar]
  • Fritz U. andHavaš P., 2007. Checklist of Chelonians of the World. Vertebrate Zool., 57, 149–368. [Google Scholar]
  • Fujisaki I., Hart K.M., Mazzotti F.J., Rice K.G., Snow S. andRochford M., 2010. Risk assessment of potential invasiveness of exotic reptiles imported to south Florida. Biol. Invasions, 12, 2585–2596. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillon J.M., Guéry L., Hulin V., Girondot M., 2012. A large phylogeny of turtles (Testudines) using molecular data. Contrib. Zool., 81, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Hayes K.R. andBarry S.C., 2008. Are there any consistent predictros of invasion success? Biol. Invasions, 10, 483–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson W., Bomford M. andCassey P., 2011. Managing the risk of exotic vertebrates incursions in Australia. Wildlife Res., 38, 501–508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme P.E., 2006. Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 835–847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeschke J.M. andStrayer D.L., 2006. Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Glob. Change Biol., 12, 1608–1619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kark S., Solarz W., Chiron F., Clergeau P. and Shirley S., 2009. Alien birds, amphibians and reptiles of Europe, Handbook of alien species in Europe, Springer, Dordrecht, 26 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Keller R.P., Frang K. andLodge D.M., 2008. Preventing the sprej of invasive species: economic benefits of intervention guided by ecological predictions. Conserv. Biol., 22, 80–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kolar C. andLodge D.M., 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 199–204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kraus F., 2009. Alien Reptiles and Amphibians: a Scientific Compendium and Analysis. Springer, New York, 576 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Livengood E.J. and Chapman F.A., 2007. The ornamental fish trade: An introduction with perspectives for responsible aquarium fish ownership. University of Florida IFAS, Gainesville, 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lockwood J.L., Cassey P. and Blackburn T., 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 223–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mack R., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W., Evans H., Clout M. andBazzaz F., 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl., 10, 689–710. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • de Magalhaes J.P. andCosta J., 2009. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J. Evol. Biol., 22, 1770–1774. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Manchester S.J. andBullock J.M., 2000. The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. J. Appl. Ecol., 37, 845–864. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martínez-Silvestre A., Soler J., Solé R., González F.X. andSampere X., 1997. Nota sobre la reproducción en condiciones naturales de la tortuga de Florida (Trachemys scripta elegans) en Masquefa (Cataluña, España). Boletín de la Asociación Herpetológica Española, 8, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  • McGuire C. andMarnell F., 2000. The present status of the slow-worm, Anguis fragilis L., in Ireland. Bull. Irish Biogeogr. Soc., 24, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller-Morgan T., 2009. A Brief Overview of Ornamental Fish Industry and Hobby. In: Roberts H.E. (ed.), Fundamentals of Ornamental Fish Helath, Blackwell Publishing, New York, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Mlíkovský J. and Stýblo P., 2006. Nepůvodní druhy fauny a flóry České republiky. ČSOP, Praha, 496 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S., 2009. Invasive non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe: Recommendations on managing them. Knowl. Managt. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Pešát J., 2008. Želvy ohrožují hnízdění vodního ptactva. Živa 5, 229. [Google Scholar]
  • Pimentel D., Zuniga R. and Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ., 52, 273–288. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Polo-Cavia N., López P. andMartín J., 2008. Interspecific Differences in Responses to Predation Risk May Confer Competitive Advantages to Invasive Freshwater Turtle Species. Ethology, 114, 115–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Proches S., Wilson J.R.U., Richardson D.M. andRejmánek M., 2008. Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 17, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyšek P., Bacher S., Chytrý M., Jarošík V., Wild J., Celesti-Grapow L., Gassó N., Kenis M., Lambdon P.W., Nentwig W., Pergl J., Roques A., Sádlo J., Solarz W., Vilà M. andHulme P.E., 2010. Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 19, 317–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricciardi A., 2007. Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change? Conserv. Biol., 21, 329–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sindaco R., Doria G., Razzetti E. and Bernini F., 2006. Atlas of Italian amphibians and reptiles, Polistampa, Firenze, 792 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Simberloff D., 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 40, 81–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statsoft Inc., 2010. Electronic Statistics textbook. Tulsa (StatSoft), USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Strauss S.Y., Webb C.O. andSalamin N., 2006. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 5841–5845. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer D.L., Evinver V.T., Jeschke J.M. andPace M.L., 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 645–651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor C.M. andHastings A., 2005. Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol. Lett., 8, 895–908. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teillac-Deschamps P. and Prevot-Julliard A.C., 2006. Impact of exotic slider turtles on freshwater communities: an experimental approach. First European congress of conservation biology, book of abstracts. Society for Conservation Biology, Heger, p. 162–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Thornhill R., 1993. Darwinian aesthetics informs traditional aesthetics. In: Kellert S.R and Wilson E.Q. (eds.), The biophilia hypothesis, Island Press, Washington, 9–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Thuiller W., Richardson D., Pyšek P., Midgley G., Hughes G. andRouget M., 2005. Niche based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2234–2250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van Wilgen N.J. andRichardson D.M., 2012. The role of climate, phylogenetic relatedness, introduction effort, and reproducitove traits in the establishment of non-native reptiles and amphibians. Conserv. Biol., 26, 267–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • van Wilgen N.J., Roura-Pascual N., and Richardson D.M. 2009. A quantitative climate-match score for risk-assessment screening of reptile & amphibian introductions. Environ. Manag., 44, 590–607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williamson M., 1996. Biological Invasions, Chapman and Hall, London, 244 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou Z. andJiang Z., 2008. Characteristics and Risk Assessment of International Trade in Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles in China. Chelon. Conserv. Biol., 7, 28–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.