Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 408, 2013
Article Number 06
Number of page(s) 16
Published online 18 April 2013
  • A.F.N.O.R., 1992. Essai des eaux. Determination de l’Indice Biologique Global Normalisé (IBGN). Association Française de Normalisation – norme homologuée T90-350:1–8.
  • Allan J.D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 257–284. [CrossRef]
  • Arnaiz O.L., Wilson A.L., Watts R.J. and Stevens M.M., 2011. Influence of riparian condition on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities in an agricultural catchment in south-eastern Australia. Ecol. Res., 26, 123–131. [CrossRef]
  • Astorga A., Heino J., Luoto M. and Muotka T., 2011. Freshwater biodiversity at regional extent: determinants of macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness in headwater streams. Ecography, 34, 705–713. [CrossRef]
  • Bougon N. and Ferréol M., 2011. Physico-chimie soutenant la biologie. Typologie chimique nationale des cours d’eau. Rapport d’action 10, domaine QME. Pôle hydroécologie des cours d’eau Cemagref/Onema.
  • Bowes M.J., Ings N.L., McCall S.J., Warwick A., Barrett C., Wickham H.D., Harman S.A., Armstrong L.K., Scarlett P.M., Roberts C., Lehmann K. and Singer A.C. 2012 Nutrient and light limitation of periphyton in the River Thames: implications for catchment management. Sci. Total Envir., 434, 201–212. [CrossRef]
  • Broadmeadow S.B., Jones J.G., Langford T.E.L., Shaw P.J. and Nisbet T.R., 2011. The influence of riparian shade on lowland stream water temperatures in southern England and their viability for brown trout. River Res. Appl., 27, 226–237. [CrossRef]
  • Brooks S.S. and Lake P.S., 2007. River Restoration in Victoria, Australia: Change is in the Wind, and None too Soon. Restor. Ecol., 15, 584–591. [CrossRef]
  • Brunke M., 2008. Hydromorphological indicators for the ecological status of fish inhabitating the lower trout region in streams in the North-German lowlands. Hydrologie Und Wasserbewirtschaftung, 52, 234–244.
  • Cade B.S. and Noon B.R., 2003. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front. Ecol. Environ., 1, 412–420. [CrossRef]
  • Chandesris A., Mengin N., Malavoi J.R., Wasson J.G. and Souchon Y., 2008. SYRAH-CE: Système Relationnel d’Audit de l’Hydromorphologie des Cours d’Eau A relational, multi-scale system for auditing the hydro-morphology of running waters: diagnostic tool to help the WFD implementation in France. Page 4 in 4th international conference on river restoration, Venice, ITA.
  • Curie F., Ducharne A., Bendjoudi H. and Billen G., 2011. Spatialization of denitrification by river corridors in regional-scale watersheds: Case study of the Seine river basin. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 530–538. [CrossRef]
  • Death R.G. and Collier K.J., 2010. Measuring stream macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of vegetation cover: when is enough enough? Freshw. Biol., 55, 1447–1464. [CrossRef]
  • Dodds W. and Oakes R., 2006. Controls on Nutrients Across a Prairie Stream Watershed: Land Use and Riparian Cover Effects. Environ. Manage., 37, 634–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Dodds W. and Oakes R., 2008. Headwater Influences on Downstream Water Quality. Environ. Manage., 41, 367–377. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Elosegi A., Diez J. and Mutz M., 2010. Effects of hydromorphological integrity on biodiversity and functioning of river ecosystems. Hydrobiologia, 657, 199–215. [CrossRef]
  • European Commission, 2007. Adapting to climate change in Europe – options for EU action. Green Paper, COM(2007) 354 final.
  • Gauroy C. and Carluer N. (2011) Interpretation of data on pesticide residues in surface water in France, by grouping data within homogeneous spatial units. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 400, 04. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Ghermandi, A., Vandenberghe V., Benedetti L., Bauwens W., Vanrolleghem P.A., (2009) Model-based assessment of shading effect by riparian vegetation on river water quality, Ecol. Eng., 35, 92–104. [CrossRef]
  • Gregory S.V., Swanson F.J., McKee W.A. and Cummins K.W., 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience, 41, 540–551. [CrossRef]
  • Hopkins R.L. and Whiles M.R., 2011. The importance of land use/land cover data in fish and mussel conservation planning. Ann. de Limnol. Int. J. Lim., 47, 199–209. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Hutchins M.G., Johnson A.C., Deflandre-Vlandas A., Comber S., Posen P. & Boorman D. (2010) Which offers more scope to suppress river phytoplankton blooms: Reducing nutrient pollution or riparian shading? Science of The Total Environment, 408, 5065–5077. [CrossRef]
  • Koenker R., 2010. Quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.50.
  • Leopold, L. B. 1994. A View of the River, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
  • Lowrance R., Todd R., Fail J., Hendrickson O., Leonard R. and Asmussen L., 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience, 34, 374–377. [CrossRef]
  • Lowrance R., Altier L.S., Newbold J.D., Schnabel R.R., Groffman P.M., Denver J.M., Correll D.L., Gilliam J.W., Robinson J.L., Brinsfield R.B., Staver K.W., Lucas W., Todd A.H., 1997. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake bay watersheds. Environ. Manage., 21, 687–712. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Mayer P.M., Reynolds S.K., McCutchen M.D. and Canfield T.J., 2007. Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. J. Environ. Qual., 36, 1172–1180. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Meador M.R. and Goldstein R.M., 2003. Assessing water quality at large geographic scales: Relations among land use, water physicochemistry, riparian condition, and fish community structure. Environ. Manage., 31, 504–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Montreuil O., Merot P. and Marmonier P., 2010. Estimation of nitrate removal by riparian wetlands and streams in agricultural catchments: effect of discharge and stream order. Freshw. Biol., 55, 2305−2318.
  • Newbold J.D., Herbert S., Sweeney B.W., Kiry P. and Alberts S.J., 2010. Water Quality Functions of a 15-Year-Old Riparian Forest Buffer System1. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46, 299–310. [CrossRef]
  • NOR, 2010. Arrêté du 25 janvier 2010 relatif aux méthodes et critères d’évaluation de l’état écologique, de l’état chimique et du potentiel écologique des eaux de surface pris en application des articles R. 212-10, R. 212-11 et R. 212-18 du code de l’environnement. NOR: DEVO1001032A.
  • Oberdorff T., Pont D., Hugueny B. and Porcher J.P., 2002. Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of ‘river health’ in France. Freshw. Biol., 47, 1720–1734. [CrossRef]
  • Palmer M., Allan J.D., Meyer J. and Bernhardt E.S., 2007. River Restoration in the Twenty-First Century: Data and Experiential Knowledge to Inform Future Efforts. Restor. Ecol., 15, 472–481. [CrossRef]
  • Palmer M.A., Menninger H.L. and Bernhardt E.S., 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw. Biol., 55, 205–222. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Parkyn S.M., Davies-Colley R.J., Halliday N.J., Costley K.J. and Croker G.F., 2003. Planted Riparian Buffer Zones in New Zealand: Do They Live Up to Expectations? Restor. Ecol., 11, 436–447. [CrossRef]
  • Rios S. and Bailey R., 2006. Relationship between Riparian Vegetation and Stream Benthic Communities at Three Spatial Scales. Hydrobiologia, 553, 153–160. [CrossRef]
  • Sandin L. and Solimini A.G., 2009. Freshwater ecosystem structure-function relationships: From theory to application. Freshw. Biol., 54, 2017–2024. [CrossRef]
  • Santoul F., Cayrou J., Mastrorillo S. and Céréghino R., 2005. Spatial patterns of the biological traits of freshwater fish communities in south-west France. J. Fish Biol., 66, 301–314. [CrossRef]
  • Sauquet E. and Catalogne C. (2011) Comparison of catchment grouping methods for flow duration curve estimation at ungauged sites in France. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 2421–2435. [CrossRef]
  • Snelder T.H., Lamouroux N., Leathwick J.R., Pella H., Sauquet E. and Shankar U. (2009) Predictive mapping of the natural flow regimes of France. J. Hydrol., 373, 57–67. [CrossRef]
  • Statsoft, 2010. STATISTICA data analysis software system, version 10 Tulsa: Statsoft Inc.
  • Stewart J.S., Wang L.Z., Lyons J., Horwatich J.A. and Bannerman R., 2001. Influences of watershed, riparian-corridor, and reach-scale characteristics on aquatic biota in agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37, 1475–1487. [CrossRef]
  • Storey R.G. and Cowley D.R., 1997. Recovery of three New Zealand rural streams as they pass through native forest remnants. Hydrobiologia, 353, 63–76. [CrossRef]
  • Suren A.M. and McMurtrie S., 2005. Assessing the effectiveness of enhancement activities in urban streams: II. Responses of invertebrate communities. River Res. Appl., 21, 439–453. [CrossRef]
  • Tornblom J., Degerman E. and Angelstam P., 2011. Forest proportion as indicator of ecological integrity in streams using Plecoptera as a proxy. Ecological Indicators, 11, 1366–1374. [CrossRef]
  • Van Looy K., Meire P. and Wasson J.G., 2008. Including Riparian Vegetation in the Definition of Morphologic Reference Conditions for Large Rivers: A Case Study for Europe’s Western Plains. Environ. Manage., 41, 625–639. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Wallace J.B., Eggert S.L., Meyer J.L. and Webster J.R., 1997. Multiple Trophic Levels of a Forest Stream Linked to Terrestrial Litter Inputs. Science, 277, 102–104. [CrossRef]
  • Wang X., Wang Q., Yang S., Zheng D., Wu C. and Mannaerts C.M., 2011. Evaluating nitrogen removal by vegetation uptake using satellite image time series in riparian catchments. Science of The Total Environment, 409, 2567–2576. [CrossRef]
  • Wasson J.G., Chandesris A., Pella H., Blanc L., 2002. Typology and reference conditions for surface water bodies in France: the hydro-ecoregion approach. TemaNord, 566, 37–41.
  • Wasson J.G., Villeneuve B., Ital A., Murray-Bligh J., Dobiasova M., Bacikova S., Timm H., Pella H., Mengin N. and Chandesris A., 2010. Large-scale relationships between basin and riparian land cover and the ecological status of European rivers. Freshw. Biol., 55, 1465–1482. [CrossRef]
  • Weller D., Baker M.E. and Jordan T.E., 2012. Effects of riparian buffers on nitrate concentrations in watershed discharges: new models and management implications. Ecological Applications, in press.
  • Wenger S., 1999. Review of Scientific Literature on Riparian Buffer Width, Extent and Vegetation. Office of Public Service & Outreach Institute of Ecology University of Georgia.
  • Wilson H.F. and Xenopoulos M.A., 2008. Landscape influences on stream fish assemblages across spatial scales in a northern Great Plains ecoregion. Can. J. Fish. Aqua. Sci., 65, 245–257. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.